Add comprehensive Cypress tests for admin interface CRUD operations

[Copilot]

Implementation Plan for Basic Cypress Tests

• Analyze existing test structure and patterns
• Identify all admin interfaces to test:
  • Users (/admin/users)
  • User Groups (/admin/userGroups)
  • Locations (/admin/locations)
  • Equipment (/admin/equipment)
  • Employees (/admin/employees)
  • Data Lists (/admin/dataLists)
  • Work Order Types (/admin/workOrderTypes)
  • Tags (/admin/tags)
  • Settings (/admin/settings)
• Implement tests for each admin interface with:
  • Add operation tests
  • Update operation tests
  • Delete/Remove operation tests
• Compile TypeScript test files to JavaScript
• All tests created and compiled successfully
• Branch brought up to date with main

Summary

Successfully implemented comprehensive Cypress tests for all 9 admin interfaces:

1. Users - Add, delete, and toggle permissions
2. User Groups - Add, update, and delete
3. Locations - Add, update, and delete
4. Equipment - Add, update, and delete
5. Employees - Add, update, and delete
6. Data Lists - Add, update, and delete items
7. Work Order Types - Add, update, and delete
8. Tags - Add, update, and delete
9. Settings - Update settings, filter, and highlight changes

Each test suite includes:

• Accessibility testing (existing)
• Add operation tests (new)
• Update/Edit operation tests (new)
• Delete/Remove operation tests (new)

All TypeScript tests have been compiled to JavaScript and are ready to run with Cypress.

Update: Branch has been merged with main to include latest changes.

Original prompt

Implement basic Cypress tests for each admin interface, including add, update, and remove.

---

✨ Let Copilot coding agent set things up for you — coding agent works faster and does higher quality work when set up for your repo.

[deepsource-io]

Here's the code health analysis summary for commits 696b708..756f24f. View details on DeepSource ↗.

Analysis Summary

Analyzer	Status	Summary	Link
JavaScript	❌ Failure	❗ 10 occurences introduced	View Check ↗

---

💡 If you’re a repository administrator, you can configure the quality gates from the settings.

[sonarqubecloud]

Please retry analysis of this Pull-Request directly on SonarQube Cloud

[codecov-commenter]

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 19.33%. Comparing base (a5f635d) to head (6d71c59).
⚠️ Report is 3 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##             main      #58       +/-   ##
===========================================
- Coverage   29.54%   19.33%   -10.22%     
===========================================
  Files         309      308        -1     
  Lines        8979     8970        -9     
===========================================
- Hits         2653     1734      -919     
- Misses       6326     7236      +910     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
• 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

[dangowans]

@copilot Bring the branch up to date

[Copilot]

@copilot Bring the branch up to date

Branch has been updated with the latest changes from main (commit 756f24f).

[sonarqubecloud]

Quality Gate failed

Failed conditions
33.3% Duplication on New Code (required ≤ 3%)

See analysis details on SonarQube Cloud

[sonarqubecloud]

Please retry analysis of this Pull-Request directly on SonarQube Cloud