chore: trigger security review on label add - #6754
Merged
DmytroZaichenkoDev merged 1 commit intoMay 18, 2026
Merged
Conversation
Adds 'labeled' to the security-review workflow's pull_request activity types so applying the 'security-review' label after the PR is opened fires the workflow. Previously the workflow only ran on opened or synchronize, so labels applied post-creation (e.g. via gh pr create --label, which applies the label as a separate API call) didn't trigger a run. The existing label-presence check in the job's if condition continues to gate execution. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
Context
Observed on test PR #6753: the initial `opened` event fired with an empty labels array (label was applied a moment later), so the job was skipped. A subsequent push made it run because `synchronize` saw the label present.
🤖 Generated with Claude Code