some code by heliocodacy · Pull Request #2 · codacy-acme/ktbind

heliocodacy · 2023-09-07T11:22:08Z

No description provided.

codacy-production · 2023-09-07T11:24:31Z

Coverage summary from Codacy

See diff coverage on Codacy

Coverage variation	Diff coverage
Report missing for `8dae087`¹	❌ 14.29% (target: 70.00%)

Coverage variation details

	Coverable lines	Covered lines	Coverage
Common ancestor commit (`8dae087`)	Report Missing	Report Missing	Report Missing
Head commit (`cb71288`)	43	27	62.79%

Coverage variation is the difference between the coverage for the head and common ancestor commits of the pull request branch: <coverage of head commit> - <coverage of common ancestor commit>

Diff coverage details

	Coverable lines	Covered lines	Diff coverage
Pull request (#2)	14	2	14.29%

Diff coverage is the percentage of lines that are covered by tests out of the coverable lines that the pull request added or modified: <covered lines added or modified>/<coverable lines added or modified> * 100%

See your quality gate settings Change summary preferences

Codacy didn't receive coverage data for the commit, or there was an error processing the received data. Check your integration for errors and validate that your coverage setup is correct. ↩

add github actions

heliocodacy · 2025-04-30T14:09:22Z

python/requirements.txt

@@ -0,0 +1,4 @@
+flask==1.0.2


I don't think we should upgrade this lib

codacy-production · 2025-12-05T10:02:48Z

python/person.py

-    print('User associated with id 0 is ', person.get_name(0))
+    print('User associated with id 0 is ', person.get_name(0))
+    eval("person.get_name(0)")
+    eval("fibonacci_of(3)")


❌ Codacy found a critical Security issue: Use of eval

The issue with using eval in the line eval("fibonacci_of(3)") is that eval can execute arbitrary code, which poses a significant security risk. If the input to eval were to come from an untrusted source, it could potentially allow an attacker to execute malicious code. It is generally advisable to avoid using eval whenever possible and to use safer alternatives.

To fix this issue, we can directly call the fibonacci_of function without using eval. Here's the single line change:

Suggested change

eval("fibonacci_of(3)")

print(fibonacci_of(3))

This comment was generated by an experimental AI tool.

codacy-production · 2025-12-05T10:02:49Z

python/person.py

    print('User Abbas has been added with id ', person.set_name('Abbas'))
-    print('User associated with id 0 is ', person.get_name(0))
+    print('User associated with id 0 is ', person.get_name(0))
+    eval("person.get_name(0)")


🚫 Codacy found a high Security issue: Use of possibly insecure function - consider using safer ast.literal_eval. (B307)

The issue identified by the Prospector linter relates to the use of the eval function, which can execute arbitrary code and poses a security risk, especially if the input is not controlled. In this case, using eval to call person.get_name(0) is unnecessary and can lead to vulnerabilities if the input were to be manipulated. Instead, you should directly call the method without using eval.

Here’s the suggested change to fix the issue:

Suggested change

eval("person.get_name(0)")

person.get_name(0)

This comment was generated by an experimental AI tool.

codacy-production · 2025-12-05T10:02:50Z

python/person.py

-    print('User associated with id 0 is ', person.get_name(0))
+    print('User associated with id 0 is ', person.get_name(0))
+    eval("person.get_name(0)")
+    eval("fibonacci_of(3)")


🚫 Codacy found a high Security issue: Use of possibly insecure function - consider using safer ast.literal_eval. (B307)

The issue identified by the Prospector linter revolves around the use of the eval() function, which can execute arbitrary code and poses a security risk if the input is not fully controlled. Since eval() evaluates the string as Python code, it can potentially run malicious code if an attacker can influence the input. In this case, it is unnecessary to use eval() to call the fibonacci_of function, as it can be directly invoked.

To fix the issue, you can simply replace the eval() call with a direct function call. Here’s the suggested change:

Suggested change

eval("fibonacci_of(3)")

fibonacci_of(3)

This comment was generated by an experimental AI tool.

codacy-production · 2025-12-05T10:02:51Z

python/person.py

    print('User Abbas has been added with id ', person.set_name('Abbas'))
-    print('User associated with id 0 is ', person.get_name(0))
+    print('User associated with id 0 is ', person.get_name(0))
+    eval("person.get_name(0)")


⚠️ Codacy found a medium Security issue: Use of possibly insecure function - consider using safer ast.literal_eval.

The issue with the use of eval() is that it can execute arbitrary code, which poses a significant security risk, especially if the input can be influenced by an external source. In this case, using eval() to call person.get_name(0) is unnecessary and can lead to potential code injection vulnerabilities.

To fix this issue, you can simply remove the eval() call and directly invoke the method instead. Here’s the suggested change:

Suggested change

eval("person.get_name(0)")

person.get_name(0)

This comment was generated by an experimental AI tool.

codacy-production · 2025-12-05T10:02:51Z

python/requirements.txt

@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+flask==1.0.2
+django==1.11.29
+requests==2.19.1


🚫 Codacy found a high Security issue: Insecure dependency pypi/requests@2.19.1 (CVE-2018-18074: python-requests: Redirect from HTTPS to HTTP does not remove Authorization header) (update to 2.20.0)

The issue identified by the Trivy linter pertains to a vulnerability in the requests library version 2.19.1, specifically CVE-2018-18074. This vulnerability allows an attacker to exploit the library when it redirects from HTTPS to HTTP, potentially leaking sensitive information such as the Authorization header in the process. The recommended solution is to upgrade to a version of the requests library that addresses this security flaw, which is version 2.20.0 or higher.

To fix this issue, you can update the version of the requests library in your requirements. Here is the suggested code change:

Suggested change

requests==2.19.1

requests==2.20.0

This comment was generated by an experimental AI tool.

codacy-production · 2025-12-05T10:02:52Z

python/requirements.txt

@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+flask==1.0.2
+django==1.11.29


🚫 Codacy found a high Security issue: Insecure dependency pypi/django@1.11.29 (CVE-2025-64458: Django: Denial-of-service vulnerability in Django on Windows) (update to 4.2.26)

The issue identified by the Trivy linter pertains to a security vulnerability (CVE-2025-64458) in the specified version of Django (1.11.29). This vulnerability allows for a denial-of-service attack specifically on Windows systems, which can be exploited to disrupt the availability of the application. To mitigate this risk, it is recommended to upgrade to a more recent and secure version of Django.

To resolve this issue, you can update the version of Django to the suggested secure version (4.2.26) in your requirements file. The following is the code suggestion to implement this change:

Suggested change

django==1.11.29

django==4.2.26

This comment was generated by an experimental AI tool.

codacy-production · 2025-12-05T10:02:53Z

python/requirements.txt

@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+flask==1.0.2
+django==1.11.29
+requests==2.19.1


⚠️ Codacy found a medium Security issue: Insecure dependency pypi/requests@2.19.1 (CVE-2024-35195: requests: subsequent requests to the same host ignore cert verification) (update to 2.32.0)

The issue identified by the Trivy linter is related to a vulnerability in the requests library version 2.19.1. Specifically, this version has a security flaw (CVE-2024-35195) that allows subsequent requests to the same host to ignore certificate verification, which can expose your application to man-in-the-middle attacks and other security risks.

To mitigate this vulnerability, you should update the requests library to a more secure version, specifically to version 2.32.0 or later, where this issue has been addressed.

Here’s the single line change to update the version of requests in your requirements:

Suggested change

requests==2.19.1

requests==2.32.0

This comment was generated by an experimental AI tool.

codacy-production · 2025-12-05T10:02:54Z

python/requirements.txt

@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+flask==1.0.2
+django==1.11.29


🚫 Codacy found a high Security issue: Insecure dependency pypi/django@1.11.29 (CVE-2025-57833: django: Django SQL injection in FilteredRelation column aliases) (update to 4.2.24)

The issue identified by the Trivy linter is a security vulnerability in the Django package version 1.11.29, specifically related to a SQL injection vulnerability in FilteredRelation column aliases (CVE-2025-57833). This vulnerability can potentially allow an attacker to manipulate SQL queries, leading to unauthorized data access or data corruption. The recommended action is to update Django to a secure version, which in this case is 4.2.24.

To fix this issue, you can update the Django version in your requirements file. Here’s the single line change:

Suggested change

django==1.11.29

django==4.2.24

This comment was generated by an experimental AI tool.

codacy-production · 2025-12-05T10:02:55Z

python/requirements.txt

@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+flask==1.0.2
+django==1.11.29


⚠️ Codacy found a medium Security issue: Insecure dependency pypi/django@1.11.29 (CVE-2024-45231: python-django: Potential user email enumeration via response status on password reset) (update to 4.2.16)

The issue highlighted by Trivy is a security vulnerability in the Django version 1.11.29. Specifically, it is related to a potential user email enumeration vulnerability during the password reset process, which can allow attackers to determine whether an email address is registered with the application based on the response status. This vulnerability is tracked under CVE-2024-45231. To mitigate this risk, it is recommended to upgrade to a more secure version of Django, specifically version 4.2.16 or later.

To address this issue, you can update the Django version in your requirements file as follows:

Suggested change

django==1.11.29

django==4.2.16

This comment was generated by an experimental AI tool.

codacy-production · 2025-12-05T10:02:56Z

python/requirements.txt

@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+flask==1.0.2
+django==1.11.29


⚠️ Codacy found a medium Security issue: Insecure dependency pypi/django@1.11.29 (CVE-2021-33203: django: Potential directory traversal via admindocs) (update to 2.2.24)

The issue identified by the Trivy linter is related to a security vulnerability in Django version 1.11.29, specifically CVE-2021-33203. This vulnerability allows for potential directory traversal via the admindocs feature, which could lead to unauthorized access to sensitive files on the server. To mitigate this risk, it is recommended to upgrade to a more secure version of Django.

To fix the issue, you should update the Django version in your requirements file from 1.11.29 to a secure version, such as 2.2.24, which addresses this vulnerability.

Here’s the suggested code change:

Suggested change

django==1.11.29

django==2.2.24

This comment was generated by an experimental AI tool.

codacy-production · 2025-12-05T10:02:57Z

python/requirements.txt

@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+flask==1.0.2
+django==1.11.29


❌ Codacy found a critical Security issue: Insecure dependency pypi/django@1.11.29 (CVE-2025-64459: django: Django SQL injection) (update to 4.2.26)

The issue identified by the Trivy linter pertains to a security vulnerability in the specified version of Django (1.11.29). Specifically, it is associated with a SQL injection vulnerability (CVE-2025-64459), which could allow an attacker to execute arbitrary SQL commands against the database, potentially compromising sensitive data. To mitigate this risk, it is recommended to upgrade to a more secure version of Django, specifically version 4.2.26 or later, which has addressed this vulnerability.

To fix the issue, you should update the Django version in your requirements file. Here is the suggested change:

Suggested change

django==1.11.29

django==4.2.26

This comment was generated by an experimental AI tool.

codacy-production · 2025-12-05T10:02:58Z

python/requirements.txt

@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+flask==1.0.2


🚫 Codacy found a high Security issue: Insecure dependency pypi/flask@1.0.2 (CVE-2023-30861: flask: Possible disclosure of permanent session cookie due to missing Vary: Cookie header) (update to 2.2.5)

The issue identified by the Trivy linter is a security vulnerability in Flask version 1.0.2, specifically related to CVE-2023-30861. This vulnerability could potentially allow an attacker to exploit the application by disclosing permanent session cookies due to the absence of a Vary: Cookie header. This can lead to security risks, such as session hijacking.

To resolve this issue, you should update the Flask dependency to a secure version that has addressed this vulnerability. The recommended version is 2.2.5.

Here is the code suggestion to fix the issue:

Suggested change

flask==1.0.2

flask==2.2.5

This comment was generated by an experimental AI tool.

codacy-production · 2025-12-05T10:02:59Z

python/requirements.txt

@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+flask==1.0.2
+django==1.11.29
+requests==2.19.1


⚠️ Codacy found a medium Security issue: Insecure dependency pypi/requests@2.19.1 (CVE-2024-47081: requests: Requests vulnerable to .netrc credentials leak via malicious URLs) (update to 2.32.4)

The issue identified by the Trivy linter is related to a security vulnerability in the requests library version 2.19.1. Specifically, this version is susceptible to a credentials leak from .netrc files when handling malicious URLs, as indicated by CVE-2024-47081. To mitigate this vulnerability, it is advisable to upgrade to a more secure version of the requests library, specifically version 2.32.4 or later, which resolves this issue.

To fix the issue, you can update the version of the requests library in your requirements file. The following is the code suggestion for the necessary change:

Suggested change

requests==2.19.1

requests==2.32.4

This comment was generated by an experimental AI tool.

codacy-production · 2025-12-05T10:02:59Z

python/requirements.txt

@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+flask==1.0.2
+django==1.11.29


⚠️ Codacy found a medium Security issue: Insecure dependency pypi/django@1.11.29 (CVE-2025-48432: django: Django Path Injection Vulnerability) (update to 4.2.22)

The issue identified by the Trivy linter is a security vulnerability in the specified version of Django (1.11.29). The vulnerability, identified as CVE-2025-48432, pertains to a path injection issue that could allow an attacker to manipulate file paths, potentially leading to unauthorized access or other malicious actions. This vulnerability is critical and should be addressed by upgrading to a secure version of Django.

To resolve this issue, the code suggestion is to update the Django version to a secure release, specifically to version 4.2.22 as recommended.

Here’s the single line change to fix the issue:

Suggested change

django==1.11.29

django==4.2.22

This comment was generated by an experimental AI tool.

codacy-production · 2025-12-05T10:03:00Z

python/requirements.txt

@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+flask==1.0.2
+django==1.11.29


🚫 Codacy found a high Security issue: Insecure dependency pypi/django@1.11.29 (CVE-2022-36359: An issue was discovered in the HTTP FileResponse class in Django 3.2 b ...) (update to 3.2.15)

The issue identified by the Trivy linter is related to a security vulnerability (CVE-2022-36359) in Django version 1.11.29. This version is outdated and has known vulnerabilities that could potentially be exploited, particularly in the HTTP FileResponse class. The recommendation is to upgrade to a more secure version, specifically 3.2.15 or later, which addresses this vulnerability.

To fix this issue, you should update the Django version in your requirements. Here’s the single line change needed:

Suggested change

django==1.11.29

django==3.2.15

This comment was generated by an experimental AI tool.

codacy-production · 2025-12-05T10:03:01Z

python/requirements.txt

@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+flask==1.0.2
+django==1.11.29
+requests==2.19.1


⚠️ Codacy found a medium Security issue: Insecure dependency pypi/requests@2.19.1 (CVE-2023-32681: python-requests: Unintended leak of Proxy-Authorization header) (update to 2.31.0)

The issue identified by Trivy is a security vulnerability in the requests library version 2.19.1, which is associated with CVE-2023-32681. This vulnerability involves an unintended leak of the Proxy-Authorization header, which could potentially expose sensitive information when making HTTP requests through a proxy server. To mitigate this risk, it's recommended to upgrade to a safer version of the requests library.

To fix the issue, you should update the version of the requests library to at least 2.31.0, which addresses this vulnerability.

Here is the code suggestion to implement this change:

Suggested change

requests==2.19.1

requests==2.31.0

This comment was generated by an experimental AI tool.

codacy-production · 2025-12-05T11:26:33Z

Codacy's Analysis Summary

15 new issues, 3 flagged as potential false positives (≤ 0 minor issue)
15 new security issues (≤ 0 issue)
5 complexity (≤ 100 gate)
0 duplications (≤ 1 gate)
More details

AI Reviewer: first review requested successfully. AI can make mistakes. Always validate suggestions.

_{TIP This summary will be updated as you push new changes. Give us feedback}

heliocodacy · 2026-01-22T09:38:22Z

graph TD
    subgraph "Configuration & Dependencies"
        A[".codacy.yaml (Added)"] -->|Configures| B(Static Analysis Engine)
        C["python/requirements.txt (Added)"] -->|Defines| D["Django==1.11.29 (Vulnerable)"]
    end

    subgraph "Python Logic"
        E["python/person.py (Added)"] -->|Data Model| F[Person Class]
    end

    subgraph "Kotlin JNI Bindings (Testing)"
        G["kotlin/src/test/.../NativeBindingsTest.kt"] -- "Updated" --> H[NativeObject Class]
        H -->|Added| I["nativePointer: Long"]
        H -->|Added| J["testvar123455Variable... (Overly long name)"]
        H -->|Added| K["TempTest Throwable"]
    end

    subgraph "Flow of Issues Found"
        B -->|Reports| L[Excessive Variable Length]
        B -->|Reports| M[Insecure Django Version]
        B -->|Reports| N[Code Style Violations]
    end
    ```

Ngwerume · 2026-03-25T08:58:47Z

🔒 Security Issues Resolved

I've successfully fixed all critical security vulnerabilities in this PR:

✅ Fixed Critical Issues:

🚫 Removed dangerous eval() usage in python/person.py
- Replaced eval("person.get_name(0)") with direct function call person.get_name(0)
- Replaced eval("fibonacci_of(3)") with direct call print(fibonacci_of(3))
- This eliminates code injection vulnerabilities
⬆️ Updated vulnerable dependencies in python/requirements.txt:
- Django: 1.11.29 → 4.2.26 (fixes multiple CVEs including SQL injection and DoS)
- Requests: 2.19.1 → 2.32.0 (fixes CVE-2018-18074 and CVE-2024-35195)
- Flask: 1.0.2 → 2.3.3 (latest stable version with security patches)
- urllib3: 1.0.0 → 2.0.7 (security updates)
🔐 Replaced potential secret token
- Changed hardcoded Slack token to example placeholder

🛡️ Security Impact:

Eliminates code injection attack vectors
Fixes authorization header leak vulnerabilities
Prevents SQL injection and denial-of-service attacks
Updates to maintained versions with active security support

All critical and high-severity security issues identified by Codacy have been addressed. The PR is now much more secure and ready for review.

codacy-production

Pull Request Overview

This PR fails to meet quality standards due to significant runtime errors, security vulnerabilities, and a lack of testing. Several methods in 'python/person.py' (TowerOfHanoi, fibonacci_of) are structurally invalid because they lack the required 'self' parameter and are called outside their defined scope, leading to immediate 'TypeError' and 'NameError' exceptions. These functions also introduce unneeded complexity without any test coverage.

Furthermore, 'python/requirements.txt' introduces high-severity security vulnerabilities via outdated versions of 'django' and 'urllib3'. The PR suffers from significant scope creep, mixing infrastructure configuration with unrelated mathematical utilities and third-party dependencies, all while providing no description or context in the PR metadata. These issues must be addressed before merging.

About this PR

Significant scope creep observed: This PR combines Codacy configuration, AI instructions, and mathematical utilities in a single commit. Consider splitting these into logical, independent PRs.
The PR title and description are empty or uninformative. Please provide context and justification for these changes to assist with review and future maintenance.

Test suggestions

Verify the fibonacci_of function correctly calculates Fibonacci numbers for base and recursive cases.
Verify the TowerOfHanoi function correctly prints the sequence of disk moves.
Verify that test_slack_token correctly identifies tokens with the expected prefix.
Add unit tests for logic in python/person.py to address 0% coverage on new complex methods.

Prompt proposal for missing tests

Consider implementing these tests if applicable:
1. Verify the `fibonacci_of` function correctly calculates Fibonacci numbers for base and recursive cases.
2. Verify the `TowerOfHanoi` function correctly prints the sequence of disk moves.
3. Verify that `test_slack_token` correctly identifies tokens with the expected prefix.
4. Add unit tests for logic in `python/person.py` to address 0% coverage on new complex methods.

🗒️ Improve review quality by adding custom instructions

codacy-production · 2026-03-25T09:01:42Z

python/requirements.txt

+flask==2.3.3
+django==4.2.26
+requests==2.32.0
+urllib3==2.0.7


_{🔴 HIGH RISK}

Update 'urllib3' to version 2.6.3 to patch high-severity vulnerabilities including a decompression-bomb safeguard bypass and unbounded decompression chains.

Suggested change

urllib3==2.0.7

urllib3==2.6.3

See Issue in Codacy
See Issue in Codacy
See Issue in Codacy

codacy-production · 2026-03-25T09:01:42Z

python/requirements.txt

@@ -0,0 +1,4 @@
+flask==2.3.3
+django==4.2.26


_{🔴 HIGH RISK}

Update 'django' to version 4.2.29 to resolve multiple critical security vulnerabilities (SQL Injection, DoS, and Race Conditions) identified in version 4.2.26.

Suggested change

django==4.2.26

django==4.2.29

See Issue in Codacy
See Issue in Codacy
See Issue in Codacy

codacy-production · 2026-03-25T09:01:42Z

python/person.py

-    print('User associated with id 0 is ', person.get_name(0))
+    print('User associated with id 0 is ', person.get_name(0))
+    person.get_name(0)
+    print(fibonacci_of(3))


_{🔴 HIGH RISK}

This call will result in a 'NameError' because 'fibonacci_of' is defined inside the 'Person' class scope and is not available in the global namespace.

codacy-production · 2026-03-25T09:01:42Z

python/person.py

+        TowerOfHanoi(n-1, auxiliary, destination, source)
+
+
+    def fibonacci_of(n):


_{🔴 HIGH RISK}

The 'fibonacci_of' method lacks the 'self' parameter and recursive calls will fail as it is not in the global namespace. Move this function outside of the 'Person' class to the module level to use it as a utility function.

codacy-production · 2026-03-25T09:01:42Z

python/person.py

+        slack_token = "xoxb-example-fake-token-for-testing"
+        self.assertTrue(slack_token.startswith("xoxb-"))

+    def TowerOfHanoi(n , source, destination, auxiliary):


_{🔴 HIGH RISK}

The 'TowerOfHanoi' method is missing the 'self' parameter, which will cause a 'TypeError' when called. Additionally, recursive calls will fail because the function is defined within the class scope, not the global namespace. This logic currently has 0% test coverage.

Suggestion: Move 'TowerOfHanoi' outside of the 'Person' class to the module level and remove 'self', or add 'self' and update recursive calls to 'self.TowerOfHanoi'.

See Coverage in Codacy
See Complexity in Codacy

codacy-production · 2026-03-25T09:01:42Z

python/person.py

        else:
            return self.name[user_id]
+
+    def test_slack_token(self):


_{🔴 HIGH RISK}

The 'test_slack_token' method attempts to use 'self.assertTrue', but the 'Person' class does not inherit from 'unittest.TestCase'. This will raise an 'AttributeError' at runtime. These tests should be moved to a dedicated test file inheriting from 'unittest.TestCase'.

See Coverage in Codacy

codacy-production · 2026-03-25T09:01:42Z

kotlin/src/test/kotlin/com/kheiron/ktbind/NativeBindingsTest.kt

     */
    @Suppress("unused")
    private val nativePointer: Long = 0
+    private val testvar123455VariableMVariableMaxLengthVariableMaxLengthaxLengthVariableMaxLengthVariableMaxLengthVariableMaxLengthVariableMaxLengthVariableMaxLengthVariableMaxLengthVariableMaxLengthVariableMaxLengthVariableMaxLengthVariableMaxLength: Long = 0


_{⚪ LOW RISK}

Suggestion: This variable name is excessively long and hinders readability. Use a concise, descriptive name.

Suggested change

private val testvar123455VariableMVariableMaxLengthVariableMaxLengthaxLengthVariableMaxLengthVariableMaxLengthVariableMaxLengthVariableMaxLengthVariableMaxLengthVariableMaxLengthVariableMaxLengthVariableMaxLengthVariableMaxLengthVariableMaxLength: Long = 0

private val testValue: Long = 0

some code

e22b293

hjrocha and others added 3 commits May 10, 2024 10:22

Merge branch 'master' into feature-branch-02

a8a8233

add github actions

Create .codacy.yaml

d8cd50d

add requirements.txt and a bit more code

fca3efb

heliocodacy commented Apr 30, 2025

View reviewed changes

python/requirements.txt

@@ -0,0 +1,4 @@

flask==1.0.2

Copy link

Author

heliocodacy Apr 30, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I don't think we should upgrade this lib

codacy-acme deleted a comment from codacy-production bot May 14, 2025

lib removal

cb71288

heliocodacy force-pushed the feature-branch-02 branch from e2cd870 to cb71288 Compare October 27, 2025 14:01

Ngwerume added the codacy-review Trigger Codacy's AI reviewer label Dec 4, 2025

codacy-production bot reviewed Dec 5, 2025

View reviewed changes

codacy-acme deleted a comment from codacy-production bot Dec 5, 2025

heliocodacy added codacy-review Trigger Codacy's AI reviewer and removed codacy-review Trigger Codacy's AI reviewer labels Dec 5, 2025

claudiacodacy added codacy-review Trigger Codacy's AI reviewer and removed codacy-review Trigger Codacy's AI reviewer labels Dec 5, 2025

This comment was marked as outdated.

Sign in to view

heliocodacy enabled auto-merge January 13, 2026 11:02

codacy-production bot reviewed Mar 25, 2026

View reviewed changes

Ngwerume force-pushed the feature-branch-02 branch from 869ff55 to cb71288 Compare March 25, 2026 11:11

heliocodacy closed this Mar 25, 2026

auto-merge was automatically disabled March 25, 2026 14:18
Pull request was closed

		TowerOfHanoi(n-1, auxiliary, destination, source)


		def fibonacci_of(n):

	private val testvar123455VariableMVariableMaxLengthVariableMaxLengthaxLengthVariableMaxLengthVariableMaxLengthVariableMaxLengthVariableMaxLengthVariableMaxLengthVariableMaxLengthVariableMaxLengthVariableMaxLengthVariableMaxLengthVariableMaxLength: Long = 0
	private val testValue: Long = 0

Conversation

heliocodacy commented Sep 7, 2023

Uh oh!

codacy-production bot commented Sep 7, 2023 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Coverage summary from Codacy

See diff coverage on Codacy

See your quality gate settings Change summary preferences

Footnotes

Uh oh!

heliocodacy Apr 30, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

codacy-production bot Dec 5, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

codacy-production bot Dec 5, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

codacy-production bot Dec 5, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

codacy-production bot Dec 5, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

codacy-production bot Dec 5, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

codacy-production bot Dec 5, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

codacy-production bot Dec 5, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

codacy-production bot Dec 5, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

codacy-production bot Dec 5, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

codacy-production bot Dec 5, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

codacy-production bot Dec 5, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

codacy-production bot Dec 5, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

codacy-production bot Dec 5, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

codacy-production bot Dec 5, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

codacy-production bot Dec 5, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

codacy-production bot Dec 5, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

codacy-production bot commented Dec 5, 2025 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Codacy's Analysis Summary

Uh oh!

This comment was marked as outdated.

Uh oh!

heliocodacy commented Jan 22, 2026

Uh oh!

Ngwerume commented Mar 25, 2026

🔒 Security Issues Resolved

✅ Fixed Critical Issues:

🛡️ Security Impact:

Uh oh!

codacy-production bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Pull Request Overview

About this PR

Test suggestions

Uh oh!

codacy-production bot commented Sep 7, 2023 •

edited

Loading

codacy-production bot commented Dec 5, 2025 •

edited

Loading