New gb flag for building with getgb.io#80
Open
mhammonds wants to merge 1 commit intocodegangsta:masterfrom
bitmotive:master
Open
New gb flag for building with getgb.io#80mhammonds wants to merge 1 commit intocodegangsta:masterfrom bitmotive:master
mhammonds wants to merge 1 commit intocodegangsta:masterfrom
bitmotive:master
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This commit brings support for the gb build system (http://getgb.io/) by passing in a --usegb / -gb flag.
Unfortunately, Gb doesn't currently support arbitrary naming of build output files (See: constabulary/gb#97). This means I couldn't follow the same template used for godep support, and instead I adjusted the documentation to point out that enabling Gb means you must use an absolute path for the --bin flag so gin knows where to run the executable after it is built.