π§βπ¬ Advanced Issue β the most complex work in this project: architectural, multi-module, or core-logic changes where the solution itself may need discovering.
Time: ~30+ hours Β· Prerequisites: a proven track record here (β₯1 completed intermediate issue; demonstrated CI/CD proficiency substitutes for workflow-focused issues).
The bar is production-ready: safe, maintainable, architecturally sound.
The task
Problem:
Reading permission holders in a given repository is gated by permissions, requires read permissions.
When we want to track who has permissions in a repo and their activity rates, such as in table:
https://hiero-hackers.github.io/analytics/#tab=Governance&widget=gonedark
We rely on approximating who is a role holder by looking at the config.yaml file from governance https://github.com/hiero-ledger/governance/blob/main/config.yaml and mapping their permissions, then tracking their activity based on these approximated permissions.
If instead we can confirm permissions directly from the github api, we can use our existing activity trackers to plug in to that data, making the solution much more accurate and also lightweight
Impact / what done looks like:
Confirm and migrate from approximating permissions from config.yaml to fetching from github directly with use of this token
Known unknowns and risks:
We do not know if the token will enable this, nor the codebase that needs to be updated
How to work on this
- Claim it: comment
/assign β yes, even at this level; unassigned PRs are closed automatically.
- Propose your design as a comment before building. Cover the approach, the alternatives you rejected, and the system-wide impact. For large changes, say how you'll split the work into reviewable PRs. (
@coderabbitai plan can sketch a starting point, but the design is yours.)
What tends to bite experienced contributors in this repo:
- The dependency DAG in docs/architecture.md is deliberately strict (zero violations today) β a solution that needs a new cross-layer import needs a design conversation first, not an exception.
- The output-contract test pins every CSV, chart, and dashboard artifact the pipelines produce. Changing the output surface means changing the contract on purpose, and downstream dashboard consumers exist.
- Ingestion has deliberate two-layer staleness semantics (TTL cache vs. the durable incremental dataset store with reuse/refresh windows) β read the module docstrings before touching fetch paths; naive "fixes" here reintroduce bugs we've already removed.
π€ AI: tools are welcome; verified work is required β see the AI policy. Fully automated bot PRs are closed.
Before opening your PR:
Review expectations: advanced PRs get probing questions and may take longer than a day β that's the level working as intended. Stuck or want a design sounding board? Comment here β see getting help.
The task
Problem:
Reading permission holders in a given repository is gated by permissions, requires read permissions.
When we want to track who has permissions in a repo and their activity rates, such as in table:
https://hiero-hackers.github.io/analytics/#tab=Governance&widget=gonedark
We rely on approximating who is a role holder by looking at the config.yaml file from governance https://github.com/hiero-ledger/governance/blob/main/config.yaml and mapping their permissions, then tracking their activity based on these approximated permissions.
If instead we can confirm permissions directly from the github api, we can use our existing activity trackers to plug in to that data, making the solution much more accurate and also lightweight
Impact / what done looks like:
Confirm and migrate from approximating permissions from config.yaml to fetching from github directly with use of this token
Known unknowns and risks:
We do not know if the token will enable this, nor the codebase that needs to be updated
How to work on this
/assignβ yes, even at this level; unassigned PRs are closed automatically.@coderabbitai plancan sketch a starting point, but the design is yours.)What tends to bite experienced contributors in this repo:
π€ AI: tools are welcome; verified work is required β see the AI policy. Fully automated bot PRs are closed.
Before opening your PR:
Review expectations: advanced PRs get probing questions and may take longer than a day β that's the level working as intended. Stuck or want a design sounding board? Comment here β see getting help.