Add super-minimal support for enum.member()#1931
Merged
Merged
Conversation
copybara-service
Bot
force-pushed
the
cl/820345768
branch
2 times, most recently
from
4f487a3 to
0a41057
Compare
PiperOrigin-RevId: 821615588
copybara-service
Bot
force-pushed
the
cl/820345768
branch
from
0a41057 to
268c04b
Compare
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Add super-minimal support for
enum.member()This implementation is just as a no-op pass-through. This wrapper is not actually supposed to be no-op, but this is a close enough approximation. PyType already treats every member of an enum as a member. Wrapping it into
enum.member()only makes it explicit and gives you the ability to write code that is compatible with both PyType and Python 3.13, which doesn't actually make everything a member anymore.