Skip to content

PR Test - 0603#23

Open
heliocodacy wants to merge 5 commits intomasterfrom
feature-branch-02
Open

PR Test - 0603#23
heliocodacy wants to merge 5 commits intomasterfrom
feature-branch-02

Conversation

@heliocodacy
Copy link

No description provided.

@codacy-production
Copy link

codacy-production bot commented Mar 25, 2026

Codacy's Analysis Summary

15 new issues, 3 flagged as potential false positives (≤ 0 minor issue)
15 new security issues (≤ 0 issue)
5 complexity (≤ 100 gate)
0 duplications (≤ 1 gate)
More details

AI Reviewer: first review requested successfully. AI can make mistakes. Always validate suggestions.

Run reviewer

TIP This summary will be updated as you push new changes. Give us feedback

Copy link

@codacy-production codacy-production bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull Request Overview

This PR is not up to standards and contains several critical issues that must prevent merging. Significant security risks have been introduced through the use of eval() and the addition of severely outdated, vulnerable versions of Flask, Django, and Requests.

Furthermore, the logic in python/person.py is fundamentally broken; new methods TowerOfHanoi and fibonacci_of are missing the required self parameter and will fail on recursive calls. This file is particularly high-risk as its complexity has increased while its test coverage has dropped by nearly 27%, leaving the new complex logic entirely unverified. Additionally, the PR lacks a description or linked Jira ticket, and several required functional test scenarios for the new math implementations are missing.

About this PR

  • There is a systemic pattern of introducing security risks, ranging from insecure function execution (eval) to the use of end-of-life dependencies with critical CVEs.
  • The PR lacks a description and a linked Jira ticket. Given the nature of the changes (introducing vulnerabilities and broken logic), the intent and context are unclear.

Test suggestions

  • Verify TowerOfHanoi implementation with valid disk counts
  • Verify fibonacci_of calculation for base cases and recursive steps
  • Ensure Person.get_name handles out-of-bounds user_id correctly
  • Address uncovered logic in complex file python/person.py
Prompt proposal for missing tests
Consider implementing these tests if applicable:
1. Verify TowerOfHanoi implementation with valid disk counts
2. Verify fibonacci_of calculation for base cases and recursive steps
3. Ensure Person.get_name handles out-of-bounds user_id correctly
4. Address uncovered logic in complex file python/person.py

🗒️ Improve review quality by adding custom instructions

@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
flask==1.0.2
django==1.11.29

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🔴 HIGH RISK

Django 1.11.29 is end-of-life and insecure. Upgrade to at least 4.2.26 to mitigate critical SQL injection risks (CVE-2025-64459) and other high-severity vulnerabilities.

Suggested change
django==1.11.29
django==4.2.26

See Issue in Codacy

@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
flask==1.0.2

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🔴 HIGH RISK

Flask version 1.0.2 is severely outdated and contains known security vulnerabilities (CVE-2023-30861) related to session management. Update to a supported version.

Suggested change
flask==1.0.2
flask==2.2.5

See Issue in Codacy

print('User Abbas has been added with id ', person.set_name('Abbas'))
print('User associated with id 0 is ', person.get_name(0)) No newline at end of file
print('User associated with id 0 is ', person.get_name(0))
eval("person.get_name(0)")

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🔴 HIGH RISK

The use of eval() is a significant security risk (code injection). Use safer alternatives like getattr() or call the method directly.

Suggested change
eval("person.get_name(0)")
person.get_name(0)

TowerOfHanoi(n-1, auxiliary, destination, source)


def fibonacci_of(n):

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🔴 HIGH RISK

This method is missing the 'self' parameter. Add 'self' and update recursive calls to 'self.fibonacci_of(n - 1)', or move the function outside the class definition.

else:
return self.name[user_id]

def TowerOfHanoi(n , source, destination, auxiliary):

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🔴 HIGH RISK

This method lacks the required 'self' parameter for an instance method. Additionally, the recursive calls will raise a NameError because the function names are not in the global scope. Either add 'self' and call via 'self.TowerOfHanoi', or use the @staticmethod decorator. This complex logic currently lacks any unit test coverage.

See Complexity in Codacy
See Coverage in Codacy

@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
flask==1.0.2
django==1.11.29
requests==2.19.1

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🟡 MEDIUM RISK

Upgrade the requests library to version 2.32.4 or higher to prevent sensitive credential leakage in malicious URLs (CVE-2024-47081).

Suggested change
requests==2.19.1
requests==2.32.4

See Issue in Codacy

*/
@Suppress("unused")
private val nativePointer: Long = 0
private val testvar123455VariableMVariableMaxLengthVariableMaxLengthaxLengthVariableMaxLengthVariableMaxLengthVariableMaxLengthVariableMaxLengthVariableMaxLengthVariableMaxLengthVariableMaxLengthVariableMaxLengthVariableMaxLengthVariableMaxLength: Long = 0

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚪ LOW RISK

Nitpick: The variable name is excessively long (>180 characters) and impairs readability. Standard naming conventions recommend concise, descriptive names.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants