You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
This issue supersedes #2600 (Consolidate the CALM platform) and #2857 (CalmStudio roadmap H2 2026). Both are closed in favour of this one. The direction agreed on 2026-07-28 (#2857 comment, WG 2026-07-28) is the starting point here, not the desktop-Studio target state in #2600.
Target Project:
Cross-cutting: calm-hub, calm-hub-ui, calm-plugins/vscode, calm-widgets, shared, calm-models, calm-studio. Led by @byrash, with @jpgough-ms and @initcron contributing.
Description of Feature:
Unify the CALM authoring and visualisation tooling onto one stack:
Layer
Target
Visualisation
One React Flow visualisation package, used by CALM Hub UI and the VS Code extension
Layout
One layout model (x, y, w, h per node), persisted identically by Hub and VS Code
Editing
Hub gains a studio mode (edit node/relationship properties, save through the Hub API); VS Code extension edits the same documents
Backend
CALM Hub API decoupled from Hub UI; OIDC and Git/SCM backing stores
CalmStudio
Useful pieces (node packs, palette, validation panel, nested containers) move into Hub; the SvelteKit app retires at parity
Enterprises that must stay read-only get Hub in standalone mode; studio mode is opt-in.
User Stories:
As an architect, I want the same diagram in Hub and VS Code so that a layout I save in one renders identically in the other.
As an architect, I want to edit an architecture visually in Hub or VS Code so that I do not need a third tool.
As a platform owner, I want one visualisation stack so that a rendering fix is made in one place.
As an enterprise admin, I want Hub to run read-only so that governed content cannot be edited in place.
Current Limitations:
Three renderers (Hub UI, VS Code extension, CalmStudio) with divergent layout formats.
CalmStudio duplicates validation, MCP, and node packs the platform already owns.
Hub UI and Hub API are coupled; Hub has no edit surface.
Proposed Implementation:
Tracked as sub-issues of this issue. Existing issues are attached as-is; new ones are opened as phases start.
Migration note for CalmStudio users at retirement.
Implementation Checklist:
Design reviewed and approved
Implementation completed
Tests written and passing
Documentation updated
Relevant workflows updated (if needed)
Performance impact assessed
Additional Context:
The static render path (calm-widgets, docs embed, SVG export) stays separate from the interactive React Flow canvas: one set of view semantics, two render targets. Views (#2344) are the common contract.
The #2857 thread proposed @jpgough-ms as lead. I would like input from the other maintainers here on whether @byrash leads overall with Jim owning the Hub pieces, or the reverse.
Feature Proposal
Important
This issue supersedes #2600 (Consolidate the CALM platform) and #2857 (CalmStudio roadmap H2 2026). Both are closed in favour of this one. The direction agreed on 2026-07-28 (#2857 comment, WG 2026-07-28) is the starting point here, not the desktop-Studio target state in #2600.
Target Project:
Cross-cutting:
calm-hub,calm-hub-ui,calm-plugins/vscode,calm-widgets,shared,calm-models,calm-studio. Led by @byrash, with @jpgough-ms and @initcron contributing.Description of Feature:
Unify the CALM authoring and visualisation tooling onto one stack:
x, y, w, hper node), persisted identically by Hub and VS CodeEnterprises that must stay read-only get Hub in standalone mode; studio mode is opt-in.
User Stories:
Current Limitations:
Proposed Implementation:
Tracked as sub-issues of this issue. Existing issues are attached as-is; new ones are opened as phases start.
Disposition of the #2600 track issues:
Testing Strategy:
Per sub-issue. The shared visualisation package needs a render-parity test between Hub UI and the VS Code extension.
Documentation Requirements:
Implementation Checklist:
Additional Context:
The static render path (
calm-widgets, docs embed, SVG export) stays separate from the interactive React Flow canvas: one set of view semantics, two render targets. Views (#2344) are the common contract.The #2857 thread proposed @jpgough-ms as lead. I would like input from the other maintainers here on whether @byrash leads overall with Jim owning the Hub pieces, or the reverse.