prisma-next: typecheck is red and not gated in CI — the type-level operator-capability tests aren't enforced #684

Summary

@cipherstash/prisma-next has excellent type-level tests proving that EQL v3 query operators are capability-gated at compile time — e.g. packages/prisma-next/test/operation-types.types.test-d.ts asserts (via @ts-expect-error) that:

• eqlEq does not surface on storage-only eql_v3_boolean / eql_v3_text
• eqlMatch does not surface on eql_v3_text_eq (no free-text index)
• eqlGt does not surface on eql_v3_double_eq (no order/range)

These currently pass (each @ts-expect-error is satisfied), so the capability gating is real. But two gaps mean nothing enforces it going forward:

1. pnpm --filter @cipherstash/prisma-next typecheck is currently red — ~38 errors, all unrelated implicit-any (TS7006 / TS7031 / TS7053) in test/v3/properties.test.ts, integration/adapter.ts, and several test/live/* files. None are in the capability test files, but they fail the whole tsc --noEmit run.
2. typecheck isn't wired into any CI workflow (no .github/workflows/* runs the prisma-next typecheck script). So even once it's green, a regression that makes an unsupported operator type-check (silently removing the gating) would not be caught.

Why it matters

The .test-d.ts @ts-expect-error assertions are only enforced when tsc actually processes them. Right now they're aspirational: a future change that made eqlGt available on a non-ord column would flip an @ts-expect-error from 'used' to 'unused' — which is itself a tsc error — but only if typecheck runs and is required. Today it neither passes nor runs in CI.

Suggested fix

1. Fix the ~38 implicit-any errors (add annotations / satisfies) so typecheck is green.
2. Add a typecheck step to the prisma-next CI job (or the shared type-check job) so .test-d.ts capability assertions become a required, enforced check.

Context

Surfaced while reviewing the prisma-next EQL v3 work (#655) and the CLI skill companion (#683) — the skill documents 'unsupported operators are a compile error', which is true today but not CI-guarded.

https://claude.ai/code/session_01MxTTPaPP16m6br7Hoab94w