Skip to content

Conversation

@pknowles
Copy link
Collaborator

@pknowles pknowles commented Feb 7, 2025

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Chores
    • Introduced new configuration options for custom dependency search paths, enhancing build flexibility.
    • Refined the structure and readability of dependency settings and messaging to improve overall consistency during builds.

@coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Feb 7, 2025

Warning

Rate limit exceeded

@pknowles has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 15 minutes and 28 seconds before requesting another review.

⌛ How to resolve this issue?

After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit.

🚦 How do rate limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization.

Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout.

Please see our FAQ for further information.

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 8371d0c and 415ea55.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • CMakeLists.txt (2 hunks)
  • test/CMakeLists.txt (1 hunks)

Walkthrough

The changes update dependency management in two CMake configuration files. New options have been introduced to specify custom search paths for dependencies: one for the decodeless_offset_ptr in the main CMakeLists.txt and another for the decodeless_allocator in the test/CMakeLists.txt. The find_package commands now reference these options instead of hardcoded paths, with minor reformatting and a slight reorganization of the conditional logic. Error handling and linking behavior remain unchanged.

Changes

File(s) Summary of Change
CMakeLists.txt, test/CMakeLists.txt Added new search path options (DECODELESS_OFFSET_PTR_SEARCH_PATH and DECODELESS_ALLOCATOR_SEARCH_PATH) to allow custom dependency locations. Updated find_package commands and reformatted descriptions for clarity.

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    participant U as User
    participant C as CMake
    participant F as find_package
    participant D as decodeless_offset_ptr

    U->>C: Run configuration with DECODELESS_OFFSET_PTR_SEARCH_PATH option
    C->>F: Execute find_package using provided search path
    F->>D: Search for decodeless_offset_ptr package
    alt Package Found
        D-->>F: Return package info
        F-->>C: Supply dependency details
    else Package Not Found
        F-->>C: Return error details
        C->>U: Display fatal error message
    end
Loading
sequenceDiagram
    participant U as User
    participant C as CMake_test
    participant F as find_package
    participant D as decodeless_allocator

    U->>C: Run test configuration with DECODELESS_ALLOCATOR_SEARCH_PATH option
    C->>F: Execute find_package using provided search path
    F->>D: Search for decodeless_allocator package
    alt Package Found
        D-->>F: Return package info
        F-->>C: Supply dependency details
    else Package Not Found
        F-->>C: Return error details
        C->>U: Display fatal error message
    end
Loading

Poem

Oh, I hopped in code today,
With new paths lighting up my way,
DECODELESS options now lead the crew,
Finding dependencies fresh and new,
In the realm of CMake, my joy takes flight,
A bunny’s dance in the code’s moonlight! 🐰
Cheers to changes that make it all bright!


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai or @coderabbitai title anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 2

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between d100a5c and 8371d0c.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • CMakeLists.txt (2 hunks)
  • test/CMakeLists.txt (1 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (2)
  • GitHub Check: build (windows-latest, Release, cl)
  • GitHub Check: build (windows-latest, Debug, cl)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
CMakeLists.txt (2)

9-12: Clarify Boolean Options for Dependency Control

The boolean options DECODELESS_SEARCH_DEPENDENCIES and DECODELESS_FETCH_DEPENDENCIES are clearly defined with descriptive help texts. This makes it easy for users to override dependency management behavior.


37-37: Linking Update Consistency

The update to the target_link_libraries() invocation on line 37 now cleanly links the decodeless_header interface library to decodeless::offset_ptr. This reformatting is consistent and improves readability.

Comment on lines +16 to +19
option(DECODELESS_OFFSET_PTR_SEARCH_PATH
"${CMAKE_CURRENT_LIST_DIR}/../offset_ptr")
find_package(decodeless_offset_ptr REQUIRED CONFIG PATHS
"${DECODELESS_OFFSET_PTR_SEARCH_PATH}")
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Reconsider Using option() for a Path Variable

A new option DECODELESS_OFFSET_PTR_SEARCH_PATH has been introduced and used to pass a custom search path to find_package. However, the option() command is meant for boolean values. For a path string, it is best practice to use set() with a CACHE entry of type PATH to ensure proper type handling and caching behavior.

Consider replacing the declaration with the following diff:

-    option(DECODELESS_OFFSET_PTR_SEARCH_PATH
-           "${CMAKE_CURRENT_LIST_DIR}/../offset_ptr")
+    set(DECODELESS_OFFSET_PTR_SEARCH_PATH "${CMAKE_CURRENT_LIST_DIR}/../offset_ptr" CACHE PATH "Path to decodeless_offset_ptr")
📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
option(DECODELESS_OFFSET_PTR_SEARCH_PATH
"${CMAKE_CURRENT_LIST_DIR}/../offset_ptr")
find_package(decodeless_offset_ptr REQUIRED CONFIG PATHS
"${DECODELESS_OFFSET_PTR_SEARCH_PATH}")
set(DECODELESS_OFFSET_PTR_SEARCH_PATH "${CMAKE_CURRENT_LIST_DIR}/../offset_ptr" CACHE PATH "Path to decodeless_offset_ptr")
find_package(decodeless_offset_ptr REQUIRED CONFIG PATHS
"${DECODELESS_OFFSET_PTR_SEARCH_PATH}")

Comment on lines 17 to +21
if(DECODELESS_SEARCH_DEPENDENCIES)
option(DECODELESS_ALLOCATOR_SEARCH_PATH
"${CMAKE_CURRENT_LIST_DIR}/../allocator")
find_package(decodeless_allocator REQUIRED CONFIG PATHS
"${CMAKE_CURRENT_LIST_DIR}/../../allocator")
"${DECODELESS_ALLOCATOR_SEARCH_PATH}")
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🧹 Nitpick (assertive)

🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Refactor String-Based Dependency Path Option

A new option DECODELESS_ALLOCATOR_SEARCH_PATH is introduced to customize the search path for decodeless_allocator. Similar to the main CMakeLists.txt, using option() here for a path is not ideal because option() is reserved for booleans. Switching to set() with a CACHE type PATH will ensure the variable is treated as a string instead of a boolean value.

Apply this change with the following diff:

-    option(DECODELESS_ALLOCATOR_SEARCH_PATH
-           "${CMAKE_CURRENT_LIST_DIR}/../allocator")
+    set(DECODELESS_ALLOCATOR_SEARCH_PATH "${CMAKE_CURRENT_LIST_DIR}/../allocator" CACHE PATH "Path to decodeless_allocator")

This change will make the configuration more robust when users provide custom paths.

📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
if(DECODELESS_SEARCH_DEPENDENCIES)
option(DECODELESS_ALLOCATOR_SEARCH_PATH
"${CMAKE_CURRENT_LIST_DIR}/../allocator")
find_package(decodeless_allocator REQUIRED CONFIG PATHS
"${CMAKE_CURRENT_LIST_DIR}/../../allocator")
"${DECODELESS_ALLOCATOR_SEARCH_PATH}")
if(DECODELESS_SEARCH_DEPENDENCIES)
- option(DECODELESS_ALLOCATOR_SEARCH_PATH
- "${CMAKE_CURRENT_LIST_DIR}/../allocator")
+ set(DECODELESS_ALLOCATOR_SEARCH_PATH "${CMAKE_CURRENT_LIST_DIR}/../allocator" CACHE PATH "Path to decodeless_allocator")
find_package(decodeless_allocator REQUIRED CONFIG PATHS
"${DECODELESS_ALLOCATOR_SEARCH_PATH}")

@pknowles pknowles merged commit 415ea55 into main Feb 7, 2025
12 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants