revert(sdk): deserialization error due to outdated contract cache#3114
revert(sdk): deserialization error due to outdated contract cache#3114
Conversation
✅ gRPC Query Coverage Report |
📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughThis PR removes the Changes
Estimated code review effort🎯 4 (Complex) | ⏱️ ~45 minutes Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
Poem
🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 3✅ Passed checks (3 passed)
✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings. ✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Tip Issue Planner is now in beta. Read the docs and try it out! Share your feedback on Discord. Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
packages/rs-sdk/src/platform/fetch_many.rs (1)
340-340: Remove commented-out code.Line 340 has a leftover commented-out line that appears to be debug/development residue.
🧹 Proposed cleanup
- // let object: Option<BTreeMap<K,Document>> = sdk - let documents = sdk + let documents = sdk🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
Verify each finding against the current code and only fix it if needed. In `@packages/rs-sdk/src/platform/fetch_many.rs` at line 340, Remove the leftover commented-out debug line "let object: Option<BTreeMap<K,Document>> = sdk" in fetch_many.rs (the commented declaration near the fetch_many logic); simply delete that commented line so the file contains no dead/commented-out development residue while leaving surrounding code and function behavior unchanged.
🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents
Verify each finding against the current code and only fix it if needed.
Nitpick comments:
In `@packages/rs-sdk/src/platform/fetch_many.rs`:
- Line 340: Remove the leftover commented-out debug line "let object:
Option<BTreeMap<K,Document>> = sdk" in fetch_many.rs (the commented declaration
near the fetch_many logic); simply delete that commented line so the file
contains no dead/commented-out development residue while leaving surrounding
code and function behavior unchanged.
|
Why? |
|
@PastaPastaPasta because it's actually not fixing the problem. Actual fix is here #3071 |
Reverts #3052
Summary by CodeRabbit
Bug Fixes
Refactor