Unify flowrate / velocity interface#381
Open
jbreue16 wants to merge 2 commits into
Open
Conversation
schmoelder
reviewed
Mar 28, 2025
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Our interface and internal computation of the entangled parameters
velocity,cross_section_areaand the flow rates specified in theconnectionsmatrix are ambiguous, the interface should be unique and explicit, any reparameterizations etc. belong to the frontend.This PR
velocityfrom the interface, which is then solely computed from the cross section area and flow rate. Note that this is how its done in CADET-Process and CASEMA (cross section or radius needed for error estimates in 2D models) anyways.FLOW_DIRECTIONfield, only -1 and 1 are accepted for forward and backward flow respectively, this also substitutes the fieldVELOCITY_COEFFfor radial and frustum flow