Skip to content

hmcts/civil-ccd-definition

BranchesTags

Folders and files

NameName
Last commit message
Last commit date

Latest commit

 

History

3,547 Commits
.git-config/hooks
.git-config/hooks
 
 
.github
.github
 
 
.husky
.husky
 
 
.yarn/releases
.yarn/releases
 
 
__files
__files
 
 
bin
bin
 
 
ccd-definition
ccd-definition
 
 
charts/civil-ccd
charts/civil-ccd
 
 
config
config
 
 
custom-eslint-configs
custom-eslint-configs
 
 
e2e
e2e
 
 
gradle/wrapper
gradle/wrapper
 
 
playwright-e2e
playwright-e2e
 
 
plugins/custom-eslint-plugins
plugins/custom-eslint-plugins
 
 
src
src
 
 
wa/tasks
wa/tasks
 
 
.dockerignore
.dockerignore
 
 
.editorconfig
.editorconfig
 
 
.env.ccd.local
.env.ccd.local
 
 
.env.cui.local
.env.cui.local
 
 
.gitignore
.gitignore
 
 
.nvmrc
.nvmrc
 
 
.prettierignore
.prettierignore
 
 
.prettierrc
.prettierrc
 
 
.travis.yml
.travis.yml
 
 
.yarnrc.yml
.yarnrc.yml
 
 
Jenkinsfile_CNP
Jenkinsfile_CNP
 
 
Jenkinsfile_nightly
Jenkinsfile_nightly
 
 
LICENSE
LICENSE
 
 
README.md
README.md
 
 
build.gradle
build.gradle
 
 
catalog-info.yaml
catalog-info.yaml
 
 
codecept.conf.js
codecept.conf.js
 
 
env.d.ts
env.d.ts
 
 
eslint.config.mjs
eslint.config.mjs
 
 
flowset-studio.xml
flowset-studio.xml
 
 
gradle.lockfile
gradle.lockfile
 
 
gradlew
gradlew
 
 
gradlew.bat
gradlew.bat
 
 
jsconfig.json
jsconfig.json
 
 
lombok.config
lombok.config
 
 
package.json
package.json
 
 
playwright-categories.json
playwright-categories.json
 
 
playwright.config.ts
playwright.config.ts
 
 
saucelabs.conf.js
saucelabs.conf.js
 
 
security.md
security.md
 
 
settings.gradle
settings.gradle
 
 
sonar-project.properties
sonar-project.properties
 
 
steps.d.ts
steps.d.ts
 
 
tsconfig.json
tsconfig.json
 
 
yarn-audit-known-issues
yarn-audit-known-issues
 
 
yarn-error.log
yarn-error.log
 
 
yarn.lock
yarn.lock
 
 

Repository files navigation

civil-ccd-definition

Civil CCD Definition and E2E tests

Contents:

Building and deploying the application

Dependencies

The project is dependent on other Civil repositories:

To set up complete local environment for Civil check civil-sdk

Local Setup

Before running CCD definition imports locally, you need to pull the shared scripts from civil-service:

./bin/pull-latest-civil-shared.sh

This downloads the shared IDAM/CCD helper scripts to bin/shared/. You can optionally specify a branch:

./bin/pull-latest-civil-shared.sh feature-branch

Preview environment

Preview environment will be created when opening new PR. Camunda BPMN definitions will be pulled from the latest GitHub release. Service instance will be running the latest image version deployed to ACR.

To access XUI visit url (make sure that it starts with https, otherwise IDAM won't let you log in):

  • https://xui-civil-ccd-pr-PR_NUMBER.service.core-compute-preview.internal

To access Camunda visit url (login and password are both admin):

  • https://camunda-civil-ccd-pr-PR_NUMBER.service.core-compute-preview.internal

The below labels are options to get the different services running on the PR


  "enable_keep_helm" label to retain helm release on preview

  "pr-values:enableNotifyEmails" label to be able to send live notifications on the PR

  "pr-values:elasticsearch" label to have elastic search running - needed for scheduler testing

  "pr-values:enableWA" label to verify work allocation task

  "pr-values:enableHmc" label to enable the HMC integration with services running in AAT.

  "civilServicePr:????" label to point this deployment to a specific civil-service image,
  replace ???? with the correspondent civil-service PR number, e.g. civilServicePr:6215 .

Note: enabling HMC, will create a custom CaseType in definitions and import it to AAT. Please delete the same after use by running:

curl -v -k -X DELETE \
  'http://ccd-definition-store-api-aat.service.core-compute-aat.internal/api/testing-support/cleanup-case-type/{PR_NUMBER}/?caseTypeIds=CIVIL'

Running Crossbrowser tests:

Install saucelabs on local machine

$ yarn test:crossbrowser

Testing

The repo uses codeceptjs framework for e2e tests.

To install dependencies enter yarn install.

To run e2e tests enter yarn test in the command line.

Optional configuration

To run tests with browser window open set SHOW_BROWSER_WINDOW=true. By default, the browser window is hidden.

Smoke test

To run smoke tests enter yarn test:smoke.

Functional tests

To run functional tests enter yarn test:functional.

API test

Before running API tests, you will need the SENDGRID_API_KEY environment variable setup and to be running the service locally along with all containers.

To run API tests enter yarn test:api.

Generating CodeceptJS E2E Test Documentation

Generating test documentation JSON:

  1. yarn test:generate:e2e-ui-data writes e2e/e2e-documentation/results/codeceptjs-ui-tests.json.
  2. yarn test:generate:e2e-api-data writes e2e/e2e-documentation/results/codeceptjs-api-tests.json.

Uploading to Confluence:

  1. Export CONFLUENCE_PERSONAL_ACCESS_TOKEN, CONFLUENCE_BASE_URL, and CONFLUENCE_PAGE_ID.
  2. yarn test:confluence:e2e-ui-table updates the "UI Tests" table on the Confluence page.
  3. yarn test:confluence:e2e-api-table updates the "API Tests" table.
  4. Optional: pass a custom JSON path as the first argument to either script.

Updating README tables:

  1. yarn test:readme:e2e-ui-table refreshes the UI section and yarn test:readme:e2e-api-table refreshes the API section (run both commands to update the entire table set).
  2. Optional: pass a custom JSON path as the first argument to either script (e.g. yarn test:readme:e2e-ui-table ../path/to/ui.json).
  3. Commit README changes if required.
  4. The workflow in .github/workflows/update-readme-docs.yml runs these scripts automatically on master.

UI Test Documentation

Show UI Tests
Test Name Steps Tags Pipelines Functional Test Groups Feature Name File Path Skipped Independent Scenario
1v1 case flags journey 1. api.createClaimWithRepresentedRespondent
2. api.notifyClaim
3. api.notifyClaimDetails
4. api.defendantResponse
5. api.claimantResponse
6. I.createCaseFlags
7. I.validateCaseFlags (skipped)
8. I.manageCaseFlags
9. I.validateUpdatedCaseFlags (skipped)		 @civil-ccd-nightly

@ui-case-flags		 civil-ccd-definition: nightly pr_ft_ui-case-flags 1v1 case flags journey e2e -> tests -> ui_tests -> case-flags -> 1v1_case_flags_test.js no no
1v1 spec case flags journey 1. api_spec.createClaimWithRepresentedRespondent
2. api_spec.defendantResponse
3. api_spec.claimantResponse
4. LRspec.createCaseFlags
5. I.validateCaseFlags (skipped)
6. LRspec.manageCaseFlags
7. I.validateUpdatedCaseFlags (skipped)		 @civil-ccd-nightly

@ui-case-flags		 civil-ccd-definition: nightly pr_ft_ui-case-flags 1v1 spec case flags journey e2e -> tests -> ui_tests -> case-flags -> 1v1_spec_case_flags_test.js no no
Claimant solicitor raise a claim against 2 defendants, one of who is without a solicitor (LiP) should progress case offline 1. I.createCase (skipped) @civil-ccd-nightly

@ui-case-offline		 civil-ccd-definition: nightly pr_ft_ui-case-offline 1v2 Create claim, then automatically goes offline e2e -> tests -> ui_tests -> case-offline -> 1v2CreateClaim_offline_test.js yes yes
1v2DS fast track case progression journey 1. api.createClaimWithRepresentedRespondent
2. api.addCaseNote
3. api.amendClaimDocuments
4. api.notifyClaim
5. api.notifyClaimDetails
6. api.acknowledgeClaim (skipped)
7. api.defendantResponse
8. api.claimantResponse
9. api.assignTaskToUser
10. I.initiateSDO
11. I.evidenceUpload
12. I.evidenceUpload (skipped)
13. I.transferOnlineCase		 @civil-ccd-master

@civil-ccd-pr

@civil-ccd-nightly

@ui-case-progression		 civil-ccd-definition: master

civil-ccd-definition: PR

civil-ccd-definition: nightly		 pr_ft_ui-case-progression 1v2DS fast track case progression journey e2e -> tests -> ui_tests -> case-progression -> 1v2DS_fast_case_progression_test.js no no
1v2DS spec small track case progression journey 1. api_spec_fast.createClaimWithRepresentedRespondent
2. LRspec.respondToClaimFullDefence
3. LRspec.respond1v2DiffLR_FullDefence
4. LRspec.respondToDefence
5. LRspec.initiateSDO
6. LRspec.evidenceUploadSpec (skipped)
7. LRspec.evidenceUploadSpec
8. LRspec.createHearingScheduled
9. LRspec.payHearingFee		 @civil-ccd-master

@civil-ccd-pr

@civil-ccd-nightly

@ui-case-progression		 civil-ccd-definition: master

civil-ccd-definition: PR

civil-ccd-definition: nightly		 pr_ft_ui-case-progression 1v2DS spec small track case progression journey e2e -> tests -> ui_tests -> case-progression -> 1v2DS_spec_small_case_progression_test.js no no
1v2 - one LIP and one LR - notify/notify claim details journey 1. api.createClaimWithRespondentLitigantInPerson
2. I.fillLRNotifyClaimCOSForm
3. I.fillLRNotifyClaimDetailsCOSForm		 @civil-ccd-nightly

@ui-cos		 civil-ccd-definition: nightly pr_ft_ui-cos CCD 1v2LIPLR COS UI test e2e -> tests -> ui_tests -> cos -> 1v2_LIPLR_COS_test.js no yes
1v2 two respondents are LIP - notify/notify claim details journey 1. api.createClaimWithRespondentLitigantInPerson
2. I.fillNotifyClaimCOSForm
3. I.verifyCOSTabDetails
4. I.fillNotifyClaimDetailsCOSForm
5. I.verifyCOSTabNotifyClaimDetails		 @civil-ccd-nightly

@ui-cos		 civil-ccd-definition: nightly pr_ft_ui-cos CCD 1v2 2 LIPs COS UI test e2e -> tests -> ui_tests -> cos -> 1v2LIPs_COS_test.js no yes
Discontinue This Claim After Hearing Schedule - Full discontinuance - 1v1 - spec 1. api.createClaimWithRepresentedRespondent
2. api.amendClaimDocuments
3. api.notifyClaim
4. api.notifyClaimDetails
5. api.defendantResponse
6. api.claimantResponse
7. api.createSDO
8. api.evidenceUploadApplicant
9. api.evidenceUploadRespondent
10. api.scheduleHearing
11. LRspec.requestForDiscontinueThisClaimForUI (skipped)
12. api.assignTaskToUser (skipped)
13. LRspec.requestForValidateDiscontinuanceForUI (skipped)
14. LRspec.addCaseNote (skipped)		 @civil-ccd-nightly

@ui-discontinue-claim		 civil-ccd-definition: nightly pr_ft_ui-discontinue-claim Discontinue This Claim After Hearing Schedule - Full discontinuance - 1v1 - spec e2e -> tests -> ui_tests -> discontinue-claim -> 1v1DiscontinueThisClaim_AfterHearingScheduled_test.js no no
Discontinue This Claim - Full discontinuance - 1v1 - spec 1. api_spec_small.createClaimWithRepresentedRespondent
2. api_spec_small.defendantResponse
3. api_spec_small.claimantResponse
4. LRspec.requestForDiscontinueThisClaimForUI
5. api.assignTaskToUser (skipped)
6. LRspec.requestForValidateDiscontinuanceForUI (skipped)		 @civil-ccd-nightly

@ui-discontinue-claim		 civil-ccd-definition: nightly pr_ft_ui-discontinue-claim Discontinue This Claim - Full discontinuance - 1v1 - spec e2e -> tests -> ui_tests -> discontinue-claim -> 1v1DiscontinueThisClaim_test.js no no
Discontinue This Claim - Hearing Schedule - Full discontinuance - 1v2 - spec 1. api.createClaimWithRepresentedRespondent
2. api.notifyClaim
3. api.notifyClaimDetails
4. api.defendantResponse
5. api.claimantResponse
6. api.createSDO
7. api.scheduleHearing
8. LRspec.requestForDiscontinueThisClaimForUI1v2
9. api.assignTaskToUser
10. LRspec.requestForValidateDiscontinuanceForUI
11. LRspec.addCaseNote		 @u-nightly-prod

@ui-discontinue-claim		 pr_ft_ui-discontinue-claim Discontinue This Claim - Hearing Schedule - Full discontinuance - 1v2 - spec e2e -> tests -> ui_tests -> discontinue-claim -> 1v2DiscontinueThisClaim_AfterHearingScheduled_test.js no no
Discontinue This Claim - Full discontinuance - 1v2 - spec 1. api_spec_small.createClaimWithRepresentedRespondent
2. LRspec.requestForDiscontinueThisClaimForUI1v2
3. api.assignTaskToUser
4. LRspec.requestForValidateDiscontinuanceForUI		 @civil-ccd-nightly

@ui-discontinue-claim		 civil-ccd-definition: nightly pr_ft_ui-discontinue-claim Discontinue This Claim - Full discontinuance - 1v2 - spec e2e -> tests -> ui_tests -> discontinue-claim -> 1v2DiscontinueThisClaim_test.js no no
Discontinue This Claim - Hearing Schedule - Full discontinuance - 2v1 - spec 1. api.createClaimWithRepresentedRespondent
2. api.notifyClaim
3. api.notifyClaimDetails
4. api.defendantResponse
5. api.claimantResponse
6. api.createSDO
7. api.scheduleHearing
8. LRspec.requestForDiscontinueThisClaimForUI2v1
9. api.assignTaskToUser (skipped)
10. LRspec.requestForValidateDiscontinuanceForUI (skipped)
11. LRspec.addCaseNote (skipped)		 @civil-ccd-nightly

@ui-discontinue-claim		 civil-ccd-definition: nightly pr_ft_ui-discontinue-claim Discontinue This Claim - Hearing Schedule - Full discontinuance - 2v1 - spec e2e -> tests -> ui_tests -> discontinue-claim -> 2v1DiscontinueThisClaim_AfterHearingScheduled_test.js no no
Discontinue This Claim - Full discontinuance - 2v1 - spec 1. api_spec_small.createClaimWithRepresentedRespondent
2. LRspec.requestForDiscontinueThisClaimForUI2v1
3. api.assignTaskToUser (skipped)
4. LRspec.requestForValidateDiscontinuanceForUI (skipped)		 @civil-ccd-nightly

@ui-discontinue-claim		 civil-ccd-definition: nightly pr_ft_ui-discontinue-claim Discontinue This Claim - Full discontinuance - 2v1 - spec e2e -> tests -> ui_tests -> discontinue-claim -> 2v1DiscontinueThisClaim_test.js no no
01 Create 1v1 other remedy claim, notify claim, notify claim details, request default judgement 1. api.createClaimWithRepresentedRespondent
2. api.amendClaimDocuments
3. api.notifyClaim
4. api.notifyClaimDetails
5. api.amendRespondent1ResponseDeadline
6. I.initiateDJUnspec		 @civil-ccd-nightly

@ui-other-remedy-dj		 civil-ccd-definition: nightly pr_ft_ui-other-remedy-dj 1v1 Unspec Other Remedy default judgment e2e -> tests -> ui_tests -> dj -> 1v1OtherRemedyDJ_test.js no yes
1v1 create spec claim request default judgment 1. api_spec.createClaimWithRepresentedRespondent
2. api_spec.amendRespondent1ResponseDeadline
3. I.initiateDJSpec		 @civil-ccd-master

@civil-ccd-pr

@civil-ccd-nightly

@ui-dj		 civil-ccd-definition: master

civil-ccd-definition: PR

civil-ccd-definition: nightly		 pr_ft_ui-dj 1v1 spec default judgment e2e -> tests -> ui_tests -> dj -> 1v1specDJ_test.js no yes
1v1 unspec default judgment 1. api.createClaimWithRepresentedRespondent
2. api.amendClaimDocuments
3. api.notifyClaim
4. api.notifyClaimDetails
5. api.amendRespondent1ResponseDeadline
6. I.initiateDJUnspec
7. I.judgeAddsCaseNotes (skipped)
8. api.assignTaskToUser
9. I.judgePerformDJDirectionOrder
10. api.amendHearingDate (skipped)
11. api.amendHearingDate (skipped)
12. WA.runChallengedAccessSteps (skipped)
13. WA.runChallengedAccessSteps (skipped)
14. WA.runChallengedAccessSteps (skipped)
15. WA.runSpecificAccessRequestSteps (skipped)
16. WA.runSpecificAccessApprovalSteps (skipped)
17. WA.verifyApprovedSpecificAccess (skipped)
18. WA.runSpecificAccessRequestSteps (skipped)
19. WA.runSpecificAccessApprovalSteps (skipped)
20. WA.verifyApprovedSpecificAccess (skipped)
21. WA.runSpecificAccessRequestSteps (skipped)
22. WA.runSpecificAccessApprovalSteps (skipped)
23. WA.verifyApprovedSpecificAccess (skipped)
24. WA.runSpecificAccessRequestSteps (skipped)
25. WA.runSpecificAccessApprovalSteps (skipped)
26. WA.verifyApprovedSpecificAccess (skipped)
27. WA.verifyStaffLink (skipped)
28. WA.createBooking (skipped)
29. WA.verifyCreatedBooking (skipped)		 @civil-ccd-nightly

@ui-dj

@civil-ccd-master

@civil-ccd-pr		 civil-ccd-definition: nightly

civil-ccd-definition: master

civil-ccd-definition: PR		 pr_ft_ui-dj 1v1 unspec default judgment e2e -> tests -> ui_tests -> dj -> 1v1UnspecDJ_test.js no no
1v2 create spec claim, request default judgment 1. api_spec.createClaimWithRepresentedRespondent
2. api_spec.amendRespondent1ResponseDeadline
3. I.initiateDJSpec		 @ui-dj pr_ft_ui-dj 1v2 spec defaultJudgement e2e -> tests -> ui_tests -> dj -> 1v2specDJ_test.js no yes
1v2 unspec default judgement 1. api.createClaimWithRepresentedRespondent
2. api.amendClaimDocuments
3. api.notifyClaim
4. api.notifyClaimDetails
5. api.amendRespondent1ResponseDeadline
6. api.amendRespondent2ResponseDeadline
7. I.initiateDJUnspec
8. I.judgeAddsCaseNotes
9. api.assignTaskToUser
10. I.judgePerformDJDirectionOrder
11. I.staffPerformDJCaseTransferCaseOffline		 @civil-ccd-nightly

@ui-dj		 civil-ccd-definition: nightly pr_ft_ui-dj 1v2 unspec default judgement e2e -> tests -> ui_tests -> dj -> 1v2UnspecDJ_test.js no no
Applicant solicitor creates 1v2DS specified claim defendant Different LRs for flight delay 1. LRspec.createCaseSpecifiedForFlightDelay @civil-ccd-nightly

@ui-flight-delay		 civil-ccd-definition: nightly pr_ft_ui-flight-delay Claim creation 1v2 Diff Solicitor with flight delay e2e -> tests -> ui_tests -> flight-delay -> 1v2CreateClaim-LRspec_DiffSol_FlightDelay_test.js no yes
1v1 specified assert general application unavailable before respondent assigned 1. I.verifyNoAccessToGeneralApplications (skipped) @ui-ga-access pr_ft_ui-ga-access 1v1 unspecified assert general application unavailable before respondent assigned e2e -> tests -> ui_tests -> ga -> ga-access -> api_1v1_ga_unavailable_before_assignment_test.js yes yes
1v1 unspecified assert general application unavailable before respondent assigned 1. I.verifyNoAccessToGeneralApplications (skipped) @ui-ga-access pr_ft_ui-ga-access 1v1 unspecified assert general application unavailable before respondent assigned e2e -> tests -> ui_tests -> ga -> ga-access -> api_1v1_ga_unavailable_before_assignment_test.js yes yes
GA for 1v1- respond to application - Request more information 1. I.createGeneralApplication
2. I.clickAndVerifyTab
3. I.payAndVerifyGAStatus
4. I.respondToApplication
5. I.respCloseAndReturnToCaseDetails
6. I.judgeRequestMoreInfo
7. I.judgeCloseAndReturnToCaseDetails
8. I.verifyJudgesSummaryPage
9. I.verifyUploadedApplicationDocument
10. I.respondToJudgeAdditionalInfo		 @civil-ccd-nightly

@ui-ga-add-info		 civil-ccd-definition: nightly pr_ft_ui-ga-add-info GA 1v1 Judge Make Decision Additional Information tests e2e -> tests -> ui_tests -> ga -> ga-add-info -> 1v1_judge_decision_addln_info_test.js no yes
GA for 1v2 Same Solicitor - Send application to other party journey 1. I.createGeneralApplication
2. I.clickAndVerifyTab
3. I.payAndVerifyGAStatus
4. I.judgeRequestMoreInfo
5. I.judgeCloseAndReturnToCaseDetails
6. I.verifyJudgesSummaryPage
7. I.respondToApplication
8. I.verifyCaseFileAppDocument		 @ui-ga-add-info pr_ft_ui-ga-add-info GA CCD 1v2 Same Solicitor - General Application Journey e2e -> tests -> ui_tests -> ga -> ga-add-info -> 1v2SS_addIn_Info_test.js no yes
With Notice application - Org3 Solicitor Initiate GA 1. I.navigateToApplicationsTab @civil-ccd-nightly

@ui-ga-collections		 civil-ccd-definition: nightly pr_ft_ui-ga-collections 1v2 Different Solicitor - General Application Collections test Journey e2e -> tests -> ui_tests -> ga -> ga-collections -> 1v2_different_solicitor_GA_Unspec_collections_test.js no yes
Without Notice application - Org2 Solicitor Initiate GA - Awaiting Written Representations 1. I.navigateToApplicationsTab @civil-ccd-nightly

@ui-ga-collections		 civil-ccd-definition: nightly pr_ft_ui-ga-collections 1v2 Different Solicitor - General Application Collections test Journey e2e -> tests -> ui_tests -> ga -> ga-collections -> 1v2_different_solicitor_GA_Unspec_collections_test.js no yes
NBC admin Approve Consent Order 1. I.approveConsentOrder
2. I.verifyUploadedApplicationDocument
3. I.navigateToApplicationsTab
4. I.verifyUploadedClaimDocument
5. I.verifyCaseFileOrderDocument
6. I.verifyCaseFileAppDocument		 @ui-ga-consent-order pr_ft_ui-ga-consent-order Before SDO 1v2 - GA - Consent Orders e2e -> tests -> ui_tests -> ga -> ga-consent-order -> 1v2_ConsentOrders_test.js no yes
GA for 1v1 - Direction order journey 1. I.createGeneralApplication
2. I.clickAndVerifyTab
3. I.payAndVerifyGAStatus
4. I.judgeMakeDecision
5. I.judgeCloseAndReturnToCaseDetails
6. I.verifyJudgesSummaryPage
7. I.verifyUploadedApplicationDocument
8. I.verifyUploadedClaimDocument
9. I.verifyCaseFileOrderDocument
10. I.verifyCaseFileAppDocument
11. I.respondToJudgesDirections		 @civil-ccd-nightly

@ui-ga-directions-order		 civil-ccd-definition: nightly pr_ft_ui-ga-directions-order GA 1v1 Judge Make Order Directions Order tests e2e -> tests -> ui_tests -> ga -> ga-directions-order -> 1v1_directions_order_test.js no yes
1v1 - Assisted order - Without Further Hearing 1. I.verifyUploadedApplicationDocument
2. I.navigateToApplicationsTab
3. I.verifyUploadedClaimDocument		 @civil-ccd-nightly

@ui-ga-final-order		 civil-ccd-definition: nightly pr_ft_ui-ga-final-order Before SDO 1v1 - GA CP - Applications Orders e2e -> tests -> ui_tests -> ga -> ga-final-order -> 1v1_CP_ApplicationOrders_test.js no yes
1v1 - Free form order - With notice journey 1. I.judgeMakeAppOrder
2. I.judgeCloseAndReturnToCaseDetails
3. I.verifyUploadedApplicationDocument
4. I.navigateToApplicationsTab
5. I.verifyUploadedClaimDocument
6. I.verifyCaseFileOrderDocument
7. I.verifyCaseFileAppDocument		 @civil-ccd-nightly

@ui-ga-final-order		 civil-ccd-definition: nightly pr_ft_ui-ga-final-order Before SDO 1v1 - GA CP - Applications Orders e2e -> tests -> ui_tests -> ga -> ga-final-order -> 1v1_CP_ApplicationOrders_test.js no yes
1v2 - Assisted order - With Further Hearing 1. I.judgeMakeAppOrder
2. I.judgeCloseAndReturnToCaseDetails
3. I.verifyUploadedApplicationDocument
4. I.navigateToApplicationsTab
5. I.verifyUploadedClaimDocument
6. I.verifyCaseFileOrderDocument
7. I.verifyCaseFileAppDocument		 @civil-ccd-master

@civil-ccd-pr

@civil-ccd-nightly

@ui-ga-final-order		 civil-ccd-definition: master

civil-ccd-definition: PR

civil-ccd-definition: nightly		 pr_ft_ui-ga-final-order Before SDO 1v2 - GA CP - Applications Orders e2e -> tests -> ui_tests -> ga -> ga-final-order -> 1v2_CP_ApplicationOrders_test.js no yes
Claimant and Defendant Hearing notice - With notice journey 1. I.navigateToApplicationsTab
2. I.navigateToHearingNoticePage
3. I.fillHearingNotice
4. I.click
5. I.verifyUploadedApplicationDocument
6. I.verifyUploadedClaimDocument		 @civil-ccd-nightly

@ui-ga-hearing-notice		 civil-ccd-definition: nightly pr_ft_ui-ga-hearing-notice Before SDO 1v1 - GA CP - Hearing Notice document e2e -> tests -> ui_tests -> ga -> ga-hearing-notice -> 1v1_CP_HearingNotice_test.js no yes
Claimant Hearing notice - Without notice journey 1. I.navigateToApplicationsTab
2. I.navigateToHearingNoticePage
3. I.fillHearingNotice
4. I.click
5. I.verifyUploadedApplicationDocument
6. I.verifyUploadedClaimDocument
7. I.verifyCaseFileAppDocument
8. I.dontSee		 @civil-ccd-master

@civil-ccd-pr

@civil-ccd-nightly

@ui-ga-hearing-notice		 civil-ccd-definition: master

civil-ccd-definition: PR

civil-ccd-definition: nightly		 pr_ft_ui-ga-hearing-notice After SDO 1v2 - GA CP - Hearing Notice document e2e -> tests -> ui_tests -> ga -> ga-hearing-notice -> 1v2_CP_HearingNotice_AfterSDO_test.js no yes
GA for Specified Claim 1v2 different Solicitor - respond to application - Hearing order journey 1. I.createGeneralApplication (skipped)
2. I.clickAndVerifyTab (skipped)
3. I.verifyNoServiceReqElements (skipped)
4. I.payAndVerifyGAStatus (skipped)
5. I.verifyApplicantSummaryPage (skipped)
6. I.respondToApplication (skipped)
7. I.respCloseAndReturnToCaseDetails (skipped)
8. I.verifyResponseSummaryPage (skipped)
9. I.respondToSameApplicationAndVerifyErrorMsg (skipped)
10. I.judgeListForAHearingDecision (skipped)
11. I.judgeCloseAndReturnToCaseDetails (skipped)
12. I.verifyJudgesSummaryPage (skipped)
13. I.verifyUploadedApplicationDocument (skipped)
14. I.dontSee (skipped)
15. I.verifyCaseFileAppDocument (skipped)		 @civil-ccd-nightly

@ui-ga-hearing-notice		 civil-ccd-definition: nightly pr_ft_ui-ga-hearing-notice GA for Specified Claim 1v2 different Solicitor - respond to application - Hearing order journey e2e -> tests -> ui_tests -> ga -> ga-hearing-notice -> 1v2_spec_hearingNotice_BeforeSDO_test.js yes yes
GA for 1v1 Specified Claim- Dismissal order journey 1. I.createGeneralApplication
2. I.clickAndVerifyTab
3. I.payAndVerifyGAStatus
4. I.judgeMakeDecision
5. I.judgeCloseAndReturnToCaseDetails
6. I.verifyJudgesSummaryPage
7. I.verifyUploadedApplicationDocument
8. I.dontSee
9. I.verifyUploadedClaimDocument
10. I.verifyCaseFileOrderDocument
11. I.verifyCaseFileAppDocument		 @civil-ccd-nightly

@ui-ga-make-decision		 civil-ccd-definition: nightly pr_ft_ui-ga-make-decision GA CCD 1v1 - General Application Journey e2e -> tests -> ui_tests -> ga -> ga-make-decision -> 1v1_application_dissmised_test.js no yes
GA for 1v1 - Makes a decision 1. I.createGeneralApplication
2. I.clickAndVerifyTab
3. I.verifyCaseFileAppDocument
4. I.payAndVerifyGAStatus
5. I.judgeMakeDecision
6. I.judgeCloseAndReturnToCaseDetails
7. I.verifyJudgesSummaryPage
8. I.verifyUploadedApplicationDocument
9. I.verifyUploadedClaimDocument
10. I.verifyCaseFileOrderDocument		 @ui-ga-make-decision pr_ft_ui-ga-make-decision 1v1 Judge makes a decision e2e -> tests -> ui_tests -> ga -> ga-make-decision -> 1v1_judge_makes_decision_test.js no yes
GA for 1v2 Same Solicitor - respond to application - Sequential written representations journey 1. I.createGeneralApplication
2. I.clickAndVerifyTab
3. I.payAndVerifyGAStatus
4. I.respondToApplication
5. I.respCloseAndReturnToCaseDetails
6. I.verifyResponseSummaryPage
7. I.judgeWrittenRepresentationsDecision
8. I.judgeCloseAndReturnToCaseDetails
9. I.verifyJudgesSummaryPage
10. I.verifyUploadedApplicationDocument
11. I.respondToJudgesWrittenRep
12. I.verifyCaseFileAppDocument		 @ui-ga-make-decision pr_ft_ui-ga-make-decision GA CCD 1v2 Same Solicitor - General Application Journey e2e -> tests -> ui_tests -> ga -> ga-make-decision -> 1v2SS_make_decision_test.js no yes
GA for 2v1 - Concurrent written representations - without notice to with notice journey 1. I.createGeneralApplication
2. I.clickAndVerifyTab
3. I.payAndVerifyGAStatus
4. I.judgeWrittenRepresentationsDecision
5. I.judgeCloseAndReturnToCaseDetails
6. I.verifyJudgesSummaryPage
7. I.verifyUploadedApplicationDocument
8. I.respondToJudgesWrittenRep
9. I.verifyCaseFileAppDocument		 @civil-ccd-nightly

@ui-ga-make-decision		 civil-ccd-definition: nightly pr_ft_ui-ga-make-decision GA CCD 2v1 - General Application Journey e2e -> tests -> ui_tests -> ga -> ga-make-decision -> 2v1_make_decision_test.js no yes
With Notice application - Org2 Solicitor Initiate GA 1. I.navigateToApplicationsTab @civil-ccd-nightly

@ui-ga-notice		 civil-ccd-definition: nightly pr_ft_ui-ga-notice 1v2 Different Solicitor - General Application Journey e2e -> tests -> ui_tests -> ga -> ga-notice -> 1v2DS_Without_With_Notice_test.js no yes
Without Notice application for a hearing 1. I.navigateToApplicationsTab @civil-ccd-nightly

@ui-ga-notice		 civil-ccd-definition: nightly pr_ft_ui-ga-notice 1v2 Different Solicitor - General Application Journey e2e -> tests -> ui_tests -> ga -> ga-notice -> 1v2DS_Without_With_Notice_test.js no yes
Defendant of main claim initiates Vary payment terms of judgment application 1. I.verifyNoN245Form (skipped)
2. I.initiateVaryJudgementGA (skipped)
3. I.clickAndVerifyTab (skipped)
4. I.verifyN245FormElements (skipped)
5. I.clickOnTab (skipped)
6. I.verifyCaseFileAppDocument (skipped)
7. I.payAndVerifyGAStatus (skipped)
8. I.respondToVaryJudgementApp (skipped)
9. I.respCloseAndReturnToCaseDetails (skipped)		 @civil-ccd-nightly

@ui-ga-vary-payment		 civil-ccd-definition: nightly pr_ft_ui-ga-vary-payment GA 1v1 Vary Payment Terms of Judgment - General Application Journey e2e -> tests -> ui_tests -> ga -> ga-vary-payment -> 1v1_vary_payment_terms_test.js yes yes
After SDO GA - Judge Make decision - HC admin schedule Hearing 1. I.judgeListForAHearingDecisionWA
2. I.fillHearingNotice		 @ui-ga-wa pr_ft_ui-ga-wa 1v1 UnSpec claim: GA - WA Scenarios e2e -> tests -> ui_tests -> ga -> ga-wa -> 1v1_Unspec_GA_WA_scheduleHearing_test.js no yes
Before SDO GA - Judge Make decision - NBC admin schedule Hearing 1. I.judgeListForAHearingDecisionWA (skipped)
2. I.fillHearingNotice (skipped)		 @ui-ga-wa pr_ft_ui-ga-wa 1v1 UnSpec claim: GA - WA Scenarios e2e -> tests -> ui_tests -> ga -> ga-wa -> 1v1_Unspec_GA_WA_scheduleHearing_test.js yes yes
Before SDO GA - LA Make decision - NBC admin schedule Hearing 1. I.judgeListForAHearingDecisionWA (skipped)
2. I.fillHearingNotice (skipped)		 @ui-ga-wa pr_ft_ui-ga-wa 1v1 UnSpec claim: GA - WA Scenarios e2e -> tests -> ui_tests -> ga -> ga-wa -> 1v1_Unspec_GA_WA_scheduleHearing_test.js yes yes
After SDO GA - Change court location - HC admin review application order 1. I.judgeListForAHearingDecisionWA (skipped)
2. I.fillHearingNotice (skipped)		 @ui-ga-wa pr_ft_ui-ga-wa 1v2 Spec claim: GA - WA Scenarios e2e -> tests -> ui_tests -> ga -> ga-wa -> 1v2_Spec_GA_WA_reviewAppOrder_test.js yes yes
LA refer to judge - R2 Judge Make decision - NBC admin schedule Hearing 1. I.judgeListForAHearingDecisionWA (skipped)
2. I.fillHearingNotice (skipped)		 @ui-ga-wa pr_ft_ui-ga-wa 1v2 Spec claim: GA - WA Scenarios e2e -> tests -> ui_tests -> ga -> ga-wa -> 1v2_Spec_GA_WA_reviewAppOrder_test.js yes yes
1v2 Diff Sols Hearing Request Journey 1. api.createClaimWithRepresentedRespondent
2. api.amendClaimDocuments
3. api.notifyClaim
4. api.notifyClaimDetails
5. api.defendantResponse
6. api.claimantResponse
7. api.createSDO
8. I.requestNewHearing
9. I.updateHearing
10. I.cancelHearing		 @civil-ccd-nightly

@ui-hearings		 civil-ccd-definition: nightly pr_ft_ui-hearings 1v2 Diff Sols Hearing Request Journey e2e -> tests -> ui_tests -> hearings -> 1v2_Diff_Sols_Create_fast_track_With_Hearing_Request_test.js no no
1v2DS unspec intermediate track 1. api.createClaimWithRepresentedRespondent
2. api.notifyClaim
3. api.notifyClaimDetails
4. api.defendantResponse
5. api.claimantResponse
6. api.createFinalOrder
7. api.scheduleHearing
8. I.initiateFinalOrder
9. I.evidenceUpload		 @civil-ccd-nightly

@ui-intermediate-track		 civil-ccd-definition: nightly pr_ft_ui-intermediate-track 1v2DS unspec intermediate track journey e2e -> tests -> ui_tests -> intermediate-track -> 1v2DS_intermediate_track_test.js no yes
1v2DS spec intermediate track 1. api_spec.createClaimWithRepresentedRespondent
2. api_spec.defendantResponse
3. api_spec.claimantResponse
4. api_spec.createFinalOrderJO
5. api_spec.scheduleHearing
6. api_spec.amendHearingDueDate
7. api_spec.hearingFeePaid
8. I.evidenceUpload		 @ui-intermediate-track pr_ft_ui-intermediate-track 1v2DS spec intermediate track journey e2e -> tests -> ui_tests -> intermediate-track -> 1v2DS_spec_intermediate_track_test.js no yes
1v2SS unspec intermediate track 1. api.createClaimWithRepresentedRespondent
2. api.notifyClaim
3. api.notifyClaimDetails
4. api.defendantResponse
5. api.claimantResponse
6. I.initiateFinalOrder
7. I.evidenceUpload
8. I.verifyBundleDetails		 @civil-ccd-nightly

@ui-intermediate-track		 civil-ccd-definition: nightly pr_ft_ui-intermediate-track 1v2SS unspec intermediate track journey e2e -> tests -> ui_tests -> intermediate-track -> 1v2SS_intermediate_track_test.js no yes
1vLIP spec multi track 1. api_spec_cui.createSpecifiedClaimWithUnrepresentedRespondent
2. api_spec_cui.performCitizenDefendantResponse
3. I.respondToDefenceMinti		 @civil-ccd-nightly

@ui-intermediate-track		 civil-ccd-definition: nightly pr_ft_ui-intermediate-track 1vLIP spec multi track journey e2e -> tests -> ui_tests -> intermediate-track -> 1vLIP_spec_intermediate_track_test.js no yes
1v1 Spec Defence Received in Time Judgment Set Aside 1. api_spec.createClaimWithRepresentedRespondent
2. api_spec.amendRespondent1ResponseDeadline
3. I.initiateDJSpec
4. LRspec.requestReferToJudgeDefendedClaim
5. api.assignTaskToUser
6. LRspec.generateDirectionsOrder		 @civil-ccd-nightly

@ui-jo		 civil-ccd-definition: nightly pr_ft_ui-jo 1v1 Spec Defence Received in Time Judgment Set Aside e2e -> tests -> ui_tests -> jo -> 1v1specDJReferToJudgeDefendedClaim_test.js no no
1v1 Spec Set Aside Judgment Following Application 1. api_spec.createClaimWithRepresentedRespondent
2. api_spec.amendRespondent1ResponseDeadline
3. I.initiateDJSpec
4. LRspec.requestSetAsideJudgmentFollowingApplication
5. api.assignTaskToUser
6. LRspec.caseProceedsInCaseman		 @civil-ccd-nightly

@ui-jo		 civil-ccd-definition: nightly pr_ft_ui-jo 1v1 Spec Set Aside Judgment Following Application e2e -> tests -> ui_tests -> jo -> 1v1specDJSetAsideJudgmentFollowingApplication_test.js no no
1v1 Spec Set Aside Judgment Following Receiving Defence 1. api_spec.createClaimWithRepresentedRespondent
2. api_spec.amendRespondent1ResponseDeadline
3. I.initiateDJSpec
4. LRspec.requestSetAsideJudgmentFollowingDefenceReceived
5. api.assignTaskToUser
6. LRspec.caseProceedsInCaseman		 @civil-ccd-nightly

@ui-jo		 civil-ccd-definition: nightly pr_ft_ui-jo 1v1 Spec Set Aside Judgment Following Receiving Defence e2e -> tests -> ui_tests -> jo -> 1v1specDJSetAsideJudgmentFollowingDefenceReceived_test.js no no
1v1 Spec Set Aside Judgment Following Judgment Made in Error 1. api_spec.createClaimWithRepresentedRespondent
2. api_spec.amendRespondent1ResponseDeadline
3. I.initiateDJSpec
4. LRspec.requestSetAsideJudgmentMadeInError
5. api.assignTaskToUser
6. LRspec.caseProceedsInCaseman		 @civil-ccd-nightly

@ui-jo		 civil-ccd-definition: nightly pr_ft_ui-jo 1v1 Spec Set Aside Judgment Following Judgment Made in Error e2e -> tests -> ui_tests -> jo -> 1v1specDJSetAsideJudgmentHasBeenMadeInError_test.js no no
1v2 Same Solicitor - Manage Contact Information 1. api.createClaimWithRepresentedRespondent
2. api.notifyClaim
3. api.notifyClaimDetails
4. api.addDefendantLitigationFriend
5. api.defendantResponse
6. api.claimantResponse
7. I.manageWitnessesForDefendant
8. I.manageOrganisationIndividualsForClaimant
9. I.manageLitigationFriendForDefendant
10. I.manageDefendant		 @civil-ccd-nightly

@ui-mci		 civil-ccd-definition: nightly pr_ft_ui-mci 1v2 Same Solicitor - Manage Contact Information e2e -> tests -> ui_tests -> mci -> 1v2SameSolicitor_manageContactInformation_test.js no no
1v2SS SDO Carm - Upload mediation documents 1. api_spec.createClaimWithRepresentedRespondent
2. api_spec.defendantResponse
3. api_spec.claimantResponse
4. api_spec.createSDO
5. LRspec.uploadMediationDocs
6. api_spec.scheduleHearing
7. LRspec.uploadMediationDocs
8. api_spec.amendHearingDueDate
9. api_spec.hearingFeePaid
10. LRspec.uploadMediationDocs		 @civil-ccd-nightly

@ui-mediation		 civil-ccd-definition: nightly pr_ft_ui-mediation 1v2SS SDO Carm - Upload mediation documents e2e -> tests -> ui_tests -> mediation -> 1v2_spec_upload_mediation_doc_test.js no no
2v1 SDO Carm - Upload mediation documents 1. api_spec.createClaimWithRepresentedRespondent
2. api_spec.defendantResponse
3. api_spec.claimantResponse
4. LRspec.uploadMediationDocs
5. LRspec.uploadMediationDocs		 @civil-ccd-nightly

@ui-mediation		 civil-ccd-definition: nightly pr_ft_ui-mediation 2v1 SDO Carm - Upload mediation documents e2e -> tests -> ui_tests -> mediation -> 2v1_spec_upload_mediation_doc_test.js no no
1v2SS spec multi track 1. api_spec.createClaimWithRepresentedRespondent
2. api_spec.defendantResponse
3. api_spec.claimantResponse
4. api_spec.createFinalOrderJO
5. api_spec.scheduleHearing
6. api_spec.amendHearingDueDate
7. api_spec.hearingFeePaid
8. I.evidenceUpload
9. I.verifyBundleDetails		 @civil-ccd-nightly

@ui-multi-track		 civil-ccd-definition: nightly pr_ft_ui-multi-track 1v2SS spec multi track journey e2e -> tests -> ui_tests -> multi-track -> 1v2SS_spec_multi_track_test.js no yes
1vLIP multi track 1. api_spec_cui.createSpecifiedClaimWithUnrepresentedRespondent
2. api_spec_cui.performCitizenDefendantResponse
3. I.respondToDefenceMinti		 @civil-ccd-nightly

@ui-multi-track		 civil-ccd-definition: nightly pr_ft_ui-multi-track 1vLIP spec multi track journey e2e -> tests -> ui_tests -> multi-track -> 1vLIP_spec_multi_track_test.js no yes
1v2 - both respondents litigant in person - NoC to same solicitor 1. api.createClaimWithRespondentLitigantInPerson (skipped)
2. api.notifyClaimLip (skipped)
3. api.notifyClaimDetailsLip (skipped)
4. I.initiateNoticeOfChange (skipped)
5. I.initiateNoticeOfChange (skipped)
6. api.defendantResponse (skipped)
7. api.claimantResponse (skipped)
8. api.createSDO (skipped)		 @civil-ccd-master

@civil-ccd-pr

@civil-ccd-nightly

@ui-noc		 civil-ccd-definition: master

civil-ccd-definition: PR

civil-ccd-definition: nightly		 pr_ft_ui-noc 1v2 - both respondents litigant in person - NoC to same solicitor e2e -> tests -> ui_tests -> noc -> 1v2LIPS_noc_test.js yes no
1v1 - Claim Journey with OtherRemedy type Damages and other remedy 1. I.createCase
2. I.notifyClaim
3. I.notifyClaimDetails
4. I.acknowledgeClaim
5. I.respondToClaim
6. I.respondToDefence		 @civil-ccd-nightly

@ui-other-remedy		 civil-ccd-definition: nightly pr_ft_ui-other-remedy 1v1 - Claim Journey with OtherRemedy type Damages and other remedy e2e -> tests -> ui_tests -> other-remedy -> 1v1CreateClaim_OtherRemedy_Damages_test.js no no
1v1 - Claim Journey with OtherRemedy type Housing Disrepair 1. I.createCase
2. I.notifyClaim
3. I.notifyClaimDetails
4. I.acknowledgeClaim
5. I.informAgreedExtensionDate
6. I.addDefendantLitigationFriend
7. I.respondToClaim
8. I.respondToDefence
9. I.createCaseFlags
10. I.validateCaseFlags (skipped)
11. I.manageCaseFlags
12. I.validateUpdatedCaseFlags (skipped)
13. api.assignTaskToUser
14. I.initiateSDOforOtherRemedy		 @civil-ccd-nightly

@ui-other-remedy		 civil-ccd-definition: nightly pr_ft_ui-other-remedy 1v1 - Claim Journey with OtherRemedy type Housing Disrepair e2e -> tests -> ui_tests -> other-remedy -> 1v1CreateClaim_OtherRemedy_HousingDisrepair_test.js no no
1v2 Different Solicitors small claims - Claim Journey Other Remedy 1. api.createClaimWithRepresentedRespondent
2. api.notifyClaim
3. api.notifyClaimDetails
4. I.respondToClaim
5. I.respondToClaim
6. I.respondToDefence
7. api.assignTaskToUser
8. I.initiateSDOforOtherRemedy		 @civil-ccd-nightly

@ui-other-remedy		 civil-ccd-definition: nightly pr_ft_ui-other-remedy 1v2 Different Solicitors small claims - Claim Journey Other Remedy e2e -> tests -> ui_tests -> other-remedy -> 1v2CreateClaim_OtherRemedy_small_claims_test.js no no
Query Management - Raise, Respond and Follow up Queries 1. api_spec.createClaimWithRepresentedRespondent
2. api_spec.defendantResponse
3. api_spec.claimantResponse
4. api_spec.createFinalOrderJO
5. qmSteps.raiseLRQuery
6. qmSteps.respondToQuery
7. I.raiseFollowUpQuestionAndVerify
8. I.verifyFollowUpQuestionAsCaseWorker
9. I.verifyFollowUpQuestionAsJudge		 @civil-ccd-nightly

@ui-qm		 civil-ccd-definition: nightly pr_ft_ui-qm Query Management - Raise, Respond and Follow up Queries e2e -> tests -> ui_tests -> qm -> qm_followUp__spec_LR_test.js no no
Query Management - Hearing E2E journey 1. api_spec.createClaimWithRepresentedRespondent (skipped)
2. api_spec.defendantResponse (skipped)
3. api_spec.claimantResponse (skipped)
4. api_spec.createFinalOrderJO (skipped)
5. I.raiseNewHearingQuery (skipped)
6. I.verifyQueriesDetails (skipped)
7. I.raiseNewHearingQuery (skipped)
8. I.verifyQueriesDetails (skipped)
9. I.verifyQueriesDetailsAsCaseWorker (skipped)
10. I.verifyQueriesDetails (skipped)
11. I.caseProceedsInCaseman (skipped)
12. I.raiseNewQueryInOfflineState (skipped)		 @civil-ccd-nightly

@ui-qm		 civil-ccd-definition: nightly pr_ft_ui-qm Query Management - Hearing E2E journey e2e -> tests -> ui_tests -> qm -> qm_Hearing_spec_LR_test.js yes no
Query Management - Non Hearing E2E journey 1. api_spec.createClaimWithRepresentedRespondent
2. api_spec.defendantResponse
3. api_spec.claimantResponse
4. api_spec.createFinalOrderJO
5. I.raiseNewNonHearingQuery
6. I.verifyQueriesDetails
7. I.raiseNewNonHearingQuery
8. I.verifyQueriesDetails
9. I.verifyQueriesDetailsAsCaseWorker
10. I.verifyQueriesDetails
11. I.caseProceedsInCaseman
12. I.raiseNewQueryInOfflineState		 @civil-ccd-nightly

@ui-qm		 civil-ccd-definition: nightly pr_ft_ui-qm Query Management - Non Hearing E2E journey e2e -> tests -> ui_tests -> qm -> qm_nonHearing_spec_LR_test.js no no
Request and Approval of a Refund after a return to Requestor by the Approval Caseworker 1. api.createClaimWithRepresentedRespondent
2. api.amendClaimDocuments
3. api.notifyClaim
4. api.notifyClaimDetails
5. I.navigateToServiceRequest
6. RequestRefundSteps.performRefunds
7. I.navigateToRefundsList
8. RequestRefundSteps.returnRefunds
9. RequestRefundSteps.reviewRefunds
10. RequestRefundSteps.approveRefund		 @civil-ccd-nightly

@ui-refunds		 civil-ccd-definition: nightly pr_ft_ui-refunds Request and Processing of refunds e2e -> tests -> ui_tests -> refunds -> ui_request_for_refunds_test.js no yes
Request and Rejection of a Refund after a return to Requestor by the Approval Caseworker 1. api.createClaimWithRepresentedRespondent
2. api.amendClaimDocuments
3. api.notifyClaim
4. api.notifyClaimDetails
5. I.navigateToServiceRequest
6. RequestRefundSteps.performRefunds
7. I.navigateToRefundsList
8. RequestRefundSteps.returnRefunds
9. RequestRefundSteps.reviewRefunds
10. RequestRefundSteps.rejectRefund		 @civil-ccd-nightly

@ui-refunds		 civil-ccd-definition: nightly pr_ft_ui-refunds Request and Processing of refunds e2e -> tests -> ui_tests -> refunds -> ui_request_for_refunds_test.js no yes
Request for reconsideration - 1v1 - spec 1. api_spec_small.createClaimWithRepresentedRespondent
2. api_spec_small.defendantResponse
3. api_spec_small.claimantResponse
4. api_spec_small.createSDO
5. LRspec.requestForReconsiderationForUI
6. api.assignTaskToUser
7. LRspec.decisionForReconsideration
8. api_spec_small.createSDO		 @civil-ccd-nightly

@ui-rfr		 civil-ccd-definition: nightly pr_ft_ui-rfr Request for reconsideration - 1v1 - spec e2e -> tests -> ui_tests -> rfr -> ui_request_for_reconsideration_test.js no no
Request for reconsideration - 1v1 - spec 1. api_spec_small.createClaimWithRepresentedRespondent
2. api_spec_small.defendantResponse
3. api_spec_small.claimantResponse
4. api_spec_small.createSDO
5. LRspec.requestForReconsiderationForUI
6. api.assignTaskToUser
7. LRspec.decisionForReconsideration
8. api_spec_small.createClaimWithRepresentedRespondent
9. api_spec_small.defendantResponse
10. api_spec_small.claimantResponse
11. api_spec_small.createSDO
12. LRspec.requestForReconsiderationForUI
13. api.assignTaskToUser
14. LRspec.decisionForReconsiderationYesOption
15. api_spec_small.createClaimWithRepresentedRespondent
16. api_spec_small.defendantResponse
17. api_spec_small.claimantResponse
18. api_spec_small.createSDO
19. LRspec.requestForReconsiderationForUI
20. api.assignTaskToUser
21. LRspec.decisionForReconsiderationNoOptionForAmending		 @civil-ccd-nightly

@ui-rfr		 civil-ccd-definition: nightly pr_ft_ui-rfr Request for reconsideration - 1v1 - spec e2e -> tests -> ui_tests -> rfr -> ui_request_for_reconsideration_with_options_test.js no no
Settle this Claim - Confirm marking as paid in full - 1v1 - spec 1. api_spec_small.createClaimWithRepresentedRespondent
2. api_spec_small.defendantResponse
3. api_spec_small.claimantResponse
4. api_spec_small.createSDO
5. LRspec.requestForSettleThisClaimForUI		 @civil-ccd-nightly

@ui-settle-claim		 civil-ccd-definition: nightly pr_ft_ui-settle-claim Settle this Claim - Confirm marking as paid in full - 1v1 - spec e2e -> tests -> ui_tests -> settle-claim -> 1v1SettleThisClaim_ConfirmPaidInFull_test.js no no
Settle this Claim - Reason for settlement - Consent order - 1v1 - spec 1. api_spec_small.createClaimWithRepresentedRespondent
2. api_spec_small.defendantResponse
3. api_spec_small.claimantResponse
4. api_spec_small.createSDO
5. LRspec.requestSettleThisClaimConsentOrderForUI		 @civil-ccd-nightly

@ui-settle-claim		 civil-ccd-definition: nightly pr_ft_ui-settle-claim Settle this Claim - Reason for settlement - Consent order - 1v1 - spec e2e -> tests -> ui_tests -> settle-claim -> 1v1SettleThisClaim_ConsentOrder_test.js no no
Settle this Claim - Confirm marking as paid in full - 1v2 - spec 1. api_spec_small.createClaimWithRepresentedRespondent
2. LRspec.requestForSettleThisClaimForUI		 @civil-ccd-nightly

@ui-settle-claim		 civil-ccd-definition: nightly pr_ft_ui-settle-claim Settle this Claim - Confirm marking as paid in full - 1v2 - spec e2e -> tests -> ui_tests -> settle-claim -> 1v2SettleThisClaim_ConfirmPaidInFull_test.js no no
Settle this Claim - Reason for settlement - Consent order - 1v2 - spec 1. api_spec_small.createClaimWithRepresentedRespondent
2. LRspec.requestSettleThisClaimConsentOrderForUI		 @civil-ccd-nightly

@ui-settle-claim		 civil-ccd-definition: nightly pr_ft_ui-settle-claim Settle this Claim - Reason for settlement - Consent order - 1v2 - spec e2e -> tests -> ui_tests -> settle-claim -> 1v2SettleThisClaim_ConsentOrder_test.js no no
Settle this Claim - Confirm marking as paid in full - 2v1 - spec 1. api_spec_small.createClaimWithRepresentedRespondent
2. LRspec.requestForSettleThisClaimForUI2v1		 @civil-ccd-nightly

@ui-settle-claim		 civil-ccd-definition: nightly pr_ft_ui-settle-claim Settle this Claim - Confirm marking as paid in full - 2v1 - spec e2e -> tests -> ui_tests -> settle-claim -> 2v1SettleThisClaim_ConfirmPaidInFull_test.js no no
Settle this Claim - Reason for settlement - Consent order - 2v1 - spec 1. api_spec_small.createClaimWithRepresentedRespondent
2. LRspec.requestSettleThisClaimConsentOrderForUI		 @civil-ccd-nightly

@ui-settle-claim		 civil-ccd-definition: nightly pr_ft_ui-settle-claim Settle this Claim - Reason for settlement - Consent order - 2v1 - spec e2e -> tests -> ui_tests -> settle-claim -> 2v1SettleThisClaim_ConsentOrder_test.js no no
Settle this Claim - Reason for settlement - judges order - 2v1 - spec 1. api_spec_small.createClaimWithRepresentedRespondent
2. LRspec.requestSettleThisClaimJudgesOrderForUI		 @civil-ccd-nightly

@ui-settle-claim		 civil-ccd-definition: nightly pr_ft_ui-settle-claim Settle this Claim - Reason for settlement - judges order - 2v1 - spec e2e -> tests -> ui_tests -> settle-claim -> 2v1SettleThisClaim_JudgesOrder_test.js no no
1v1 spec create claim and create general application @civil-ccd-smoke civil-ccd-definition: master (smoke)

civil-ccd-definition: PR (smoke)		 Smoke test - API 1v1 spec create claim and create general application e2e -> tests -> ui_tests -> smoke -> 1v1_spec_create_claim_ga_test.js no yes
1v1 spec create claim 1. api_spec.createClaimWithRepresentedRespondent Smoke test - 1v1 spec create claim e2e -> tests -> ui_tests -> smoke -> 1v1_spec_create_claim_test.js no yes
2v1 Multi Party full admit Claim Creation 2v1 1. LRspec.createCaseSpecified
2. LRspec.respondToClaimFullAdmit		 @civil-ccd-nightly

@ui-spec-full-admit		 civil-ccd-definition: nightly pr_ft_ui-spec-full-admit 2v1 Multi Party full admit Claim Creation 2v1 e2e -> tests -> ui_tests -> spec-full-admit -> 2v1_spec_fast_full_admit_test.js no no
1v1 LiP v LiP defendant response with full admit pay by set date 1. api_spec_cui.createClaimWithUnrepresentedClaimant
2. api_spec_cui.performCitizenDefendantResponse
3. api_spec_cui.performCitizenClaimantResponse		 @civil-ccd-master

@civil-ccd-pr

@civil-ccd-nightly

@ui-spec-full-admit		 civil-ccd-definition: master

civil-ccd-definition: PR

civil-ccd-definition: nightly		 pr_ft_ui-spec-full-admit 1v1 LIP v LIP spec api full admit journey e2e -> tests -> ui_tests -> spec-full-admit -> LIPvLIP_spec_full_admit_set_date_test.js no yes
1v1 spec claim journey 1. LRspec.createCaseSpecified
2. LRspec.informAgreedExtensionDateSpec
3. LRspec.respondToClaimFullDefence
4. LRspec.respondToDefence		 @civil-ccd-nightly

@ui-spec-full-defence		 civil-ccd-definition: nightly pr_ft_ui-spec-full-defence 1v1 spec claim journey e2e -> tests -> ui_tests -> spec-full-defence -> 1v1_spec_fast_full_defence_test.js no no
Claim creation 1v1 small claims 1. LRspec.createCaseSpecified
2. LRspec.respondToClaimFullDefence
3. LRspec.respondToDefence
4. LRspec.mediationUnsuccessful		 @civil-ccd-nightly

@ui-spec-full-defence		 civil-ccd-definition: nightly pr_ft_ui-spec-full-defence Claim creation 1v1 small claims e2e -> tests -> ui_tests -> spec-full-defence -> 1v1_spec_small_full_defence_test.js no no
Claim creation 1v2 Diff Solicitor with fast claims 1. api_spec_fast.createClaimWithRepresentedRespondent
2. LRspec.respondToClaimFullDefence
3. LRspec.respond1v2DiffLR_FullDefence
4. LRspec.respondToDefence		 @civil-ccd-master

@civil-ccd-pr

@civil-ccd-nightly

@ui-spec-full-defence		 civil-ccd-definition: master

civil-ccd-definition: PR

civil-ccd-definition: nightly		 pr_ft_ui-spec-full-defence Claim creation 1v2 Diff Solicitor with fast claims e2e -> tests -> ui_tests -> spec-full-defence -> 1v2DS_spec_fast_full_defence_test.js no no
Claim creation 1v2 Same Solicitor with Fast track claims 1. LRspec.createCaseSpecified
2. LRspec.respondToClaimFullDefence
3. LRspec.respondToDefence		 @civil-ccd-nightly

@ui-spec-full-defence		 civil-ccd-definition: nightly pr_ft_ui-spec-full-defence Claim creation 1v2 Same Solicitor with Fast track claims e2e -> tests -> ui_tests -> spec-full-defence -> 1v2SS_spec_fast_full_defence_test.js no no
Claim creation 1v2 Same Solicitor with Small claims 1. LRspec.createCaseSpecified
2. LRspec.respondToClaimFullDefence
3. LRspec.respondToDefence		 @civil-ccd-nightly

@ui-spec-full-defence		 civil-ccd-definition: nightly pr_ft_ui-spec-full-defence Claim creation 1v2 Same Solicitor with Small claims e2e -> tests -> ui_tests -> spec-full-defence -> 1v2SS_spec_small_full_defence_test.js no no
2v1 Multi Party full defence Claim Creation 2v1 1. LRspec.createCaseSpecified
2. LRspec.respondToClaimFullDefence		 @civil-ccd-nightly

@ui-spec-full-defence		 civil-ccd-definition: nightly pr_ft_ui-spec-full-defence 2v1 Multi Party full defence Claim Creation 2v1 e2e -> tests -> ui_tests -> spec-full-defence -> 2v1_spec_fast_full_defence_test.js no no
LR v LIP spec full defence 1. api_spec_cui.createSpecifiedClaimWithUnrepresentedRespondent
2. api_spec_cui.performCitizenDefendantResponse
3. api_spec_cui.claimantResponse		 @ui-spec-full-defence pr_ft_ui-spec-full-defence LR v LIP spec full defence api journey e2e -> tests -> ui_tests -> spec-full-defence -> LRvLIP_full_defence_test.js no yes
2v1 Multi Party part admit Claim Creation 2v1 1. LRspec.createCaseSpecified
2. LRspec.respondToClaimPartAdmit		 @civil-ccd-nightly

@ui-spec-part-admit		 civil-ccd-definition: nightly pr_ft_ui-spec-part-admit 2v1 Multi Party part admit Claim Creation 2v1 e2e -> tests -> ui_tests -> spec-part-admit -> 2v1_spec_fast_part_admit_test.js no no
1v1 LiP v LiP Part admit defendant and claimant response - claimant rejects installment plan - CARM enabled 1. api_spec_cui.createClaimWithUnrepresentedClaimant
2. api_spec_cui.performCitizenDefendantResponse
3. api_spec_cui.performCitizenClaimantResponse		 @ui-spec-part-admit pr_ft_ui-spec-part-admit LIP v LIP spec part admit api journeys e2e -> tests -> ui_tests -> spec-part-admit -> LIPvLIP_spec_test.js no yes
1v2DS spec stay case journey 1. api_spec.createClaimWithRepresentedRespondent
2. api_spec.defendantResponse
3. LRspec.respondToDefence
4. LRspec.stayCase
5. LRspec.manageStay
6. LRspec.manageStay		 @ui-stay-case pr_ft_ui-stay-case 1v2DS spec stay case journey e2e -> tests -> ui_tests -> stay-case -> 1v2DS_spec_stay_case_test.js no no
1v2 Different Solicitors fast track - Claim Journey 1. api.createClaimWithRepresentedRespondent
2. api.notifyClaim
3. api.notifyClaimDetails
4. api.acknowledgeClaim (skipped)
5. api.defendantResponse
6. api.claimantResponse
7. I.addUnavailableDates (skipped)
8. I.stayCase
9. I.manageStay
10. I.manageStay		 @civil-ccd-nightly

@ui-stay-case		 civil-ccd-definition: nightly pr_ft_ui-stay-case 1v2 Different Solicitors fast track - Claim Journey e2e -> tests -> ui_tests -> stay-case -> 1v2DS_stay_case_test.js no no
1v1 - Claim Journey 1. I.createCase
2. I.notifyClaim
3. I.notifyClaimDetails
4. I.acknowledgeClaim
5. I.informAgreedExtensionDate
6. I.addDefendantLitigationFriend
7. I.respondToClaim
8. I.respondToDefence		 @civil-ccd-nightly

@ui-unspec-full-defence		 civil-ccd-definition: nightly pr_ft_ui-unspec-full-defence 1v1 - Claim Journey e2e -> tests -> ui_tests -> unspec-full-defence -> 1v1CreateClaim_fast_track_test.js no no
1v2 Different Solicitors fast track - Claim Journey 1. api.createClaimWithRepresentedRespondent
2. api.notifyClaim
3. api.notifyClaimDetails
4. I.acknowledgeClaim
5. I.acknowledgeClaim
6. I.informAgreedExtensionDate
7. I.addDefendantLitigationFriend
8. I.respondToClaim
9. I.respondToClaim
10. I.respondToDefence		 @civil-ccd-master

@civil-ccd-pr

@civil-ccd-nightly

@ui-unspec-full-defence		 civil-ccd-definition: master

civil-ccd-definition: PR

civil-ccd-definition: nightly		 pr_ft_ui-unspec-full-defence 1v2 Different Solicitors fast track - Claim Journey e2e -> tests -> ui_tests -> unspec-full-defence -> 1v2CreateClaim_DiffSol_fast_track_test.js no no
1v2 Different Solicitors small claims - Claim Journey 1. api.createClaimWithRepresentedRespondent
2. api.notifyClaim
3. api.notifyClaimDetails
4. I.respondToClaim
5. I.respondToClaim
6. I.respondToDefence		 @civil-ccd-nightly

@ui-unspec-full-defence		 civil-ccd-definition: nightly pr_ft_ui-unspec-full-defence 1v2 Different Solicitors small claims - Claim Journey e2e -> tests -> ui_tests -> unspec-full-defence -> 1v2CreateClaim_DiffSol_small_claims_test.js no no
1v2 Same Solicitor Claim Journey 1. I.createCase
2. I.notifyClaim
3. I.notifyClaimDetails
4. I.acknowledgeClaim
5. I.informAgreedExtensionDate
6. I.addDefendantLitigationFriend
7. I.respondToClaim
8. I.respondToDefence		 @civil-ccd-nightly

@ui-unspec-full-defence		 civil-ccd-definition: nightly pr_ft_ui-unspec-full-defence 1v2 Same Solicitor Claim Journey e2e -> tests -> ui_tests -> unspec-full-defence -> 1v2CreateClaim_SameSol_fast_track_test.js no no
2v1 Claim Journey Fast track 1. I.createCase
2. I.notifyClaim
3. I.notifyClaimDetails
4. I.acknowledgeClaim
5. I.informAgreedExtensionDate
6. I.respondToClaim
7. I.respondToDefence		 @civil-ccd-nightly

@ui-unspec-full-defence		 civil-ccd-definition: nightly pr_ft_ui-unspec-full-defence 2v1 Claim Journey Fast track e2e -> tests -> ui_tests -> unspec-full-defence -> 2v1CreateClaim_fast_track_test.js no no

API Test Documentation

Show API Tests
Test Name Steps Tags Pipelines Functional Test Groups Feature Name File Path Skipped Independent Scenario
1v1 with No interest - Create claim via SDT - Claim Created - valid success sync response 1. bulks.createClaimFromSDTRequestValidSuccessSyncResponse @api-bulk-claim pr_ft_api-bulk-claim Bulk claim 1v1 SDT user API test e2e -> tests -> api_tests -> bulk-claim -> api_1v1_test.js no yes
1v1 with No interest - Create claim via SDT - Duplicate case check call 1. bulks.createClaimFromSDTRequestForDuplicateCaseCheckCall @api-bulk-claim pr_ft_api-bulk-claim Bulk claim 1v1 SDT user API test e2e -> tests -> api_tests -> bulk-claim -> api_1v1_test.js no yes
1v1 with No interest - Create claim via SDT - Postcode Negative Validation 1. bulks.createClaimFromSDTRequestForPostCodeNegative @api-bulk-claim pr_ft_api-bulk-claim Bulk claim 1v1 SDT user API test e2e -> tests -> api_tests -> bulk-claim -> api_1v1_test.js no yes
1v1 with No interest - Create claim via SDT - Postcode Positive Validation 1. bulks.createClaimFromSDTRequestForPostCodePositive @api-bulk-claim pr_ft_api-bulk-claim Bulk claim 1v1 SDT user API test e2e -> tests -> api_tests -> bulk-claim -> api_1v1_test.js no yes
Create claim - 1v1 with interest 1. bulks.createNewClaimWithCaseworkerCivilService @api-bulk-claim pr_ft_api-bulk-claim Bulk claim 1v1 SDT user API test e2e -> tests -> api_tests -> bulk-claim -> api_1v1_test.js no yes
Create claim - 1v1 with No interest 1. bulks.createNewClaimWithCaseworkerCivilService @api-bulk-claim pr_ft_api-bulk-claim Bulk claim 1v1 SDT user API test e2e -> tests -> api_tests -> bulk-claim -> api_1v1_test.js no yes
Create claim - 1v2 with No interest 1. bulks.createNewClaimWithCaseworkerCivilService @api-bulk-claim pr_ft_api-bulk-claim Bulk claim 1v1 SDT user API test e2e -> tests -> api_tests -> bulk-claim -> api_1v1_test.js no yes
1v1 case flags 1. api.createClaimWithRepresentedRespondent
2. api.notifyClaim
3. api.notifyClaimDetails
4. api.defendantResponse
5. api.claimantResponse
6. api.createCaseFlags
7. api.manageCaseFlags		 @civil-service-nightly

@api-case-flags		 civil-service: nightly pr_ft_api-case-flags 1v1 case flags api journey e2e -> tests -> api_tests -> case-flags -> api_1v1_case_flags_test.js no yes
1v1 spec case flags 1. api_spec.createClaimWithRepresentedRespondent
2. api_spec.defendantResponse
3. api_spec.claimantResponse
4. api_spec.createCaseFlags
5. api_spec.manageCaseFlags		 @civil-service-nightly

@api-case-flags		 civil-service: nightly pr_ft_api-case-flags 1v1 spec case flags api journey e2e -> tests -> api_tests -> case-flags -> api_1v1_spec_case_flags_test.js no yes
Create claim and move it to caseman 1. api.createClaimWithRepresentedRespondent
2. api.moveCaseToCaseman		 @civil-service-nightly

@api-case-offline		 civil-service: nightly pr_ft_api-case-offline 1v1 unspec api case offline journey e2e -> tests -> api_tests -> case-offline -> api_1v1_case_offline_test.js no yes
1v1 full defence unspecified - judge draws fast track WITH sum of damages - hearing scheduled 1. api.createClaimWithRepresentedRespondent (skipped)
2. api.amendClaimDocuments (skipped)
3. api.notifyClaim (skipped)
4. api.notifyClaimDetails (skipped)
5. api.defendantResponse (skipped)
6. api.claimantResponse (skipped)
7. api.createSDO (skipped)
8. api.evidenceUploadApplicant (skipped)
9. api.evidenceUploadRespondent (skipped)
10. api.scheduleHearing (skipped)
11. api.amendHearingDueDate (skipped)
12. api.hearingFeePaid (skipped)
13. api.triggerBundle (skipped)
14. api.createFinalOrder (skipped)		 @civil-service-nightly

@api-case-progression

@civil-service-master

@civil-service-pr

@civil-camunda-master

@civil-camunda-pr		 civil-service: nightly

civil-service: master

civil-service: PR

civil-camunda-bpmn-definition: master

civil-camunda-bpmn-definition: PR		 pr_ft_api-case-progression 1v1 fast track case progression api journeys e2e -> tests -> api_tests -> case-progression -> api_1v1_fast_case_progression_test.js yes yes
1v1 full defence unspecified - judge draws fast track WITHOUT sum of damages - hearing scheduled 1. api.createClaimWithRepresentedRespondent (skipped)
2. api.amendClaimDocuments (skipped)
3. api.notifyClaim (skipped)
4. api.notifyClaimDetails (skipped)
5. api.defendantResponse (skipped)
6. api.claimantResponse (skipped)
7. api.createSDO (skipped)
8. api.evidenceUploadApplicant (skipped)
9. api.evidenceUploadRespondent (skipped)
10. api.scheduleHearing (skipped)
11. api.amendHearingDueDate (skipped)
12. api.hearingFeeUnpaid (skipped)		 @civil-service-nightly

@api-case-progression		 civil-service: nightly pr_ft_api-case-progression 1v1 fast track case progression api journeys e2e -> tests -> api_tests -> case-progression -> api_1v1_fast_case_progression_test.js yes yes
1v1 full defence unspecified - judge draws small claims WITH sum of damages - hearing scheduled 1. api.createClaimWithRepresentedRespondent (skipped)
2. api.amendClaimDocuments (skipped)
3. api.notifyClaim (skipped)
4. api.notifyClaimDetails (skipped)
5. api.defendantResponse (skipped)
6. api.claimantResponse (skipped)
7. api.createSDO (skipped)
8. api.evidenceUploadApplicant (skipped)
9. api.evidenceUploadRespondent (skipped)
10. api.scheduleHearing (skipped)
11. api.amendHearingDueDate (skipped)
12. api.hearingFeePaid (skipped)
13. api.triggerBundle (skipped)
14. api.createFinalOrder (skipped)		 @civil-service-nightly

@api-case-progression		 civil-service: nightly pr_ft_api-case-progression 1v1 small track case progression api journeys e2e -> tests -> api_tests -> case-progression -> api_1v1_small_case_progression_test.js yes yes
1v1 full defence unspecified - judge draws small claims WITHOUT sum of damages - hearing scheduled 1. api.createClaimWithRepresentedRespondent (skipped)
2. api.amendClaimDocuments (skipped)
3. api.notifyClaim (skipped)
4. api.notifyClaimDetails (skipped)
5. api.defendantResponse (skipped)
6. api.claimantResponse (skipped)
7. api.createSDO (skipped)
8. api.evidenceUploadApplicant (skipped)
9. api.evidenceUploadRespondent (skipped)
10. api.scheduleHearing (skipped)
11. api.amendHearingDueDate (skipped)
12. api.hearingFeePaid (skipped)
13. api.triggerBundle (skipped)		 @civil-service-nightly

@api-case-progression		 civil-service: nightly pr_ft_api-case-progression 1v1 small track case progression api journeys e2e -> tests -> api_tests -> case-progression -> api_1v1_small_case_progression_test.js yes yes
1v1 LiP v LiP Case Progression Journey 1. api_spec_cui.createClaimWithUnrepresentedClaimant
2. api_spec_cui.performCitizenDefendantResponse
3. api_spec_cui.performCitizenClaimantResponse
4. api_spec_cui.createSDO
5. api_spec_cui.evidenceUploadApplicant
6. api_spec_cui.evidenceUploadDefendant
7. api_spec_cui.scheduleHearing
8. api_spec_cui.trialReadinessCitizen
9. api_spec_cui.createFinalOrder		 @civil-service-nightly

@api-case-progression		 civil-service: nightly pr_ft_api-case-progression 1v1 LIP v LIP and LR v LIP spec api journeys e2e -> tests -> api_tests -> case-progression -> api_LIPvLIP_spec_case_progression_test.js no yes
1v1 LR v LiP case progression 1. api_spec_cui.createSpecifiedClaimWithUnrepresentedRespondent
2. api_spec_cui.performCitizenDefendantResponse
3. api_spec_cui.claimantResponse
4. api_spec_cui.createSDO
5. api_spec_cui.evidenceUploadDefendant
6. api_spec_cui.scheduleHearing
7. api_spec_cui.amendHearingDueDate
8. api_spec_cui.hearingFeePaid
9. api_spec_cui.trialReadinessCitizen
10. api_spec_cui.createFinalOrder		 @civil-service-nightly

@api-case-progression		 civil-service: nightly pr_ft_api-case-progression 1v1 LIP v LIP and LR v LIP spec api journeys e2e -> tests -> api_tests -> case-progression -> api_LRvLIP_spec_case_progression_test.js no yes
Create claim where respondent is litigant in person and notify/notify details 1. api.createClaimWithRespondentLitigantInPerson
2. api.notifyClaimLip
3. api.notifyClaimDetailsLip		 @civil-service-nightly

@api-cos		 civil-service: nightly pr_ft_api-cos 1v1 lip unspec api journey e2e -> tests -> api_tests -> cos -> api_1v1_lip_test.js no yes
Create claim where one respondent is LIP one is LR and notify/notify details 1. api.createClaimWithRespondentLitigantInPerson
2. api.notifyClaimLip
3. api.notifyClaimDetailsLip		 @civil-service-nightly

@api-cos		 civil-service: nightly pr_ft_api-cos Unspec 1v2lips api journey e2e -> tests -> api_tests -> cos -> api_1v2_lip_test.js no yes
Create claim where two respondents are LIP and notify/notify details 1. api.createClaimWithRespondentLitigantInPerson
2. api.notifyClaimLip
3. api.notifyClaimDetailsLip		 @civil-service-nightly

@api-cos		 civil-service: nightly pr_ft_api-cos Unspec 1v2lips api journey e2e -> tests -> api_tests -> cos -> api_1v2_lip_test.js no yes
Discontinue claim 1v1 LR v LiP defendant and claimant response - claim created from exui - CARM not enabled 1. api_spec_cui.createSpecifiedClaimWithUnrepresentedRespondent
2. api_spec_cui.performCitizenDefendantResponse
3. api_spec_cui.claimantResponse
4. api_spec_cui.discontinueClaim		 @civil-service-nightly

@api-discontinue-claim		 civil-service: nightly pr_ft_api-discontinue-claim 1vLIP spec api claim discontinuance journey e2e -> tests -> api_tests -> discontinue-claim -> api_1v1_spec_cui_discontinue_claim_test.js no yes
1v1 discontinue claim spec 1. api_spec.createClaimWithRepresentedRespondent
2. api_spec.discontinueClaim
3. api_spec.validateDiscontinueClaimClaimant		 @civil-service-nightly

@api-discontinue-claim		 civil-service: nightly pr_ft_api-discontinue-claim 1v1 discontinue claim spec api journey e2e -> tests -> api_tests -> discontinue-claim -> api_1v1_spec_discontinue_claim_test.js no yes
1v2 discontinue claim spec 1. api_spec.createClaimWithRepresentedRespondent
2. api_spec.discontinueClaim
3. api_spec.validateDiscontinueClaimClaimant		 @civil-service-nightly

@api-discontinue-claim		 civil-service: nightly pr_ft_api-discontinue-claim 1v2 discontinue claim spec api journey e2e -> tests -> api_tests -> discontinue-claim -> api_1v2_spec_discontinue_claim_test.js no yes
1v2 discontinue claim spec negative 1. api_spec.createClaimWithRepresentedRespondent
2. api_spec.discontinueClaim
3. api_spec.validateDiscontinueClaimClaimant		 @civil-service-nightly

@api-discontinue-claim		 civil-service: nightly pr_ft_api-discontinue-claim 1v2 discontinue claim spec api journey e2e -> tests -> api_tests -> discontinue-claim -> api_1v2_spec_discontinue_claim_test.js no yes
2v1 discontinue claim spec 1. api_spec.createClaimWithRepresentedRespondent
2. api_spec.discontinueClaim		 @civil-service-nightly

@api-discontinue-claim		 civil-service: nightly pr_ft_api-discontinue-claim 2v1 discontinue claim spec api journey e2e -> tests -> api_tests -> discontinue-claim -> api_2v1_spec_discontinue_claim_test.js no yes
Unspec 1v1 api default judgment journey 1. api.createClaimWithRepresentedRespondent
2. api.addCaseNote
3. api.notifyClaim
4. api.notifyClaimDetails
5. api.amendRespondent1ResponseDeadline
6. api.defaultJudgment
7. api.assignTaskToUser
8. api.sdoDefaultJudgment
9. api.evidenceUploadJudge
10. api.evidenceUploadApplicant
11. api.evidenceUploadRespondent
12. api.scheduleHearing
13. api.amendHearingDueDate
14. api.hearingFeePaid
15. api.trialReadiness
16. api.triggerBundle
17. api.assignTaskToUser (skipped)		 @civil-service-nightly

@api-dj		 civil-service: nightly pr_ft_api-dj Unspec 1v1 api default judgment journey e2e -> tests -> api_tests -> dj -> api_dj_1v1_test.js no no
Unspec 1v2 api default judgment journey 1. api.createClaimWithRepresentedRespondent
2. api.addCaseNote
3. api.notifyClaim
4. api.notifyClaimDetails
5. api.amendRespondent1ResponseDeadline
6. api.defaultJudgment
7. api.sdoDefaultJudgment
8. api.assignTaskToUser
9. api.evidenceUploadJudge (skipped)
10. api.evidenceUploadApplicant (skipped)
11. api.evidenceUploadRespondent (skipped)
12. api.scheduleHearing (skipped)
13. api.triggerBundle
14. api.assignTaskToUser (skipped)		 @civil-service-master

@civil-service-nightly

@civil-wa-master

@civil-wa-pr

@civil-wa-nightly

@api-dj		 civil-service: master

civil-service: nightly

civil-wa-task-configuration: master

civil-wa-task-configuration: PR

civil-wa-task-configuration: nightly		 pr_ft_api-dj Unspec 1v2 api default judgment journey e2e -> tests -> api_tests -> dj -> api_dj_1v2_test.js no no
Unspec 2v1 api default judgment journey 1. api.createClaimWithRepresentedRespondent
2. api.addCaseNote
3. api.notifyClaim
4. api.notifyClaimDetails
5. api.amendRespondent1ResponseDeadline
6. api.defaultJudgment
7. api.assignTaskToUser (skipped)
8. api.sdoDefaultJudgment
9. api.evidenceUploadJudge
10. api.evidenceUploadApplicant
11. api.evidenceUploadRespondent
12. api.scheduleHearing
13. api.amendHearingDueDate
14. api.hearingFeePaid
15. api.trialReadiness
16. api.triggerBundle
17. api.assignTaskToUser		 @civil-service-nightly

@api-dj		 civil-service: nightly pr_ft_api-dj Unspec 2v1 api default judgment journey e2e -> tests -> api_tests -> dj -> api_dj_2v1_test.js no no
Default Judgment Spec claim 1v1 1. api_spec.createClaimWithRepresentedRespondent
2. api_spec.amendRespondent1ResponseDeadline
3. api_spec.defaultJudgmentSpec		 @civil-service-master

@civil-service-pr

@civil-camunda-master

@civil-camunda-pr

@civil-service-nightly

@api-dj		 civil-service: master

civil-service: PR

civil-camunda-bpmn-definition: master

civil-camunda-bpmn-definition: PR

civil-service: nightly		 pr_ft_api-dj Unspec 1v1 api default judgment journey e2e -> tests -> api_tests -> dj -> api_dj_spec_1v1_test.js no yes
Default Judgment Spec claim 1v2 divergent 1. api_spec.createClaimWithRepresentedRespondent
2. api_spec.amendRespondent1ResponseDeadline
3. api_spec.defaultJudgmentSpec		 @civil-service-nightly

@api-dj		 civil-service: nightly pr_ft_api-dj Spec 1v2 api default judgment journey e2e -> tests -> api_tests -> dj -> api_dj_spec_1v2_test.js no yes
Default Judgment Spec claim 1v2 non divergent 1. api_spec.createClaimWithRepresentedRespondent
2. api_spec.amendRespondent1ResponseDeadline
3. api_spec.defaultJudgmentSpec		 @civil-service-nightly

@api-dj		 civil-service: nightly pr_ft_api-dj Spec 1v2 api default judgment journey e2e -> tests -> api_tests -> dj -> api_dj_spec_1v2_test.js no yes
Default Judgment Spec claim 2v1 1. api_spec.createClaimWithRepresentedRespondent
2. api_spec.amendRespondent1ResponseDeadline
3. api_spec.defaultJudgmentSpec		 @civil-service-nightly

@api-dj		 civil-service: nightly pr_ft_api-dj Spec 2v1 api default judgment journey e2e -> tests -> api_tests -> dj -> api_dj_spec_2v1_test.js no yes
01 Default Judgment claim 1. api.createClaimWithRepresentedRespondent
2. api.notifyClaim
3. api.notifyClaimDetails
4. api.amendRespondent1ResponseDeadline
5. api.defaultJudgment		 @civil-service-nightly

@api-other-remedy-dj		 civil-service: nightly pr_ft_api-other-remedy-dj Unspec 1v1 api Other Remedy default judgment journey e2e -> tests -> api_tests -> dj -> api_otherRemedy_dj_1v1_test.js no yes
02 Verify Direction order(summaryJudgmentDirectionsTask) Judge task 1. api.assignTaskToUser @civil-service-nightly

@api-other-remedy-dj		 civil-service: nightly pr_ft_api-other-remedy-dj Unspec 1v1 api Other Remedy default judgment journey e2e -> tests -> api_tests -> dj -> api_otherRemedy_dj_1v1_test.js no yes
03 Default Judgment claim SDO 1. api.sdoDefaultJudgment @civil-service-nightly

@api-other-remedy-dj		 civil-service: nightly pr_ft_api-other-remedy-dj Unspec 1v1 api Other Remedy default judgment journey e2e -> tests -> api_tests -> dj -> api_otherRemedy_dj_1v1_test.js no yes
04 Case progression tests (Upload evidence, schedule a hearing, amend hearing date, pay fee, confirm trial readiness) 1. api.evidenceUploadJudge
2. api.evidenceUploadApplicant
3. api.evidenceUploadRespondent
4. api.scheduleHearing
5. api.amendHearingDueDate
6. api.hearingFeePaid
7. api.trialReadiness		 @civil-service-nightly

@api-other-remedy-dj		 civil-service: nightly pr_ft_api-other-remedy-dj Unspec 1v1 api Other Remedy default judgment journey e2e -> tests -> api_tests -> dj -> api_otherRemedy_dj_1v1_test.js no yes
05 Verify Case progression trial bundle 1. api.triggerBundle @civil-service-nightly

@api-other-remedy-dj		 civil-service: nightly pr_ft_api-other-remedy-dj Unspec 1v1 api Other Remedy default judgment journey e2e -> tests -> api_tests -> dj -> api_otherRemedy_dj_1v1_test.js no yes
1v1 full defence unspecified - judge draws small claims DRH - hearing scheduled 1. api.createClaimWithRepresentedRespondent (skipped)
2. api.amendClaimDocuments (skipped)
3. api.notifyClaim (skipped)
4. api.notifyClaimDetails (skipped)
5. api.defendantResponse (skipped)
6. api.claimantResponse (skipped)
7. api.createSDO (skipped)
8. api.evidenceUploadApplicant (skipped)
9. api.evidenceUploadRespondent (skipped)
10. api.scheduleHearing (skipped)
11. api.amendHearingDueDate (skipped)
12. api.hearingFeePaidDRH (skipped)		 @civil-service-nightly

@api-drh

@civil-wa-master

@civil-wa-pr

@civil-wa-nightly		 civil-service: nightly

civil-wa-task-configuration: master

civil-wa-task-configuration: PR

civil-wa-task-configuration: nightly		 pr_ft_api-drh 1v1 sdo api journeys e2e -> tests -> api_tests -> drh -> api_1v1_dispute_resolution_hearing_test.js yes yes
1v1 spec small create SDO for DRH - CARM disabled 1. api_spec_small.createClaimWithRepresentedRespondent
2. api_spec_small.defendantResponse
3. api_spec_small.claimantResponse
4. api_spec_small.uploadMediationDocuments
5. api_spec_small.createSDO		 @civil-service-nightly

@api-drh		 civil-service: nightly pr_ft_api-drh Dispute resolution hearing API test - fast claim - unspec e2e -> tests -> api_tests -> drh -> api_1v1_spec_dispute_resolution_hearing_test.js no yes
1v1 spec small create SDO for DRH - CARM enabled 1. api_spec_small.createClaimWithRepresentedRespondent
2. api_spec_small.defendantResponse
3. api_spec_small.claimantResponse
4. api_spec_small.mediationUnsuccessful
5. api_spec_small.uploadMediationDocuments
6. api_spec_small.createSDO		 @civil-service-nightly

@api-drh		 civil-service: nightly pr_ft_api-drh Dispute resolution hearing API test - fast claim - unspec e2e -> tests -> api_tests -> drh -> api_1v1_spec_dispute_resolution_hearing_test.js no yes
1v1 unspec create SDO for DRH 1. api.createClaimWithRepresentedRespondent
2. api.amendClaimDocuments
3. api.notifyClaim
4. api.notifyClaimDetails
5. api.defendantResponse
6. api.claimantResponse
7. api.createSDO
8. api.evidenceUploadApplicant
9. api.evidenceUploadRespondent
10. api.scheduleHearing
11. api.amendHearingDueDate
12. api.hearingFeePaidDRH
13. api.triggerBundle
14. api.createFinalOrderJO		 @civil-service-nightly

@api-drh		 civil-service: nightly pr_ft_api-drh Dispute resolution hearing API test - fast claim - unspec e2e -> tests -> api_tests -> drh -> api_1v1_spec_dispute_resolution_hearing_test.js no yes
1v1 full defence unspecified - judge draws small claims WITHOUT sum of damages - flight delay 1. api_spec.createClaimSpecFlightDelay
2. api_spec.defendantResponse
3. api_spec.claimantResponseForFlightDelay
4. api_spec.createSDO		 @civil-service-nightly

@api-flight-delay		 civil-service: nightly pr_ft_api-flight-delay Create SDO SmallTrack- Flight Delay - 1v1 - spec e2e -> tests -> api_tests -> flight-delay -> api_1v1_spec_flight_delay_test.js no yes
1v1 specified - flight delay other option Small-claim 1. api_spec.createClaimSpecFlightDelay
2. api_spec.defendantResponse
3. api_spec.claimantResponseForFlightDelay		 @civil-service-nightly

@api-flight-delay		 civil-service: nightly pr_ft_api-flight-delay Create SDO SmallTrack- Flight Delay - 1v1 - spec e2e -> tests -> api_tests -> flight-delay -> api_1v1_spec_flight_delay_test.js no yes
Judge makes decision 1V1 - AWAITING_ADDITIONAL_INFORMATION @civil-service-nightly

@api-ga-add-info		 civil-service: nightly pr_ft_api-ga-add-info GA 1v1 Judge Make Decision Additional Information Required API tests e2e -> tests -> api_tests -> ga -> ga-add-info -> api_1v1_judge_decision_addln_info_test.js no yes
Judge makes decision 1V1 - AWAITING_ADDITIONAL_INFORMATION @civil-service-master

@civil-service-pr

@civil-service-nightly

@api-ga-add-info		 civil-service: master

civil-service: PR

civil-service: nightly		 pr_ft_api-ga-add-info GA SPEC Claim 1v1 Judge Make Decision Additional Information Required API tests e2e -> tests -> api_tests -> ga -> ga-add-info -> api_spec_1v1_judge_decision_addIn_info_test.js no yes
AC 1 - 14 Days without consent, with notice @civil-service-nightly

@api-ga-adjourn-ga		 civil-service: nightly pr_ft_api-ga-adjourn-ga GA 1v1 Make Adjourn Vacate API tests e2e -> tests -> api_tests -> ga -> ga-adjourn -> api_1v1_adjourn_vacate_ga_test.js no yes
AC 2 - 14 Days without consent, without notice @civil-service-nightly

@api-ga-adjourn-ga		 civil-service: nightly pr_ft_api-ga-adjourn-ga GA 1v1 Make Adjourn Vacate API tests e2e -> tests -> api_tests -> ga -> ga-adjourn -> api_1v1_adjourn_vacate_ga_test.js no yes
AC 3 - 14 Days with consent @civil-service-nightly

@api-ga-adjourn-ga		 civil-service: nightly pr_ft_api-ga-adjourn-ga GA 1v1 Make Adjourn Vacate API tests e2e -> tests -> api_tests -> ga -> ga-adjourn -> api_1v1_adjourn_vacate_ga_test.js no yes
AC 4 - 15 Days with consent @civil-service-nightly

@api-ga-adjourn-ga		 civil-service: nightly pr_ft_api-ga-adjourn-ga GA 1v1 Make Adjourn Vacate API tests e2e -> tests -> api_tests -> ga -> ga-adjourn -> api_1v1_adjourn_vacate_ga_test.js no yes
Case offline APPLICATION_SUBMITTED_AWAITING_JUDICIAL_DECISION @civil-service-nightly

@api-ga-case-offline		 civil-service: nightly pr_ft_api-ga-case-offline GA Claim 1v1 Claimant Response Case Close API tests e2e -> tests -> api_tests -> ga -> ga-case-offline -> api_1v1_claimant_response_offline_test.js no yes
Case offline ORDER_MADE @civil-service-nightly

@api-ga-case-offline		 civil-service: nightly pr_ft_api-ga-case-offline GA Claim 1v1 Claimant Response Case Close API tests e2e -> tests -> api_tests -> ga -> ga-case-offline -> api_1v1_claimant_response_offline_test.js no yes
Case offline 1V2 notify_claim_details AWAITING_DIRECTIONS_ORDER_DOCS @civil-service-nightly civil-service: nightly GA 1v2 Notify Claim Details Case Close API tests e2e -> tests -> api_tests -> ga -> ga-case-offline -> api_1v2_notify_claim_details_offline_nightly_test.js no yes
Case offline 1V2 notify_claim_details AWAITING_ADDITIONAL_INFORMATION @civil-service-nightly civil-service: nightly GA Claim 1v2 Notify Claim Case Close API tests e2e -> tests -> api_tests -> ga -> ga-case-offline -> api_1v2_notify_claim_offline_nightly_test.js no yes
Judge makes decision 1V2 - Accept Strike out application @civil-service-nightly

@api-ga-case-offline		 civil-service: nightly pr_ft_api-ga-case-offline GA 1v2 Judge accepts strike out application API tests e2e -> tests -> api_tests -> ga -> ga-case-offline -> api_1v2_proceeds_in_heritage_test.js no yes
Case offline APPLICATION_DISMISSED @civil-service-nightly civil-service: nightly GA SPEC Claim 1v2 Claimant Response Case Close API tests e2e -> tests -> api_tests -> ga -> ga-case-offline -> api_spec_1v2_claimant_response_offline_nightly_test.js yes yes
Case offline AWAITING_RESPONDENT_RESPONSE @civil-service-nightly civil-service: nightly GA SPEC Claim 1v2 Claimant Response Case Close API tests e2e -> tests -> api_tests -> ga -> ga-case-offline -> api_spec_1v2_claimant_response_offline_nightly_test.js yes yes
Case offline LISTING_FOR_A_HEARING @civil-service-nightly civil-service: nightly GA SPEC Claim 1v2 Claimant Response Case Close API tests e2e -> tests -> api_tests -> ga -> ga-case-offline -> api_spec_1v2_claimant_response_offline_nightly_test.js yes yes
Case offline APPLICATION_SUBMITTED_AWAITING_JUDICIAL_DECISION @civil-service-nightly

@api-ga-case-offline		 civil-service: nightly pr_ft_api-ga-case-offline GA SPEC Claim 1v2 Defendant Response Case Close API tests e2e -> tests -> api_tests -> ga -> ga-case-offline -> api_spec_1v2_defendant_response_offline_nightly_test.js no yes
Case offline ORDER_MADE @civil-service-nightly

@api-ga-case-offline		 civil-service: nightly pr_ft_api-ga-case-offline GA SPEC Claim 1v2 Defendant Response Case Close API tests e2e -> tests -> api_tests -> ga -> ga-case-offline -> api_spec_1v2_defendant_response_offline_nightly_test.js no yes
Case offline APPLICATION_DISMISSED @civil-service-nightly

@api-ga-case-offline		 civil-service: nightly pr_ft_api-ga-case-offline GA SPEC Claim 1v2 Move to Case Man Case Close API tests e2e -> tests -> api_tests -> ga -> ga-case-offline -> api_spec_1v2_move_case_to_caseman_offline_nightly_test.js no yes
Case offline APPLICATION_SUBMITTED_AWAITING_JUDICIAL_DECISION @civil-service-nightly

@api-ga-case-offline		 civil-service: nightly pr_ft_api-ga-case-offline GA SPEC Claim 1v2 Move to Case Man Case Close API tests e2e -> tests -> api_tests -> ga -> ga-case-offline -> api_spec_1v2_move_case_to_caseman_offline_nightly_test.js no yes
Case offline ORDER_MADE @civil-service-nightly

@api-ga-case-offline		 civil-service: nightly pr_ft_api-ga-case-offline GA SPEC Claim 1v2 Move to Case Man Case Close API tests e2e -> tests -> api_tests -> ga -> ga-case-offline -> api_spec_1v2_move_case_to_caseman_offline_nightly_test.js no yes
1v1 LIP v LIP Spec Case marked paid in full @civil-service-nightly

@api-ga-cert-of-satisfaction		 civil-service: nightly pr_ft_api-ga-cert-of-satisfaction GA SPEC Claim 1v1 Certification of Satisfaction/Cancellation e2e -> tests -> api_tests -> ga -> ga-cert-of-satisfaction -> api_spec_1v1_certificate_of_satisfaction_test.js no yes
1v1 LIP v LIP Spec Case not marked paid in full @civil-service-nightly

@api-ga-cert-of-satisfaction		 civil-service: nightly pr_ft_api-ga-cert-of-satisfaction GA SPEC Claim 1v1 Certification of Satisfaction/Cancellation e2e -> tests -> api_tests -> ga -> ga-cert-of-satisfaction -> api_spec_1v1_certificate_of_satisfaction_test.js no yes
1v1 LR v LIP Spec case JBA marked paid in full @civil-service-nightly

@api-ga-cert-of-satisfaction		 civil-service: nightly pr_ft_api-ga-cert-of-satisfaction GA SPEC Claim 1v1 Certification of Satisfaction/Cancellation e2e -> tests -> api_tests -> ga -> ga-cert-of-satisfaction -> api_spec_1v1_certificate_of_satisfaction_test.js no yes
1v1 LR v LIP Spec case marked paid in full @civil-service-nightly

@api-ga-cert-of-satisfaction		 civil-service: nightly pr_ft_api-ga-cert-of-satisfaction GA SPEC Claim 1v1 Certification of Satisfaction/Cancellation e2e -> tests -> api_tests -> ga -> ga-cert-of-satisfaction -> api_spec_1v1_certificate_of_satisfaction_test.js no yes
GA 1v2 - Without Notice Application Collection after Creation of GA Case initiated by Defendant2 @civil-service-nightly

@api-ga-collections		 civil-service: nightly pr_ft_api-ga-collections GA 1v2 application collection for different solicitor API tests e2e -> tests -> api_tests -> ga -> ga-collections -> api_1v2_general_app_collections_test.js no yes
GA 1v2 - Without Notice Application Collection after Creation of GA Case Test @civil-service-nightly

@api-ga-collections		 civil-service: nightly pr_ft_api-ga-collections GA 1v2 application collection for different solicitor API tests e2e -> tests -> api_tests -> ga -> ga-collections -> api_1v2_general_app_collections_test.js no yes
GA 1v2 - Without Notice Application Collection After Judge Makes Decision List for Hearing @civil-service-nightly

@api-ga-collections

@civil-service-master

@civil-service-pr		 civil-service: nightly

civil-service: master

civil-service: PR		 pr_ft_api-ga-collections GA 1v2 application collection for different solicitor API tests e2e -> tests -> api_tests -> ga -> ga-collections -> api_1v2_general_app_collections_test.js no yes
GA 1v2 - Without Notice Application Collection after Judge Makes Decision Order Made @civil-service-nightly

@api-ga-collections		 civil-service: nightly pr_ft_api-ga-collections GA 1v2 application collection for different solicitor API tests e2e -> tests -> api_tests -> ga -> ga-collections -> api_1v2_general_app_collections_test.js no yes
After SDO - CONSENT ORDER - CaseWorker Refer to Judge makes decision 1V1 - Uncloak Application @civil-service-nightly

@api-ga-consent-order		 civil-service: nightly pr_ft_api-ga-consent-order GA 1v1 Consent Order API tests e2e -> tests -> api_tests -> ga -> ga-consent-order -> api_1v1_approve_consent_order_test.js no yes
After SDO - CONSENT ORDER - CaseWorker Refer to Judge makes decision 1V1 -- URGENT - Uncloak Application @civil-service-nightly

@api-ga-consent-order		 civil-service: nightly pr_ft_api-ga-consent-order GA 1v1 Consent Order API tests e2e -> tests -> api_tests -> ga -> ga-consent-order -> api_1v1_approve_consent_order_test.js no yes
Caseworker makes decision 1V1 - CONSENT ORDER @civil-service-nightly

@api-ga-consent-order		 civil-service: nightly pr_ft_api-ga-consent-order GA 1v1 Consent Order API tests e2e -> tests -> api_tests -> ga -> ga-consent-order -> api_1v1_approve_consent_order_test.js no yes
Judge makes decision 1V1 - CONSENT ORDER - Uncloak Application @civil-service-nightly civil-service: nightly GA 1v1 Consent Order API tests e2e -> tests -> api_tests -> ga -> ga-consent-order -> api_1v1_approve_consent_order_test.js no yes
Judge makes decision 1V1 - CONSENT ORDER - URGENT Uncloak Application @civil-service-nightly civil-service: nightly GA 1v1 Consent Order API tests e2e -> tests -> api_tests -> ga -> ga-consent-order -> api_1v1_approve_consent_order_test.js no yes
Judge Revisit 1V1 - consentOrder End Date Scheduler @civil-service-nightly civil-service: nightly GA 1v1 Consent Order API tests e2e -> tests -> api_tests -> ga -> ga-consent-order -> api_1v1_approve_consent_order_test.js no yes
Legal Advisor decision 1V1 - CONSENT ORDER - Uncloak Application @civil-service-nightly

@api-ga-consent-order		 civil-service: nightly pr_ft_api-ga-consent-order GA 1v1 Consent Order API tests e2e -> tests -> api_tests -> ga -> ga-consent-order -> api_1v1_approve_consent_order_test.js no yes
Defendants response 1V2 @civil-service-nightly civil-service: nightly GA 1v2 Defendants response consent order API tests e2e -> tests -> api_tests -> ga -> ga-consent-order -> api_1v2_defendant_response_consent_test.js no yes
Judge makes decision 1V1 - VARY-JUDGEMENT - DIRECTIONS ORDER - Respondent upload Directions Document @api-ga-directions-order pr_ft_api-ga-directions-order GA 1v1 Judge Make Order Directions Order API tests e2e -> tests -> api_tests -> ga -> ga-directions-order -> api_1v1_directions_order_test.js no yes
Judge makes decision 1V1 - VARY-JUDGEMENT as DEFENDANT - PROCEEDS IN HERITAGE @api-ga-directions-order pr_ft_api-ga-directions-order GA 1v1 Judge Make Order Directions Order API tests e2e -> tests -> api_tests -> ga -> ga-directions-order -> api_1v1_directions_order_test.js no yes
Judge makes decision 1V2 - DIRECTIONS ORDER @civil-service-nightly

@api-ga-directions-order		 civil-service: nightly pr_ft_api-ga-directions-order GA 1v2 Judge Make Order Directions Order API tests e2e -> tests -> api_tests -> ga -> ga-directions-order -> api_1v2_directions_order_test.js no yes
Judge makes decision 1V1 Specified case- DIRECTIONS ORDER @civil-service-nightly

@api-ga-directions-order		 civil-service: nightly pr_ft_api-ga-directions-order GA SPEC Claim 1v1 Judge Make Order Directions Order API tests e2e -> tests -> api_tests -> ga -> ga-directions-order -> api_spec_1v1_directions_order_test.js no yes
Make an Urgent General Application with Vary payment terms of judgment @civil-service-nightly

@api-ga-directions-order		 civil-service: nightly pr_ft_api-ga-directions-order GA SPEC Claim 1v1 Judge Make Order Directions Order API tests e2e -> tests -> api_tests -> ga -> ga-directions-order -> api_spec_1v1_directions_order_test.js no yes
Spec Claimant create GA with multiple application types Create Lip v Lip claim - Default Judgment e2e -> tests -> api_tests -> ga -> ga-directions-order -> api_spec_1v1_lip_lip_directions_order_test.js no yes
Spec Claimant create GA with single application type and HWF Create Lip v Lip claim - Default Judgment e2e -> tests -> api_tests -> ga -> ga-directions-order -> api_spec_1v1_lip_lip_directions_order_test.js no yes
Spec Claimant create GA without notice Create Lip v Lip claim - Default Judgment e2e -> tests -> api_tests -> ga -> ga-directions-order -> api_spec_1v1_lip_lip_directions_order_test.js no yes
Spec Claimant create GA without notice judge make final order Create Lip v Lip claim - Default Judgment e2e -> tests -> api_tests -> ga -> ga-directions-order -> api_spec_1v1_lip_lip_directions_order_test.js no yes
Spec Claimant create GA without notice judge make order Create Lip v Lip claim - Default Judgment e2e -> tests -> api_tests -> ga -> ga-directions-order -> api_spec_1v1_lip_lip_directions_order_test.js no yes
MixTypesWithSetAside - 119 pounds @ga-fees GA 1v1 GA Fee API tests e2e -> tests -> api_tests -> ga -> ga-fees -> api_1v1_ga_fee_test.js no yes
MixTypesWithVary - 119 pounds @ga-fees GA 1v1 GA Fee API tests e2e -> tests -> api_tests -> ga -> ga-fees -> api_1v1_ga_fee_test.js yes yes
GA 1v1 Free Fee - LR initiates GA vs LIP @ga-fees General Application LR vs LIP 1V1 Application e2e -> tests -> api_tests -> ga -> ga-fees -> api_spec_1v1_lr_lip_freefee_test.js yes yes
GA 1v1 Without Notice - LR initiates GA vs LIP @ga-fees General Application LR vs LIP 1V1 Application e2e -> tests -> api_tests -> ga -> ga-fees -> api_spec_1v1_lr_lip_freefee_test.js yes yes
Without Notice Hearing notice journey @civil-service-nightly

@api-ga-final-order		 civil-service: nightly pr_ft_api-ga-final-order GA 1v2 Judge makes order application after hearing API tests e2e -> tests -> api_tests -> ga -> ga-final-order -> api_1v2_judge_make_final_order_test.js no yes
Spec Claimant create GA - JUDICIAL_REFERRAL state @civil-service-nightly

@api-ga-final-order		 civil-service: nightly pr_ft_api-ga-final-order Spec 1v2 - General Application after SDO Journey e2e -> tests -> api_tests -> ga -> ga-final-order -> api_1v2SS_spec_afterSDO_final_order_test.js no yes
Judge makes decision 1V1 - ORDER_MADE - Uncloak and Application Approved @civil-service-nightly civil-service: nightly GA 1v1 Uncloak application API e2e -> tests -> api_tests -> ga -> ga-make-decision -> api_1v_judge_decision_uncloak_application_test.js no yes
Judge makes decision 1V1 - REQUEST_MORE_INFORMATION - Payment fails @civil-service-nightly civil-service: nightly GA 1v1 Uncloak application API e2e -> tests -> api_tests -> ga -> ga-make-decision -> api_1v_judge_decision_uncloak_application_test.js no yes
Judge makes decision 1V1 - REQUEST_MORE_INFORMATION - Uncloak Application @civil-service-nightly civil-service: nightly GA 1v1 Uncloak application API e2e -> tests -> api_tests -> ga -> ga-make-decision -> api_1v_judge_decision_uncloak_application_test.js no yes
Judge makes decision 1V1 - REQUEST_MORE_INFORMATION - Uncloak Application - Response - Directions Order @civil-service-nightly civil-service: nightly GA 1v1 Uncloak application API e2e -> tests -> api_tests -> ga -> ga-make-decision -> api_1v_judge_decision_uncloak_application_test.js no yes
Claimant create GA - JUDICIAL_REFERRAL state @civil-service-nightly

@api-ga-make-decision		 civil-service: nightly pr_ft_api-ga-make-decision Unspec 1v1 - General Application after SDO Journey e2e -> tests -> api_tests -> ga -> ga-make-decision -> api_1v1_afterSDO_make_decision_test.js no yes
Defendant Hearing notice journey @civil-service-nightly civil-service: nightly Before SDO 1v1 - GA CP - Hearing Notice document API tests e2e -> tests -> api_tests -> ga -> ga-make-decision -> api_1v1_judge_make_final_order_test.js no yes
Judge decides Free Form Order @civil-service-nightly civil-service: nightly Before SDO 1v1 - GA CP - Hearing Notice document API tests e2e -> tests -> api_tests -> ga -> ga-make-decision -> api_1v1_judge_make_final_order_test.js no yes
Judge makes decision 1V1 - Order Made @civil-service-nightly

@api-ga-make-decision		 civil-service: nightly pr_ft_api-ga-make-decision GA 1v1 Judge make decision order made API tests e2e -> tests -> api_tests -> ga -> ga-make-decision -> api_1v1_judge_order_made_decision_test.js no yes
Judge Revisit 1V1 unspec - Order Made End Date Scheduler @civil-service-nightly

@api-ga-make-decision		 civil-service: nightly pr_ft_api-ga-make-decision GA 1v1 Judge make decision order made API tests e2e -> tests -> api_tests -> ga -> ga-make-decision -> api_1v1_judge_order_made_decision_test.js no yes
Judge makes decision 1V1 - unless order @civil-service-nightly

@api-ga-make-decision		 civil-service: nightly pr_ft_api-ga-make-decision GA 1v1 Judge make decision unless order API tests e2e -> tests -> api_tests -> ga -> ga-make-decision -> api_1v1_judge_unless_order_decision_test.js no yes
Judge Revisit 1V1 - unless order End Date Scheduler @civil-service-nightly

@api-ga-make-decision		 civil-service: nightly pr_ft_api-ga-make-decision GA 1v1 Judge make decision unless order API tests e2e -> tests -> api_tests -> ga -> ga-make-decision -> api_1v1_judge_unless_order_decision_test.js no yes
Judge makes decision 1V1 - WRITTEN_REPRESENTATIONS- Respondent upload Directions Document GA 1v1 Judge Make Order Written Rep API tests e2e -> tests -> api_tests -> ga -> ga-make-decision -> api_1v1_written_rep_test.js no yes
Judge uncloaked the without notice application: Judge revisit makes decision 1V1 - WRITTEN_REPRESENTATIONS- Respondent upload Directions Document GA 1v1 Judge Make Order Written Rep API tests e2e -> tests -> api_tests -> ga -> ga-make-decision -> api_1v1_written_rep_test.js no yes
Judge makes decision 1V2 - DISMISS_THE_APPLICATION @civil-service-nightly

@api-ga-make-decision		 civil-service: nightly pr_ft_api-ga-make-decision GA 1v2 Judge Dismiss Application API tests e2e -> tests -> api_tests -> ga -> ga-make-decision -> api_1v2_application_dissmised_test.js no yes
Judge makes decision 1V2 - WRITTEN_REPRESENTATIONS @civil-service-nightly

@api-ga-make-decision		 civil-service: nightly pr_ft_api-ga-make-decision GA 1v2 Judge Make Order Written Rep API tests e2e -> tests -> api_tests -> ga -> ga-make-decision -> api_1v2_awaiting_written_representation_test.js no yes
Spec Claimant create GA - CASE_PROGRESSION state @civil-service-nightly

@api-ga-make-decision		 civil-service: nightly pr_ft_api-ga-make-decision Spec 1v2 - General Application after SDO Journey e2e -> tests -> api_tests -> ga -> ga-make-decision -> api_1v2SS_spec_afterSDO_make_decision_test.js yes yes
Verify Specific access check for judge GA - WA Specific Access e2e -> tests -> api_tests -> ga -> ga-wa -> 1v1_unspec_ga_wa_specific_access_test.js no yes
Verify Specific access check for Legal Ops GA - WA Specific Access e2e -> tests -> api_tests -> ga -> ga-wa -> 1v1_unspec_ga_wa_specific_access_test.js no yes
Verify Specific access check for NBC Admin GA - WA Specific Access e2e -> tests -> api_tests -> ga -> ga-wa -> 1v1_unspec_ga_wa_specific_access_test.js no yes
1v1 Unspec GA-WA Application closed test GA - WA Application Closed e2e -> tests -> api_tests -> ga -> ga-wa -> api_1v1_unspec_ga_wa_application_closed_test.js yes yes
GA - Challenged Access test - LegalAdvisor GA - WA Challenged Access e2e -> tests -> api_tests -> ga -> ga-wa -> api_1v1_unspec_ga_wa_challenged_access_test.js no yes
GA - Challenged Access test - NBCAdmin & judge GA - WA Challenged Access e2e -> tests -> api_tests -> ga -> ga-wa -> api_1v1_unspec_ga_wa_challenged_access_test.js no yes
1V2 Unspec After SDO - Judge Revist Application- Request More Information Additional Response time Expired GA - WA Judge Revisit Applications e2e -> tests -> api_tests -> ga -> ga-wa -> api_ga_wa_judge_revisit_scenarios_test.js yes yes
Before SDO GA - Directions Order Additional Response time Expired GA - WA Judge Revisit Applications e2e -> tests -> api_tests -> ga -> ga-wa -> api_ga_wa_judge_revisit_scenarios_test.js yes yes
Before SDO GA 1v1 spec - Written Representations Additional Response time Expired GA - WA Judge Revisit Applications e2e -> tests -> api_tests -> ga -> ga-wa -> api_ga_wa_judge_revisit_scenarios_test.js yes yes
CCD 1v2 Spec fast hearings API test 1. api_spec_fast.createClaimWithRepresentedRespondent (skipped)
2. api_spec_fast.defendantResponse (skipped)
3. api_spec_fast.claimantResponse (skipped)
4. hearings.createCaseFlags (skipped)
5. api_spec_fast.createSDO (skipped)
6. hearings.generateHearingsPayload (skipped)		 @civil-service-nightly

@api-hearings		 civil-service: nightly pr_ft_api-hearings CCD 1v2 Spec fast hearings API test e2e -> tests -> api_tests -> hearings -> api_1v2_spec_fast_hearings_test.js yes no
CCD 1v2 Unspec fast hearings API test 1. api.createClaimWithRepresentedRespondent
2. api.notifyClaim
3. api.notifyClaimDetails
4. api.defendantResponse
5. api.claimantResponse
6. hearings.createCaseFlags
7. api.createSDO (skipped)
8. hearings.generateHearingsPayload (skipped)		 @civil-service-nightly

@api-hearings

@civil-wa-master

@civil-wa-pr

@civil-wa-nightly		 civil-service: nightly

civil-wa-task-configuration: master

civil-wa-task-configuration: PR

civil-wa-task-configuration: nightly		 pr_ft_api-hearings CCD 1v2 Unspec fast hearings API test e2e -> tests -> api_tests -> hearings -> api_1v2DS_unspec_fast_hearings_test.js no no
Spec automated hearing notice schedulers 1. hearings.setupStaticMocks
2. api_spec_small.createClaimWithRepresentedRespondent
3. api_spec_small.defendantResponse
4. api_spec_small.claimantResponse
5. api_spec_small.createSDO
6. hearings.createSpecDisposalHearing
7. hearings.triggerSpecAutomatedHearingNoticeScheduler
8. hearings.createSpecTrialHearing
9. hearings.triggerSpecAutomatedHearingNoticeScheduler
10. hearings.createSpecDisputeResolutionHearing
11. hearings.triggerSpecAutomatedHearingNoticeScheduler		 @civil-service-pr

@api-hearings		 civil-service: PR pr_ft_api-hearings Spec automated hearing notice schedulers e2e -> tests -> api_tests -> hearings -> api_spec_hearing_notice_scheduler_test.js no no
Unspec automated hearing notice schedulers 1. hearings.setupStaticMocks
2. api.createClaimWithRepresentedRespondent
3. api.amendClaimDocuments
4. api.notifyClaim
5. api.notifyClaimDetails
6. api.defendantResponse
7. api.claimantResponse
8. api.createSDO
9. hearings.createUnspecDisposalHearing
10. hearings.triggerUnspecAutomatedHearingNoticeScheduler
11. hearings.createUnspecTrialHearing
12. hearings.triggerUnspecAutomatedHearingNoticeScheduler
13. hearings.createUnspecDisputeResolutionHearing
14. hearings.triggerUnspecAutomatedHearingNoticeScheduler		 Unspec automated hearing notice schedulers e2e -> tests -> api_tests -> hearings -> api_unspec_hearing_notice_scheduler_test.js no no
1v1 Create Unspecified Intermediate Track claim 1. api.createClaimWithRepresentedRespondent
2. api.notifyClaim
3. api.notifyClaimDetails
4. api.defendantResponse
5. api.claimantResponse
6. api.createFinalOrder
7. api.evidenceUploadRespondent
8. api.scheduleHearing		 @civil-service-master

@civil-service-pr

@civil-camunda-master

@civil-camunda-pr

@civil-service-nightly

@api-intermediate-track		 civil-service: master

civil-service: PR

civil-camunda-bpmn-definition: master

civil-camunda-bpmn-definition: PR

civil-service: nightly		 pr_ft_api-intermediate-track 1v1 unspec intermediate track api journey e2e -> tests -> api_tests -> intermediate-track -> api_1v1_intermediate_test.js no yes
1v1 spec counter claim intermediate claim 1. api_spec.createClaimWithRepresentedRespondent
2. api_spec.defendantResponse		 @civil-service-nightly civil-service: nightly 1v1 spec intermediate track api journey e2e -> tests -> api_tests -> intermediate-track -> api_1v1_spec_intermediate_test.js no yes
1v1 spec full admission intermediate claim 1. api_spec.createClaimWithRepresentedRespondent
2. api_spec.defendantResponse
3. api_spec.claimantResponse		 @civil-service-nightly civil-service: nightly 1v1 spec intermediate track api journey e2e -> tests -> api_tests -> intermediate-track -> api_1v1_spec_intermediate_test.js no yes
1v1 spec full defence intermediate claim 1. api_spec.createClaimWithRepresentedRespondent
2. api_spec.defendantResponse
3. api_spec.claimantResponse
4. api_spec.createFinalOrderJO
5. api_spec.evidenceUploadApplicant
6. api_spec.scheduleHearing		 @civil-service-nightly civil-service: nightly 1v1 spec intermediate track api journey e2e -> tests -> api_tests -> intermediate-track -> api_1v1_spec_intermediate_test.js no yes
1v1 spec part admission intermediate claim 1. api_spec.createClaimWithRepresentedRespondent (skipped)
2. api_spec.defendantResponse (skipped)
3. api_spec.claimantResponse (skipped)		 @civil-service-nightly civil-service: nightly 1v1 spec intermediate track api journey e2e -> tests -> api_tests -> intermediate-track -> api_1v1_spec_intermediate_test.js yes yes
1v2DS spec full defence intermediate claim 1. api_spec.createClaimWithRepresentedRespondent
2. api_spec.defendantResponse
3. api_spec.claimantResponse
4. api_spec.createFinalOrderJO
5. api_spec.evidenceUploadApplicant
6. api_spec.scheduleHearing		 @civil-service-nightly

@api-intermediate-track		 civil-service: nightly pr_ft_api-intermediate-track 1v2DS spec intermediate track api journey e2e -> tests -> api_tests -> intermediate-track -> api_1v2DS_spec_intermediate_test.js no yes
1v2 Same Solicitor Create Unspecified Intermediate Track claim 1. api.createClaimWithRepresentedRespondent
2. api.notifyClaim
3. api.notifyClaimDetails
4. api.defendantResponse
5. api.claimantResponse
6. api.createFinalOrder
7. api.evidenceUploadRespondent
8. api.scheduleHearing		 @civil-service-nightly

@api-intermediate-track		 civil-service: nightly pr_ft_api-intermediate-track 1v2SS unspec intermediate track api journey e2e -> tests -> api_tests -> intermediate-track -> api_1v2SS_intermediate_test.js no yes
1v2SS spec full defence intermediate claim 1. api_spec.createClaimWithRepresentedRespondent (skipped)
2. api_spec.defendantResponse (skipped)
3. api_spec.claimantResponse (skipped)
4. api_spec.assignTaskToUser (skipped)
5. api_spec.createFinalOrderJO (skipped)
6. api_spec.evidenceUploadApplicant (skipped)
7. api_spec.scheduleHearing (skipped)		 @civil-service-nightly

@civil-wa-master

@civil-wa-pr

@civil-wa-nightly		 civil-service: nightly

civil-wa-task-configuration: master

civil-wa-task-configuration: PR

civil-wa-task-configuration: nightly		 1v2SS spec intermediate track api journey e2e -> tests -> api_tests -> intermediate-track -> api_1v2SS_spec_intermediate_test.js yes yes
2v1 Create Unspecified Intermediate Track claim 1. api.createClaimWithRepresentedRespondent
2. api.notifyClaim
3. api.notifyClaimDetails
4. api.defendantResponse
5. api.claimantResponse
6. api.createFinalOrder
7. api.evidenceUploadRespondent
8. api.scheduleHearing		 @civil-service-nightly civil-service: nightly 2v1 unspec intermediate track api journey e2e -> tests -> api_tests -> intermediate-track -> api_2v1_intermediate_test.js no yes
1v1 LiP v LiP defendant and claimant response - CARM enabled - Minti Enabled 1. api_spec_cui.createClaimWithUnrepresentedClaimant
2. api_spec_cui.performCitizenDefendantResponse
3. api_spec_cui.performCitizenClaimantResponse		 @civil-service-nightly

@api-intermediate-track		 civil-service: nightly pr_ft_api-intermediate-track 1v1 LIP v LIP and LR v LIP spec api journeys e2e -> tests -> api_tests -> intermediate-track -> api_lipvlip_spec_intermediate_test.js no yes
1v1 LR v LiP intermediate track 1. api_spec_cui.createSpecifiedClaimWithUnrepresentedRespondent
2. api_spec_cui.performCitizenDefendantResponse
3. api_spec_cui.claimantResponse
4. api_spec_cui.assignTaskToUser		 @civil-service-master

@civil-service-pr

@civil-camunda-master

@civil-camunda-pr

@civil-service-nightly

@api-intermediate-track		 civil-service: master

civil-service: PR

civil-camunda-bpmn-definition: master

civil-camunda-bpmn-definition: PR

civil-service: nightly		 pr_ft_api-intermediate-track Spec 1v1 LR v LiP api intermediate track journey e2e -> tests -> api_tests -> intermediate-track -> api_lrlip_spec_intermediate_test.js no yes
1v1 LiP v LiP defendant response with part admit pay by installments judgment by admission mark paid in full 1. api_spec_cui.createClaimWithUnrepresentedClaimant
2. api_spec_cui.performCitizenDefendantResponse
3. api_spec_cui.performCitizenClaimantResponse
4. api_spec_cui.judgmentPaidInFullCui		 @civil-service-master

@civil-service-pr

@civil-camunda-master

@civil-camunda-pr

@civil-service-nightly

@api-jo		 civil-service: master

civil-service: PR

civil-camunda-bpmn-definition: master

civil-camunda-bpmn-definition: PR

civil-service: nightly		 pr_ft_api-jo Spec 1v1 judgment by admission mark paid in full api test e2e -> tests -> api_tests -> jo -> api_1v1_spec_jba_mark_paid_in_full_1v1_test.js no yes
1v1 LR v LR defendant response with full admit pay by set date judgment by admission mark paid in full 1. api_spec.createClaimWithRepresentedRespondent
2. api_spec.defendantResponse
3. api_spec.claimantResponse
4. api_spec.markJudgmentPaid		 @civil-service-master

@civil-service-pr

@civil-camunda-master

@civil-camunda-pr

@civil-service-nightly		 civil-service: master

civil-service: PR

civil-camunda-bpmn-definition: master

civil-camunda-bpmn-definition: PR

civil-service: nightly		 Spec 1v1 judgment by admission mark paid in full api test e2e -> tests -> api_tests -> jo -> api_1v1_spec_jba_mark_paid_in_full_1v1_test.js no yes
Record Judgment Spec claim 1v1 with mark paid in full 1. api_spec.createClaimWithRepresentedRespondent (skipped)
2. api_spec.informAgreedExtensionDate (skipped)
3. api_spec.defendantResponse (skipped)
4. api_spec.claimantResponse (skipped)
5. api_spec.createSDO (skipped)
6. api_spec.createFinalOrderJO (skipped)
7. api_spec.confirmOrderReview (skipped)
8. api_spec.recordJudgment (skipped)
9. api_spec.editJudgment (skipped)
10. api_spec.markJudgmentPaid (skipped)		 @civil-service-nightly civil-service: nightly 1v1 spec record judgment api test e2e -> tests -> api_tests -> jo -> api_judgment_online_spec_1v1_test.js yes yes
Refer To Judge Spec claim 1v1 Defence Received In Time 1. api_spec.createClaimWithRepresentedRespondent (skipped)
2. api_spec.informAgreedExtensionDate (skipped)
3. api_spec.defendantResponse (skipped)
4. api_spec.claimantResponse (skipped)
5. api_spec.createSDO (skipped)
6. api_spec.createFinalOrderJO (skipped)
7. api_spec.confirmOrderReview (skipped)
8. api_spec.recordJudgment (skipped)
9. api_spec.referToJudgeDefenceReceived (skipped)		 @civil-service-nightly civil-service: nightly 1v1 spec record judgment api test e2e -> tests -> api_tests -> jo -> api_judgment_online_spec_1v1_test.js yes yes
SetAside Default Judgment after judgment error - Spec claim 1v1 - Case taken offline 1. api_spec.createClaimWithRepresentedRespondent
2. api_spec.amendRespondent1ResponseDeadline
3. api_spec.defaultJudgmentSpec
4. api_spec.markJudgmentPaid
5. api_spec.setAsideJudgment		 @civil-service-nightly

@api-jo		 civil-service: nightly pr_ft_api-jo 1v1 spec record judgment api test e2e -> tests -> api_tests -> jo -> api_judgment_online_spec_1v1_test.js no yes
SetAside Default Judgment Spec claim 1v1 - Record new judgment after hearing 1. api_spec.createClaimWithRepresentedRespondent
2. api_spec.amendRespondent1ResponseDeadline
3. api_spec.defaultJudgmentSpec
4. api_spec.setAsideJudgment		 @civil-service-nightly civil-service: nightly 1v1 spec record judgment api test e2e -> tests -> api_tests -> jo -> api_judgment_online_spec_1v1_test.js no yes
Default judgment Spec claim 1v2 - Set Aside after defence - Case taken offline 1. api_spec.createClaimWithRepresentedRespondent
2. api_spec.amendRespondent1ResponseDeadline
3. api_spec.defaultJudgmentSpec
4. api_spec.markJudgmentPaid
5. api_spec.setAsideJudgment		 @civil-service-nightly civil-service: nightly 1v2 spec record judgment api test e2e -> tests -> api_tests -> jo -> api_judgment_online_spec_1v2_test.js no yes
Default judgment Spec claim 1v2 - Set Aside After Order - Record new judgment 1. api_spec.createClaimWithRepresentedRespondent
2. api_spec.amendRespondent1ResponseDeadline
3. api_spec.defaultJudgmentSpec
4. api_spec.setAsideJudgment		 @civil-service-nightly civil-service: nightly 1v2 spec record judgment api test e2e -> tests -> api_tests -> jo -> api_judgment_online_spec_1v2_test.js no yes
Record Judgment with mark judgment paid Spec claim 1v2 1. api_spec.createClaimWithRepresentedRespondent (skipped)
2. api_spec.defendantResponse (skipped)
3. api_spec.claimantResponse (skipped)
4. api_spec.createSDO (skipped)
5. api_spec.createFinalOrderJO (skipped)
6. api_spec.confirmOrderReview (skipped)
7. api_spec.recordJudgment (skipped)
8. api_spec.editJudgment (skipped)		 @civil-service-nightly

@api-jo		 civil-service: nightly pr_ft_api-jo 1v2 spec record judgment api test e2e -> tests -> api_tests -> jo -> api_judgment_online_spec_1v2_test.js yes yes
1v1 manage contact information 1. api.createClaimWithRepresentedRespondent
2. api.notifyClaim
3. api.notifyClaimDetails
4. api.defendantResponse
5. api.claimantResponse
6. api.manageDefendant1Details (skipped)
7. api.manageDefendant1LROrgDetails		 @civil-service-nightly

@api-mci		 civil-service: nightly pr_ft_api-mci 1v1 manage contact information api journey e2e -> tests -> api_tests -> mci -> api_1v1_mci_test.js no yes
1v1 spec api manage contact information 1. api_spec_small.createClaimWithRepresentedRespondent
2. api_spec_small.defendantResponse
3. api_spec_small.claimantResponse
4. api_spec_small.manageContactInformation		 @civil-service-nightly

@api-mci		 civil-service: nightly pr_ft_api-mci 1v1 spec api manage contact information journeys e2e -> tests -> api_tests -> mci -> api_1v1_spec_mci_test.js no yes
1v1 spec api manage contact information - CARM enabled 1. api_spec_small.createClaimWithRepresentedRespondent
2. api_spec_small.defendantResponse
3. api_spec_small.claimantResponse
4. api_spec_small.manageContactInformation		 @civil-service-nightly

@api-mci		 civil-service: nightly pr_ft_api-mci 1v1 spec api manage contact information journeys e2e -> tests -> api_tests -> mci -> api_1v1_spec_mci_test.js no yes
CARM enabled 1. api_spec_cui.createSpecifiedClaimWithUnrepresentedRespondent
2. api_spec_cui.performCitizenDefendantResponse
3. api_spec_cui.claimantResponse
4. api_spec_cui.mediationUnsuccessful		 @civil-service-nightly

@api-mediation

@civil-service-master

@civil-service-pr

@civil-camunda-master

@civil-camunda-pr		 civil-service: nightly

civil-service: master

civil-service: PR

civil-camunda-bpmn-definition: master

civil-camunda-bpmn-definition: PR		 pr_ft_api-mediation Unsuccessful mediation for spec small claim with unrepresented defendant e2e -> tests -> api_tests -> mediation -> api_1v1_spec_cui_mediation_test.js no yes
CARM not enabled 1. api_spec_cui.createSpecifiedClaimWithUnrepresentedRespondent
2. api_spec_cui.performCitizenDefendantResponse
3. api_spec_cui.claimantResponse
4. api_spec_cui.mediationUnsuccessful		 @civil-service-nightly

@api-mediation		 civil-service: nightly pr_ft_api-mediation Unsuccessful mediation for spec small claim with unrepresented defendant e2e -> tests -> api_tests -> mediation -> api_1v1_spec_cui_mediation_test.js no yes
1v1 claimant and defendant part admit reject upload mediation documents - CARM enabled 1. api_spec_small.createClaimWithRepresentedRespondent (skipped)
2. api_spec_small.defendantResponse (skipped)
3. api_spec_small.claimantResponse (skipped)
4. api_spec_small.mediationUnsuccessful (skipped)
5. api_spec_small.uploadMediationDocuments (skipped)
6. api_spec_small.createSDO (skipped)		 @civil-service-nightly civil-service: nightly 1v1 spec small claims mediation api journey e2e -> tests -> api_tests -> mediation -> api_1v1_spec_small_mediation_documents_upload_test.js yes yes
1v1 claimant and defendant part admit states paid- claimant not received payment - upload mediation documents - CARM enabled 1. api_spec_small.createClaimWithRepresentedRespondent (skipped)
2. api_spec_small.defendantResponse (skipped)
3. api_spec_small.claimantResponse (skipped)
4. api_spec_small.mediationUnsuccessful (skipped)
5. api_spec_small.uploadMediationDocuments (skipped)		 @civil-service-nightly civil-service: nightly 1v1 spec small claims mediation api journey e2e -> tests -> api_tests -> mediation -> api_1v1_spec_small_mediation_documents_upload_test.js yes yes
1v1 claimant and defendant part admit states paid- claimant received payment rejects PA - upload mediation documents - CARM enabled 1. api_spec_small.createClaimWithRepresentedRespondent (skipped)
2. api_spec_small.defendantResponse (skipped)
3. api_spec_small.claimantResponse (skipped)
4. api_spec_small.mediationUnsuccessful (skipped)
5. api_spec_small.uploadMediationDocuments (skipped)		 @civil-service-nightly civil-service: nightly 1v1 spec small claims mediation api journey e2e -> tests -> api_tests -> mediation -> api_1v1_spec_small_mediation_documents_upload_test.js yes yes
1v1 claimant and defendant upload mediation documents - CARM enabled 1. api_spec_small.createClaimWithRepresentedRespondent (skipped)
2. api_spec_small.defendantResponse (skipped)
3. api_spec_small.claimantResponse (skipped)
4. api_spec_small.mediationUnsuccessful (skipped)
5. api_spec_small.uploadMediationDocuments (skipped)
6. api_spec_small.createSDO (skipped)		 @civil-service-nightly

@api-mediation		 civil-service: nightly pr_ft_api-mediation 1v1 spec small claims mediation api journey e2e -> tests -> api_tests -> mediation -> api_1v1_spec_small_mediation_documents_upload_test.js yes yes
1v1 claimant and defendant upload mediation documents - CARM not enabled 1. api_spec_small.createClaimWithRepresentedRespondent (skipped)
2. api_spec_small.defendantResponse (skipped)
3. api_spec_small.claimantResponse (skipped)
4. api_spec_small.uploadMediationDocuments (skipped)
5. api_spec_small.createSDO (skipped)		 @civil-service-nightly

@civil-service-master

@civil-service-pr

@civil-camunda-master

@civil-camunda-pr		 civil-service: nightly

civil-service: master

civil-service: PR

civil-camunda-bpmn-definition: master

civil-camunda-bpmn-definition: PR		 1v1 spec small claims mediation api journey e2e -> tests -> api_tests -> mediation -> api_1v1_spec_small_mediation_documents_upload_test.js yes yes
1v2 different solicitor claimant and defendant upload mediation documents - CARM enabled 1. api_spec.createClaimWithRepresentedRespondent (skipped)
2. api_spec.defendantResponse (skipped)
3. api_spec.claimantResponse (skipped)
4. api_spec.mediationUnsuccessful (skipped)
5. api_spec.uploadMediationDocuments (skipped)		 @api-nightly-prod

@api-mediation		 pr_ft_api-nightly-prod

pr_ft_api-mediation		 Spec small claims mediation api journey e2e -> tests -> api_tests -> mediation -> api_1v2_spec_small_mediation_documents_upload_test.js yes yes
1v2 different solicitor claimant and defendant upload mediation documents - CARM not enabled 1. api_spec.createClaimWithRepresentedRespondent (skipped)
2. api_spec.defendantResponse (skipped)
3. api_spec.claimantResponse (skipped)
4. api_spec.uploadMediationDocuments (skipped)		 @api-nightly-prod pr_ft_api-nightly-prod Spec small claims mediation api journey e2e -> tests -> api_tests -> mediation -> api_1v2_spec_small_mediation_documents_upload_test.js yes yes
1v2 same solicitor claimant and defendant upload mediation documents - CARM enabled 1. api_spec.createClaimWithRepresentedRespondent (skipped)
2. api_spec.defendantResponse (skipped)
3. api_spec.claimantResponse (skipped)
4. api_spec.mediationUnsuccessful (skipped)
5. api_spec.uploadMediationDocuments (skipped)		 @api-nightly-prod pr_ft_api-nightly-prod Spec small claims mediation api journey e2e -> tests -> api_tests -> mediation -> api_1v2_spec_small_mediation_documents_upload_test.js yes yes
1v2 same solicitor claimant and defendant upload mediation documents - CARM not enabled 1. api_spec.createClaimWithRepresentedRespondent (skipped)
2. api_spec.defendantResponse (skipped)
3. api_spec.claimantResponse (skipped)
4. api_spec.uploadMediationDocuments (skipped)		 @api-nightly-prod pr_ft_api-nightly-prod Spec small claims mediation api journey e2e -> tests -> api_tests -> mediation -> api_1v2_spec_small_mediation_documents_upload_test.js yes yes
2v1 claimant and defendant upload mediation documents - CARM enabled 1. api_spec.createClaimWithRepresentedRespondent (skipped)
2. api_spec.defendantResponse (skipped)
3. api_spec.claimantResponse (skipped)
4. api_spec.mediationUnsuccessful (skipped)
5. api_spec.uploadMediationDocuments (skipped)		 @api-nightly-prod pr_ft_api-nightly-prod Spec small claims mediation api journey e2e -> tests -> api_tests -> mediation -> api_2v1_spec_small_mediation_documents_upload_test.js yes yes
2v1 claimant and defendant upload mediation documents - CARM not enabled 1. api_spec.createClaimWithRepresentedRespondent (skipped)
2. api_spec.defendantResponse (skipped)
3. api_spec.claimantResponse (skipped)
4. api_spec.uploadMediationDocuments (skipped)		 @api-nightly-prod pr_ft_api-nightly-prod Spec small claims mediation api journey e2e -> tests -> api_tests -> mediation -> api_2v1_spec_small_mediation_documents_upload_test.js yes yes
1v1 unspec multi track 1. api.createClaimWithRepresentedRespondent
2. api.notifyClaim
3. api.notifyClaimDetails
4. api.defendantResponse
5. api.claimantResponse
6. api.assignTaskToUser
7. api.createFinalOrder
8. api.evidenceUploadApplicant
9. api.scheduleHearing		 @civil-service-master

@civil-service-pr

@civil-camunda-master

@civil-camunda-pr

@civil-service-nightly

@api-multi-track		 civil-service: master

civil-service: PR

civil-camunda-bpmn-definition: master

civil-camunda-bpmn-definition: PR

civil-service: nightly		 pr_ft_api-multi-track 1v1 unspec multi track journey e2e -> tests -> api_tests -> multi-track -> api_1v1_multi_test.js no yes
1v1 spec counter claim multi claim 1. api_spec.createClaimWithRepresentedRespondent
2. api_spec.defendantResponse		 @civil-service-nightly civil-service: nightly 1v1 spec api multi track journeys e2e -> tests -> api_tests -> multi-track -> api_1v1_spec_multi_test.js no yes
1v1 spec full admission multi claim 1. api_spec.createClaimWithRepresentedRespondent
2. api_spec.defendantResponse
3. api_spec.claimantResponse		 @civil-service-nightly civil-service: nightly 1v1 spec api multi track journeys e2e -> tests -> api_tests -> multi-track -> api_1v1_spec_multi_test.js no yes
1v1 spec full defence multi claim 1. api_spec.createClaimWithRepresentedRespondent
2. api_spec.defendantResponse
3. api_spec.claimantResponse
4. api_spec.createFinalOrderJO
5. api_spec.evidenceUploadRespondent
6. api_spec.scheduleHearing		 @civil-service-nightly

@api-multi-track		 civil-service: nightly pr_ft_api-multi-track 1v1 spec api multi track journeys e2e -> tests -> api_tests -> multi-track -> api_1v1_spec_multi_test.js no yes
1v1 spec part admission multi claim 1. api_spec.createClaimWithRepresentedRespondent (skipped)
2. api_spec.defendantResponse (skipped)
3. api_spec.claimantResponse (skipped)		 @civil-service-nightly civil-service: nightly 1v1 spec api multi track journeys e2e -> tests -> api_tests -> multi-track -> api_1v1_spec_multi_test.js yes yes
1v2DS unspec multi track claim 1. api.createClaimWithRepresentedRespondent
2. api.notifyClaim
3. api.notifyClaimDetails
4. api.defendantResponse
5. api.claimantResponse
6. api.assignTaskToUser
7. api.createFinalOrder
8. api.evidenceUploadApplicant
9. api.scheduleHearing		 @civil-service-nightly

@api-multi-track

@civil-wa-master

@civil-wa-pr

@civil-wa-nightly		 civil-service: nightly

civil-wa-task-configuration: master

civil-wa-task-configuration: PR

civil-wa-task-configuration: nightly		 pr_ft_api-multi-track 1v2DS unspec multi track journey e2e -> tests -> api_tests -> multi-track -> api_1v2DS_multi_test.js no yes
1v2DS spec full defence multi claim 1. api_spec.createClaimWithRepresentedRespondent
2. api_spec.defendantResponse
3. api_spec.claimantResponse
4. api_spec.createFinalOrderJO
5. api_spec.evidenceUploadRespondent
6. api_spec.scheduleHearing		 @civil-service-nightly

@api-multi-track		 civil-service: nightly pr_ft_api-multi-track 1v2DS spec api multi track journey e2e -> tests -> api_tests -> multi-track -> api_1v2DS_spec_multi_test.js no yes
1v2SS unspec multi track claim 1. api.createClaimWithRepresentedRespondent
2. api.notifyClaim
3. api.notifyClaimDetails
4. api.defendantResponse
5. api.claimantResponse
6. api.assignTaskToUser
7. api.createFinalOrder
8. api.evidenceUploadApplicant
9. api.scheduleHearing		 @civil-service-nightly civil-service: nightly 1v2SS unspec multi track journey e2e -> tests -> api_tests -> multi-track -> api_1v2SS_multi_test.js no yes
1v2SS spec full defence multi claim 1. api_spec.createClaimWithRepresentedRespondent
2. api_spec.defendantResponse
3. api_spec.claimantResponse
4. api_spec.createFinalOrderJO
5. api_spec.evidenceUploadRespondent
6. api_spec.scheduleHearing		 @civil-service-nightly civil-service: nightly 1v2SS spec api multi track journey e2e -> tests -> api_tests -> multi-track -> api_1v2SS_spec_multi_test.js no yes
2v1 unspec multi track claim 1. api.createClaimWithRepresentedRespondent
2. api.notifyClaim
3. api.notifyClaimDetails
4. api.defendantResponse
5. api.claimantResponse
6. api.assignTaskToUser
7. api.createFinalOrder
8. api.evidenceUploadApplicant
9. api.scheduleHearing		 @civil-service-master

@civil-service-pr

@civil-camunda-master

@civil-camunda-pr

@civil-service-nightly		 civil-service: master

civil-service: PR

civil-camunda-bpmn-definition: master

civil-camunda-bpmn-definition: PR

civil-service: nightly		 2v1 unspec multi track journey e2e -> tests -> api_tests -> multi-track -> api_2v1_multi_test.js no yes
1v1 LR v LiP multi track 1. api_spec_cui.createSpecifiedClaimWithUnrepresentedRespondent
2. api_spec_cui.performCitizenDefendantResponse
3. api_spec_cui.claimantResponse
4. api_spec_cui.assignTaskToUser		 @civil-service-nightly

@api-multi-track		 civil-service: nightly pr_ft_api-multi-track 1v1 LR v LiP spec multi track api journey e2e -> tests -> api_tests -> multi-track -> api_lrvlip_spec_multi_test.js no yes
1v1 unspec create SDO for Noise Induced Hearing Loss 1. api.createClaimWithRepresentedRespondent
2. api.amendClaimDocuments
3. api.notifyClaim
4. api.notifyClaimDetails
5. api.defendantResponse
6. api.claimantResponse
7. api.createSDO
8. api.evidenceUploadApplicant
9. api.evidenceUploadRespondent
10. api.scheduleHearing
11. api.amendHearingDueDate
12. api.hearingFeePaid
13. api.triggerBundle
14. api.createFinalOrder		 @civil-service-nightly

@api-nihl		 civil-service: nightly pr_ft_api-nihl Noise Induced Hearing Loss API test - fast claim - unspec e2e -> tests -> api_tests -> nihl -> api_noise_induced_hearing_loss_test.js no yes
1v1 unspec notice of change 1. api.createClaimWithRepresentedRespondent
2. api.notifyClaim
3. api.notifyClaimDetails
4. noc.requestNoticeOfChangeForApplicant1Solicitor
5. api.checkUserCaseAccess
6. noc.requestNoticeOfChangeForRespondent1Solicitor		 @civil-service-nightly

@api-noc		 civil-service: nightly pr_ft_api-noc 1v1 unspec notice of change api journey e2e -> tests -> api_tests -> noc -> api_1v1_noc_test.js no yes
1v1 spec notice of change 1. api_spec.createClaimWithRepresentedRespondent
2. noc.requestNoticeOfChangeForApplicant1Solicitor
3. api_spec.checkUserCaseAccess
4. noc.requestNoticeOfChangeForRespondent1Solicitor		 @civil-service-nightly

@api-noc		 civil-service: nightly pr_ft_api-noc 1v1 spec notice of change api journey e2e -> tests -> api_tests -> noc -> api_1v1_spec_noc_test.js no yes
1vDS spec notice of change 1. api.createClaimWithRepresentedRespondent
2. api.notifyClaim
3. api.notifyClaimDetails
4. noc.requestNoticeOfChangeForRespondent1Solicitor
5. api.checkUserCaseAccess
6. noc.requestNoticeOfChangeForRespondent2Solicitor		 @civil-service-nightly

@api-noc		 civil-service: nightly pr_ft_api-noc 1vDS spec notice of change api journey e2e -> tests -> api_tests -> noc -> api_1v2DS_noc_test.js no yes
notice of change - 1v2 - same solicitor to diff solicitor 1. api.createClaimWithRepresentedRespondent (skipped)
2. api.notifyClaim (skipped)
3. api.notifyClaimDetails (skipped)
4. noc.requestNoticeOfChangeForRespondent1Solicitor (skipped)
5. api.checkUserCaseAccess (skipped)
6. noc.requestNoticeOfChangeForRespondent2Solicitor (skipped)		 @civil-service-nightly

@api-noc		 civil-service: nightly pr_ft_api-noc Unspecified Notice of Change on Unpecified Claim API test e2e -> tests -> api_tests -> noc -> api_1v2SS_noc_test.js yes yes
1vSS spec notice of change 1. api_spec.createClaimWithRepresentedRespondent
2. noc.requestNoticeOfChangeForRespondent1Solicitor
3. api_spec.checkUserCaseAccess
4. api_spec.defendantResponse		 @civil-service-nightly

@api-noc		 civil-service: nightly pr_ft_api-noc 1vSS spec notice of change api journey e2e -> tests -> api_tests -> noc -> api_1v2SS_spec_noc_test.js no yes
1vLIP unspec notice of change 1. api.createClaimWithRespondentLitigantInPerson
2. api.notifyClaimLip
3. api.notifyClaimDetailsLip
4. noc.requestNoticeOfChangeForRespondent1Solicitor
5. api.checkUserCaseAccess		 @civil-service-nightly

@api-noc		 civil-service: nightly pr_ft_api-noc 1vLIP unspec notice of change api journey e2e -> tests -> api_tests -> noc -> api_1vLIP_noc_test.js no yes
2v1 unspec notice of change 1. api.createClaimWithRepresentedRespondent (skipped)
2. api.notifyClaim (skipped)
3. api.notifyClaimDetails (skipped)
4. noc.requestNoticeOfChangeForApplicant1Solicitor (skipped)
5. api.checkUserCaseAccess (skipped)
6. noc.requestNoticeOfChangeForApplicant2Solicitor (skipped)		 @civil-service-nightly

@api-noc		 civil-service: nightly pr_ft_api-noc 2v1 unspec notice of change api journey e2e -> tests -> api_tests -> noc -> api_2v1_noc_test.js yes yes
2v1 spec notice of change 1. api_spec.createClaimWithRepresentedRespondent
2. noc.requestNoticeOfChangeForApplicant1Solicitor
3. api_spec.checkUserCaseAccess
4. noc.requestNoticeOfChangeForRespondent1Solicitor		 @civil-service-nightly

@api-noc		 civil-service: nightly pr_ft_api-noc 2v1 spec notice of change api journey e2e -> tests -> api_tests -> noc -> api_2v1_spec_noc_test.js no yes
notice of change - 1v2 - both respondents LiPs to diff solicitor 1. api.createClaimWithRespondentLitigantInPerson
2. api.notifyClaimLip
3. api.notifyClaimDetailsLip
4. noc.requestNoticeOfChangeForRespondent1Solicitor
5. noc.requestNoticeOfChangeForRespondent2Solicitor
6. api.checkUserCaseAccess
7. api.defendantResponse
8. api.claimantResponse		 @civil-service-nightly

@api-noc		 civil-service: nightly pr_ft_api-noc Unspecified Notice of Change on Unpecified Claim API test e2e -> tests -> api_tests -> noc -> api_LRv2LIPs_noc_test.js no yes
notice of change - 1v2 - both respondents LiPs to same solicitor 1. api.createClaimWithRespondentLitigantInPerson
2. api.notifyClaimLip
3. api.notifyClaimDetailsLip
4. noc.requestNoticeOfChangeForRespondent1Solicitor
5. noc.requestNoticeOfChangeForRespondent2Solicitor
6. api.checkUserCaseAccess
7. api.defendantResponse
8. api.claimantResponse		 @civil-service-nightly

@api-noc		 civil-service: nightly pr_ft_api-noc Unspecified Notice of Change on Unpecified Claim API test e2e -> tests -> api_tests -> noc -> api_LRv2LIPs_noc_test.js no yes
LR v LiP notice of change 1. api_spec_cui.createClaimWithUnrepresentedClaimant
2. noc.requestNoticeOfChangeForApplicant1Solicitor
3. api_spec_cui.checkUserCaseAccess
4. api_spec_cui.performCitizenDefendantResponse
5. api_spec_cui.claimantResponse		 @civil-service-nightly

@api-noc		 civil-service: nightly pr_ft_api-noc LR v LiP notice of change spec api journey e2e -> tests -> api_tests -> noc -> api_LRvLIP_noc_spec_test.js no yes
LR v LR LIP spec notice of change 1. api.createClaimWithRespondentLitigantInPerson
2. api.notifyClaimLip
3. api.notifyClaimDetailsLip
4. noc.requestNoticeOfChangeForRespondent2Solicitor
5. api.checkUserCaseAccess		 @civil-service-nightly

@api-noc		 civil-service: nightly pr_ft_api-noc LR v LR LIP spec notice of change api journey e2e -> tests -> api_tests -> noc -> api_LRvLRLIP_noc_test.js no yes
1v1 unspec full defence - not suitable SDO - Other Reasons 1. api.createClaimWithRepresentedRespondent
2. api.amendClaimDocuments
3. api.notifyClaim
4. api.notifyClaimDetails
5. api.defendantResponse
6. api.claimantResponse
7. api.notSuitableSDO		 @civil-service-nightly civil-service: nightly Transfer Online Case 1v1 API test - fast claim - unspec e2e -> tests -> api_tests -> not-suitable-sdo -> api_1v1_unspec_fast_not_suitable_sdo_test.js no yes
1v1 unspec full defence - not suitable SDO - Transfer Case 1. api.createClaimWithRepresentedRespondent
2. api.amendClaimDocuments
3. api.notifyClaim
4. api.notifyClaimDetails
5. api.defendantResponse
6. api.claimantResponse
7. api.notSuitableSDO
8. api.transferCase		 @civil-service-nightly

@api-not-suitable-sdo		 civil-service: nightly pr_ft_api-not-suitable-sdo Transfer Online Case 1v1 API test - fast claim - unspec e2e -> tests -> api_tests -> not-suitable-sdo -> api_1v1_unspec_fast_not_suitable_sdo_test.js no yes
Transfer Online Spec claim 1v2 - not suitable SDO - Other reasons 1. api_spec.createClaimWithRepresentedRespondent
2. api_spec.defendantResponse
3. api_spec.claimantResponse
4. api_spec.notSuitableSDOspec		 @civil-service-nightly

@api-not-suitable-sdo		 civil-service: nightly pr_ft_api-not-suitable-sdo Transfer Online Case 1v2 API test - small claim - spec e2e -> tests -> api_tests -> not-suitable-sdo -> api_1v2_spec_small_not_suitable_sdo_test.js no yes
Transfer Online Spec claim 1v2 - not suitable SDO - Transfer Case 1. api_spec.createClaimWithRepresentedRespondent
2. api_spec.defendantResponse
3. api_spec.claimantResponse
4. api_spec.notSuitableSDOspec
5. api_spec.transferCaseSpec		 @civil-service-nightly civil-service: nightly Transfer Online Case 1v2 API test - small claim - spec e2e -> tests -> api_tests -> not-suitable-sdo -> api_1v2_spec_small_not_suitable_sdo_test.js no yes
1v2 full defence unspecified - not suitable SDO - Transfer Case) 1. api.createClaimWithRepresentedRespondent
2. api.amendClaimDocuments
3. api.notifyClaim
4. api.notifyClaimDetails
5. api.defendantResponse
6. api.claimantResponse
7. api.notSuitableSDO
8. api.transferCase		 @api-not-suitable-sdo

@civil-service-nightly		 civil-service: nightly pr_ft_api-not-suitable-sdo Transfer Online Case 1v2 API test - fast claim - unspec e2e -> tests -> api_tests -> not-suitable-sdo -> api_1v2_unspec_fast_not_suitable_sdo_test.js no yes
1v1 unspec full defence 1. api.createClaimWithRepresentedRespondent
2. api.notifyClaim
3. api.notifyClaimDetails
4. api.defendantResponse
5. api.claimantResponse		 @civil-service-nightly

@api-other-remedy		 civil-service: nightly pr_ft_api-other-remedy 1v1 unspec full defence api journey for Other Remedy claim type fast track e2e -> tests -> api_tests -> other-remedy -> api_1v1_otherRemedy_fastTrack_test.js no yes
1v1 unspec full defence 1. api.createClaimWithRepresentedRespondent
2. api.notifyClaim
3. api.notifyClaimDetails
4. api.defendantResponse
5. api.claimantResponse		 @civil-service-nightly

@api-other-remedy		 civil-service: nightly pr_ft_api-other-remedy 1v1 unspec full defence api journey for Other Remedy claim type small claims e2e -> tests -> api_tests -> other-remedy -> api_1v1_otherRemedy_smallClaims_test.js no yes
1v1 query management api journey 1. api.createClaimWithRepresentedRespondent
2. api.notifyClaim
3. api.notifyClaimDetails
4. api.defendantResponse
5. api.claimantResponse
6. qmSteps.raiseLRQuery
7. qmSteps.respondToQuery
8. qmSteps.followUpOnLRQuery
9. qmSteps.raiseLRQuery
10. qmSteps.respondToQuery
11. qmSteps.followUpOnLRQuery		 @civil-service-nightly civil-service: nightly 1v1 query management api journey e2e -> tests -> api_tests -> qm -> api_1v1_qm_test.js no no
CCD 1v2 Unspec fast hearings API test 1. api.createClaimWithRepresentedRespondent
2. api.notifyClaim
3. api.notifyClaimDetails
4. api.defendantResponse
5. api.claimantResponse
6. qmSteps.raiseLRQuery
7. qmSteps.validateQmResponseTask
8. qmSteps.respondToQuery
9. qmSteps.followUpOnLRQuery
10. qmSteps.raiseLRQuery
11. qmSteps.validateQmResponseTask
12. qmSteps.respondToQuery
13. qmSteps.followUpOnLRQuery
14. qmSteps.raiseLRQuery
15. qmSteps.validateQmResponseTask
16. qmSteps.respondToQuery
17. qmSteps.followUpOnLRQuery		 @civil-service-nightly

@api-qm

@civil-wa-master

@civil-wa-pr

@civil-wa-nightly		 civil-service: nightly

civil-wa-task-configuration: master

civil-wa-task-configuration: PR

civil-wa-task-configuration: nightly		 pr_ft_api-qm CCD 1v2 Unspec fast hearings API test e2e -> tests -> api_tests -> qm -> api_1v2DS_qm_test.js no no
1v2SS query management api journey 1. api.createClaimWithRepresentedRespondent
2. api.notifyClaim
3. api.notifyClaimDetails
4. api.defendantResponse
5. api.claimantResponse
6. qmSteps.raiseLRQuery
7. qmSteps.respondToQuery
8. qmSteps.followUpOnLRQuery
9. qmSteps.raiseLRQuery
10. qmSteps.respondToQuery
11. qmSteps.followUpOnLRQuery		 @civil-service-nightly civil-service: nightly 1v2SS query management api journey e2e -> tests -> api_tests -> qm -> api_1v2SS_qm_test.js no no
2v1 query management api journey 1. api.createClaimWithRepresentedRespondent
2. api.notifyClaim
3. api.notifyClaimDetails
4. api.defendantResponse
5. api.claimantResponse
6. qmSteps.raiseLRQuery
7. qmSteps.respondToQuery
8. qmSteps.followUpOnLRQuery
9. qmSteps.raiseLRQuery
10. qmSteps.respondToQuery
11. qmSteps.followUpOnLRQuery		 @civil-service-nightly civil-service: nightly 2v1 query management api journey e2e -> tests -> api_tests -> qm -> api_2v1_qm_test.js no no
LR v LIP query management spec 1. api_spec_cui.createClaimWithUnrepresentedClaimant
2. api_spec_cui.performCitizenDefendantResponse
3. api_spec_cui.performCitizenClaimantResponse
4. api_spec_cui.createSDO
5. qmSteps.raiseLipQuery
6. qmSteps.validateQmResponseTask
7. qmSteps.respondToQuery
8. qmSteps.followUpOnLipQuery		 @civil-service-nightly

@api-qm		 civil-service: nightly pr_ft_api-qm LR v LIP query management spec api journey e2e -> tests -> api_tests -> qm -> api_LIPvLIP_spec_qm_test.js no yes
1v1 LiP v LR defendant and claimant response- CARM enabled 1. api_spec_cui.createClaimWithUnrepresentedClaimant
2. noc.requestNoticeOfChangeForRespondent1Solicitor
3. api_spec_cui.checkUserCaseAccess
4. qmSteps.raiseLipQuery
5. qmSteps.validateQmResponseTask
6. qmSteps.respondToQuery
7. qmSteps.followUpOnLipQuery
8. qmSteps.raiseLRQuery
9. qmSteps.followUpOnLRQuery		 @civil-service-nightly civil-service: nightly 1v1 LIP v LIP and LR v LIP spec api journeys e2e -> tests -> api_tests -> qm -> api_LIPvLR_spec_qm_test.js no yes
LR v LIP query management spec 1. api_spec_cui.createSpecifiedClaimWithUnrepresentedRespondent
2. api_spec_cui.performCitizenDefendantResponse
3. api_spec_cui.claimantResponse
4. api_spec_cui.createSDO
5. qmSteps.raiseLRQuery
6. qmSteps.respondToQuery
7. qmSteps.followUpOnLRQuery
8. qmSteps.raiseLipQuery
9. qmSteps.validateQmResponseTask
10. qmSteps.followUpOnLipQuery		 @civil-service-nightly civil-service: nightly LR v LIP query management spec api journey e2e -> tests -> api_tests -> qm -> api_LRvLIP_spec_qm_test.js no yes
1v1 spec request for reconsideration for create a new SDO 1. api_spec_small.createClaimWithRepresentedRespondent
2. api_spec_small.defendantResponse
3. api_spec_small.claimantResponse
4. api_spec_small.createSDO
5. api_spec_small.requestForReconsideration
6. api_spec_small.judgeDecisionOnReconsiderationRequest
7. api_spec_small.notSuitableSdoChangeLocation (skipped)		 @civil-service-nightly civil-service: nightly Request for reconsideration - 1v1 - spec e2e -> tests -> api_tests -> rfr -> api_1v1_request_for_reconsideration_test.js no yes
1v1 spec request for reconsideration for create general order 1. api_spec_small.createClaimWithRepresentedRespondent
2. api_spec_small.defendantResponse
3. api_spec_small.claimantResponse
4. api_spec_small.createSDO
5. api_spec_small.requestForReconsideration
6. api_spec_small.judgeDecisionOnReconsiderationRequest		 @civil-service-nightly civil-service: nightly Request for reconsideration - 1v1 - spec e2e -> tests -> api_tests -> rfr -> api_1v1_request_for_reconsideration_test.js no yes
1v1 spec request for reconsideration for create new SDO 1. api_spec_small.createClaimWithRepresentedRespondent
2. api_spec_small.defendantResponse
3. api_spec_small.claimantResponse
4. api_spec_small.createSDO
5. api_spec_small.requestForReconsideration
6. api_spec_small.judgeDecisionOnReconsiderationRequest		 @civil-service-nightly

@api-rfr		 civil-service: nightly pr_ft_api-rfr Request for reconsideration - 1v1 - spec e2e -> tests -> api_tests -> rfr -> api_1v1_request_for_reconsideration_test.js no yes
1v1 spec request for reconsideration for uphold previous order 1. api_spec_small.createClaimWithRepresentedRespondent
2. api_spec_small.defendantResponse
3. api_spec_small.claimantResponse
4. api_spec_small.createSDO
5. api_spec_small.requestForReconsideration
6. api_spec_small.judgeDecisionOnReconsiderationRequest		 @civil-service-nightly

@api-rfr		 civil-service: nightly pr_ft_api-rfr Request for reconsideration - 1v1 - spec e2e -> tests -> api_tests -> rfr -> api_1v1_request_for_reconsideration_test.js no yes
1v1 spec request for reconsideration when claim amount is greater than 1000 1. api_spec.createClaimWithRepresentedRespondent (skipped)
2. api_spec.defendantResponse (skipped)
3. api_spec.claimantResponse (skipped)
4. api_spec.createSDO (skipped)
5. api_spec.requestForReconsideration (skipped)		 @civil-service-nightly civil-service: nightly Request for reconsideration - 1v1 - spec e2e -> tests -> api_tests -> rfr -> api_1v1_request_for_reconsideration_test.js yes yes
1v2 spec request for reconsideration by defendant 2 for create general order 1. api_spec_small.createClaimWithRepresentedRespondent
2. api_spec_small.defendantResponse
3. api_spec_small.claimantResponse
4. api_spec_small.createSDO
5. api_spec_small.requestForReconsideration
6. api_spec_small.judgeDecisionOnReconsiderationRequest		 @civil-service-nightly

@api-rfr		 civil-service: nightly pr_ft_api-rfr Request for reconsideration - 1v1 - spec e2e -> tests -> api_tests -> rfr -> api_1v2DS_request_for_reconsideration_test.js no yes
1v1 LiP v LiP Request for reconsideration 1. api_spec_cui.createClaimWithUnrepresentedClaimant
2. api_spec_cui.performCitizenDefendantResponse
3. api_spec_cui.performCitizenClaimantResponse
4. api_spec_cui.createSDO
5. api_spec_cui.requestForReconsiderationCitizen
6. api_spec_cui.judgeDecisionOnReconsiderationRequest		 @civil-service-nightly

@api-rfr		 civil-service: nightly pr_ft_api-rfr LIPvLIP spec request for reconsideration api journeys e2e -> tests -> api_tests -> rfr -> api_LIPvLIP_request_for_reconsideration_test.js no yes
1v1 LR v LiP Request for reconsideration 1. api_spec_cui.createSpecifiedClaimWithUnrepresentedRespondent
2. api_spec_cui.performCitizenDefendantResponse
3. api_spec_cui.claimantResponse
4. api_spec_cui.createSDO
5. api_spec_cui.requestForReconsiderationCitizen
6. api_spec_cui.judgeDecisionOnReconsiderationRequest		 @civil-service-nightly

@api-rfr		 civil-service: nightly pr_ft_api-rfr LRvLIP spec request for reconsideration api journeys e2e -> tests -> api_tests -> rfr -> api_LRvLIP_request_for_reconsideration_test.js no yes
1v1 settle claim spec 1. api_spec.createClaimWithRepresentedRespondent
2. api_spec.informAgreedExtensionDate
3. api_spec.defendantResponse
4. api_spec.claimantResponse
5. api_spec.settleClaim		 @civil-service-nightly

@api-settle-claim		 civil-service: nightly pr_ft_api-settle-claim 1v1 settle claim spec api journey e2e -> tests -> api_tests -> settle-claim -> api_1v1_spec_settle_claim_test.js no yes
1v2 settle claim spec 1. api_spec.createClaimWithRepresentedRespondent
2. api_spec.defendantResponse
3. api_spec.settleClaim		 @civil-service-nightly

@api-settle-claim		 civil-service: nightly pr_ft_api-settle-claim 1v2 settle claim spec api journey e2e -> tests -> api_tests -> settle-claim -> api_1v2DS_spec_settle_claim_test.js no yes
2v1 settle claim spec 1. api_spec.createClaimWithRepresentedRespondent
2. api_spec.settleClaimSelectClaimant		 @civil-service-nightly

@api-settle-claim		 civil-service: nightly pr_ft_api-settle-claim 2v1 settle claim spec api journey e2e -> tests -> api_tests -> settle-claim -> api_2v1_spec_settle_claim_test.js no yes
API 1v1 spec create claim and create general application @civil-service-smoke civil-service: master (smoke)

civil-service: PR (smoke)		 Smoke test - API 1v1 spec create claim and create general application e2e -> tests -> api_tests -> smoke -> api_1v1_spec_create_claim_ga_test.js no yes
API 1v1 spec create claim and create general application 1. api_spec.createClaimWithRepresentedRespondent @civil-camunda-smoke

@civil-wa-smoke		 civil-camunda-bpmn-definition: master (smoke)

civil-camunda-bpmn-definition: PR (smoke)

civil-wa-task-configuration: master (smoke)

civil-wa-task-configuration: PR (smoke)		 Smoke test - API 1v1 spec create claim and create general application e2e -> tests -> api_tests -> smoke -> api_1v1_spec_create_claim_test.js no yes
1v1 counter claim 1. api_spec.createClaimWithRepresentedRespondent
2. api_spec.defendantResponse		 @civil-service-nightly

@api-spec-counterclaim		 civil-service: nightly pr_ft_api-spec-counterclaim 1v1 spec counter claim api journey e2e -> tests -> api_tests -> spec-counter-claim -> api_1v1_spec_counter_claim_test.js no yes
1v1 spec small claim counter claim 1. api_spec_small.createClaimWithRepresentedRespondent
2. api_spec_small.defendantResponse		 @civil-service-nightly

@api-spec-counterclaim		 civil-service: nightly pr_ft_api-spec-counterclaim 1v1 spec small claim counter claim api journey e2e -> tests -> api_tests -> spec-counter-claim -> api_1v1_spec_small_counter_claim_test.js no yes
1v2SS small claim counter claim 1. api_spec.createClaimWithRepresentedRespondent
2. api_spec.defendantResponse		 @civil-service-nightly

@api-spec-counterclaim		 civil-service: nightly pr_ft_api-spec-counterclaim 1v2SS spec counter claim api journey e2e -> tests -> api_tests -> spec-counter-claim -> api_1v2SS_spec_counter_claim_test.js no yes
1v2SS fast claim counter claim 1. api_spec_fast.createClaimWithRepresentedRespondent
2. api_spec_fast.defendantResponse		 @civil-service-nightly

@api-spec-counterclaim		 civil-service: nightly pr_ft_api-spec-counterclaim 1v2SS spec fast track counter api journey e2e -> tests -> api_tests -> spec-counter-claim -> api_1v2SS_spec_fast_counter_claim_test.js no yes
2v1 small claim counter claim 1. api_spec.createClaimWithRepresentedRespondent
2. api_spec.defendantResponse		 @civil-service-nightly

@api-spec-counterclaim		 civil-service: nightly pr_ft_api-spec-counterclaim 2v1 spec counter claim api journey e2e -> tests -> api_tests -> spec-counter-claim -> api_2v1_spec_counter_claim_test.js no yes
2v1 fast claim counter claim 1. api_spec_fast.createClaimWithRepresentedRespondent
2. api_spec_fast.defendantResponse		 @civil-service-nightly

@api-spec-counterclaim		 civil-service: nightly pr_ft_api-spec-counterclaim 2v1 spec api fast track journeys e2e -> tests -> api_tests -> spec-counter-claim -> api_2v1_spec_fast_counter_claim_test.js no yes
1v1 spec full admit 1. api_spec.createClaimWithRepresentedRespondent
2. api_spec.defendantResponse
3. api_spec.claimantResponse		 @civil-service-nightly

@api-spec-full-admit		 civil-service: nightly pr_ft_api-spec-full-admit 1v1 spec full admit api journey e2e -> tests -> api_tests -> spec-full-admit -> api_1v1_spec_full_admit_test.js no yes
1v1 spec small claims full admit 1. api_spec_small.createClaimWithRepresentedRespondent
2. api_spec_small.defendantResponse
3. api_spec_small.claimantResponse		 @civil-service-nightly

@api-spec-full-admit		 civil-service: nightly pr_ft_api-spec-full-admit 1v1 spec small claims full admit api journey e2e -> tests -> api_tests -> spec-full-admit -> api_1v1_spec_small_full_admit_test.js no yes
1v2SS fast claim fast claim full admit, defendant and claimant response 1. api_spec_fast.createClaimWithRepresentedRespondent
2. api_spec_fast.defendantResponse
3. api_spec_fast.claimantResponse		 @civil-service-nightly

@api-spec-full-admit		 civil-service: nightly pr_ft_api-spec-full-admit 1v2SS spec api fast track journeys e2e -> tests -> api_tests -> spec-full-admit -> api_1v2SS_spec_fast_full_admit_test.js no yes
1v2SS small claim full admit, claimant response 1. api_spec.createClaimWithRepresentedRespondent
2. api_spec.defendantResponse
3. api_spec.claimantResponse		 @civil-service-nightly

@api-spec-full-admit		 civil-service: nightly pr_ft_api-spec-full-admit 1v2SS spec full admit api journey e2e -> tests -> api_tests -> spec-full-admit -> api_1v2SS_spec_full_admit_test.js no yes
2v1 fast claim full admission 1. api_spec_fast.createClaimWithRepresentedRespondent (skipped)
2. api_spec_fast.defendantResponse (skipped)		 @civil-service-nightly

@api-spec-full-admit		 civil-service: nightly pr_ft_api-spec-full-admit 2v1 spec fast track api journeys e2e -> tests -> api_tests -> spec-full-admit -> api_2v1_spec_fast_counter_claim_test.js yes yes
2v1 spec fast track full admission 1. api_spec_fast.createClaimWithRepresentedRespondent
2. api_spec_fast.defendantResponse
3. api_spec_fast.claimantResponse		 @civil-service-nightly

@api-spec-full-admit		 civil-service: nightly pr_ft_api-spec-full-admit 2v1 spec fast track full admission api journeys e2e -> tests -> api_tests -> spec-full-admit -> api_2v1_spec_fast_full_admit_test.js no yes
2v1 spec full admit 1. api_spec.createClaimWithRepresentedRespondent
2. api_spec.defendantResponse
3. api_spec.claimantResponse		 @civil-service-nightly

@api-spec-full-admit		 civil-service: nightly pr_ft_api-spec-full-admit 2v1 spec full admit api journey e2e -> tests -> api_tests -> spec-full-admit -> api_2v1_spec_full_admit_test.js no yes
1v1 LiP v LiP defendant response with full admit pay by set date 1. api_spec_cui.createClaimWithUnrepresentedClaimant
2. api_spec_cui.performCitizenDefendantResponse
3. api_spec_cui.performCitizenClaimantResponse		 @civil-service-master

@civil-service-pr

@civil-camunda-master

@civil-camunda-pr

@civil-service-nightly

@api-spec-full-admit		 civil-service: master

civil-service: PR

civil-camunda-bpmn-definition: master

civil-camunda-bpmn-definition: PR

civil-service: nightly		 pr_ft_api-spec-full-admit 1v1 LIP v LIP spec api full admit journey e2e -> tests -> api_tests -> spec-full-admit -> api_LIPvLIP_spec_full_admit_set_date_test.js no yes
1v1 spec full defence 1. api_spec.createClaimWithRepresentedRespondent
2. api_spec.informAgreedExtensionDate
3. api_spec.defendantResponse
4. api_spec.claimantResponse		 @civil-service-nightly

@api-spec-full-defence		 civil-service: nightly pr_ft_api-spec-full-defence 1v1 spec full defence api journey e2e -> tests -> api_tests -> spec-full-defence -> api_1v1_spec_full_defence_test.js no yes
1v1 FULL_DEFENCE claimant and defendant response small claim 1. api_spec_small.createClaimWithRepresentedRespondent
2. api_spec_small.defendantResponse
3. api_spec_small.claimantResponse
4. api_spec_small.manageContactInformation		 @civil-service-nightly

@api-spec-full-defence		 civil-service: nightly pr_ft_api-spec-full-defence 1v1 spec api small claims journeys e2e -> tests -> api_tests -> spec-full-defence -> api_1v1_spec_small_full_defence_test.js no yes
1v2DS spec full defence 1. api_spec.createClaimWithRepresentedRespondent
2. api_spec.defendantResponse		 @civil-service-nightly

@api-spec-full-defence		 civil-service: nightly pr_ft_api-spec-full-defence 1v2DS spec full defence api journeys e2e -> tests -> api_tests -> spec-full-defence -> api_1v2DS_spec_full_defence_test.js no yes
1v2SS different response no full defence 1. api_spec_fast.createClaimWithRepresentedRespondent
2. api_spec_fast.defendantResponse		 @civil-service-nightly

@api-spec-full-defence		 civil-service: nightly pr_ft_api-spec-full-defence 1v2SS spec api fast track journeys e2e -> tests -> api_tests -> spec-full-defence -> api_1v2SS_spec_fast_full_defence_test.js no yes
1v2SS fast claim full defence and not proceed 1. api_spec_fast.createClaimWithRepresentedRespondent
2. api_spec_fast.defendantResponse
3. api_spec_fast.claimantResponse		 @civil-service-nightly

@api-spec-full-defence		 civil-service: nightly pr_ft_api-spec-full-defence 1v2SS spec api fast track journeys e2e -> tests -> api_tests -> spec-full-defence -> api_1v2SS_spec_fast_full_defence_test.js no yes
1v2SS full defence and claimant response 1. api_spec_fast.createClaimWithRepresentedRespondent
2. api_spec_fast.defendantResponse
3. api_spec_fast.claimantResponse		 @civil-service-nightly

@api-spec-full-defence		 civil-service: nightly pr_ft_api-spec-full-defence 1v2SS spec api fast track journeys e2e -> tests -> api_tests -> spec-full-defence -> api_1v2SS_spec_fast_full_defence_test.js no yes
1v2SS small claim different response full defence 1. api_spec.createClaimWithRepresentedRespondent
2. api_spec.defendantResponse		 @civil-service-nightly

@api-spec-full-defence		 civil-service: nightly pr_ft_api-spec-full-defence 1v2SS spec full defence api journeys e2e -> tests -> api_tests -> spec-full-defence -> api_1v2SS_spec_full_defence_test.js no yes
1v2SS small claim full defence, claimant response 1. api_spec.createClaimWithRepresentedRespondent
2. api_spec.defendantResponse
3. api_spec.claimantResponse		 @civil-service-nightly

@api-spec-full-defence

@civil-service-master

@civil-service-pr

@civil-camunda-master

@civil-camunda-pr		 civil-service: nightly

civil-service: master

civil-service: PR

civil-camunda-bpmn-definition: master

civil-camunda-bpmn-definition: PR		 pr_ft_api-spec-full-defence 1v2SS spec full defence api journeys e2e -> tests -> api_tests -> spec-full-defence -> api_1v2SS_spec_full_defence_test.js no yes
1v2SS small claim full defence, claimant response not proceed 1. api_spec.createClaimWithRepresentedRespondent
2. api_spec.defendantResponse
3. api_spec.claimantResponse		 @civil-service-nightly

@api-spec-full-defence		 civil-service: nightly pr_ft_api-spec-full-defence 1v2SS spec full defence api journeys e2e -> tests -> api_tests -> spec-full-defence -> api_1v2SS_spec_full_defence_test.js no yes
1v2SS small claim full defence, defendant response 1. api_spec.createClaimWithRepresentedRespondent
2. api_spec.defendantResponse		 @civil-service-nightly

@api-spec-full-defence		 civil-service: nightly pr_ft_api-spec-full-defence 1v2SS spec full defence api journeys e2e -> tests -> api_tests -> spec-full-defence -> api_1v2SS_spec_full_defence_test.js no yes
2v1 fast claim different response full defence 1. api_spec_fast.createClaimWithRepresentedRespondent
2. api_spec_fast.defendantResponse		 @civil-service-nightly

@api-spec-full-defence		 civil-service: nightly pr_ft_api-spec-full-defence 2v1 spec fast track full defence api journeys e2e -> tests -> api_tests -> spec-full-defence -> api_2v1_spec_fast_full_defence_test.js no yes
2v1 fast claim different response no full defence 1. api_spec_fast.createClaimWithRepresentedRespondent
2. api_spec_fast.defendantResponse		 @civil-service-nightly

@api-spec-full-defence		 civil-service: nightly pr_ft_api-spec-full-defence 2v1 spec fast track full defence api journeys e2e -> tests -> api_tests -> spec-full-defence -> api_2v1_spec_fast_full_defence_test.js no yes
2v1 fast claim full defence and claimant response 1. api_spec_fast.createClaimWithRepresentedRespondent (skipped)
2. api_spec_fast.defendantResponse (skipped)
3. api_spec_fast.claimantResponse (skipped)		 @civil-service-nightly

@api-spec-full-defence		 civil-service: nightly pr_ft_api-spec-full-defence 2v1 spec fast track full defence api journeys e2e -> tests -> api_tests -> spec-full-defence -> api_2v1_spec_fast_full_defence_test.js yes yes
2v1 fast claim full defence and not proceed 1. api_spec_fast.createClaimWithRepresentedRespondent
2. api_spec_fast.defendantResponse
3. api_spec_fast.claimantResponse		 @civil-service-nightly

@api-spec-full-defence		 civil-service: nightly pr_ft_api-spec-full-defence 2v1 spec fast track full defence api journeys e2e -> tests -> api_tests -> spec-full-defence -> api_2v1_spec_fast_full_defence_test.js no yes
2v1 small claim different response full defence 1. api_spec.createClaimWithRepresentedRespondent
2. api_spec.defendantResponse		 @civil-service-nightly

@api-spec-full-defence		 civil-service: nightly pr_ft_api-spec-full-defence 2v1 spec full defence api journeys e2e -> tests -> api_tests -> spec-full-defence -> api_2v1_spec_full_defence_test.js no yes
2v1 small claim different response no full defence 1. api_spec.createClaimWithRepresentedRespondent (skipped)
2. api_spec.defendantResponse (skipped)		 @civil-service-nightly

@api-spec-full-defence		 civil-service: nightly pr_ft_api-spec-full-defence 2v1 spec full defence api journeys e2e -> tests -> api_tests -> spec-full-defence -> api_2v1_spec_full_defence_test.js yes yes
2v1 small claim full defence and defendant response 1. api_spec.createClaimWithRepresentedRespondent
2. api_spec.defendantResponse
3. api_spec.claimantResponse		 @civil-service-nightly

@api-spec-full-defence		 civil-service: nightly pr_ft_api-spec-full-defence 2v1 spec full defence api journeys e2e -> tests -> api_tests -> spec-full-defence -> api_2v1_spec_full_defence_test.js no yes
2v1 small claim full defence and not proceed 1. api_spec.createClaimWithRepresentedRespondent
2. api_spec.defendantResponse
3. api_spec.claimantResponse		 @civil-service-nightly

@api-spec-full-defence		 civil-service: nightly pr_ft_api-spec-full-defence 2v1 spec full defence api journeys e2e -> tests -> api_tests -> spec-full-defence -> api_2v1_spec_full_defence_test.js no yes
LR v LIP spec full defence 1. api_spec_cui.createSpecifiedClaimWithUnrepresentedRespondent
2. api_spec_cui.performCitizenDefendantResponse
3. api_spec_cui.claimantResponse		 @civil-service-nightly

@api-spec-full-defence		 civil-service: nightly pr_ft_api-spec-full-defence LR v LIP spec full defence api journey e2e -> tests -> api_tests -> spec-full-defence -> api_LRvLIP_full_defence_test.js no yes
LiP v LiP defendant response with part admit pay by installments 1. api_spec_cui.createClaimWithUnrepresentedClaimant
2. api_spec_cui.performCitizenDefendantResponse
3. api_spec_cui.performCitizenClaimantResponse		 @civil-ccd-master

@civil-ccd-pr

@civil-service-nightly

@api-spec-part-admit		 civil-ccd-definition: master

civil-ccd-definition: PR

civil-service: nightly		 pr_ft_api-spec-part-admit LIP v LIP spec api part admit journey e2e -> tests -> api_tests -> spec-part-admit -> api_1v1_spec_cui_part_admit_installments_test.js no yes
1v1 spec part admit 1. api_spec.createClaimWithRepresentedRespondent (skipped)
2. api_spec.defendantResponse (skipped)
3. api_spec.claimantResponse (skipped)		 @civil-service-nightly

@api-spec-part-admit		 civil-service: nightly pr_ft_api-spec-part-admit 1v1 spec part admit api journey e2e -> tests -> api_tests -> spec-part-admit -> api_1v1_spec_part_admit_test.js yes yes
1v1 spec api small claims 1. api_spec_small.createClaimWithRepresentedRespondent
2. api_spec_small.defendantResponse
3. api_spec_small.claimantResponse		 @civil-service-nightly

@api-spec-part-admit		 civil-service: nightly pr_ft_api-spec-part-admit 1v1 spec api small claims journey e2e -> tests -> api_tests -> spec-part-admit -> api_1v1_spec_small_part_admit_test.js no yes
1v2SS fast claim part admit, defendant and claimant response 1. api_spec_fast.createClaimWithRepresentedRespondent
2. api_spec_fast.defendantResponse
3. api_spec_fast.claimantResponse		 @civil-service-nightly

@api-spec-part-admit		 civil-service: nightly pr_ft_api-spec-part-admit 1v2SS spec api fast track journeys e2e -> tests -> api_tests -> spec-part-admit -> api_1v2SS_spec_fast_part_admit_test.js no yes
1v2SS spec part admit 1. api_spec.createClaimWithRepresentedRespondent
2. api_spec.defendantResponse
3. api_spec.claimantResponse		 @civil-service-nightly

@api-spec-part-admit		 civil-service: nightly pr_ft_api-spec-part-admit 1v2SS spec part admit api journey e2e -> tests -> api_tests -> spec-part-admit -> api_1v2SS_spec_part_admit_test.js no yes
2v1 spec fast track part admit 1. api_spec_fast.createClaimWithRepresentedRespondent
2. api_spec_fast.defendantResponse
3. api_spec_fast.claimantResponse		 @civil-service-nightly

@api-spec-part-admit		 civil-service: nightly pr_ft_api-spec-part-admit 2v1 spec fast track part admit api journeys e2e -> tests -> api_tests -> spec-part-admit -> api_2v1_spec_part_admit_fast_test.js no yes
2v1 spec part admission 1. api_spec.createClaimWithRepresentedRespondent
2. api_spec.defendantResponse
3. api_spec.claimantResponse		 @civil-service-nightly

@api-spec-part-admit		 civil-service: nightly pr_ft_api-spec-part-admit 2v1 spec part admission api journey e2e -> tests -> api_tests -> spec-part-admit -> api_2v1_spec_part_admit_test.js no yes
1v1 LiP v LiP Part admit defendant and claimant response - claimant rejects installment plan - CARM enabled 1. api_spec_cui.createClaimWithUnrepresentedClaimant
2. api_spec_cui.performCitizenDefendantResponse
3. api_spec_cui.performCitizenClaimantResponse		 @civil-service-nightly

@api-spec-part-admit		 civil-service: nightly pr_ft_api-spec-part-admit LIP v LIP spec part admit api journeys e2e -> tests -> api_tests -> spec-part-admit -> api_LIPvLIP_spec_test.js no yes
1v1 LR FAST TRACK prepare for conduct hearing stay case 1. api_spec.createClaimWithRepresentedRespondent
2. api_spec.defendantResponse
3. api_spec.claimantResponse
4. api_spec.createSDO
5. api_spec.scheduleHearing
6. api_spec.amendHearingDueDate
7. api_spec.hearingFeePaid
8. api_spec.stayCase
9. api_spec.manageStay
10. api_spec.sendMessage
11. api_spec.replyMessage
12. api_spec.dismissCase		 @civil-service-nightly

@api-stay-case		 civil-service: nightly pr_ft_api-stay-case 1v1 spec stay case api journey e2e -> tests -> api_tests -> stay-case -> api_1v1_spec_stay_case_test.js no yes
1v2DS Stay Case Judicial Referral 1. api.createClaimWithRepresentedRespondent
2. api.notifyClaim
3. api.notifyClaimDetails
4. api.defendantResponse
5. api.claimantResponse
6. api.stayCase
7. api.manageStay
8. api.sendMessage (skipped)
9. api.replyMessage (skipped)
10. api.createFinalOrder
11. api.scheduleHearing
12. api.dismissCase		 @civil-service-nightly

@api-stay-case		 civil-service: nightly pr_ft_api-stay-case 1v2DS spec stay case api journey e2e -> tests -> api_tests -> stay-case -> api_1v2DS_stay_case_test.js no yes
1v2SS LR UNSPEC claim hearing readiness 1. api.createClaimWithRepresentedRespondent
2. api.notifyClaim
3. api.notifyClaimDetails
4. api.amendRespondent1ResponseDeadline
5. api.defaultJudgment
6. api.sdoDefaultJudgment
7. api.scheduleHearing
8. api.stayCase
9. api.manageStay
10. api.sendMessage
11. api.replyMessage
12. api.dismissCase		 @civil-service-nightly

@api-stay-case		 civil-service: nightly pr_ft_api-stay-case 1v2SS spec stay case api journey e2e -> tests -> api_tests -> stay-case -> api_1v2SS_stay_case_test.js no yes
1v1 JUDICIAL_REFERRAL Lip v Lip stay case dismiss case 1. api_spec_cui.createClaimWithUnrepresentedClaimant
2. api_spec_cui.performCitizenDefendantResponse
3. api_spec_cui.performCitizenClaimantResponse
4. api_spec_cui.stayCase
5. api_spec_cui.manageStay
6. api_spec_cui.createSDO
7. api_spec_cui.dismissCase		 @civil-service-nightly

@api-stay-case		 civil-service: nightly pr_ft_api-stay-case LIP v LIP spec stay case api journey e2e -> tests -> api_tests -> stay-case -> api_LIPvLIP_spec_stay_case_test.js no yes
LR v LIP spec stay case 1. api_spec_cui.createSpecifiedClaimWithUnrepresentedRespondent
2. api_spec_cui.performCitizenDefendantResponse
3. api_spec_cui.claimantResponse
4. api_spec_cui.stayCase
5. api_spec_cui.manageStay
6. api_spec_cui.sendMessage
7. api_spec_cui.replyMessage
8. api_spec_cui.createSDO
9. api_spec_cui.dismissCase		 @civil-service-nightly

@api-stay-case		 civil-service: nightly pr_ft_api-stay-case LR v LIP spec stay case api journey e2e -> tests -> api_tests -> stay-case -> api_LRvLIP_spec_stay_case_test.js no yes
1v1 unspec full defence 1. api.createClaimWithRepresentedRespondent
2. api.addCaseNote
3. api.amendClaimDocuments
4. api.notifyClaim
5. api.notifyClaimDetails
6. api.amendPartyDetails
7. api.acknowledgeClaim
8. api.informAgreedExtension
9. api.addDefendantLitigationFriend
10. api.defendantResponse
11. api.claimantResponse		 @civil-service-nightly

@api-unspec-full-defence		 civil-service: nightly pr_ft_api-unspec-full-defence 1v1 unspec full defence api journey e2e -> tests -> api_tests -> unspec-full-defence -> api_1v1_test.js no yes
1v2 different solicitor unspec full defence 1. api.createClaimWithRepresentedRespondent
2. api.addCaseNote
3. api.amendClaimDocuments
4. api.notifyClaim
5. api.notifyClaimDetails
6. api.amendPartyDetails
7. api.acknowledgeClaim
8. api.acknowledgeClaim (skipped)
9. api.informAgreedExtension
10. api.defendantResponse
11. api.claimantResponse		 @civil-service-nightly

@api-unspec-full-defence		 civil-service: nightly pr_ft_api-unspec-full-defence 1v2 different solicitor unspec full defence api journey e2e -> tests -> api_tests -> unspec-full-defence -> api_1v2_different_solicitor_test.js no yes
1v2 same solicitor unspec full defence 1. api.createClaimWithRepresentedRespondent
2. api.addCaseNote
3. api.amendClaimDocuments
4. api.notifyClaim
5. api.notifyClaimDetails
6. api.amendPartyDetails
7. api.acknowledgeClaim
8. api.informAgreedExtension
9. api.defendantResponse
10. api.claimantResponse		 @civil-service-nightly

@api-unspec-full-defence		 civil-service: nightly pr_ft_api-unspec-full-defence 1v2 same solicitor unspec full defence api journey e2e -> tests -> api_tests -> unspec-full-defence -> api_1v2_same_solicitor_test.js no yes
2v1 unspec full defence 1. api.createClaimWithRepresentedRespondent
2. api.addCaseNote
3. api.amendClaimDocuments
4. api.notifyClaim
5. api.notifyClaimDetails
6. api.amendPartyDetails
7. api.acknowledgeClaim
8. api.informAgreedExtension
9. api.defendantResponse
10. api.claimantResponse		 @civil-service-nightly

@api-unspec-full-defence		 civil-service: nightly pr_ft_api-unspec-full-defence 2v1 unspec full defence api journey e2e -> tests -> api_tests -> unspec-full-defence -> api_2v1_test.js no yes

Generating CodeceptJS Functional Test Group Documentation

Generating functional test group documentation JSON:

  1. yarn test:generate:ft-groups-ui-data writes e2e/e2e-documentation/results/ft-groups-data/ft-groups-ui-data.json.
  2. yarn test:generate:ft-groups-api-data writes e2e/e2e-documentation/results/ft-groups-data/ft-groups-api-data.json.

Uploading to Confluence:

  1. Export CONFLUENCE_PERSONAL_ACCESS_TOKEN, CONFLUENCE_BASE_URL, and CONFLUENCE_PAGE_ID.
  2. yarn test:confluence:ft-groups-ui-table updates the "Functional Test Groups" table on the Confluence page for UI groups.
  3. yarn test:confluence:ft-groups-api-table updates the "Functional Test Groups" table for API groups.
  4. Optional: pass a custom JSON path as the first argument to either script.

Updating README tables:

  1. yarn test:readme:ft-groups-ui-table refreshes the functional test groups UI section and yarn test:readme:ft-groups-api-table refreshes the functional test groups API section (run both commands to update the entire table set).
  2. Optional: pass a custom JSON path as the first argument to either script (e.g. yarn test:readme:ft-groups-ui-table ../path/to/ft-groups-ui.json).
  3. Commit README changes if required.

UI Functional Test Group Documentation

Show UI Functional Test Groups
Functional Test Group Folder Path GitHub Label Name Tag Pipeline Steps Covered Test Names
Case Flags e2e/tests/ui_tests/case-flags pr_ft_ui-case-flags @ui-case-flags civil-ccd-definition: PR
civil-service: PR
civil-camunda-bpmn-definition: PR
civil-wa-task-configuration: PR		 1. api.createClaimWithRepresentedRespondent
2. api.notifyClaim
3. api.notifyClaimDetails
4. api.defendantResponse
5. api.claimantResponse
6. I.createCaseFlags
7. I.validateCaseFlags (skipped)
8. I.manageCaseFlags
9. I.validateUpdatedCaseFlags (skipped)
10. api_spec.createClaimWithRepresentedRespondent
11. api_spec.defendantResponse
12. api_spec.claimantResponse
13. LRspec.createCaseFlags
14. LRspec.manageCaseFlags		 1v1 case flags journey

1v1 spec case flags journey
Case Offline e2e/tests/ui_tests/case-offline pr_ft_ui-case-offline @ui-case-offline civil-ccd-definition: PR
civil-service: PR
civil-camunda-bpmn-definition: PR
civil-wa-task-configuration: PR		 1. I.createCase Claimant solicitor raise a claim against 2 defendants, one of who is without a solicitor (LiP) should progress case offline
Case Progression e2e/tests/ui_tests/case-progression pr_ft_ui-case-progression @ui-case-progression civil-ccd-definition: PR
civil-service: PR
civil-camunda-bpmn-definition: PR
civil-wa-task-configuration: PR		 1. api.createClaimWithRepresentedRespondent
2. api.addCaseNote
3. api.amendClaimDocuments
4. api.notifyClaim
5. api.notifyClaimDetails
6. api.acknowledgeClaim (skipped)
7. api.defendantResponse
8. api.claimantResponse
9. api.assignTaskToUser
10. I.initiateSDO
11. I.evidenceUpload
12. I.transferOnlineCase
13. api_spec_fast.createClaimWithRepresentedRespondent
14. LRspec.respondToClaimFullDefence
15. LRspec.respond1v2DiffLR_FullDefence
16. LRspec.respondToDefence
17. LRspec.initiateSDO
18. LRspec.evidenceUploadSpec
19. LRspec.createHearingScheduled
20. LRspec.payHearingFee		 1v2DS fast track case progression journey

1v2DS spec small track case progression journey
Certificate of Service e2e/tests/ui_tests/cos pr_ft_ui-cos @ui-cos civil-ccd-definition: PR
civil-service: PR
civil-camunda-bpmn-definition: PR
civil-wa-task-configuration: PR		 1. api.createClaimWithRespondentLitigantInPerson
2. I.fillLRNotifyClaimCOSForm
3. I.fillLRNotifyClaimDetailsCOSForm
4. I.fillNotifyClaimCOSForm
5. I.verifyCOSTabDetails
6. I.fillNotifyClaimDetailsCOSForm
7. I.verifyCOSTabNotifyClaimDetails		 1v2 - one LIP and one LR - notify/notify claim details journey

1v2 two respondents are LIP - notify/notify claim details journey
Default Judgment e2e/tests/ui_tests/dj pr_ft_ui-dj @ui-dj civil-ccd-definition: PR
civil-service: PR
civil-camunda-bpmn-definition: PR
civil-wa-task-configuration: PR		 1. api_spec.createClaimWithRepresentedRespondent
2. api_spec.amendRespondent1ResponseDeadline
3. I.initiateDJSpec
4. api.createClaimWithRepresentedRespondent
5. api.amendClaimDocuments
6. api.notifyClaim
7. api.notifyClaimDetails
8. api.amendRespondent1ResponseDeadline
9. I.initiateDJUnspec
10. I.judgeAddsCaseNotes
11. api.assignTaskToUser
12. I.judgePerformDJDirectionOrder
13. api.amendHearingDate
14. WA.runChallengedAccessSteps
15. WA.runSpecificAccessRequestSteps
16. WA.runSpecificAccessApprovalSteps
17. WA.verifyApprovedSpecificAccess
18. WA.verifyStaffLink
19. WA.createBooking
20. WA.verifyCreatedBooking
21. api.amendRespondent2ResponseDeadline
22. I.staffPerformDJCaseTransferCaseOffline		 1v1 create spec claim request default judgment

1v1 unspec default judgment

1v2 create spec claim, request default judgment

1v2 unspec default judgement
Discontinue Claim e2e/tests/ui_tests/discontinue-claim pr_ft_ui-discontinue-claim @ui-discontinue-claim civil-ccd-definition: PR
civil-service: PR
civil-camunda-bpmn-definition: PR
civil-wa-task-configuration: PR		 1. api.createClaimWithRepresentedRespondent
2. api.amendClaimDocuments
3. api.notifyClaim
4. api.notifyClaimDetails
5. api.defendantResponse
6. api.claimantResponse
7. api.createSDO
8. api.evidenceUploadApplicant
9. api.evidenceUploadRespondent
10. api.scheduleHearing
11. LRspec.requestForDiscontinueThisClaimForUI
12. api.assignTaskToUser
13. LRspec.requestForValidateDiscontinuanceForUI
14. LRspec.addCaseNote
15. api_spec_small.createClaimWithRepresentedRespondent
16. api_spec_small.defendantResponse
17. api_spec_small.claimantResponse
18. LRspec.requestForDiscontinueThisClaimForUI1v2
19. LRspec.requestForDiscontinueThisClaimForUI2v1		 Discontinue This Claim After Hearing Schedule - Full discontinuance - 1v1 - spec

Discontinue This Claim - Full discontinuance - 1v1 - spec

Discontinue This Claim - Hearing Schedule - Full discontinuance - 1v2 - spec

Discontinue This Claim - Full discontinuance - 1v2 - spec

Discontinue This Claim - Hearing Schedule - Full discontinuance - 2v1 - spec

Discontinue This Claim - Full discontinuance - 2v1 - spec
Flight Delay e2e/tests/ui_tests/flight-delay pr_ft_ui-flight-delay @ui-flight-delay civil-ccd-definition: PR
civil-service: PR
civil-camunda-bpmn-definition: PR
civil-wa-task-configuration: PR		 1. LRspec.createCaseSpecifiedForFlightDelay Applicant solicitor creates 1v2DS specified claim defendant Different LRs for flight delay
ga-access e2e/tests/ui_tests/ga pr_ft_ui-ga-access @ui-ga-access civil-ccd-definition: PR
civil-service: PR		 1. I.verifyNoAccessToGeneralApplications 1v1 specified assert general application unavailable before respondent assigned

1v1 unspecified assert general application unavailable before respondent assigned
ga-add-info e2e/tests/ui_tests/ga pr_ft_ui-ga-add-info @ui-ga-add-info civil-ccd-definition: PR
civil-service: PR		 1. I.createGeneralApplication
2. I.clickAndVerifyTab
3. I.payAndVerifyGAStatus
4. I.respondToApplication
5. I.respCloseAndReturnToCaseDetails
6. I.judgeRequestMoreInfo
7. I.judgeCloseAndReturnToCaseDetails
8. I.verifyJudgesSummaryPage
9. I.verifyUploadedApplicationDocument
10. I.respondToJudgeAdditionalInfo
11. I.verifyCaseFileAppDocument		 GA for 1v1- respond to application - Request more information

GA for 1v2 Same Solicitor - Send application to other party journey
ga-collections e2e/tests/ui_tests/ga pr_ft_ui-ga-collections @ui-ga-collections civil-ccd-definition: PR
civil-service: PR		 1. I.navigateToApplicationsTab With Notice application - Org3 Solicitor Initiate GA

Without Notice application - Org2 Solicitor Initiate GA - Awaiting Written Representations
ga-consent-order e2e/tests/ui_tests/ga pr_ft_ui-ga-consent-order @ui-ga-consent-order civil-ccd-definition: PR
civil-service: PR		 1. I.approveConsentOrder
2. I.verifyUploadedApplicationDocument
3. I.navigateToApplicationsTab
4. I.verifyUploadedClaimDocument
5. I.verifyCaseFileOrderDocument
6. I.verifyCaseFileAppDocument		 NBC admin Approve Consent Order
ga-directions-order e2e/tests/ui_tests/ga pr_ft_ui-ga-directions-order @ui-ga-directions-order civil-ccd-definition: PR
civil-service: PR		 1. I.createGeneralApplication
2. I.clickAndVerifyTab
3. I.payAndVerifyGAStatus
4. I.judgeMakeDecision
5. I.judgeCloseAndReturnToCaseDetails
6. I.verifyJudgesSummaryPage
7. I.verifyUploadedApplicationDocument
8. I.verifyUploadedClaimDocument
9. I.verifyCaseFileOrderDocument
10. I.verifyCaseFileAppDocument
11. I.respondToJudgesDirections		 GA for 1v1 - Direction order journey
ga-final-order e2e/tests/ui_tests/ga pr_ft_ui-ga-final-order @ui-ga-final-order civil-ccd-definition: PR
civil-service: PR		 1. I.verifyUploadedApplicationDocument
2. I.navigateToApplicationsTab
3. I.verifyUploadedClaimDocument
4. I.judgeMakeAppOrder
5. I.judgeCloseAndReturnToCaseDetails
6. I.verifyCaseFileOrderDocument
7. I.verifyCaseFileAppDocument		 1v1 - Assisted order - Without Further Hearing

1v1 - Free form order - With notice journey

1v2 - Assisted order - With Further Hearing
ga-hearing-notice e2e/tests/ui_tests/ga pr_ft_ui-ga-hearing-notice @ui-ga-hearing-notice civil-ccd-definition: PR
civil-service: PR		 1. I.navigateToApplicationsTab
2. I.navigateToHearingNoticePage
3. I.fillHearingNotice
4. I.click
5. I.verifyUploadedApplicationDocument
6. I.verifyUploadedClaimDocument
7. I.verifyCaseFileAppDocument
8. I.dontSee
9. I.createGeneralApplication
10. I.clickAndVerifyTab
11. I.verifyNoServiceReqElements
12. I.payAndVerifyGAStatus
13. I.verifyApplicantSummaryPage
14. I.respondToApplication
15. I.respCloseAndReturnToCaseDetails
16. I.verifyResponseSummaryPage
17. I.respondToSameApplicationAndVerifyErrorMsg
18. I.judgeListForAHearingDecision
19. I.judgeCloseAndReturnToCaseDetails
20. I.verifyJudgesSummaryPage		 Claimant and Defendant Hearing notice - With notice journey

Claimant Hearing notice - Without notice journey

GA for Specified Claim 1v2 different Solicitor - respond to application - Hearing order journey
ga-make-decision e2e/tests/ui_tests/ga pr_ft_ui-ga-make-decision @ui-ga-make-decision civil-ccd-definition: PR
civil-service: PR		 1. I.createGeneralApplication
2. I.clickAndVerifyTab
3. I.payAndVerifyGAStatus
4. I.judgeMakeDecision
5. I.judgeCloseAndReturnToCaseDetails
6. I.verifyJudgesSummaryPage
7. I.verifyUploadedApplicationDocument
8. I.dontSee
9. I.verifyUploadedClaimDocument
10. I.verifyCaseFileOrderDocument
11. I.verifyCaseFileAppDocument
12. I.respondToApplication
13. I.respCloseAndReturnToCaseDetails
14. I.verifyResponseSummaryPage
15. I.judgeWrittenRepresentationsDecision
16. I.respondToJudgesWrittenRep		 GA for 1v1 Specified Claim- Dismissal order journey

GA for 1v1 - Makes a decision

GA for 1v2 Same Solicitor - respond to application - Sequential written representations journey

GA for 2v1 - Concurrent written representations - without notice to with notice journey
ga-notice e2e/tests/ui_tests/ga pr_ft_ui-ga-notice @ui-ga-notice civil-ccd-definition: PR
civil-service: PR		 1. I.navigateToApplicationsTab With Notice application - Org2 Solicitor Initiate GA

Without Notice application for a hearing
ga-vary-payment e2e/tests/ui_tests/ga pr_ft_ui-ga-vary-payment @ui-ga-vary-payment civil-ccd-definition: PR
civil-service: PR		 1. I.verifyNoN245Form
2. I.initiateVaryJudgementGA
3. I.clickAndVerifyTab
4. I.verifyN245FormElements
5. I.clickOnTab
6. I.verifyCaseFileAppDocument
7. I.payAndVerifyGAStatus
8. I.respondToVaryJudgementApp
9. I.respCloseAndReturnToCaseDetails		 Defendant of main claim initiates Vary payment terms of judgment application
ga-wa e2e/tests/ui_tests/ga pr_ft_ui-ga-wa @ui-ga-wa civil-ccd-definition: PR
civil-service: PR		 1. I.judgeListForAHearingDecisionWA
2. I.fillHearingNotice		 After SDO GA - Judge Make decision - HC admin schedule Hearing

Before SDO GA - Judge Make decision - NBC admin schedule Hearing

Before SDO GA - LA Make decision - NBC admin schedule Hearing

After SDO GA - Change court location - HC admin review application order

LA refer to judge - R2 Judge Make decision - NBC admin schedule Hearing
Hearings e2e/tests/ui_tests/hearings pr_ft_ui-hearings @ui-hearings civil-ccd-definition: PR
civil-service: PR
civil-camunda-bpmn-definition: PR
civil-wa-task-configuration: PR		 1. api.createClaimWithRepresentedRespondent
2. api.amendClaimDocuments
3. api.notifyClaim
4. api.notifyClaimDetails
5. api.defendantResponse
6. api.claimantResponse
7. api.createSDO
8. I.requestNewHearing
9. I.updateHearing
10. I.cancelHearing		 1v2 Diff Sols Hearing Request Journey
Intermediate Track e2e/tests/ui_tests/intermediate-track pr_ft_ui-intermediate-track @ui-intermediate-track civil-ccd-definition: PR
civil-service: PR
civil-camunda-bpmn-definition: PR
civil-wa-task-configuration: PR		 1. api.createClaimWithRepresentedRespondent
2. api.notifyClaim
3. api.notifyClaimDetails
4. api.defendantResponse
5. api.claimantResponse
6. api.createFinalOrder
7. api.scheduleHearing
8. I.initiateFinalOrder
9. I.evidenceUpload
10. api_spec.createClaimWithRepresentedRespondent
11. api_spec.defendantResponse
12. api_spec.claimantResponse
13. api_spec.createFinalOrderJO
14. api_spec.scheduleHearing
15. api_spec.amendHearingDueDate
16. api_spec.hearingFeePaid
17. I.verifyBundleDetails
18. api_spec_cui.createSpecifiedClaimWithUnrepresentedRespondent
19. api_spec_cui.performCitizenDefendantResponse
20. I.respondToDefenceMinti		 1v2DS unspec intermediate track

1v2DS spec intermediate track

1v2SS unspec intermediate track

1vLIP spec multi track
Judgment Online e2e/tests/ui_tests/jo pr_ft_ui-jo @ui-jo civil-ccd-definition: PR
civil-service: PR
civil-camunda-bpmn-definition: PR
civil-wa-task-configuration: PR		 1. api_spec.createClaimWithRepresentedRespondent
2. api_spec.amendRespondent1ResponseDeadline
3. I.initiateDJSpec
4. LRspec.requestReferToJudgeDefendedClaim
5. api.assignTaskToUser
6. LRspec.generateDirectionsOrder
7. LRspec.requestSetAsideJudgmentFollowingApplication
8. LRspec.caseProceedsInCaseman
9. LRspec.requestSetAsideJudgmentFollowingDefenceReceived
10. LRspec.requestSetAsideJudgmentMadeInError		 1v1 Spec Defence Received in Time Judgment Set Aside

1v1 Spec Set Aside Judgment Following Application

1v1 Spec Set Aside Judgment Following Receiving Defence

1v1 Spec Set Aside Judgment Following Judgment Made in Error
Manage Contact Information e2e/tests/ui_tests/mci pr_ft_ui-mci @ui-mci civil-ccd-definition: PR
civil-service: PR
civil-camunda-bpmn-definition: PR
civil-wa-task-configuration: PR		 1. api.createClaimWithRepresentedRespondent
2. api.notifyClaim
3. api.notifyClaimDetails
4. api.addDefendantLitigationFriend
5. api.defendantResponse
6. api.claimantResponse
7. I.manageWitnessesForDefendant
8. I.manageOrganisationIndividualsForClaimant
9. I.manageLitigationFriendForDefendant
10. I.manageDefendant		 1v2 Same Solicitor - Manage Contact Information
Mediation e2e/tests/ui_tests/mediation pr_ft_ui-mediation @ui-mediation civil-ccd-definition: PR
civil-service: PR
civil-camunda-bpmn-definition: PR
civil-wa-task-configuration: PR		 1. api_spec.createClaimWithRepresentedRespondent
2. api_spec.defendantResponse
3. api_spec.claimantResponse
4. api_spec.createSDO
5. LRspec.uploadMediationDocs
6. api_spec.scheduleHearing
7. api_spec.amendHearingDueDate
8. api_spec.hearingFeePaid		 1v2SS SDO Carm - Upload mediation documents

2v1 SDO Carm - Upload mediation documents
Multi Track e2e/tests/ui_tests/multi-track pr_ft_ui-multi-track @ui-multi-track civil-ccd-definition: PR
civil-service: PR
civil-camunda-bpmn-definition: PR
civil-wa-task-configuration: PR		 1. api_spec.createClaimWithRepresentedRespondent
2. api_spec.defendantResponse
3. api_spec.claimantResponse
4. api_spec.createFinalOrderJO
5. api_spec.scheduleHearing
6. api_spec.amendHearingDueDate
7. api_spec.hearingFeePaid
8. I.evidenceUpload
9. I.verifyBundleDetails
10. api_spec_cui.createSpecifiedClaimWithUnrepresentedRespondent
11. api_spec_cui.performCitizenDefendantResponse
12. I.respondToDefenceMinti		 1v2SS spec multi track

1vLIP multi track
Notice of Change e2e/tests/ui_tests/noc pr_ft_ui-noc @ui-noc civil-ccd-definition: PR
civil-service: PR
civil-camunda-bpmn-definition: PR
civil-wa-task-configuration: PR		 1. api.createClaimWithRespondentLitigantInPerson
2. api.notifyClaimLip
3. api.notifyClaimDetailsLip
4. I.initiateNoticeOfChange
5. api.defendantResponse
6. api.claimantResponse
7. api.createSDO		 1v2 - both respondents litigant in person - NoC to same solicitor
other-remedy e2e/tests/ui_tests/other-remedy pr_ft_ui-other-remedy @ui-other-remedy civil-ccd-definition: PR
civil-service: PR
civil-camunda-bpmn-definition: PR
civil-wa-task-configuration: PR		 1. I.createCase
2. I.notifyClaim
3. I.notifyClaimDetails
4. I.acknowledgeClaim
5. I.respondToClaim
6. I.respondToDefence
7. I.informAgreedExtensionDate
8. I.addDefendantLitigationFriend
9. I.createCaseFlags
10. I.validateCaseFlags (skipped)
11. I.manageCaseFlags
12. I.validateUpdatedCaseFlags (skipped)
13. api.assignTaskToUser
14. I.initiateSDOforOtherRemedy
15. api.createClaimWithRepresentedRespondent
16. api.notifyClaim
17. api.notifyClaimDetails		 1v1 - Claim Journey with OtherRemedy type Damages and other remedy

1v1 - Claim Journey with OtherRemedy type Housing Disrepair

1v2 Different Solicitors small claims - Claim Journey Other Remedy
other-remedy-dj e2e/tests/ui_tests/dj pr_ft_ui-other-remedy-dj @ui-other-remedy-dj civil-ccd-definition: PR
civil-service: PR
civil-camunda-bpmn-definition: PR
civil-wa-task-configuration: PR		 1. api.createClaimWithRepresentedRespondent
2. api.amendClaimDocuments
3. api.notifyClaim
4. api.notifyClaimDetails
5. api.amendRespondent1ResponseDeadline
6. I.initiateDJUnspec		 01 Create 1v1 other remedy claim, notify claim, notify claim details, request default judgement
Query Management e2e/tests/ui_tests/qm pr_ft_ui-qm @ui-qm civil-ccd-definition: PR
civil-service: PR
civil-camunda-bpmn-definition: PR
civil-wa-task-configuration: PR		 1. api_spec.createClaimWithRepresentedRespondent
2. api_spec.defendantResponse
3. api_spec.claimantResponse
4. api_spec.createFinalOrderJO
5. qmSteps.raiseLRQuery
6. qmSteps.respondToQuery
7. I.raiseFollowUpQuestionAndVerify
8. I.verifyFollowUpQuestionAsCaseWorker
9. I.verifyFollowUpQuestionAsJudge
10. I.raiseNewHearingQuery
11. I.verifyQueriesDetails
12. I.verifyQueriesDetailsAsCaseWorker
13. I.caseProceedsInCaseman
14. I.raiseNewQueryInOfflineState
15. I.raiseNewNonHearingQuery		 Query Management - Raise, Respond and Follow up Queries

Query Management - Hearing E2E journey

Query Management - Non Hearing E2E journey
refunds e2e/tests/ui_tests/refunds pr_ft_ui-refunds @ui-refunds civil-ccd-definition: PR
civil-service: PR
civil-camunda-bpmn-definition: PR
civil-wa-task-configuration: PR		 1. api.createClaimWithRepresentedRespondent
2. api.amendClaimDocuments
3. api.notifyClaim
4. api.notifyClaimDetails
5. I.navigateToServiceRequest
6. RequestRefundSteps.performRefunds
7. I.navigateToRefundsList
8. RequestRefundSteps.returnRefunds
9. RequestRefundSteps.reviewRefunds
10. RequestRefundSteps.approveRefund
11. RequestRefundSteps.rejectRefund		 Request and Approval of a Refund after a return to Requestor by the Approval Caseworker

Request and Rejection of a Refund after a return to Requestor by the Approval Caseworker
Request For Reconsideration e2e/tests/ui_tests/rfr pr_ft_ui-rfr @ui-rfr civil-ccd-definition: PR
civil-service: PR
civil-camunda-bpmn-definition: PR
civil-wa-task-configuration: PR		 1. api_spec_small.createClaimWithRepresentedRespondent
2. api_spec_small.defendantResponse
3. api_spec_small.claimantResponse
4. api_spec_small.createSDO
5. LRspec.requestForReconsiderationForUI
6. api.assignTaskToUser
7. LRspec.decisionForReconsideration
8. LRspec.decisionForReconsiderationYesOption
9. LRspec.decisionForReconsiderationNoOptionForAmending		 Request for reconsideration - 1v1 - spec
Settle Claim e2e/tests/ui_tests/settle-claim pr_ft_ui-settle-claim @ui-settle-claim civil-ccd-definition: PR
civil-service: PR
civil-camunda-bpmn-definition: PR
civil-wa-task-configuration: PR		 1. api_spec_small.createClaimWithRepresentedRespondent
2. api_spec_small.defendantResponse
3. api_spec_small.claimantResponse
4. api_spec_small.createSDO
5. LRspec.requestForSettleThisClaimForUI
6. LRspec.requestSettleThisClaimConsentOrderForUI
7. LRspec.requestForSettleThisClaimForUI2v1
8. LRspec.requestSettleThisClaimJudgesOrderForUI		 Settle this Claim - Confirm marking as paid in full - 1v1 - spec

Settle this Claim - Reason for settlement - Consent order - 1v1 - spec

Settle this Claim - Confirm marking as paid in full - 1v2 - spec

Settle this Claim - Reason for settlement - Consent order - 1v2 - spec

Settle this Claim - Confirm marking as paid in full - 2v1 - spec

Settle this Claim - Reason for settlement - Consent order - 2v1 - spec

Settle this Claim - Reason for settlement - judges order - 2v1 - spec
Specified Full Admit e2e/tests/ui_tests/spec-full-admit pr_ft_ui-spec-full-admit @ui-spec-full-admit civil-ccd-definition: PR
civil-service: PR
civil-camunda-bpmn-definition: PR
civil-wa-task-configuration: PR		 1. LRspec.createCaseSpecified
2. LRspec.respondToClaimFullAdmit
3. api_spec_cui.createClaimWithUnrepresentedClaimant
4. api_spec_cui.performCitizenDefendantResponse
5. api_spec_cui.performCitizenClaimantResponse		 2v1 Multi Party full admit Claim Creation 2v1

1v1 LiP v LiP defendant response with full admit pay by set date
Specified Full Defence e2e/tests/ui_tests/spec-full-defence pr_ft_ui-spec-full-defence @ui-spec-full-defence civil-ccd-definition: PR
civil-service: PR
civil-camunda-bpmn-definition: PR
civil-wa-task-configuration: PR		 1. LRspec.createCaseSpecified
2. LRspec.informAgreedExtensionDateSpec
3. LRspec.respondToClaimFullDefence
4. LRspec.respondToDefence
5. LRspec.mediationUnsuccessful
6. api_spec_fast.createClaimWithRepresentedRespondent
7. LRspec.respond1v2DiffLR_FullDefence
8. api_spec_cui.createSpecifiedClaimWithUnrepresentedRespondent
9. api_spec_cui.performCitizenDefendantResponse
10. api_spec_cui.claimantResponse		 1v1 spec claim journey

Claim creation 1v1 small claims

Claim creation 1v2 Diff Solicitor with fast claims

Claim creation 1v2 Same Solicitor with Fast track claims

Claim creation 1v2 Same Solicitor with Small claims

2v1 Multi Party full defence Claim Creation 2v1

LR v LIP spec full defence
Specified Part Admit e2e/tests/ui_tests/spec-part-admit pr_ft_ui-spec-part-admit @ui-spec-part-admit civil-ccd-definition: PR
civil-service: PR
civil-camunda-bpmn-definition: PR
civil-wa-task-configuration: PR		 1. LRspec.createCaseSpecified
2. LRspec.respondToClaimPartAdmit
3. api_spec_cui.createClaimWithUnrepresentedClaimant
4. api_spec_cui.performCitizenDefendantResponse
5. api_spec_cui.performCitizenClaimantResponse		 2v1 Multi Party part admit Claim Creation 2v1

1v1 LiP v LiP Part admit defendant and claimant response - claimant rejects installment plan - CARM enabled
Stay Case e2e/tests/ui_tests/stay-case pr_ft_ui-stay-case @ui-stay-case civil-ccd-definition: PR
civil-service: PR
civil-camunda-bpmn-definition: PR
civil-wa-task-configuration: PR		 1. api_spec.createClaimWithRepresentedRespondent
2. api_spec.defendantResponse
3. LRspec.respondToDefence
4. LRspec.stayCase
5. LRspec.manageStay
6. api.createClaimWithRepresentedRespondent
7. api.notifyClaim
8. api.notifyClaimDetails
9. api.acknowledgeClaim (skipped)
10. api.defendantResponse
11. api.claimantResponse
12. I.addUnavailableDates
13. I.stayCase
14. I.manageStay		 1v2DS spec stay case journey

1v2 Different Solicitors fast track - Claim Journey
Unspecified Full Defence e2e/tests/ui_tests/unspec-full-defence pr_ft_ui-unspec-full-defence @ui-unspec-full-defence civil-ccd-definition: PR
civil-service: PR
civil-camunda-bpmn-definition: PR
civil-wa-task-configuration: PR		 1. I.createCase
2. I.notifyClaim
3. I.notifyClaimDetails
4. I.acknowledgeClaim
5. I.informAgreedExtensionDate
6. I.addDefendantLitigationFriend
7. I.respondToClaim
8. I.respondToDefence
9. api.createClaimWithRepresentedRespondent
10. api.notifyClaim
11. api.notifyClaimDetails		 1v1 - Claim Journey

1v2 Different Solicitors fast track - Claim Journey

1v2 Different Solicitors small claims - Claim Journey

1v2 Same Solicitor Claim Journey

2v1 Claim Journey Fast track

API Functional Test Group Documentation

Show API Functional Test Groups
Functional Test Group Folder Path GitHub Label Name Tag Pipeline Steps Covered Test Names
Bulk Claim e2e/tests/api_tests/bulk-claim pr_ft_api-bulk-claim @api-bulk-claim civil-ccd-definition: PR
civil-service: PR
civil-camunda-bpmn-definition: PR
civil-wa-task-configuration: PR		 1. bulks.createClaimFromSDTRequestValidSuccessSyncResponse
2. bulks.createClaimFromSDTRequestForDuplicateCaseCheckCall
3. bulks.createClaimFromSDTRequestForPostCodeNegative
4. bulks.createClaimFromSDTRequestForPostCodePositive
5. bulks.createNewClaimWithCaseworkerCivilService		 1v1 with No interest - Create claim via SDT - Claim Created - valid success sync response

1v1 with No interest - Create claim via SDT - Duplicate case check call

1v1 with No interest - Create claim via SDT - Postcode Negative Validation

1v1 with No interest - Create claim via SDT - Postcode Positive Validation

Create claim - 1v1 with interest

Create claim - 1v1 with No interest

Create claim - 1v2 with No interest
Case Flags e2e/tests/api_tests/case-flags pr_ft_api-case-flags @api-case-flags civil-ccd-definition: PR
civil-service: PR
civil-camunda-bpmn-definition: PR
civil-wa-task-configuration: PR		 1. api.createClaimWithRepresentedRespondent
2. api.notifyClaim
3. api.notifyClaimDetails
4. api.defendantResponse
5. api.claimantResponse
6. api.createCaseFlags
7. api.manageCaseFlags
8. api_spec.createClaimWithRepresentedRespondent
9. api_spec.defendantResponse
10. api_spec.claimantResponse
11. api_spec.createCaseFlags
12. api_spec.manageCaseFlags		 1v1 case flags

1v1 spec case flags
Case Offline e2e/tests/api_tests/case-offline pr_ft_api-case-offline @api-case-offline civil-ccd-definition: PR
civil-service: PR
civil-camunda-bpmn-definition: PR
civil-wa-task-configuration: PR		 1. api.createClaimWithRepresentedRespondent
2. api.moveCaseToCaseman		 Create claim and move it to caseman
Case Progression e2e/tests/api_tests/case-progression pr_ft_api-case-progression @api-case-progression civil-ccd-definition: PR
civil-service: PR
civil-camunda-bpmn-definition: PR
civil-wa-task-configuration: PR		 1. api.createClaimWithRepresentedRespondent
2. api.amendClaimDocuments
3. api.notifyClaim
4. api.notifyClaimDetails
5. api.defendantResponse
6. api.claimantResponse
7. api.createSDO
8. api.evidenceUploadApplicant
9. api.evidenceUploadRespondent
10. api.scheduleHearing
11. api.amendHearingDueDate
12. api.hearingFeePaid
13. api.triggerBundle
14. api.createFinalOrder
15. api.hearingFeeUnpaid
16. api_spec_cui.createClaimWithUnrepresentedClaimant
17. api_spec_cui.performCitizenDefendantResponse
18. api_spec_cui.performCitizenClaimantResponse
19. api_spec_cui.createSDO
20. api_spec_cui.evidenceUploadApplicant
21. api_spec_cui.evidenceUploadDefendant
22. api_spec_cui.scheduleHearing
23. api_spec_cui.trialReadinessCitizen
24. api_spec_cui.createFinalOrder
25. api_spec_cui.createSpecifiedClaimWithUnrepresentedRespondent
26. api_spec_cui.claimantResponse
27. api_spec_cui.amendHearingDueDate
28. api_spec_cui.hearingFeePaid		 1v1 full defence unspecified - judge draws fast track WITH sum of damages - hearing scheduled

1v1 full defence unspecified - judge draws fast track WITHOUT sum of damages - hearing scheduled

1v1 full defence unspecified - judge draws small claims WITH sum of damages - hearing scheduled

1v1 full defence unspecified - judge draws small claims WITHOUT sum of damages - hearing scheduled

1v1 LiP v LiP Case Progression Journey

1v1 LR v LiP case progression
Certificate of Service e2e/tests/api_tests/cos pr_ft_api-cos @api-cos civil-ccd-definition: PR
civil-service: PR
civil-camunda-bpmn-definition: PR
civil-wa-task-configuration: PR		 1. api.createClaimWithRespondentLitigantInPerson
2. api.notifyClaimLip
3. api.notifyClaimDetailsLip		 Create claim where respondent is litigant in person and notify/notify details

Create claim where one respondent is LIP one is LR and notify/notify details

Create claim where two respondents are LIP and notify/notify details
Default Judgment e2e/tests/api_tests/dj pr_ft_api-dj @api-dj civil-ccd-definition: PR
civil-service: PR
civil-camunda-bpmn-definition: PR
civil-wa-task-configuration: PR		 1. api.createClaimWithRepresentedRespondent
2. api.addCaseNote
3. api.notifyClaim
4. api.notifyClaimDetails
5. api.amendRespondent1ResponseDeadline
6. api.defaultJudgment
7. api.assignTaskToUser
8. api.sdoDefaultJudgment
9. api.evidenceUploadJudge
10. api.evidenceUploadApplicant
11. api.evidenceUploadRespondent
12. api.scheduleHearing
13. api.amendHearingDueDate
14. api.hearingFeePaid
15. api.trialReadiness
16. api.triggerBundle
17. api_spec.createClaimWithRepresentedRespondent
18. api_spec.amendRespondent1ResponseDeadline
19. api_spec.defaultJudgmentSpec		 Unspec 1v1 api default judgment journey

Unspec 1v2 api default judgment journey

Unspec 2v1 api default judgment journey

Default Judgment Spec claim 1v1

Default Judgment Spec claim 1v2 divergent

Default Judgment Spec claim 1v2 non divergent

Default Judgment Spec claim 2v1
Discontinue Claim e2e/tests/api_tests/discontinue-claim pr_ft_api-discontinue-claim @api-discontinue-claim civil-ccd-definition: PR
civil-service: PR
civil-camunda-bpmn-definition: PR
civil-wa-task-configuration: PR		 1. api_spec_cui.createSpecifiedClaimWithUnrepresentedRespondent
2. api_spec_cui.performCitizenDefendantResponse
3. api_spec_cui.claimantResponse
4. api_spec_cui.discontinueClaim
5. api_spec.createClaimWithRepresentedRespondent
6. api_spec.discontinueClaim
7. api_spec.validateDiscontinueClaimClaimant		 Discontinue claim 1v1 LR v LiP defendant and claimant response - claim created from exui - CARM not enabled

1v1 discontinue claim spec

1v2 discontinue claim spec

1v2 discontinue claim spec negative

2v1 discontinue claim spec
Dispute Resolution Hearing e2e/tests/api_tests/drh pr_ft_api-drh @api-drh civil-ccd-definition: PR
civil-service: PR
civil-camunda-bpmn-definition: PR
civil-wa-task-configuration: PR		 1. api.createClaimWithRepresentedRespondent
2. api.amendClaimDocuments
3. api.notifyClaim
4. api.notifyClaimDetails
5. api.defendantResponse
6. api.claimantResponse
7. api.createSDO
8. api.evidenceUploadApplicant
9. api.evidenceUploadRespondent
10. api.scheduleHearing
11. api.amendHearingDueDate
12. api.hearingFeePaidDRH
13. api_spec_small.createClaimWithRepresentedRespondent
14. api_spec_small.defendantResponse
15. api_spec_small.claimantResponse
16. api_spec_small.uploadMediationDocuments
17. api_spec_small.createSDO
18. api_spec_small.mediationUnsuccessful
19. api.triggerBundle
20. api.createFinalOrderJO		 1v1 full defence unspecified - judge draws small claims DRH - hearing scheduled

1v1 spec small create SDO for DRH - CARM disabled

1v1 spec small create SDO for DRH - CARM enabled

1v1 unspec create SDO for DRH
Flight Delay e2e/tests/api_tests/flight-delay pr_ft_api-flight-delay @api-flight-delay civil-ccd-definition: PR
civil-service: PR
civil-camunda-bpmn-definition: PR
civil-wa-task-configuration: PR		 1. api_spec.createClaimSpecFlightDelay
2. api_spec.defendantResponse
3. api_spec.claimantResponseForFlightDelay
4. api_spec.createSDO		 1v1 full defence unspecified - judge draws small claims WITHOUT sum of damages - flight delay

1v1 specified - flight delay other option Small-claim
ga-add-info e2e/tests/api_tests/ga pr_ft_api-ga-add-info @api-ga-add-info civil-ccd-definition: PR
civil-service: PR		 Judge makes decision 1V1 - AWAITING_ADDITIONAL_INFORMATION
ga-adjourn-ga e2e/tests/api_tests/ga pr_ft_api-ga-adjourn-ga @api-ga-adjourn-ga civil-ccd-definition: PR
civil-service: PR		 AC 1 - 14 Days without consent, with notice

AC 2 - 14 Days without consent, without notice

AC 3 - 14 Days with consent

AC 4 - 15 Days with consent
ga-case-offline e2e/tests/api_tests/ga pr_ft_api-ga-case-offline @api-ga-case-offline civil-ccd-definition: PR
civil-service: PR		 Case offline APPLICATION_SUBMITTED_AWAITING_JUDICIAL_DECISION

Case offline ORDER_MADE

Judge makes decision 1V2 - Accept Strike out application

Case offline APPLICATION_DISMISSED
ga-cert-of-satisfaction e2e/tests/api_tests/ga pr_ft_api-ga-cert-of-satisfaction @api-ga-cert-of-satisfaction civil-ccd-definition: PR
civil-service: PR		 1v1 LIP v LIP Spec Case marked paid in full

1v1 LIP v LIP Spec Case not marked paid in full

1v1 LR v LIP Spec case JBA marked paid in full

1v1 LR v LIP Spec case marked paid in full
ga-collections e2e/tests/api_tests/ga pr_ft_api-ga-collections @api-ga-collections civil-ccd-definition: PR
civil-service: PR		 GA 1v2 - Without Notice Application Collection after Creation of GA Case initiated by Defendant2

GA 1v2 - Without Notice Application Collection after Creation of GA Case Test

GA 1v2 - Without Notice Application Collection After Judge Makes Decision List for Hearing

GA 1v2 - Without Notice Application Collection after Judge Makes Decision Order Made
ga-consent-order e2e/tests/api_tests/ga pr_ft_api-ga-consent-order @api-ga-consent-order civil-ccd-definition: PR
civil-service: PR		 After SDO - CONSENT ORDER - CaseWorker Refer to Judge makes decision 1V1 - Uncloak Application

After SDO - CONSENT ORDER - CaseWorker Refer to Judge makes decision 1V1 -- URGENT - Uncloak Application

Caseworker makes decision 1V1 - CONSENT ORDER

Legal Advisor decision 1V1 - CONSENT ORDER - Uncloak Application
ga-directions-order e2e/tests/api_tests/ga pr_ft_api-ga-directions-order @api-ga-directions-order civil-ccd-definition: PR
civil-service: PR		 Judge makes decision 1V1 - VARY-JUDGEMENT - DIRECTIONS ORDER - Respondent upload Directions Document

Judge makes decision 1V1 - VARY-JUDGEMENT as DEFENDANT - PROCEEDS IN HERITAGE

Judge makes decision 1V2 - DIRECTIONS ORDER

Judge makes decision 1V1 Specified case- DIRECTIONS ORDER

Make an Urgent General Application with Vary payment terms of judgment
ga-final-order e2e/tests/api_tests/ga pr_ft_api-ga-final-order @api-ga-final-order civil-ccd-definition: PR
civil-service: PR		 Without Notice Hearing notice journey

Spec Claimant create GA - JUDICIAL_REFERRAL state
ga-make-decision e2e/tests/api_tests/ga pr_ft_api-ga-make-decision @api-ga-make-decision civil-ccd-definition: PR
civil-service: PR		 Claimant create GA - JUDICIAL_REFERRAL state

Judge makes decision 1V1 - Order Made

Judge Revisit 1V1 unspec - Order Made End Date Scheduler

Judge makes decision 1V1 - unless order

Judge Revisit 1V1 - unless order End Date Scheduler

Judge makes decision 1V2 - DISMISS_THE_APPLICATION

Judge makes decision 1V2 - WRITTEN_REPRESENTATIONS

Spec Claimant create GA - CASE_PROGRESSION state
Hearings e2e/tests/api_tests/hearings pr_ft_api-hearings @api-hearings civil-ccd-definition: PR
civil-service: PR
civil-camunda-bpmn-definition: PR
civil-wa-task-configuration: PR		 1. api_spec_fast.createClaimWithRepresentedRespondent
2. api_spec_fast.defendantResponse
3. api_spec_fast.claimantResponse
4. hearings.createCaseFlags
5. api_spec_fast.createSDO
6. hearings.generateHearingsPayload
7. api.createClaimWithRepresentedRespondent
8. api.notifyClaim
9. api.notifyClaimDetails
10. api.defendantResponse
11. api.claimantResponse
12. api.createSDO
13. hearings.setupStaticMocks
14. api_spec_small.createClaimWithRepresentedRespondent
15. api_spec_small.defendantResponse
16. api_spec_small.claimantResponse
17. api_spec_small.createSDO
18. hearings.createSpecDisposalHearing
19. hearings.triggerSpecAutomatedHearingNoticeScheduler
20. hearings.createSpecTrialHearing
21. hearings.createSpecDisputeResolutionHearing		 CCD 1v2 Spec fast hearings API test

CCD 1v2 Unspec fast hearings API test

Spec automated hearing notice schedulers
Intermediate Track e2e/tests/api_tests/intermediate-track pr_ft_api-intermediate-track @api-intermediate-track civil-ccd-definition: PR
civil-service: PR
civil-camunda-bpmn-definition: PR
civil-wa-task-configuration: PR		 1. api.createClaimWithRepresentedRespondent
2. api.notifyClaim
3. api.notifyClaimDetails
4. api.defendantResponse
5. api.claimantResponse
6. api.createFinalOrder
7. api.evidenceUploadRespondent
8. api.scheduleHearing
9. api_spec.createClaimWithRepresentedRespondent
10. api_spec.defendantResponse
11. api_spec.claimantResponse
12. api_spec.createFinalOrderJO
13. api_spec.evidenceUploadApplicant
14. api_spec.scheduleHearing
15. api_spec_cui.createClaimWithUnrepresentedClaimant
16. api_spec_cui.performCitizenDefendantResponse
17. api_spec_cui.performCitizenClaimantResponse
18. api_spec_cui.createSpecifiedClaimWithUnrepresentedRespondent
19. api_spec_cui.claimantResponse
20. api_spec_cui.assignTaskToUser		 1v1 Create Unspecified Intermediate Track claim

1v2DS spec full defence intermediate claim

1v2 Same Solicitor Create Unspecified Intermediate Track claim

1v1 LiP v LiP defendant and claimant response - CARM enabled - Minti Enabled

1v1 LR v LiP intermediate track
Judgment Online e2e/tests/api_tests/jo pr_ft_api-jo @api-jo civil-ccd-definition: PR
civil-service: PR
civil-camunda-bpmn-definition: PR
civil-wa-task-configuration: PR		 1. api_spec_cui.createClaimWithUnrepresentedClaimant
2. api_spec_cui.performCitizenDefendantResponse
3. api_spec_cui.performCitizenClaimantResponse
4. api_spec_cui.judgmentPaidInFullCui
5. api_spec.createClaimWithRepresentedRespondent
6. api_spec.amendRespondent1ResponseDeadline
7. api_spec.defaultJudgmentSpec
8. api_spec.markJudgmentPaid
9. api_spec.setAsideJudgment
10. api_spec.defendantResponse
11. api_spec.claimantResponse
12. api_spec.createSDO
13. api_spec.createFinalOrderJO
14. api_spec.confirmOrderReview
15. api_spec.recordJudgment
16. api_spec.editJudgment		 1v1 LiP v LiP defendant response with part admit pay by installments judgment by admission mark paid in full

SetAside Default Judgment after judgment error - Spec claim 1v1 - Case taken offline

Record Judgment with mark judgment paid Spec claim 1v2
Manage Contact Information e2e/tests/api_tests/mci pr_ft_api-mci @api-mci civil-ccd-definition: PR
civil-service: PR
civil-camunda-bpmn-definition: PR
civil-wa-task-configuration: PR		 1. api.createClaimWithRepresentedRespondent
2. api.notifyClaim
3. api.notifyClaimDetails
4. api.defendantResponse
5. api.claimantResponse
6. api.manageDefendant1Details (skipped)
7. api.manageDefendant1LROrgDetails
8. api_spec_small.createClaimWithRepresentedRespondent
9. api_spec_small.defendantResponse
10. api_spec_small.claimantResponse
11. api_spec_small.manageContactInformation		 1v1 manage contact information

1v1 spec api manage contact information

1v1 spec api manage contact information - CARM enabled
Mediation e2e/tests/api_tests/mediation pr_ft_api-mediation @api-mediation civil-ccd-definition: PR
civil-service: PR
civil-camunda-bpmn-definition: PR
civil-wa-task-configuration: PR		 1. api_spec_cui.createSpecifiedClaimWithUnrepresentedRespondent
2. api_spec_cui.performCitizenDefendantResponse
3. api_spec_cui.claimantResponse
4. api_spec_cui.mediationUnsuccessful
5. api_spec_small.createClaimWithRepresentedRespondent
6. api_spec_small.defendantResponse
7. api_spec_small.claimantResponse
8. api_spec_small.mediationUnsuccessful
9. api_spec_small.uploadMediationDocuments
10. api_spec_small.createSDO
11. api_spec.createClaimWithRepresentedRespondent
12. api_spec.defendantResponse
13. api_spec.claimantResponse
14. api_spec.mediationUnsuccessful
15. api_spec.uploadMediationDocuments		 CARM enabled

CARM not enabled

1v1 claimant and defendant upload mediation documents - CARM enabled

1v2 different solicitor claimant and defendant upload mediation documents - CARM enabled
Multi Track e2e/tests/api_tests/multi-track pr_ft_api-multi-track @api-multi-track civil-ccd-definition: PR
civil-service: PR
civil-camunda-bpmn-definition: PR
civil-wa-task-configuration: PR		 1. api.createClaimWithRepresentedRespondent
2. api.notifyClaim
3. api.notifyClaimDetails
4. api.defendantResponse
5. api.claimantResponse
6. api.assignTaskToUser
7. api.createFinalOrder
8. api.evidenceUploadApplicant
9. api.scheduleHearing
10. api_spec.createClaimWithRepresentedRespondent
11. api_spec.defendantResponse
12. api_spec.claimantResponse
13. api_spec.createFinalOrderJO
14. api_spec.evidenceUploadRespondent
15. api_spec.scheduleHearing
16. api_spec_cui.createSpecifiedClaimWithUnrepresentedRespondent
17. api_spec_cui.performCitizenDefendantResponse
18. api_spec_cui.claimantResponse
19. api_spec_cui.assignTaskToUser		 1v1 unspec multi track

1v1 spec full defence multi claim

1v2DS unspec multi track claim

1v2DS spec full defence multi claim

1v1 LR v LiP multi track
nightly-prod e2e/tests/api_tests/mediation pr_ft_api-nightly-prod @api-nightly-prod civil-ccd-definition: PR
civil-service: PR
civil-camunda-bpmn-definition: PR
civil-wa-task-configuration: PR		 1. api_spec.createClaimWithRepresentedRespondent
2. api_spec.defendantResponse
3. api_spec.claimantResponse
4. api_spec.mediationUnsuccessful
5. api_spec.uploadMediationDocuments		 1v2 different solicitor claimant and defendant upload mediation documents - CARM enabled

1v2 different solicitor claimant and defendant upload mediation documents - CARM not enabled

1v2 same solicitor claimant and defendant upload mediation documents - CARM enabled

1v2 same solicitor claimant and defendant upload mediation documents - CARM not enabled

2v1 claimant and defendant upload mediation documents - CARM enabled

2v1 claimant and defendant upload mediation documents - CARM not enabled
Noise Induced Hearing Loss e2e/tests/api_tests/nihl pr_ft_api-nihl @api-nihl civil-ccd-definition: PR
civil-service: PR
civil-camunda-bpmn-definition: PR
civil-wa-task-configuration: PR		 1. api.createClaimWithRepresentedRespondent
2. api.amendClaimDocuments
3. api.notifyClaim
4. api.notifyClaimDetails
5. api.defendantResponse
6. api.claimantResponse
7. api.createSDO
8. api.evidenceUploadApplicant
9. api.evidenceUploadRespondent
10. api.scheduleHearing
11. api.amendHearingDueDate
12. api.hearingFeePaid
13. api.triggerBundle
14. api.createFinalOrder		 1v1 unspec create SDO for Noise Induced Hearing Loss
Not Suitable For SDO e2e/tests/api_tests/not-suitable-sdo pr_ft_api-not-suitable-sdo @api-not-suitable-sdo civil-ccd-definition: PR
civil-service: PR
civil-camunda-bpmn-definition: PR
civil-wa-task-configuration: PR		 1. api.createClaimWithRepresentedRespondent
2. api.amendClaimDocuments
3. api.notifyClaim
4. api.notifyClaimDetails
5. api.defendantResponse
6. api.claimantResponse
7. api.notSuitableSDO
8. api.transferCase
9. api_spec.createClaimWithRepresentedRespondent
10. api_spec.defendantResponse
11. api_spec.claimantResponse
12. api_spec.notSuitableSDOspec		 1v1 unspec full defence - not suitable SDO - Transfer Case

Transfer Online Spec claim 1v2 - not suitable SDO - Other reasons

1v2 full defence unspecified - not suitable SDO - Transfer Case)
Notice of Change e2e/tests/api_tests/noc pr_ft_api-noc @api-noc civil-ccd-definition: PR
civil-service: PR
civil-camunda-bpmn-definition: PR
civil-wa-task-configuration: PR		 1. api.createClaimWithRepresentedRespondent
2. api.notifyClaim
3. api.notifyClaimDetails
4. noc.requestNoticeOfChangeForApplicant1Solicitor
5. api.checkUserCaseAccess
6. noc.requestNoticeOfChangeForRespondent1Solicitor
7. api_spec.createClaimWithRepresentedRespondent
8. api_spec.checkUserCaseAccess
9. noc.requestNoticeOfChangeForRespondent2Solicitor
10. api_spec.defendantResponse
11. api.createClaimWithRespondentLitigantInPerson
12. api.notifyClaimLip
13. api.notifyClaimDetailsLip
14. noc.requestNoticeOfChangeForApplicant2Solicitor
15. api.defendantResponse
16. api.claimantResponse
17. api_spec_cui.createClaimWithUnrepresentedClaimant
18. api_spec_cui.checkUserCaseAccess
19. api_spec_cui.performCitizenDefendantResponse
20. api_spec_cui.claimantResponse		 1v1 unspec notice of change

1v1 spec notice of change

1vDS spec notice of change

notice of change - 1v2 - same solicitor to diff solicitor

1vSS spec notice of change

1vLIP unspec notice of change

2v1 unspec notice of change

2v1 spec notice of change

notice of change - 1v2 - both respondents LiPs to diff solicitor

notice of change - 1v2 - both respondents LiPs to same solicitor

LR v LiP notice of change

LR v LR LIP spec notice of change
other-remedy e2e/tests/api_tests/other-remedy pr_ft_api-other-remedy @api-other-remedy civil-ccd-definition: PR
civil-service: PR
civil-camunda-bpmn-definition: PR
civil-wa-task-configuration: PR		 1. api.createClaimWithRepresentedRespondent
2. api.notifyClaim
3. api.notifyClaimDetails
4. api.defendantResponse
5. api.claimantResponse		 1v1 unspec full defence
other-remedy-dj e2e/tests/api_tests/dj pr_ft_api-other-remedy-dj @api-other-remedy-dj civil-ccd-definition: PR
civil-service: PR
civil-camunda-bpmn-definition: PR
civil-wa-task-configuration: PR		 1. api.createClaimWithRepresentedRespondent
2. api.notifyClaim
3. api.notifyClaimDetails
4. api.amendRespondent1ResponseDeadline
5. api.defaultJudgment
6. api.assignTaskToUser
7. api.sdoDefaultJudgment
8. api.evidenceUploadJudge
9. api.evidenceUploadApplicant
10. api.evidenceUploadRespondent
11. api.scheduleHearing
12. api.amendHearingDueDate
13. api.hearingFeePaid
14. api.trialReadiness
15. api.triggerBundle		 01 Default Judgment claim

02 Verify Direction order(summaryJudgmentDirectionsTask) Judge task

03 Default Judgment claim SDO

04 Case progression tests (Upload evidence, schedule a hearing, amend hearing date, pay fee, confirm trial readiness)

05 Verify Case progression trial bundle
Query Management e2e/tests/api_tests/qm pr_ft_api-qm @api-qm civil-ccd-definition: PR
civil-service: PR
civil-camunda-bpmn-definition: PR
civil-wa-task-configuration: PR		 1. api.createClaimWithRepresentedRespondent
2. api.notifyClaim
3. api.notifyClaimDetails
4. api.defendantResponse
5. api.claimantResponse
6. qmSteps.raiseLRQuery
7. qmSteps.validateQmResponseTask
8. qmSteps.respondToQuery
9. qmSteps.followUpOnLRQuery
10. api_spec_cui.createClaimWithUnrepresentedClaimant
11. api_spec_cui.performCitizenDefendantResponse
12. api_spec_cui.performCitizenClaimantResponse
13. api_spec_cui.createSDO
14. qmSteps.raiseLipQuery
15. qmSteps.followUpOnLipQuery		 CCD 1v2 Unspec fast hearings API test

LR v LIP query management spec
Request For Reconsideration e2e/tests/api_tests/rfr pr_ft_api-rfr @api-rfr civil-ccd-definition: PR
civil-service: PR
civil-camunda-bpmn-definition: PR
civil-wa-task-configuration: PR		 1. api_spec_small.createClaimWithRepresentedRespondent
2. api_spec_small.defendantResponse
3. api_spec_small.claimantResponse
4. api_spec_small.createSDO
5. api_spec_small.requestForReconsideration
6. api_spec_small.judgeDecisionOnReconsiderationRequest
7. api_spec_cui.createClaimWithUnrepresentedClaimant
8. api_spec_cui.performCitizenDefendantResponse
9. api_spec_cui.performCitizenClaimantResponse
10. api_spec_cui.createSDO
11. api_spec_cui.requestForReconsiderationCitizen
12. api_spec_cui.judgeDecisionOnReconsiderationRequest
13. api_spec_cui.createSpecifiedClaimWithUnrepresentedRespondent
14. api_spec_cui.claimantResponse		 1v1 spec request for reconsideration for create new SDO

1v1 spec request for reconsideration for uphold previous order

1v2 spec request for reconsideration by defendant 2 for create general order

1v1 LiP v LiP Request for reconsideration

1v1 LR v LiP Request for reconsideration
Settle Claim e2e/tests/api_tests/settle-claim pr_ft_api-settle-claim @api-settle-claim civil-ccd-definition: PR
civil-service: PR
civil-camunda-bpmn-definition: PR
civil-wa-task-configuration: PR		 1. api_spec.createClaimWithRepresentedRespondent
2. api_spec.informAgreedExtensionDate
3. api_spec.defendantResponse
4. api_spec.claimantResponse
5. api_spec.settleClaim
6. api_spec.settleClaimSelectClaimant		 1v1 settle claim spec

1v2 settle claim spec

2v1 settle claim spec
spec-counterclaim e2e/tests/api_tests/spec-counter-claim pr_ft_api-spec-counterclaim @api-spec-counterclaim civil-ccd-definition: PR
civil-service: PR
civil-camunda-bpmn-definition: PR
civil-wa-task-configuration: PR		 1. api_spec.createClaimWithRepresentedRespondent
2. api_spec.defendantResponse
3. api_spec_small.createClaimWithRepresentedRespondent
4. api_spec_small.defendantResponse
5. api_spec_fast.createClaimWithRepresentedRespondent
6. api_spec_fast.defendantResponse		 1v1 counter claim

1v1 spec small claim counter claim

1v2SS small claim counter claim

1v2SS fast claim counter claim

2v1 small claim counter claim

2v1 fast claim counter claim
Specified Full Admit e2e/tests/api_tests/spec-full-admit pr_ft_api-spec-full-admit @api-spec-full-admit civil-ccd-definition: PR
civil-service: PR
civil-camunda-bpmn-definition: PR
civil-wa-task-configuration: PR		 1. api_spec.createClaimWithRepresentedRespondent
2. api_spec.defendantResponse
3. api_spec.claimantResponse
4. api_spec_small.createClaimWithRepresentedRespondent
5. api_spec_small.defendantResponse
6. api_spec_small.claimantResponse
7. api_spec_fast.createClaimWithRepresentedRespondent
8. api_spec_fast.defendantResponse
9. api_spec_fast.claimantResponse
10. api_spec_cui.createClaimWithUnrepresentedClaimant
11. api_spec_cui.performCitizenDefendantResponse
12. api_spec_cui.performCitizenClaimantResponse		 1v1 spec full admit

1v1 spec small claims full admit

1v2SS fast claim fast claim full admit, defendant and claimant response

1v2SS small claim full admit, claimant response

2v1 fast claim full admission

2v1 spec fast track full admission

2v1 spec full admit

1v1 LiP v LiP defendant response with full admit pay by set date
Specified Full Defence e2e/tests/api_tests/spec-full-defence pr_ft_api-spec-full-defence @api-spec-full-defence civil-ccd-definition: PR
civil-service: PR
civil-camunda-bpmn-definition: PR
civil-wa-task-configuration: PR		 1. api_spec.createClaimWithRepresentedRespondent
2. api_spec.informAgreedExtensionDate
3. api_spec.defendantResponse
4. api_spec.claimantResponse
5. api_spec_small.createClaimWithRepresentedRespondent
6. api_spec_small.defendantResponse
7. api_spec_small.claimantResponse
8. api_spec_small.manageContactInformation
9. api_spec_fast.createClaimWithRepresentedRespondent
10. api_spec_fast.defendantResponse
11. api_spec_fast.claimantResponse
12. api_spec_cui.createSpecifiedClaimWithUnrepresentedRespondent
13. api_spec_cui.performCitizenDefendantResponse
14. api_spec_cui.claimantResponse		 1v1 spec full defence

1v1 FULL_DEFENCE claimant and defendant response small claim

1v2DS spec full defence

1v2SS different response no full defence

1v2SS fast claim full defence and not proceed

1v2SS full defence and claimant response

1v2SS small claim different response full defence

1v2SS small claim full defence, claimant response

1v2SS small claim full defence, claimant response not proceed

1v2SS small claim full defence, defendant response

2v1 fast claim different response full defence

2v1 fast claim different response no full defence

2v1 fast claim full defence and claimant response

2v1 fast claim full defence and not proceed

2v1 small claim different response full defence

2v1 small claim different response no full defence

2v1 small claim full defence and defendant response

2v1 small claim full defence and not proceed

LR v LIP spec full defence
Specified Part Admit e2e/tests/api_tests/spec-part-admit pr_ft_api-spec-part-admit @api-spec-part-admit civil-ccd-definition: PR
civil-service: PR
civil-camunda-bpmn-definition: PR
civil-wa-task-configuration: PR		 1. api_spec_cui.createClaimWithUnrepresentedClaimant
2. api_spec_cui.performCitizenDefendantResponse
3. api_spec_cui.performCitizenClaimantResponse
4. api_spec.createClaimWithRepresentedRespondent
5. api_spec.defendantResponse
6. api_spec.claimantResponse
7. api_spec_small.createClaimWithRepresentedRespondent
8. api_spec_small.defendantResponse
9. api_spec_small.claimantResponse
10. api_spec_fast.createClaimWithRepresentedRespondent
11. api_spec_fast.defendantResponse
12. api_spec_fast.claimantResponse		 LiP v LiP defendant response with part admit pay by installments

1v1 spec part admit

1v1 spec api small claims

1v2SS fast claim part admit, defendant and claimant response

1v2SS spec part admit

2v1 spec fast track part admit

2v1 spec part admission

1v1 LiP v LiP Part admit defendant and claimant response - claimant rejects installment plan - CARM enabled
Stay Case e2e/tests/api_tests/stay-case pr_ft_api-stay-case @api-stay-case civil-ccd-definition: PR
civil-service: PR
civil-camunda-bpmn-definition: PR
civil-wa-task-configuration: PR		 1. api_spec.createClaimWithRepresentedRespondent
2. api_spec.defendantResponse
3. api_spec.claimantResponse
4. api_spec.createSDO
5. api_spec.scheduleHearing
6. api_spec.amendHearingDueDate
7. api_spec.hearingFeePaid
8. api_spec.stayCase
9. api_spec.manageStay
10. api_spec.sendMessage
11. api_spec.replyMessage
12. api_spec.dismissCase
13. api.createClaimWithRepresentedRespondent
14. api.notifyClaim
15. api.notifyClaimDetails
16. api.defendantResponse
17. api.claimantResponse
18. api.stayCase
19. api.manageStay
20. api.sendMessage (skipped)
21. api.replyMessage (skipped)
22. api.createFinalOrder
23. api.scheduleHearing
24. api.dismissCase
25. api.amendRespondent1ResponseDeadline
26. api.defaultJudgment
27. api.sdoDefaultJudgment
28. api.sendMessage
29. api.replyMessage
30. api_spec_cui.createClaimWithUnrepresentedClaimant
31. api_spec_cui.performCitizenDefendantResponse
32. api_spec_cui.performCitizenClaimantResponse
33. api_spec_cui.stayCase
34. api_spec_cui.manageStay
35. api_spec_cui.createSDO
36. api_spec_cui.dismissCase
37. api_spec_cui.createSpecifiedClaimWithUnrepresentedRespondent
38. api_spec_cui.claimantResponse
39. api_spec_cui.sendMessage
40. api_spec_cui.replyMessage		 1v1 LR FAST TRACK prepare for conduct hearing stay case

1v2DS Stay Case Judicial Referral

1v2SS LR UNSPEC claim hearing readiness

1v1 JUDICIAL_REFERRAL Lip v Lip stay case dismiss case

LR v LIP spec stay case
Unspecified Full Defence e2e/tests/api_tests/unspec-full-defence pr_ft_api-unspec-full-defence @api-unspec-full-defence civil-ccd-definition: PR
civil-service: PR
civil-camunda-bpmn-definition: PR
civil-wa-task-configuration: PR		 1. api.createClaimWithRepresentedRespondent
2. api.addCaseNote
3. api.amendClaimDocuments
4. api.notifyClaim
5. api.notifyClaimDetails
6. api.amendPartyDetails
7. api.acknowledgeClaim
8. api.informAgreedExtension
9. api.addDefendantLitigationFriend
10. api.defendantResponse
11. api.claimantResponse
12. api.acknowledgeClaim (skipped)		 1v1 unspec full defence

1v2 different solicitor unspec full defence

1v2 same solicitor unspec full defence

2v1 unspec full defence

Testing in IntelliJ (Ultimate Edition)

  1. Running a test_name.js

  • Select the .js file containing the tests you want to run and modify its run configuration.

  • Set "Node interpreter" to: [...]\node.exe

  • Set "Node parameters" to: "[...]\civil-ccd-definition\node_modules\codeceptjs\bin\codecept.js" run --debug --verbose

  • Set "Working directory" to: "[...]\civil-ccd-definition"

  • Set JavaScript file to: "[...]\test_name.js"

  • Set "Environment variables" to:

  • S2S_SECRET=[...];ENVIRONMENT=[...];NODE_TLS_REJECT_UNAUTHORIZED=0;SHOW_BROWSER_WINDOW=true

  1. Running a test from package.json

  • Run > Edit configurations > + > Node.js

  • Set "Node interpreter" to: [...]\node.exe

  • Set "Node parameters" to: "[...]\civil-ccd-definition\node_modules\codeceptjs\bin\codecept.js" run --grep @[test_name] --debug --verbose

  • Set "Working directory" to: "[...]\civil-ccd-definition"

  • Set "Environment variables" to:

  • S2S_SECRET=[...];ENVIRONMENT=[...];NODE_TLS_REJECT_UNAUTHORIZED=0;SHOW_BROWSER_WINDOW=true

Adding Git Conventions

Include the git conventions.

  • Make sure your git version is at least 2.9 using the git --version command
  • Run the following command:
git config --local core.hooksPath .git-config/hooks

Once the above is done, you will be required to follow specific conventions for your commit messages and branch names.

If you violate a convention, the git error message will report clearly the convention you should follow and provide additional information where necessary.

Optional:

  • Install this plugin in Chrome: https://github.com/refined-github/refined-github

    It will automatically set the title for new PRs according to the first commit message, so you won't have to change it manually.

    Note that it will also alter other behaviours in GitHub. Hopefully these will also be improvements to you.

In case of problems

  1. Get in touch with your Technical Lead so that they can get you unblocked

  2. If the rare eventuality that the above is not possible, you can disable enforcement of conventions using the following command

    git config --local --unset core.hooksPath

    Still, you shouldn't be doing it so make sure you get in touch with a Technical Lead soon afterwards.

Development / Debugging Environment - Preview with Mirrord

As an alternative for a development environment there is a procedure in place where after running the command below the required services for Civil are created in Preview under the developer's name, so these will be exclusively for the named developer use.

While connected to the VPN simply run one of the below commands from your project's (civil-ccd-definition) folder: Note: be sure to have Docker running

echo "CIVIL_SERVICE_IMAGE=latest" >> .env.local && npx @hmcts/dev-env@latest --env .env.local && ./bin/setup-devuser-preview-env.sh

You can optionally specify a branch for CCD definitions and Camunda definitions like below or leave it blank to use master.

echo "CIVIL_SERVICE_IMAGE=latest" >> .env.local && npx @hmcts/dev-env@latest --env .env.local && ./bin/setup-devuser-preview-env.sh camundaBranch dmnBranch waStandaloneBranch

Once the pods are up and running you can connect to them using a plugin called Mirrord on Intellij. https://mirrord.dev

If you want to clean up the environment just run:

npx @hmcts/dev-env@latest --delete

To run the specialised charts, where you can get Work Allocation for instance, run:

npx @hmcts/dev-env@latest --template values.enableWA.preview.template.yaml && ./bin/setup-devuser-preview-env.sh

Note: enabling HMC, will create a custom CaseType in definitions and import it to AAT. Please delete the same after use by running:

./bin/delete-dev-preview-definition-from-aat.sh

Hearings Development - Preview

For now any Hearings related PRs, i.e. that requires HMC/ILA must undergo some manual setup.

1 - Execute the commands below replacing ${PR_NUMBER} accordingly to create the topic subscription required

    az servicebus topic subscription create --resource-group hmc-shared-aat --namespace-name hmc-servicebus-aat \
      --topic-name hmc-to-cft-aat --subscription DCD-CNP-DEV --name hmc-to-civil-subscription-pr-${PR_NUMBER} \
      --subscription DCD-CNP-DEV && \
    az servicebus topic subscription rule create --resource-group hmc-shared-aat --subscription DCD-CNP-DEV\
      --namespace-name hmc-servicebus-aat --topic-name hmc-to-cft-aat \
      --subscription-name hmc-to-civil-subscription-pr-${PR_NUMBER} \
      --name hmc-servicebus-aat-subscription-rule-civil --subscription DCD-CNP-DEV\
      --filter-sql-expression "hmctsServiceId IN ('AAA7','AAA6')"

(Remember to delete this once finished with the PR using "az servicebus topic subscription delete")

2 - Add the label pr-values:enableHmc on your GitHub PR

3 - When in XUI/CUI the case type will have an extension to your PR number added to it.

Introduction of *-testing.json file convention for CCD definitions

A new convention for the CCD definitions files has been introduced. The new convention is to use the -testing.json suffix for definitions that are not to be used in production but will be used in AAT and Preview environments.

Pattern Local Preview AAT Production
Base files Yes Yes Yes Yes
*-prod.json No No Yes Yes
*-testing.json Yes Yes Yes No
*-nonprod.json Yes Yes No No

License

This project is licensed under the MIT License - see the LICENSE file for details

About

No description or website provided.

Topics

jenkins-cft jenkins-cft-a-c

Resources

Readme

License

MIT license

Contributing

Contributing

Security policy

Security policy
Activity
Custom properties

Stars

5 stars

Watchers

20 watching

Forks

11 forks
Report repository

Releases 1,084

CIV-5708 Sanity Test Tag Latest
Mar 29, 2023
+ 1,083 releases

Packages

 
 
 

Contributors

Languages