Skip to content

Benchmark: sentry PR 80168 - #12

Open
celmis-codereviewer wants to merge 2 commits into
cr-base-80168from
cr-pr-80168
Open

Benchmark: sentry PR 80168#12
celmis-codereviewer wants to merge 2 commits into
cr-base-80168from
cr-pr-80168

Conversation

@celmis-codereviewer

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Benchmark reproduction of getsentry#80168

… stateful detector

This adds a hook that can be implemented to produce an occurrence specific to the detector that is subclassing the StatefulDetector.

Also change the signature of evaluate to return a dict keyed by groupkey instead of a list. This helps avoid the chance of duplicate results for the same group key.

@celmis-codereviewer celmis-codereviewer left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💬 COMMENT — findings to consider

Full findings and scope are in the review summary comment on this pull request — one persistent comment, updated in place on every run.

celmis-codereviewer

This comment was marked as outdated.

@celmis-codereviewer celmis-codereviewer left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

APPROVED — no blocking findings

Full findings and scope are in the review summary comment on this pull request — one persistent comment, updated in place on every run.

@celmis-codereviewer

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

🤖 Code Review for PR #12

APPROVED — no blocking findings

No issues detected.

Scope

  • Files changed: 4
  • Lines: +249 / -151

Performance

  • Analysis time: 706.3s · agents: structural, cve, security, contract, defect · tokens: 48,402/23,465

Powered by Code Analyzer · context: tree-sitter graph + structural, cve, security, contract, defect

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants