Conversation
Signed-off-by: Isaac Obella <wizlif@users.noreply.github.com>
|
Would '>=1.2.0 <3.0.0' be a better bound here? AFAICT the 2.0.0 breaking changes don't matter—I ran the test suite successfully with both '^1.2.0' and '^2.0.0'. |
|
Sure, that would be better |
|
If you only do this, you can't use the build method: |
|
Hello, and news concerning this PR ? |
|
@jipspaul I've created a PR with more extensive changes to fix analyzer removing depreciated values. #122 If you fork my fork, you can reference the changes by adding below to your pubspec: swap my username with yours |
|
This is a kickstart to our package on pubdev: https://github.com/isar-community/isar-community For now I updated This project is a direct continuation from
I really want PRs for that new repo. All tests are passing so we must keep 100% of tests green |
No description provided.