Skip to content

fix(ci): pin third-party actions to full commit SHAs - #88

Merged
hyperpolymath merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
fix/sha-pin-actions
Sep 20, 2026
Merged

hyperpolymath merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
fix/sha-pin-actions

Conversation

@hyperpolymath

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

fix(ci): pin third-party actions to full commit SHAs

The account's Actions policy requires a full-length SHA ref. A tag or branch ref is refused at
startup — startup_failure, no jobs, "this workflow graph cannot be shown" — so these workflows
could not run at all. This resolves each ref to the commit it currently points at and records the
ref in a trailing comment, e.g. actions/checkout@<sha> # v4.

dtolnay/rust-toolchain takes its toolchain from the ref itself, so those steps also gained an
explicit with: toolchain: input; without it, a SHA ref would silently lose the channel.

No behaviour is intended to change beyond the pins.

The account's Actions policy requires a full-length SHA ref. A tag or branch ref is refused at
startup — `startup_failure`, no jobs, "this workflow graph cannot be shown" — so these workflows
could not run at all. This resolves each ref to the commit it currently points at and records the
ref in a trailing comment, e.g. `actions/checkout@<sha> # v4`.

`dtolnay/rust-toolchain` takes its toolchain from the ref itself, so those steps also gained an
explicit `with: toolchain:` input; without it, a SHA ref would silently lose the channel.

No behaviour is intended to change beyond the pins.
@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Sep 19, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Review Change StackReview Change Stack

No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉

ℹ️ Recent review info
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Organization UI

Review profile: ASSERTIVE

Plan: Advanced

Run ID: 58ad3546-65f7-4742-86d8-832c901ce5c5

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 2f04bfc and 5386b40.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • .github/workflows/fragment-conformance.yml
  • .github/workflows/rhodibot.yml

Included review availability: Your plan provides up to 1 included review per hour; 0 remain after this review.

📜 Recent review details
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout. (15)
  • GitHub Check: scan / rust-secrets
  • GitHub Check: scan / gitleaks
  • GitHub Check: scan / shell-secrets
  • GitHub Check: governance / Trusted-base reduction policy
  • GitHub Check: governance / Guix primary / Nix fallback policy
  • GitHub Check: governance / Security policy checks
  • GitHub Check: governance / Check Workflow Staleness
  • GitHub Check: governance / Code quality + docs
  • GitHub Check: governance / Workflow security linter
  • GitHub Check: governance / Language / package anti-pattern policy
  • GitHub Check: governance / Licence consistency
  • GitHub Check: governance / Well-Known (RFC 9116 + RSR)
  • GitHub Check: rust-ci / Detect Cargo.toml
  • GitHub Check: scan / Hypatia Neurosymbolic Analysis
  • GitHub Check: GitGuardian Security Checks
🔇 Additional comments (1)
.github/workflows/fragment-conformance.yml (1)

21-21: 🗄️ Data Integrity & Integration

The lockfile already contains all four action revisions. No synchronisation change is required.


📝 Summary

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Chores
    • Pinned CI workflow actions to immutable commit references for more consistent and predictable workflow execution.
    • Retained the existing action versions and workflow configuration.

Walkthrough

The workflows now reference actions/checkout and julia-actions/setup-julia by immutable commit SHAs. Existing version comments and workflow configuration remain unchanged.

Changes

Workflow action pinning

Layer / File(s) Summary
Pin workflow actions
.github/workflows/fragment-conformance.yml, .github/workflows/rhodibot.yml
The workflows replace mutable action tags with immutable commit SHAs for checkout and Julia setup actions.

Priority: ⬇️ Low

Estimated code review effort: 1 (Trivial) | ~5 minutes

Change: Bug fix

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 4 | ❌ 1

❌ Failed checks (1 warning)

Check name Status Explanation Resolution
Description check ⚠️ Warning The description explains the purpose, affected behaviour, SHA pinning, preserved version comments, and explicit Rust toolchain inputs. However, it omits the required Changes, RSR Quality Checklist, Te… Add the missing template sections. List the key changes, complete the RSR Quality Checklist, describe the tests run and their results, and state whether screenshots or terminal output are applicable.
✅ Passed checks (4 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Title check ✅ Passed The title clearly and concisely describes the main change: pinning third-party CI actions to full commit SHAs.
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check. Docstring coverage is scoped to functions touched by this diff. Analyzed 0 functions across 0…
Linked Issues check ✅ Passed Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Out of Scope Changes check ✅ Passed Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Full details: Description check

Explanation

The description explains the purpose, affected behaviour, SHA pinning, preserved version comments, and explicit Rust toolchain inputs. However, it omits the required Changes, RSR Quality Checklist, Testing, and Screenshots sections from the repository template.

  • Fix all pre-merge checks with AI

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

A rabbit reads each line,
The patch grows clear beneath the moon,
Small changes hop in place,
Tests guard the garden path,
Reviews bloom before the dawn.

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

@sonarqubecloud

Copy link
Copy Markdown

@hyperpolymath
hyperpolymath merged commit 5f16bfe into main Sep 20, 2026
22 of 23 checks passed
@hyperpolymath
hyperpolymath deleted the fix/sha-pin-actions branch September 20, 2026 00:43
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant