Skip to content

Sync with sagernet/tailscale:dev (Fix tailscale route, batched InputPackets)#1

Merged
hiddify-com merged 1 commit into
hiddify:v1.92.4-sing-box-1.13-mod.6-efrom
hiddifydeveloper:sync-with-sagernet-dev
Jul 16, 2026
Merged

Sync with sagernet/tailscale:dev (Fix tailscale route, batched InputPackets)#1
hiddify-com merged 1 commit into
hiddify:v1.92.4-sing-box-1.13-mod.6-efrom
hiddifydeveloper:sync-with-sagernet-dev

Conversation

@hiddifydeveloper

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Summary

Updates this branch to sagernet/tailscale:dev's current HEAD (7d3e867, "Fix tailscale route") — the exact commit hiddify-sing-box's go.mod pins as v1.92.4-sing-box-1.13-mod.7.0.20260711004045-7d3e867147ad.

This branch was only 2 commits behind (7d3e86714 Fix tailscale route, ae2dde129 Add batched InputPackets) and 2 ahead (the merge commit + hiddify's wgengine/magicsock.Conn.SendWithoutModify addition from #). Clean merge, no conflicts.

Test plan

  • go build ./wgengine/magicsock/... ./net/... clean in this module
  • Full hiddify-sing-box build (with the full default tag set, including with_tailscale) succeeds against this branch via the replace directive
  • go vet ./protocol/tailscale/... clean on the sing-box side

Note: go build ./... on this module has pre-existing failures in feature/debugportmapper, tsnet/example/tsnet-http-client, and tsconsensus — confirmed these also fail on pristine sagernet/tailscale:dev (unrelated to this merge, and none of these packages are imported by sing-box).

Syncs this branch to sagernet/tailscale:dev's current HEAD
(7d3e867), the exact commit hiddify-sing-box's go.mod pins.
hiddifydeveloper added a commit to hiddifydeveloper/hiddify-sing-box that referenced this pull request Jul 15, 2026
Points replace/tailscale at the sync-with-sagernet-dev branch
(hiddify/tailscale#1), which merges the fork up to the exact
sagernet/tailscale:dev commit go.mod pins. Was 18 commits behind
before this.
@hiddify-com hiddify-com merged commit 6925b9f into hiddify:v1.92.4-sing-box-1.13-mod.6-e Jul 16, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants