Skip to content

🤖 Fix #52: docs: add FAQ / troubleshooting page#62

Merged
JacobPEvans-personal merged 3 commits into
mainfrom
fix/issue-52-docs-add-faq-troubleshooting
May 25, 2026
Merged

🤖 Fix #52: docs: add FAQ / troubleshooting page#62
JacobPEvans-personal merged 3 commits into
mainfrom
fix/issue-52-docs-add-faq-troubleshooting

Conversation

@JacobPEvans-personal
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Closes #52

Problem

Common operational issues hit users with no documented answer: envelope validation failures, slow inference, HF upload 401s, viewer cache delays, and OSV suppress patterns. The README references docs/ but has no FAQ entry.

Approach

Create a new docs/faq.md with four sections (Envelope/Schema, Inference/Performance, Publishing, CI) covering the specific questions called out in the issue. Update README.md to include faq.md in the docs directory tree listing and add a cross-reference line alongside the existing docs/schema.md reference.

Files changed

  • docs/faq.md — new FAQ file with 4 Q&A sections
  • README.md — add faq.md to docs tree listing; add cross-reference after schema.md link

CI status

none — no check-runs defined at branch creation time; CI triggers on pull_request event

Self-review

This PR was drafted by Issue Solver and is opened as a DRAFT for human review before merge. The Hard Rules in the prompt enforce: signed commits via Contents API, no dependency changes, no infra/workflow edits, secret-pattern pre-flight scan.

Note: README.md already contains export HF_TOKEN="hf_..." (line 193) — a pre-existing documentation placeholder that triggers the token regex. This line was not introduced by this PR and is not a real credential.


Generated by Issue Solver — prompt source: https://github.com/JacobPEvans/claude-code-routines/blob/main/routines/issue-solver.prompt.md

Copy link
Copy Markdown

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist Bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request introduces a new FAQ and Troubleshooting guide (docs/faq.md) and updates the README.md with relevant links. The guide covers common issues related to schema validation, performance, publishing, and CI. A review comment correctly identifies that the osv-scanner configuration example in the FAQ uses an incorrect format and provides a suggestion to align it with the project's existing osv-scanner.toml structure.

Comment thread docs/faq.md Outdated
@JacobPEvans-personal JacobPEvans-personal force-pushed the fix/issue-52-docs-add-faq-troubleshooting branch from 59c4f09 to 1a43ff8 Compare May 25, 2026 20:28
@JacobPEvans-personal JacobPEvans-personal marked this pull request as ready for review May 25, 2026 22:18
@JacobPEvans-personal JacobPEvans-personal enabled auto-merge (squash) May 25, 2026 22:18
Signed-off-by: JacobPEvans <20714140+JacobPEvans@users.noreply.github.com>
Signed-off-by: JacobPEvans <20714140+JacobPEvans@users.noreply.github.com>
@JacobPEvans-personal JacobPEvans-personal force-pushed the fix/issue-52-docs-add-faq-troubleshooting branch from 1a43ff8 to 80a415d Compare May 25, 2026 22:21
Per gemini-code-assist on PR #62: the FAQ example used a fictional
`[[osv.ignore]]` / `expires` shape. The repo's actual osv-scanner.toml
uses `[[IgnoredVulns]]` headers and `ignoreUntil` with an unquoted TOML
date literal. Align the example to what readers will actually find in
the file the FAQ tells them to edit.

Assisted-by: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
@JacobPEvans-personal JacobPEvans-personal merged commit 50975e6 into main May 25, 2026
12 checks passed
@JacobPEvans-personal JacobPEvans-personal deleted the fix/issue-52-docs-add-faq-troubleshooting branch May 25, 2026 22:27
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

docs: add FAQ / troubleshooting page

1 participant