docs: expand investigation and DFIR portfolio - #24
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit: b8c6a60825
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".
|
|
||
| ## Readiness criteria | ||
|
|
||
| The capability can move from Planned to Installed when acquisition and analysis tooling is available with private storage controls. It becomes Verified only after a known test image is acquired or analyzed reproducibly. Live validated requires an approved live lab case with an evidence ledger, integrity checks, documented analysis, and sanitized results. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Require analysis before marking memory triage Verified
When a known image has merely been acquired but never analyzed, this criterion permits the combined memory acquisition-and-triage capability to be promoted to Verified. That contradicts the repository-wide definition that Verified means the workflow was exercised successfully and dfir/memory/README.md, which requires reproducible processing and recovery of expected artifacts. Require reproducible analysis and artifact recovery here so acquisition-only testing cannot advertise untested triage as Verified.
Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.
Summary
Validation
python3 playbook validate— passedpython3 -m unittest discover -s tests -v— 10 passedgit diff --check— passedBoundaries