Repository navigation
docs: fix the last repair artifacts from the sweep (rubrics, literal block) - #87
Merged
Merged
Conversation
…k with prose epythet repair (tracked in i2mint/epythet#27) turned Google 'Example(s):' headers into .. rubric:: lines and a 'specifying:' + indented paragraph into a literal block.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Follow-up to #86: the
epythet repairrun in that PR had turned GoogleExample(s):headers into.. rubric::lines (three survived ini2/util.py) and aspecifying:+ indented paragraph into a literal block (i2/signatures.py,extract_arguments). Both restored to prose/bold phrases. Tests 470 passed, doctests 761 passed,epythet validatecore errors 0, Sphinx warnings 0. Repair defects are tracked in i2mint/epythet#27.