ci: ignore HACS license check until a license is chosen - #38
Conversation
The repository (like the upstream fork it derives from) has no LICENSE file. hacs/action runs its full check suite for in-repo refs, so every push to master and every in-repo PR fails the license validation, while fork PRs skip it - which is why CI looked green until today. Ignore the check explicitly so CI reflects the state of the code; drop this once a license is committed. Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
|
Warning Review limit reached
Next review available in: 31 minutes Enable usage-based reviews in Billing to review now. Otherwise, wait until the next included review is available. How can I continue?After more reviews become available, a review can be triggered using the To avoid repeated limits, reduce automatic review volume by pausing incremental auto-reviews earlier, using label-based review opt-in, excluding WIP or generated PR titles, or requesting reviews manually when the PR is ready. If your team needs uninterrupted high-volume reviews, an organization admin can enable usage-based reviews. How do review limits work?CodeRabbit enforces per-developer PR review limits for each organization. Most developers receive the normal plan review availability. For paid Pro and Pro+ PR reviews, CodeRabbit uses adaptive limits for sustained high-volume activity. When a developer's recent PR review activity reaches the 95th percentile or higher among CodeRabbit users, additional reviews become available more gradually as earlier reviews age out of the rolling window. Please refer docs for additional details. Review details⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: defaults Review profile: CHILL Plan: Pro Run ID: 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
✨ Finishing Touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
Adds the standard MIT license (the common choice for Home Assistant custom integrations) covering the fork's history, points the README's License section at it, and removes the temporary ignore added in #38 so hacs/action validates the license again. Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
|
Follow-up complete: the repository is now MIT-licensed (b2483e6, pushed to master) and the temporary |
Summary
Every push to master and every in-repo PR currently fails the
hacsjob with "The repository has no license" — including the two master pushes from today's merges. Fork PRs (like #32/#33) run a reduced HACS check set, which is why this never surfaced before.The repo has never had a LICENSE file, and neither does the upstream Memberapple fork it derives from — so choosing a license is a maintainer decision I'm deliberately not making here (note the README's License section is also a no-warranty statement rather than a grant). This one-liner tells
hacs/actionto skip the license validation so CI reflects the actual state of the code.Follow-up for @dalyem
Pick and commit a license when you get a chance (MIT is the common choice for HA custom integrations — but since the upstream fork was unlicensed, whether/how to license is your call), then delete the
ignore: licenseline. HACS docs on the requirement: https://hacs.xyz/docs/publish/include#check-licenseVerification
After merging, the
hacsjob on master pushes and in-repo PRs should pass again (8/8 remaining checks were already green — only license fails today).🤖 Generated with Claude Code