Repository navigation
wiki: does an LLM know when a fact is missing? - #34
Merged
Merged
Conversation
The missing-facts measurement, out of the README and into a page of its own: the experiment, how to read an AUROC, the four tasks, what it means for a review band, and what it does not show. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
A Measurements page for the missing-facts chart removed from the README in #32: the experiment, how to read the AUROC, the four tasks with their counts, what it means for a review band, and its limits. Linked from the Measurements hub and from two related pages. Wiki-only change.
🤖 Generated with Claude Code