Use correct google library property for first-name-only db field.

[evansharp]

Addressed issue #177.

Summary by CodeRabbit

• Bug Fixes
  • Updated the user sign-in process so that the first name is now captured accurately, ensuring your profile information is correctly displayed.

[coderabbitai]

Walkthrough

The pull request updates the GoogleOAuth class by switching the retrieval of the user's first name from the name property to the given_name property within the setColumnsName method. This adjustment occurs during the syncingUserInfo process, with the mappings for last name and avatar remaining unchanged. The overall method logic stays intact.

Changes

File(s)	Change Summary
src/Libraries/GoogleOAuth.php	Updated first name retrieval in setColumnsName: now uses given_name instead of name during syncing.

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    participant Client as System
    participant OAuth as GoogleOAuth
    participant userInfo as User Info Object

    Client->>OAuth: Initiate syncingUserInfo process
    OAuth->>userInfo: Retrieve property "given_name"
    userInfo-->>OAuth: Return first name value
    OAuth->>Client: Map first name to configuration column

Loading

Poem

I'm a rabbit hopping through the code so bright,
Discovered a tweak that now feels just right.
"given_name" leads the way with grace,
While "name" takes a backseat in this race.
With a skip and a hop in my joyful stride,
My code garden grows with updates worldwide!
🥕🐇

Tip

⚡💬 Agentic Chat (Pro Plan, General Availability)

• We're introducing multi-step agentic chat in review comments and issue comments, within and outside of PR's. This feature enhances review and issue discussions with the CodeRabbit agentic chat by enabling advanced interactions, including the ability to create pull requests directly from comments and add commits to existing pull requests.

---

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 82f07b6 and bfb315c.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

• src/Libraries/GoogleOAuth.php (1 hunks)

🔇 Additional comments (1)

src/Libraries/GoogleOAuth.php (1)

99-99: Good fix - using given_name is correct for first name field.

This change properly addresses the issue by using Google's given_name property instead of name for the first name field. The given_name property specifically contains only the first name, while name would contain the full name. This ensures consistent data storage and matches how the newUser method already uses given_name in line 112.

✨ Finishing Touches

• 📝 Generate Docstrings

---

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

• Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
  • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
  • Generate unit testing code for this file.
  • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
• Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
  • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
• PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
  • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
  • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
  • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

• @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
• @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
• @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
• @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
• @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
• @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
• @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
• @coderabbitai plan to trigger planning for file edits and PR creation.
• @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
• @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

• Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
• Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
• Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

• You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
• Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
• If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

• Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
• Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
• Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

[evansharp]

Any reason why this cannot be merged?