Skip to content

Add composefs-ostree and some basic CLI tools #144

Merged
alexlarsson merged 4 commits into
composefs:mainfrom
alexlarsson:ostree-support
Jun 25, 2026
Merged

Add composefs-ostree and some basic CLI tools #144
alexlarsson merged 4 commits into
composefs:mainfrom
alexlarsson:ostree-support

Conversation

@alexlarsson

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Based on ideas from #141

This is an initial version of ostree support. This allows pulling
from local and remote ostree repos, which will create a set of
regular file content objects, as well as a blob containing all the
remaining ostree objects. From the blob we can create an image.

When pulling a commit, a base blob (i.e. "the previous version" can be
specified. Any objects in that base blob will not be downloaded. If a
name is given for the pulled commit, then pre-existing blobs with the
same name will automatically be used as a base blob.

This is an initial version and there are several things missing:

  • Pull operations are completely serial
  • There is no support for ostree summary files
  • There is no support for ostree delta files
  • There is no caching of local file availability (other than base blob)
  • Local ostree repos only support archive mode

@alexlarsson alexlarsson force-pushed the ostree-support branch 2 times, most recently from e0e827f to 9c5b086 Compare June 17, 2025 06:54

@allisonkarlitskaya allisonkarlitskaya left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I love this! Thanks for working on it!

I made some comments on the first round of commits. Feel free to adjust those and PR them separately: we can merge those now without further discussion.

The blobs thing is going to need a call.

I didn't review the crate addition in any detail at all. That's probably also going to need a call :)

Comment thread crates/composefs/src/repository.rs
Comment thread crates/composefs/src/repository.rs Outdated
Comment thread crates/composefs/src/repository.rs Outdated
Comment thread crates/composefs/src/repository.rs Outdated
Comment thread crates/composefs/src/repository.rs Outdated
Comment thread crates/composefs/src/lib.rs Outdated
Comment thread crates/cfsctl/Cargo.toml Outdated
Comment thread crates/composefs/src/repository.rs Outdated
@alexlarsson

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Hmmm, thinking more about this. We probably want a "content type" magic thing in the splitstream header as well, so we can error out if the wrapped thing is of the wrong type.

@alexlarsson alexlarsson force-pushed the ostree-support branch 2 times, most recently from 2ed83a2 to c041afe Compare June 19, 2025 09:11
@alexlarsson

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Ok. Reworked this to use splitstreams for object maps and commits. And, by using an object mapping to find the object map we make the content of the splitstream for the commit be just the commit data, and thus the sha256 of that splitstream matches the ostree commit id.

@alexlarsson

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

@allisonkarlitskaya There is still lots to do here. But have a look at this approach and see what you think.

@alexlarsson

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Added some further changes. We now validate all objects when pulling and all non-file objects when creating images. Its hard to efficiently validate file objects during create-image though, we would like to avoid re-reading the external object files to compute the sha256.

Remaining things to do:

  • Stream larger objects into repo
  • Support summaries and summary branches for remote repos
  • Support deltas when remote pulling
  • Parallelize downloads of objects
  • Report pull progress in some sane way
  • Use some kind of local cache for available objects other than just those from "previous version"
  • Handle GPG validation of commit objects

@alexlarsson alexlarsson force-pushed the ostree-support branch 4 times, most recently from 481e604 to e88573d Compare June 30, 2025 14:26
@alexlarsson

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

I started working on the delta support, but it failed because of an issue in gvariant-rs.

@allisonkarlitskaya allisonkarlitskaya left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It occurs to me that it might be interesting not to sort the table of fs-verity references, and it might also be interesting to permit duplicate items.

On the topic of deferring writing of objects to a background thread, this would allow us to write "external object #123" based on a sequential index to the splitstream without actually knowing the hash value yet, and then fill in the actual values in the header at the end when we're writing: it helps there that the fs-verity references aren't compressed and therefore not part of the stream...

@cgwalters

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

It seems like we should get in the splitstream changes in 0f6d69e at least sooner rather than later? Can you file a separate PR?

alexlarsson added a commit to alexlarsson/composefs-rs that referenced this pull request Sep 29, 2025
This changes the splitstream format a bit, with the goal of allowing
splitstreams to support ostree files as well (see composefs#144)

The primary differences are:

 * The header is not compressed
 * All referenced fs-verity objects are stored in the header, including
   external chunks, mapped splitstreams and (a new feature) references
   that are not used in chunks.
 * The mapping table is separate from the reference table (and generally
   smaller), and indexes into it.
 * There is a magic value to detect the file format.
 * There is a magic content type to detect the type wrapped in the stream.
 * We store a tag for what ObjectID format is used
 * The total size of the stream is stored in the header.

The ability to reference file objects in the repo even if they are not
part of the splitstream "content" will be useful for the ostree
support to reference file content objects.

This change also allows more efficient GC enumeration, because we
don't have to parse the entire splitstream to find the referenced
objects.

Signed-off-by: Alexander Larsson <alexl@redhat.com>
alexlarsson added a commit to alexlarsson/composefs-rs that referenced this pull request Sep 29, 2025
This changes the splitstream format a bit, with the goal of allowing
splitstreams to support ostree files as well (see composefs#144)

The primary differences are:

 * The header is not compressed
 * All referenced fs-verity objects are stored in the header, including
   external chunks, mapped splitstreams and (a new feature) references
   that are not used in chunks.
 * The mapping table is separate from the reference table (and generally
   smaller), and indexes into it.
 * There is a magic value to detect the file format.
 * There is a magic content type to detect the type wrapped in the stream.
 * We store a tag for what ObjectID format is used
 * The total size of the stream is stored in the header.

The ability to reference file objects in the repo even if they are not
part of the splitstream "content" will be useful for the ostree
support to reference file content objects.

This change also allows more efficient GC enumeration, because we
don't have to parse the entire splitstream to find the referenced
objects.

Signed-off-by: Alexander Larsson <alexl@redhat.com>
alexlarsson added a commit to alexlarsson/composefs-rs that referenced this pull request Oct 6, 2025
This changes the splitstream format a bit, with the goal of allowing
splitstreams to support ostree files as well (see composefs#144)

The primary differences are:

 * The header is not compressed
 * All referenced fs-verity objects are stored in the header, including
   external chunks, mapped splitstreams and (a new feature) references
   that are not used in chunks.
 * The mapping table is separate from the reference table (and generally
   smaller), and indexes into it.
 * There is a magic value to detect the file format.
 * There is a magic content type to detect the type wrapped in the stream.
 * We store a tag for what ObjectID format is used
 * The total size of the stream is stored in the header.

The ability to reference file objects in the repo even if they are not
part of the splitstream "content" will be useful for the ostree
support to reference file content objects.

This change also allows more efficient GC enumeration, because we
don't have to parse the entire splitstream to find the referenced
objects.

Signed-off-by: Alexander Larsson <alexl@redhat.com>
@alexlarsson alexlarsson force-pushed the ostree-support branch 2 times, most recently from c788da2 to 2ee193a Compare October 6, 2025 14:58
alexlarsson added a commit to alexlarsson/composefs-rs that referenced this pull request Oct 6, 2025
This changes the splitstream format a bit, with the goal of allowing
splitstreams to support ostree files as well (see composefs#144)

The primary differences are:

 * The header is not compressed
 * All referenced fs-verity objects are stored in the header, including
   external chunks, mapped splitstreams and (a new feature) references
   that are not used in chunks.
 * The mapping table is separate from the reference table (and generally
   smaller), and indexes into it.
 * There is a magic value to detect the file format.
 * There is a magic content type to detect the type wrapped in the stream.
 * We store a tag for what ObjectID format is used
 * The total size of the stream is stored in the header.

The ability to reference file objects in the repo even if they are not
part of the splitstream "content" will be useful for the ostree
support to reference file content objects.

This change also allows more efficient GC enumeration, because we
don't have to parse the entire splitstream to find the referenced
objects.

Signed-off-by: Alexander Larsson <alexl@redhat.com>
allisonkarlitskaya pushed a commit to allisonkarlitskaya/composefs-rs that referenced this pull request Nov 12, 2025
This changes the splitstream format a bit, with the goal of allowing
splitstreams to support ostree files as well (see composefs#144)

The primary differences are:

 * The header is not compressed
 * All referenced fs-verity objects are stored in the header, including
   external chunks, mapped splitstreams and (a new feature) references
   that are not used in chunks.
 * The mapping table is separate from the reference table (and generally
   smaller), and indexes into it.
 * There is a magic value to detect the file format.
 * There is a magic content type to detect the type wrapped in the stream.
 * We store a tag for what ObjectID format is used
 * The total size of the stream is stored in the header.

The ability to reference file objects in the repo even if they are not
part of the splitstream "content" will be useful for the ostree
support to reference file content objects.

This change also allows more efficient GC enumeration, because we
don't have to parse the entire splitstream to find the referenced
objects.

Signed-off-by: Alexander Larsson <alexl@redhat.com>
@alexlarsson

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

I rebased this and fixes some comments. Still some work to do though.

@alexlarsson alexlarsson force-pushed the ostree-support branch 2 times, most recently from 5fba232 to 1228e9b Compare June 2, 2026 15:49
@alexlarsson

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Ok, i updated this to the latest version and added streaming creation of repo files and parallelized fetching. Plus some other cleanups.

@alexlarsson

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Ok, I sent some time on this, its now much more like the "cfsctl oci" commands and behavior, and it does parallel fetches. I also added various integration tests. I think this is pretty complete for what it does (i.e. imports ostree commits into composefs and lets you mount it).

There are some TODOs for summary and delta support, but those are not necessarily super important for the basic functionallity.

@alexlarsson alexlarsson force-pushed the ostree-support branch 7 times, most recently from 188640d to efba46d Compare June 17, 2026 16:20
ref ostree_ref,
base_name,
} => {
eprintln!("Fetching {ostree_ref}");

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Don't log via eprintln! we have the progress API now.

Also on that topic...I think we should expose a varlink API for this now, right?

I guess neither of these need to strictly block merging though.


🤔 I guess actually...if we go down this varlink path, perhaps in theory we could have both the oci and ostree fetchers be extension binaries i.e. something like /usr/libexec/composefs/ext/oci is automatically cfsctl oci? That could be interesting...and would actually force us to have a good "core" varlink api.

Comment thread crates/composefs-ostree/src/commit.rs Outdated
Comment thread crates/composefs-ostree/src/pull.rs
Comment thread crates/composefs-ostree/src/commit.rs Outdated
@cgwalters

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

@allisonkarlitskaya You have a "changes requested" here which blocks merges

Signed-off-by: Alexander Larsson <alexl@redhat.com>
This lets you look up a ref digest from the splitstream by index
and is needed by the ostree code.

Signed-off-by: Alexander Larsson <alexl@redhat.com>
This is basically ensure_object_from_fd(), but for anything
implementing Read. basically ensure_object_from_fd() is reimplemented
based on this.

We will need this in the ostree support code for streaming a zlib
compressed file to the repo.

Signed-off-by: Alexander Larsson <alexl@redhat.com>
Based on ideas from composefs#141

This is an initial version of ostree support. This allows pulling from
local and remote ostree repos, which will create a set of regular file
content objects, as well as a commit splitstream containing all the
remaining ostree objects and file data. From the splitstream we can
create an image.

When pulling a commit, base commits (i.e. "the previous version" can
be specified, either manually and/or added automatically based on
parent commit or previous commit for the pulled ref. Any objects in
that base commit will not be downloaded.

Commits are splitstreams named ostree-commit-xxxx, and refs that
points to these are refs/ostree/$ref.

erofs images are automatically created for pulled commits, and they
can be mounted with "cfsctl ostree mount". There are also some other
subcommands, that are simliar to those of oci:
 * dump
 * compute-id
 * inspect
 * tag
 * untag
 * images

Signed-off-by: Alexander Larsson <alexl@redhat.com>
Assisted-by: Claude Code (Opus 4.6)

@cgwalters cgwalters left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Overall: Nothing blocking, from my PoV we can get this in as a clearly experimental separate crate and iterate from there.

A lot of interesting stuff here, but I think we need to write up an even more concrete plan for how consumers (flatpak?) would use this - gets into the varlink (or a -capi crate?) discussion.

Comment thread doc/ostree.md
Comment on lines +65 to +66
OSTree file objects are stored in the archive-z2 format, except not
compressed, and optionally the file content part of it may be stored

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The -z2 is obsolete terminology, it's just archive.

Also: the core library calls the "metadata+data" an "object stream". It's really pretty similar to a tar header + content.

Comment thread doc/ostree.md

OSTree file objects are stored in the archive-z2 format, except not
compressed, and optionally the file content part of it may be stored
as referencing the index of an external object. The z2 format is,

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

So not "z2 format" just "object format".

Like: when we do ostree fsck we reconstruct in memory that format and that's what we compare vs the digest - there's no compression involved.

Comment thread doc/ostree.md
content data and optionally a reference to an external object.

The exact form of the data looks like this, packed in order from the
start of the splitstream content. All ints are in little endian.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

How about "numbers" or "integers". "ints" is a bit too informal...

Comment thread doc/ostree.md
limit the search. We can also compute the total number of objects
(n_objects) by looking in the last bucket.

### Object ids

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Should re-mention the sorting here

Comment thread doc/ostree.md
```
n_objects x
+-----------------------------------+
| [u8; 32] ostree object id |

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

(binary sha256) would help clarify

Comment thread doc/ostree.md
```
n_objects x
+-----------------------------------+
| u32: Offset to per-object data |

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'd hope no one ever wants to ship more than 4G of metadata...but perhaps worth calling out. Or...perhaps instead of raw "offset" since we have the alignment requirement, we could make it "block" offset with a 8 byte block. We'd then go up to 32G of metadata. But dunno.

}
for i in 1..256 {
// Then we sum them up to the end
header.bucket_ends[i] += header.bucket_ends[i - 1];

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Same comment here re windows()

}

/// Abstraction over local and remote ostree repository access.
pub(crate) trait OstreeRepo<ObjectID: FsVerityHashValue>: Send + Sync {

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

One operation I think we want here is fsck too at least

@cgwalters

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

A lot of interesting stuff here, but I think we need to write up an even more concrete plan for how consumers (flatpak?) would use this - gets into the varlink (or a -capi crate?) discussion.

Or to say it a different way - I think we do need a tight focus on the "core" things to get to the current milestones. I didn't add this to a milestone, but if we did I think it would be e.g. 1.1 or so? I am happy to debate it of course, we could say that this is part of 1.0 too.

What I keep thinking about again here is making it really clear and obvious how to use composefs to store arbitrary content without writing a custom crate and glue. One idea here is: have a (varlink) API that accepts metadata + tarball and stores it as an OCI artifact, but where we do the splitstream stuff and support mounting it too. Think e.g. storing a dpkg/rpm in composefs.

@alexlarsson

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

@cgwalters I agree, we should have a way that lets you just store unstructured data from a tar or a directory, with no guarantees of "exact bitwise reproduceability" of the original data. That seems very useful, however its not quite the same as the oci/ostree case where we want to roundtrip both ways losslessly.

Anyway, lots of good comments here, but I'm gonna merge this for now and lets consider this unstable and then I'll do updates to it in separate PRs, because this one is getting unwieldy.

@alexlarsson alexlarsson added this pull request to the merge queue Jun 25, 2026
Merged via the queue into composefs:main with commit 0b6424e Jun 25, 2026
17 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants