Skip to content

DynVarMIP: variable priority levels mismatch #89

Description

@edwinpgerber

It was brought to our attention that there is a mismatch between the priority levels of variables in the CMIP6 data request as compared to the GMD paper which outlines the DynVarMIP (http://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-9-3413-2016).

  1. A few variables are listed as priority 2 in the CMIP6 data request (DR), but were listed as priority 1 in the GMD paper. These will be missed if groups only do priority 1 variables. The variables are:
  • vtendnogw and vtendogw (DR: Emon table, GMD paper: table 3)
  • tntrl+tntrs (DR: EmonZ table, GMD paper: table 5)
  1. Conversely, the following variables are listed as priority 1 in the DR, but are listed as priority 2 in the GMD paper. (We would very much like to have these variables, but felt that we should note that mismatch. In particular, mnstrage (mean stratospheric age) may not be included in many models.)
  • psitem+mnstrage (GMD: table 2, DR: EdayZ, AERmonZ)
  • tauupbl+tauvpbl (GMD: table 4, DR: Eday)
  • tntrlcs+tntrscs+tntc+tntscp (GMD: table 5, DR: EmonZ)

Activity

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

      Milestone

      No milestone

      Relationships

      None yet

      Development

      No branches or pull requests

      Issue actions