docs(test): harden deferred OpenDSS geometry against silent defaults - #480
Draft
BurhanAbdullah wants to merge 2 commits into
Draft
docs(test): harden deferred OpenDSS geometry against silent defaults#480BurhanAbdullah wants to merge 2 commits into
BurhanAbdullah wants to merge 2 commits into
Conversation
Member
|
@BurhanAbdullah thank you so much for your contribution. :) |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
This draft contributes a regression harness and a concrete safety contract for the geometry-normalization issue in #479.
The current reader can normalize
Lineobjects that reference the deferred OpenDSS geometry family using theLineclass factory impedance defaults, while also deriving conductor count from the balanced phase default. The result can be electrically wrong before any writer is invoked.Included
Why draft
The canonical
DistLinecurrently requires a concretelinecodeand impedance matrices. A complete fix therefore needs an intentional representation for a deferred/unresolved line rather than replacing the impedance with a sentinel that could accidentally reach a solver. I have deliberately not introduced a speculative schema change in this PR.The target invariant is:
Explicit
linecode=paths remain unchanged.Closes the implementation gap described by #479 once the deferred-line representation is agreed.