Add adjacency effects to Lake Mary example

[brentwilder]

Expands the Lake Mary test to also include the adjacency effects improvements developed from 974.

[pgbrodrick]

Needs 974 before merging.

[brentwilder]

@unbohn / @jammont revisiting this from our conversation last week. The pre-computed _bgrfl.hdr data exists in the examples data for Lake Mary, and apply_oe is written in a way that it will leverage this file without needing the entire imagecube for this exact purpose.

My main question is if we wanted to include this in the Lake Mary test as the default arg, or to somehow test both ways (on and off)?

[unbohn]

@brentwilder I'd suggest to keep the test simple for now and include the pre-computed data as default arg. But happy to go other ways, too!

[jammont]

To test both ways, could just add another template like bgrfl.args.json that includes this argument. ISOFIT auto-detects all of the template files and constructs a script for each one

[unbohn]

@jammont Sounds good to me as well!

[brentwilder]

Okay, based on our conversation from last week I added a prebuilt LUT via srtmnet (along with the lut_config file). This way we can quickly call both modes default.args.json and bgrfl.args.json without rebuilding the lut each time.

I also addressed #57 by bringing in the most recent surface from the emit sds.

I don't have a good feel for how the data should be structured, and so I just have all of the files in the /templates directory. Please let me know if this is incorrect.

[unbohn]

Thanks, @brentwilder! This looks good. The /templates directory makes sense for all the json files. However, we'd need to think about the location of the prebuilt LUT since it's not really a template. Maybe we could do two subdirectories under the Lake Mary parent directory, /templates and /luts? @jammont What do you think?