Rename API gateway URL settings to control-plane#22
Conversation
Add control-plane-url flag, DCM_CONTROL_PLANE_URL, and :8080 default. Keep legacy api-gateway names as aliases. Assisted-By: Claude (Anthropic) Signed-off-by: Gloria Ciavarrini <gciavarrini@redhat.com>
gabriel-farache
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I see the .ai/specs were not updated with the change, could you either remove them or update them to avoid having discrepancies?
Note that if you remove the folder, the comment referencing them should also be deleted
Drop catalog-manager, policy-manager, and service-provider-manager. Pin control-plane at e4374fc25292. Assisted-By: Claude (Anthropic) Signed-off-by: Gloria Ciavarrini <gciavarrini@redhat.com>
Assisted-By: Claude (Anthropic) Signed-off-by: Gloria Ciavarrini <gciavarrini@redhat.com>
Assisted-By: Claude (Anthropic) Signed-off-by: Gloria Ciavarrini <gciavarrini@redhat.com>
Assisted-By: Claude (Anthropic) Signed-off-by: Gloria Ciavarrini <gciavarrini@redhat.com>
Assisted-By: Claude (Anthropic) Signed-off-by: Gloria Ciavarrini <gciavarrini@redhat.com>
Assisted-By: Claude (Anthropic) Signed-off-by: Gloria Ciavarrini <gciavarrini@redhat.com>
I totally forgot about them. |
Thx. |
| | REQ-SPP-030 | `dcm sp provider get` MUST accept a `PROVIDER_ID` positional argument and display the SP provider | MUST | | | ||
| | REQ-SPP-040 | Missing `PROVIDER_ID` argument for `get` MUST result in a usage error (exit code 2) | MUST | | | ||
| | REQ-SPP-050 | All SP provider commands MUST use the generated SP Manager client (`service-provider-manager/pkg/client`) | MUST | | | ||
| | REQ-SPP-050 | All SP provider commands MUST use the generated SP provider client (`github.com/dcm-project/control-plane/pkg/sp/client/provider`) | MUST | | |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
so we are changing the name of SP Resource Manager to SP Provider?
I just want to make sure this is intentional
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The Resource Manager is inside the SP Manager. Since it's in process I'm unsure TBH about the naming. I can revert it. WDYT?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I think we are using SPRM in a lot of places so changing the name in this PR, in this repo, for the first time does not seem right
Reverted 02e71f1 |
|
@gciavarrini I think that once you cleaned the commit history you are good to merge :) |
This reverts commit 9cfa19d. Signed-off-by: Gloria Ciavarrini <gciavarrini@redhat.com>
Assisted-By: Claude (Anthropic) Signed-off-by: Gloria Ciavarrini <gciavarrini@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Gloria Ciavarrini <gciavarrini@redhat.com>
Assisted-By: Claude (Anthropic)
Signed-off-by: Gloria Ciavarrini gciavarrini@redhat.com