chore(policy): add the ReScript BANNED row (post-retirement sync)

[hyperpolymath]

Estate-wide policy sync (task: BANNED-row campaign, 2026-08-31).

ReScript is retired outside the enclave (owner ruling 2026-08-31: rescript, rescript-ecosystem, and the proven adapters stay ReScript; nothing else). This repo's language-policy table in .claude/CLAUDE.md predated that ruling.

• Adds | ReScript | AffineScript | to the BANNED table (whole-line insert after the TypeScript row, extra columns mirrored).
• Where the Python row still recommended ReScript as a replacement, rewrites it to AffineScript.

Doc-only change; verified estate-wide by an origin-side GraphQL scan of all 428 non-archived repos (52 repos in this sweep).

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

[coderabbitai]

No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉

ℹ️ Recent review info

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Organization UI

Review profile: ASSERTIVE

Plan: Pro Plus

Run ID: 98f34714-c16c-4677-8342-8bc4cbb5f44a

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 1fc35f7 and 8cd5299.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

• .claude/CLAUDE.md

Included review availability: Your plan provides up to 1 included review per hour; 0 remain after this review.

📜 Recent review details

⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout. (15)

• GitHub Check: Notify on Failure
• GitHub Check: governance / Licence consistency
• GitHub Check: governance / Code quality + docs
• GitHub Check: governance / Well-Known (RFC 9116 + RSR)
• GitHub Check: governance / Trusted-base reduction policy
• GitHub Check: scan / shell-secrets
• GitHub Check: governance / Check Workflow Staleness
• GitHub Check: scan / rust-secrets
• GitHub Check: governance / Guix primary / Nix fallback policy
• GitHub Check: governance / Workflow security linter
• GitHub Check: governance / Security policy checks
• GitHub Check: governance / Language / package anti-pattern policy
• GitHub Check: scan / gitleaks
• GitHub Check: scan / Hypatia Neurosymbolic Analysis
• GitHub Check: Analyze (javascript-typescript)

🔇 Additional comments (1)

.claude/CLAUDE.md (1)

45-45: LGTM!

---

📝 Walkthrough

Summary by CodeRabbit

• Documentation
  • Updated the banned technologies guidance to explicitly map ReScript to AffineScript.

Walkthrough

The project guidance now lists ReScript in the banned technologies table and maps it to AffineScript as the replacement.

Changes

Technology policy

Layer / File(s)	Summary
Banned technology mapping .claude/CLAUDE.md	The banned technologies table now lists ReScript and specifies AffineScript as its replacement.

Estimated code review effort: 1 (Trivial) | ~2 minutes

Merge Risk: ⚪ Minimal · up to 8cd52

This PR makes a localized documentation-only policy update, so it does not change runtime behavior or production data; no actionable merge-blocking risk remains after normal checks and review.

Poem

I am a rabbit beside the code,
ReScript now has a marked-out road.
AffineScript waits in the morning light,
The policy table is clear and right,
One small line keeps guidance bright.

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 5

✅ Passed checks (5 passed)

Check name	Status	Explanation
Title check	✅ Passed	The title clearly identifies the policy change: adding the ReScript BANNED row. The retirement-sync context is accurate and concise.
Description check	✅ Passed	The description directly explains the ReScript policy update, the AffineScript replacement, and the related Python-row change. It is relevant to the changeset.
Docstring Coverage	✅ Passed	No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check. Docstring coverage is scoped to functions touched by this diff. Analyzed 0 functions across 0…
Linked Issues check	✅ Passed	Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Out of Scope Changes check	✅ Passed	Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.

Full details: Docstring Coverage

Explanation

No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check. Docstring coverage is scoped to functions touched by this diff. Analyzed 0 functions across 0 files. (1 skipped: 1 unsupported.)

✨ Finishing Touches 💡 1

🛠️ Fix failing CI checks 💡

• Create stacked PR
• Commit on current branch

---

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.}