fix ACDT 083 client/name transcript typos

public/artifacts/acdt/2026-06-15_083/transcript_corrected.vtt

@@ -522,15 +522,15 @@ Potuz: We should phrase the discussion on whether or not we want this design or
 
 131
 00:24:08.420 --> 00:24:16.829
-Potuz: It's false that we would need more time to implement the mitigations. The mitigations took less than a couple of days, Terence, to implement on PRISM.
+Potuz: It's false that we would need more time to implement the mitigations. The mitigations took less than a couple of days, Terence, to implement on Prysm.
 
 132
 00:24:17.070 --> 00:24:31.879
 Potuz: So, it's a reality. We are going to delay the fork, because it needs coordination across different layers, testing the EL and the CL, we're going to change the API. The question is, do we want to do this right now or not? It's not a question about this particular attack.
 
 133
 00:24:35.810 --> 00:24:39.910
-dan (danceratopz): Thanks a lot, Potus, for the perspective. Yeah.
+dan (danceratopz): Thanks a lot, Potuz, for the perspective. Yeah.
 
 134
 00:24:40.100 --> 00:24:42.120
@@ -622,7 +622,7 @@ dan (danceratopz): Otherwise, yeah, please put your thinking caps on and comment
 
 156
 00:27:23.130 --> 00:27:25.829
-dan (danceratopz): what we… what we need to do? Potus?
+dan (danceratopz): what we… what we need to do? Potuz?
 
 157
 00:27:26.790 --> 00:27:41.660
@@ -638,7 +638,7 @@ Potuz: So, DCIP is not preventing a cache that we need to handle at the fork. Yo
 
 160
 00:28:06.060 --> 00:28:07.830
-dan (danceratopz): Thank you, Potuz Dragon.
+dan (danceratopz): Thank you, Potuz Dragan.
 
 161
 00:28:09.040 --> 00:28:14.640
@@ -742,15 +742,15 @@ Potuz: And even at today's block sizes. And it's not what we're going to be broa
 
 186
 00:30:51.630 --> 00:31:07.719
-Potuz: the same 2 seconds for propagation plus execution, and on top of that, we're going to be broadcasting a block that is not 90% smaller, it's going to be twice as large as today. So I think it's just crazy to try to ship any gas limit now without EPBS.
+Potuz: the same 2 seconds for propagation plus execution, and on top of that, we're going to be broadcasting a block that is not 90% smaller, it's going to be twice as large as today. So I think it's just crazy to try to ship any gas limit now without ePBS.
 
 187
 00:31:13.130 --> 00:31:15.699
-dan (danceratopz): Thank you, Potus. Yeah, I mean…
+dan (danceratopz): Thank you, Potuz. Yeah, I mean…
 
 188
 00:31:15.910 --> 00:31:22.509
-dan (danceratopz): The other… on the other side, the other question that Terrence raises is, would this really delay EPBS by 3 months?
+dan (danceratopz): The other… on the other side, the other question that Terrence raises is, would this really delay ePBS by 3 months?
 
 189
 00:31:23.670 --> 00:31:25.770
@@ -794,7 +794,7 @@ Berlin People: Okay, but we're still targeting about 100 megas… 100 million ga
 
 199
 00:32:27.170 --> 00:32:38.169
-Potuz: That again, that again is without the propagation. So it's not about execution, it's execution plus propagation. We don't get the decoupling if we don't ship EPBS.
+Potuz: That again, that again is without the propagation. So it's not about execution, it's execution plus propagation. We don't get the decoupling if we don't ship ePBS.
 
 200
 00:32:38.500 --> 00:32:50.509
@@ -830,7 +830,7 @@ Dragan Rakita: We can… we can even be real, like, conservative and just leave
 
 208
 00:33:23.610 --> 00:33:31.830
-Dragan Rakita: comes. But I don't see the point, basically, that we need… we need EPBS to increase the gas
+Dragan Rakita: comes. But I don't see the point, basically, that we need… we need ePBS to increase the gas
 
 209
 00:33:32.230 --> 00:33:37.660
@@ -926,7 +926,7 @@ Dragan Rakita: Just, like, information.
 
 232
 00:35:55.760 --> 00:35:58.779
-dan (danceratopz): Thanks, Barnabas. Thanks, Dragon.
+dan (danceratopz): Thanks, Barnabas. Thanks, Dragan.
 
 233
 00:35:59.870 --> 00:36:06.870