[Don't merge] Feature/2003 [Spike] Moving debt values out of annotations

[Elaine-Krauss-TCG]

Ticket link: here

Related PRs:

[sasha-dresden]

This looks amazing! I definitely like having this in the database over the transaction_view. I know the ticket had mentioned removing the transaction_view altogether. Did we maybe want a follow up ticket to remove that? Or maybe there's still some lingering information in the transaction_view that we need.

[Elaine-Krauss-TCG]

This looks amazing! I definitely like having this in the database over the transaction_view. I know the ticket had mentioned removing the transaction_view altogether. Did we maybe want a follow up ticket to remove that? Or maybe there's still some lingering information in the transaction_view that we need.

I talked with Todd briefly about this last week. Removing the transaction_view is definitely a goal, but not for this ticket. There's a few more annotated fields that we're leaning on, namely annotation that copy values from the schedule objects into a standardized format on the transaction object (e.g, "Amount" or "Date").

[sonarqubecloud]

Quality Gate failed

Failed conditions
4 Security Hotspots
6.9% Duplication on New Code (required ≤ 3%)

See analysis details on SonarQube Cloud