Skip to content

feat: completed implementation of 'worst_case' combination rule - #13

Merged
geval-labs merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
update-worst-case-logic-ordering
Mar 25, 2026
Merged

feat: completed implementation of 'worst_case' combination rule#13
geval-labs merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
update-worst-case-logic-ordering

Conversation

@overseek944

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator
  • Revised README and various documentation files to replace references of the 'all_pass' and 'any_block_blocks' combination rules with the new 'worst_case' rule, which prioritizes outcomes as BLOCK > REQUIRE_APPROVAL > PASS.
  • Enhanced explanations of policy evaluation, emphasizing unique rule priorities and the evaluation process.
  • Updated examples and demo documentation to align with the new combination rule, ensuring clarity for users on how decisions are made.
  • Adjusted CLI command descriptions and artifact formats to reflect the changes in decision-making logic.

- Revised README and various documentation files to replace references of the 'all_pass' and 'any_block_blocks' combination rules with the new 'worst_case' rule, which prioritizes outcomes as BLOCK > REQUIRE_APPROVAL > PASS.
- Enhanced explanations of policy evaluation, emphasizing unique rule priorities and the evaluation process.
- Updated examples and demo documentation to align with the new combination rule, ensuring clarity for users on how decisions are made.
- Adjusted CLI command descriptions and artifact formats to reflect the changes in decision-making logic.

@geval-labs geval-labs left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@geval-labs
geval-labs merged commit 17295b1 into main Mar 25, 2026
1 check passed
@overseek944
overseek944 deleted the update-worst-case-logic-ordering branch March 25, 2026 19:52
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants