Follow-up from #8 review.
- The comment track (
evals/prompts/review.txt, eval-0 … eval-4) still uses the old opener and was not re-measured under @anthropic-ai/claude-agent-sdk 0.3.252. It likely needs the same treatment as quality.txt: name the skill explicitly (code-review:comment-review) and ask for a report-only run.
- The three scanner-track prompts (
security.txt, performance.txt, spec.txt) hardcode the standards slot to "none", so the new lenses' <standards> path — any lens raising a standards finding — has no eval coverage. Add a standards-slot variant to at least one scanner-track eval.
https://claude.ai/code/session_01BcNztjBNBtjwfTRzbYEZjR
Follow-up from #8 review.
evals/prompts/review.txt, eval-0 … eval-4) still uses the old opener and was not re-measured under@anthropic-ai/claude-agent-sdk0.3.252. It likely needs the same treatment asquality.txt: name the skill explicitly (code-review:comment-review) and ask for a report-only run.security.txt,performance.txt,spec.txt) hardcode the standards slot to "none", so the new lenses'<standards>path — any lens raising astandardsfinding — has no eval coverage. Add a standards-slot variant to at least one scanner-track eval.https://claude.ai/code/session_01BcNztjBNBtjwfTRzbYEZjR