Conversation
|
Would an alternative be to move/fork tenca to the FSR org? Keeping this project small was one of the design goals at the beginning IIRC |
|
The rationale behind this decision was that it is cumbersome to apply changes in two repos that depend on each other if there is no need to separate the code. tenca is a very specialized library and most likely nobody but us is using it. So there is no actual benefit from publishing it as a separate library. Adding a new feature to our mailing lists (for example #582 that I did recently) currently requires you to set up an editable installation of tenca in you venv, apply your changes to the tenca and myHPI source, then have your changes at tenca reviewed, wait for a new tenca version to be released, until you can finally submit a ready-to-merge PR to myHPI with the new tenca version in the dependencies. Including tenca in the myHPI source tree makes this much easier. |
The mailman templates are served as text/plain
Because of better maintainability and expandability, we wanted to integrate the tenca code into myHPI.
ToDo: