Update napi Rust crates to v3 (major)

[hash-worker]

This PR contains the following updates:

Package	Type	Update	Change
napi	workspace.dependencies	major	2.16.17 -> 3.0.0
napi-derive	workspace.dependencies	major	2.16.13 -> 3.0.0

---

Warning

Some dependencies could not be looked up. Check the Dependency Dashboard for more information.

---

Release Notes

napi-rs/napi-rs (napi)

v3.7.1

Compare Source

Other

• clippy fix for Rust 1.92.0 (#​3058)

v3.7.0

Compare Source

Added

• (napi) provide unsafe as_mut on ArrayBuffer (#​3055)
• (napi) support Promise.resolve/reject (#​3053)

v3.6.1

Compare Source

Other

• updated the following local packages: napi-sys

v3.6.0

Compare Source

Added

• (napi-derive) add tracing feature for debug logging NAPI function calls (#​3041)
• (napi) add node_api_create_object_with_properties support for enum creation (#​2990)

Fixed

• (napi) bigInt comparison (#​3039)
• (napi) shutdown runtime at env cleanup on windows (#​3026)

Other

• (napi) add back pub NODE_VERSION_* (#​3046)
• (sys) add back non dyn-symbols behavior (#​3045)
• (napi) add Eq and PartialEq trait to BigInt (#​3033)
• update MSRV in README.md (#​3023)

v3.5.2

Compare Source

Other

• updated the following local packages: napi-build

v3.5.1

Compare Source

Fixed

• (napi) TypedArraySlice creation (#​3004)

Other

• (napi) Promise and ThreadsafeFunction::call_async don't require tokio (#​2998)

v3.5.0

Compare Source

Added

• (sys) use libloading to load napi symbols at runtime on all platform (#​2996)

Fixed

• (napi) memory leak in PromiseRaw cleanup callback (#​2995)

Other

• (napi) mark tsfn data as pub and split SendableResolver to indent file (#​2992)
• (napi) mark SendableResolver and PromiseRaw as pub (#​2981)
• add sponsors

v3.4.0

Compare Source

Added

• (napi-derive) add tracing feature for debug logging NAPI function calls (#​3041)

Fixed

• (deps) update rust crate convert_case to 0.10 (#​3031)

v3.3.0

Compare Source

Added

• (napi-derive) add discriminant_case to allow changing case of discriminant (#​2960)

Fixed

• (deps) update rust crate ctor to v0.6.0 (#​2951)

Other

• (napi) bump rust-version (#​2966)

v3.2.4

Compare Source

Other

• updated the following local packages: napi-derive-backend

v3.2.3

Compare Source

Fixed

• (napi) link issue on cargo test --features noop (#​2872)
• (deps) update rust crate ctor to v0.5.0 (#​2865)

v3.2.2

Compare Source

Other

• updated the following local packages: napi-derive-backend

v3.2.1

Compare Source

Other

• updated the following local packages: napi-derive-backend

v3.2.0

Compare Source

Added

• (napi) add ScopeGenerator trait (#​2831)
• make generator an iterator (#​2784)

v3.1.6

Compare Source

Fixed

• (napi) async task finally is not called (#​2824) This was introduced in #​2786, released in 3.1.0

v3.1.5

Compare Source

Fixed

• (napi) relax the lifetime restriction in PromiseRaw callbacks (#​2819)

v3.1.4

Compare Source

Fixed

• (napi) the generic trait rectiction of Env::spawn should be ScopedTask (#​2817)

v3.1.3

Compare Source

Other

• (napi) optimize HashMap allocation in FromNapiValue implementation for HashMap (#​2796)

v3.1.2

Compare Source

Other

• updated the following local packages: napi-derive-backend

v3.1.1

Compare Source

Other

• updated the following local packages: napi-derive-backend

v3.1.0

Compare Source

Added

• (napi) provide ScopedTask to resolve JsValue with lifetime (#​2786)

Other

• pin release-plz action

v3.0.0

Compare Source

---

Configuration

📅 Schedule: Branch creation - "before 4am every weekday,every weekend" (UTC), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Enabled.

♻ Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about these updates again.

---

• If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

---

This PR has been generated by Renovate Bot.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 59.02%. Comparing base (6d184f2) to head (a83194e).

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #7647      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   59.02%   59.02%   -0.01%     
==========================================
  Files        1187     1187              
  Lines      112486   112486              
  Branches     4939     4939              
==========================================
- Hits        66394    66393       -1     
- Misses      45334    45335       +1     
  Partials      758      758              

Flag	Coverage Δ
apps.hash-ai-worker-ts	1.40% <ø> (ø)
apps.hash-api	0.00% <ø> (ø)
blockprotocol.type-system	40.84% <ø> (ø)
local.claude-hooks	0.00% <ø> (ø)
local.harpc-client	51.24% <ø> (ø)
local.hash-graph-sdk	10.88% <ø> (ø)
local.hash-isomorphic-utils	0.00% <ø> (ø)
rust.antsi	0.00% <ø> (ø)
rust.error-stack	90.88% <ø> (ø)
rust.harpc-codec	84.70% <ø> (ø)
rust.harpc-net	96.14% <ø> (-0.02%)	⬇️
rust.harpc-tower	66.80% <ø> (ø)
rust.harpc-types	0.00% <ø> (ø)
rust.harpc-wire-protocol	92.23% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-codec	72.76% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-api	2.89% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-authorization	62.47% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-postgres-store	25.61% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-store	30.54% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-temporal-versioning	47.95% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-types	0.00% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-validation	83.45% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-ast	87.25% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-compiletest	46.65% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-core	82.36% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-diagnostics	72.43% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-eval	68.54% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-hir	89.10% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-mir	88.18% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-syntax-jexpr	94.05% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
• 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

[cursor]

PR Summary

Updates Rust N-API crates to the latest major version.

• Bumps napi from 2.16.17 to 3.0.0 in Cargo.toml
• Bumps napi-derive from 2.16.13 to 3.0.0

^{Written by Cursor Bugbot for commit a83194e. This will update automatically on new commits. Configure here.}

[github-actions]

Benchmark results

@rust/hash-graph-benches – Integrations

policy_resolution_large

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 2002	$$25.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 170 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.826 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.23 \mathrm{ms} \pm 17.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.014 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 1001	$$12.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 85.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.841 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: high, policies: 3314	$$41.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 268 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.045 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$13.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 73.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.531 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: medium, policies: 1526	$$23.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 145 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.742 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 2078	$$26.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 145 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-37.531 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.60 \mathrm{ms} \pm 16.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-82.003 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 1033	$$14.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 96.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-49.858 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

policy_resolution_medium

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 102	$$3.60 \mathrm{ms} \pm 15.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.157 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.83 \mathrm{ms} \pm 16.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.544 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 51	$$3.18 \mathrm{ms} \pm 13.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.589 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: high, policies: 269	$$4.96 \mathrm{ms} \pm 24.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.526 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.38 \mathrm{ms} \pm 16.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.570 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: medium, policies: 107	$$3.91 \mathrm{ms} \pm 17.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.220 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 133	$$4.20 \mathrm{ms} \pm 21.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.091 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.28 \mathrm{ms} \pm 13.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.492 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 63	$$3.87 \mathrm{ms} \pm 23.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.068 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

policy_resolution_none

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 2	$$2.53 \mathrm{ms} \pm 12.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}7.03 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.42 \mathrm{ms} \pm 12.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}4.78 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 1	$$2.47 \mathrm{ms} \pm 10.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.99 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 8	$$2.78 \mathrm{ms} \pm 9.95 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}6.29 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.62 \mathrm{ms} \pm 15.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}5.52 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 3	$$2.78 \mathrm{ms} \pm 13.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}4.03 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

policy_resolution_small

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 52	$$2.94 \mathrm{ms} \pm 14.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}7.04 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.61 \mathrm{ms} \pm 8.43 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}8.16 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 25	$$2.80 \mathrm{ms} \pm 12.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}8.76 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: high, policies: 94	$$3.29 \mathrm{ms} \pm 20.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}7.87 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.84 \mathrm{ms} \pm 10.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}7.31 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: medium, policies: 26	$$3.06 \mathrm{ms} \pm 11.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}7.60 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 66	$$3.16 \mathrm{ms} \pm 14.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}5.88 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.82 \mathrm{ms} \pm 15.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}7.75 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 29	$$3.06 \mathrm{ms} \pm 15.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}7.86 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

read_scaling_complete

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id;one_depth	1 entities	$$38.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 177 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.612 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth	10 entities	$$75.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 528 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.881 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth	25 entities	$$43.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 202 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}3.91 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth	5 entities	$$45.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 214 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.751 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth	50 entities	$$54.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 320 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}3.22 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	1 entities	$$40.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 163 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.67 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	10 entities	$$410 \mathrm{ms} \pm 903 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.742 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	25 entities	$$90.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 373 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-4.104 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	5 entities	$$86.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 375 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}3.53 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	50 entities	$$308 \mathrm{ms} \pm 875 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}10.6 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	1 entities	$$14.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 80.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}3.89 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	10 entities	$$14.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 72.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}3.22 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	25 entities	$$15.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 74.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.01 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	5 entities	$$14.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 69.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}3.66 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	50 entities	$$17.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 83.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.170 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

read_scaling_linkless

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id	1 entities	$$14.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 65.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.643 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	10 entities	$$14.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 65.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.47 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	100 entities	$$14.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 67.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}3.50 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	1000 entities	$$15.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 71.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.05 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	10000 entities	$$22.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 142 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.592 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

representative_read_entity

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/block/v/1	$$29.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 297 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.26 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/book/v/1	$$29.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 261 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.916 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/building/v/1	$$30.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 241 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}5.83 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/organization/v/1	$$29.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 241 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.97 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/page/v/2	$$29.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 294 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}3.74 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/person/v/1	$$31.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 282 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}9.08 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/playlist/v/1	$$29.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 245 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.021 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/song/v/1	$$29.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 301 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.289 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/uk-address/v/1	$$29.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 264 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}3.69 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

representative_read_entity_type

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
get_entity_type_by_id	Account ID: bf5a9ef5-dc3b-43cf-a291-6210c0321eba	$$8.07 \mathrm{ms} \pm 37.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.18 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

representative_read_multiple_entities

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=0	0	$$46.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 266 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.887 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=255	1,resolve_depths=inherit:1;values:255;properties:255;links:127;link_dests:126;type:true	$$93.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 370 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.755 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:0;link_dests:0;type:false	$$52.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 306 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.94 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$59.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 351 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.975 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$67.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 359 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.266 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:2;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$74.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 330 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.251 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=0	0	$$49.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 292 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.32 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=255	1,resolve_depths=inherit:1;values:255;properties:255;links:127;link_dests:126;type:true	$$76.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 392 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.775 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:0;link_dests:0;type:false	$$56.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 292 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.016 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$64.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 263 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.883 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$66.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 324 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.28 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:2;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$66.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 388 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.07 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$

scenarios

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
full_test	query-limited	$$129 \mathrm{ms} \pm 600 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.854 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
full_test	query-unlimited	$$127 \mathrm{ms} \pm 504 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-4.027 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
linked_queries	query-limited	$$39.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 182 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-62.223 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
linked_queries	query-unlimited	$$576 \mathrm{ms} \pm 1.09 \mathrm{ms}\left({\color{gray}-0.557 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph