[duuyguyiilmaz]

A pass over the claims the last few changes made stale. No screenshots added — the existing ones stay as they are.

What was wrong	Now
The leaderboard screenshot caption said it showed the viewer's own department	It was captured before the ranking was scoped, so the image is wider than what the app now returns. The caption says so, rather than quietly misdescribing the picture under it.
"Points and rewards — uploaders earn points from ratings" implied a stored balance	The total is the score the user's own notes have earned, computed where it is shown
The rating rules read as app behaviour	No self-rating and one vote per person are enforced by the security rules, which is the part worth stating in a feature list
Email verification listed as an unresolved gap	Now a decision. It is one call away and left open deliberately: the accounts here are test data, and a mandatory confirmation step would put a mailbox between a reviewer and the running app for nothing.
"No pagination" described a state from two changes ago	Still true that both read every matching note — but the leaderboard no longer reads the whole collection, and the createdAt normalisation the ordering depends on has landed. The entry now says what is left.
"Deploy the security rules" was a parenthetical	A step with the command in it, and a sentence on why it is not only about access: the rules are what verify the scoring, so an un-deployed project is either blocked or cheatable
The rules-tests intro cited points as an example of what only Firestore can enforce	That field no longer exists; replaced with the scoring check

Verification

Every in-page anchor resolves to a heading, and every relative link resolves to a file that exists — checked mechanically, not by eye.

🤖 Generated with Claude Code