docs(fork-prs): mark #23 done, drop resolved conflict notes - #80
Merged
Conversation
Issue #23 (captive-portal detection) was closed and merged via PR #48 on 2026-08-18 but the tracker table was never updated to reflect it — the only row still missing a done marker. Also prunes the Notes section's two "conflicts to resolve before scoping" callouts (#11, #2-vs-#17), both already resolved in their own rows. Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What
Row 4 (issue #23, captive-portal detection) was the only row in the
"worth pulling" table without a ✅/done marker, despite the issue
being closed and merged via #48 on 2026-08-18. Marked it done with a
summary matching the other landed rows' style.
Also drops the Notes section's two "conflicts to resolve before
scoping PRs" callouts — both (#11's
ip_input()/netif->inputdisagreement, and #2-vs-#17's teardown UAF overlap) are already
resolved in their own rows; the notes were leftover from before
scoping happened.
Why
Found while auditing FORK_PRS.md against live GitHub issue state —
gh issue listshows #37 as the only genuinely open issue onfugo101/microlink, but the file itself disagreed for row 4.Test plan
Docs-only change, no code touched.