You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
This repository was archived by the owner on Sep 2, 2026. It is now read-only.
Repository navigation
This repository was archived by the owner on Sep 2, 2026. It is now read-only.
v3: no hm+bf text domain — text_search requires the ORE term, capping eq+match string ingest at ORE speed (−87% vs v2) #355
The only v3 text domain carrying both equality (hm) and match (bf) capability is text_search, whose CHECK also requires the ORE term (ob). A v2 unique+match column migrating to v3 must therefore start generating ORE terms client-side, capping string ingest at ORE-generation speed:
Config
Throughput (10k batch)
v2 unique+match
9,649 rec/s
v3 text_search (unique+match+ore)
1,278 rec/s (−87%)
Rows are also correspondingly wider. For comparison, other v3 ingest paths are at parity with v2 (int ORE ±2%; conversion + domain-CHECK overhead measured ≈ 0), so this is entirely the extra term.
Proposal
Add an hm+bf domain to the catalog (e.g. text_eq_match) for the common "exact lookup + pattern match, no ordering" column — or explicitly document the ORE cost as an accepted trade-off of the v3 type system. Note the catalog currently has no [Hm, Bloom] entry and from_v2 fails closed on a missing ob, so there is no workaround from the consumer side.
Evidence
report/V3_COMPARISON.md ingest table and results/ingest/v3/encrypt_string_v3_combined.json on cipherstash/benches#23 (numbers re-verified under cipherstash-client 0.38.1).
Activity
auxesis commentedon Jul 14, 2026
Resolved in #389