itsmeront · itsmeront · Aug 22, 2026 · Aug 22, 2026 · Aug 22, 2026
@@ -29,6 +29,7 @@ The taxonomy gives OIR a stable map for organizing knowledge pages, source recor
 - `sanctions`
 - `computer-crime`
 - `copyright`
+- `artificial-intelligence`
 - `safe-harbor`
 - `intermediary-liability`
 - `surveillance`

@@ -0,0 +1,36 @@
+---
+id: SRC-BARTZ-V-ANTHROPIC-FAIR-USE
+title: Bartz v. Anthropic PBC, Order on Fair Use (N.D. Cal. June 23, 2025)
+type: source
+status: draft
+summary: Northern District of California summary-judgment order holding that training Anthropic’s Claude models on purchased books was fair use, while pirated library copies were not excused as fair use.
+tags:
+  - source
+  - case
+  - copyright
+  - artificial-intelligence
+sources: []
+relationships: []
+last_verified: "2026-08-22"
+---
+
+# Bartz v. Anthropic PBC, Order on Fair Use (N.D. Cal. June 23, 2025)
+
+## Bibliographic Metadata
+
+- Author or issuing body: United States District Court for the Northern District of California (Judge William Alsup)
+- Publication date: 2025-06-23
+- Source type: District court order (PDF)
+- URL: https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.cand.434709/gov.uscourts.cand.434709.231.0_4.pdf
+- Archive URL: None recorded
+- Access date: 2026-08-22
+
+## Reliability Notes
+
+RECAP copy of the fair-use summary-judgment order in No. C 24-05417 WHA. Primary authority for the court’s split holding on training copies versus pirated library copies. District-court authority; not an appellate holding. Later settlement approval is a separate source.
+
+## Used For
+
+- `CASE-BARTZ-V-ANTHROPIC`
+- `TOPIC-AI-COPYRIGHT`
+- `TOPIC-AI-LITIGATION`
@@ -0,0 +1,36 @@
+---
+id: SRC-BARTZ-V-ANTHROPIC-FINAL-APPROVAL
+title: Bartz v. Anthropic PBC, Order Granting Final Approval of Class Action Settlement (N.D. Cal. July 20, 2026)
+type: source
+status: draft
+summary: Northern District of California order granting final approval of a $1.5 billion class settlement covering Anthropic’s past acquisition and copying of listed pirated books.
+tags:
+  - source
+  - case
+  - copyright
+  - artificial-intelligence
+sources: []
+relationships: []
+last_verified: "2026-08-22"
+---
+
+# Bartz v. Anthropic PBC, Order Granting Final Approval of Class Action Settlement (N.D. Cal. July 20, 2026)
+
+## Bibliographic Metadata
+
+- Author or issuing body: United States District Court for the Northern District of California
+- Publication date: 2026-07-20
+- Source type: District court order and judgment (PDF)
+- URL: https://s3.documentcloud.org/documents/28503369/anthropic-settlement-final-approval.pdf
+- Archive URL: None recorded
+- Access date: 2026-08-22
+
+## Reliability Notes
+
+DocumentCloud reproduction of Dkt. 680 in No. 4:24-cv-05417-AMO. Primary court order for settlement terms as the court described them. Settlement approval is not a merits holding on fair use; the June 2025 fair-use order remains the source for that analysis.
+
+## Used For
+
+- `CASE-BARTZ-V-ANTHROPIC`
+- `TOPIC-AI-COPYRIGHT`
+- `TOPIC-AI-LITIGATION`
@@ -0,0 +1,35 @@
+---
+id: SRC-CONCORD-V-ANTHROPIC-DOCKET
+title: Concord Music Group, Inc. v. Anthropic PBC, CourtListener docket (N.D. Cal. No. 5:24-cv-03811)
+type: source
+status: draft
+summary: CourtListener docket for the music-publisher lyric-copyright action against Anthropic, including the original Tennessee filing date reflected on the transferred complaint.
+tags:
+  - source
+  - case
+  - copyright
+  - artificial-intelligence
+sources: []
+relationships: []
+last_verified: "2026-08-22"
+---
+
+# Concord Music Group, Inc. v. Anthropic PBC, CourtListener docket
+
+## Bibliographic Metadata
+
+- Author or issuing body: United States District Court for the Northern District of California (via CourtListener / PACER)
+- Publication date: 2024-06-26
+- Source type: Public docket
+- URL: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/68889092/concord-music-group-inc-v-anthropic-pbc/
+- Archive URL: None recorded
+- Access date: 2026-08-22
+
+## Reliability Notes
+
+CourtListener docket compiled from PACER/RECAP for No. 5:24-cv-03811. The transferred complaint docket text records an original Middle District of Tennessee filing dated October 18, 2023. Reliable for case number, transfer posture, and later docket events as of the access date. A related later action, No. 5:26-cv-00880, is a separate docket.
+
+## Used For
+
+- `CASE-CONCORD-V-ANTHROPIC`
+- `TOPIC-AI-MUSIC-COPYRIGHT`
@@ -0,0 +1,37 @@
+---
+id: SRC-CONCORD-V-ANTHROPIC-MTD-2025
+title: Concord Music Group, Inc. v. Anthropic PBC, Order Denying Motion to Dismiss FAC (N.D. Cal. Oct. 6, 2025)
+type: source
+status: draft
+summary: Northern District of California order allowing music publishers’ amended claims for secondary copyright infringement and DMCA CMI removal against Anthropic to proceed.
+tags:
+  - source
+  - case
+  - copyright
+  - artificial-intelligence
+sources: []
+relationships: []
+last_verified: "2026-08-22"
+---
+
+# Concord Music Group, Inc. v. Anthropic PBC, Order Denying Motion to Dismiss FAC
+
+## Bibliographic Metadata
+
+- Author or issuing body: United States District Court for the Northern District of California (Judge Eumi K. Lee)
+- Publication date: 2025-10-06
+- Source type: District court order (PDF)
+- URL: https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.cand.431519/gov.uscourts.cand.431519.461.0_2.pdf
+- Archive URL: None recorded
+- Access date: 2026-08-22
+
+## Reliability Notes
+
+RECAP copy of the October 6, 2025 order in No. 24-cv-03811-EKL. Primary authority for pleading-stage holdings on the first amended complaint. The order recites alleged facts from the FAC and prior procedural history (including the March 26, 2025 dismissal with leave to amend). It is not a fair-use merits ruling.
+
+## Used For
+
+- `CASE-CONCORD-V-ANTHROPIC`
+- `TOPIC-AI-MUSIC-COPYRIGHT`
+- `TOPIC-AI-COPYRIGHT`
+- `TOPIC-AI-LITIGATION`
@@ -0,0 +1,36 @@
+---
+id: SRC-GARCIA-V-CHARACTER-COMPLAINT
+title: Garcia v. Character Technologies, Inc., Complaint (M.D. Fla. Oct. 22, 2024)
+type: source
+status: draft
+summary: Wrongful-death and product-liability complaint alleging that a Character.AI chatbot contributed to the death of a 14-year-old user.
+tags:
+  - source
+  - case
+  - first-amendment
+  - artificial-intelligence
+  - digital-rights
+sources: []
+relationships: []
+last_verified: "2026-08-22"
+---
+
+# Garcia v. Character Technologies, Inc., Complaint (M.D. Fla. Oct. 22, 2024)
+
+## Bibliographic Metadata
+
+- Author or issuing body: Megan Garcia (plaintiff filing)
+- Publication date: 2024-10-22
+- Source type: District court complaint (PDF)
+- URL: https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.flmd.433581/gov.uscourts.flmd.433581.1.0.pdf
+- Archive URL: None recorded
+- Access date: 2026-08-22
+
+## Reliability Notes
+
+RECAP copy of the original complaint in No. 6:24-cv-01903 (M.D. Fla.). Primary source for original claims and parties. Allegations are unverified. Later amended complaints and the May 2025 motion-to-dismiss order control for operative theories. This page concerns a minor’s death; do not reproduce alleged chatbot transcripts or methods of harm.
+
+## Used For
+
+- `CASE-GARCIA-V-CHARACTER-TECHNOLOGIES`
+- `TOPIC-AI-LITIGATION`
@@ -0,0 +1,37 @@
+---
+id: SRC-GARCIA-V-CHARACTER-MTD-2025
+title: Garcia v. Character Technologies, Inc., Order on Motions to Dismiss (M.D. Fla. May 20, 2025)
+type: source
+status: draft
+summary: Middle District of Florida order allowing most product-liability and negligence claims against Character.AI and Google to proceed while dismissing IIED and Alphabet Inc.
+tags:
+  - source
+  - case
+  - first-amendment
+  - artificial-intelligence
+  - digital-rights
+sources: []
+relationships: []
+last_verified: "2026-08-22"
+---
+
+# Garcia v. Character Technologies, Inc., Order on Motions to Dismiss (M.D. Fla. May 20, 2025)
+
+## Bibliographic Metadata
+
+- Author or issuing body: United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida (Judge Anne C. Conway)
+- Publication date: 2025-05-20
+- Source type: District court order (PDF)
+- URL: https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.flmd.433581/gov.uscourts.flmd.433581.115.0.pdf
+- Archive URL: None recorded
+- Access date: 2026-08-22
+
+## Reliability Notes
+
+RECAP copy of Dkt. 115. Primary authority for pleading-stage holdings, including that the court was not prepared to treat Character.AI outputs as protected speech at that stage and that the app could be a “product” insofar as claims targeted design defects rather than ideas or expressions. Not a merits finding of liability. Entered on the docket May 21, 2025.
+
+## Used For
+
+- `CASE-GARCIA-V-CHARACTER-TECHNOLOGIES`
+- `TOPIC-AI-LITIGATION`
+- `TOPIC-FIRST-AMENDMENT`
@@ -0,0 +1,37 @@
+---
+id: SRC-GEMA-V-OPENAI-LG-MUENCHEN-2025
+title: LG München I, Endurteil v. 11.11.2025 – 42 O 14139/24 (GEMA v. OpenAI)
+type: source
+status: draft
+summary: First-instance Munich judgment holding that memorization of nine German song lyrics in GPT-4 and GPT-4o, and output of those lyrics, infringed German and EU copyright and was not covered by the text-and-data-mining exception.
+tags:
+  - source
+  - case
+  - copyright
+  - artificial-intelligence
+sources: []
+relationships: []
+last_verified: "2026-08-22"
+---
+
+# LG München I, Endurteil v. 11.11.2025 – 42 O 14139/24
+
+## Bibliographic Metadata
+
+- Author or issuing body: Landgericht München I, 42. Zivilkammer
+- Publication date: 2025-11-11
+- Source type: Official first-instance judgment (HTML report)
+- URL: https://www.gesetze-bayern.de/Content/Document/Y-300-Z-GRURRS-B-2025-N-30204
+- Archive URL: None recorded
+- Access date: 2026-08-22
+
+## Reliability Notes
+
+Official Bavarian judicial-decision report of the November 11, 2025 Endurteil. Primary authority for the tenor (injunction, information, and damages) and the court’s holdings on memorization, reproduction under § 16 UrhG / Art. 2 InfoSoc Directive, and the limits of § 44b UrhG. The report lists an appellate caption OLG München 6 U 3662/25 e; the judgment is first-instance and not treated here as final EU or German law.
+
+## Used For
+
+- `CASE-GEMA-V-OPENAI`
+- `TOPIC-AI-MUSIC-COPYRIGHT`
+- `TOPIC-AI-COPYRIGHT`
+- `TOPIC-AI-LITIGATION`
@@ -0,0 +1,35 @@
+---
+id: SRC-GEMA-V-OPENAI-PRESS-2025
+title: Landgericht München I, Pressemitteilung 11/2025 (GEMA v. OpenAI)
+type: source
+status: draft
+summary: Official court press release summarizing the November 11, 2025 GEMA v. OpenAI judgment and stating that the decision is not final.
+tags:
+  - source
+  - case
+  - copyright
+  - artificial-intelligence
+sources: []
+relationships: []
+last_verified: "2026-08-22"
+---
+
+# Landgericht München I, Pressemitteilung 11/2025
+
+## Bibliographic Metadata
+
+- Author or issuing body: Landgericht München I (Pressesprecherin Cornelia Kallert)
+- Publication date: 2025-11-11
+- Source type: Official court press release
+- URL: https://www.bayern.verfassungsgerichtshof.de/gerichte-und-behoerden/landgericht/muenchen-1/presse/2025/11.php
+- Archive URL: None recorded
+- Access date: 2026-08-22
+
+## Reliability Notes
+
+Official press summary issued the day of judgment. Useful for a concise statement of holdings and for the explicit statement that the judgment is not legally binding (nicht rechtskräftig). The full Endurteil is the controlling primary source for operative language.
+
+## Used For
+
+- `CASE-GEMA-V-OPENAI`
+- `TOPIC-AI-MUSIC-COPYRIGHT`
@@ -0,0 +1,36 @@
+---
+id: SRC-KADREY-V-META-FAIR-USE
+title: Kadrey v. Meta Platforms, Inc., 788 F. Supp. 3d 1026 (N.D. Cal. 2025)
+type: source
+status: draft
+summary: Northern District of California order granting Meta summary judgment on fair use for copying thirteen authors’ books as Llama training data on the record presented.
+tags:
+  - source
+  - case
+  - copyright
+  - artificial-intelligence
+sources: []
+relationships: []
+last_verified: "2026-08-22"
+---
+
+# Kadrey v. Meta Platforms, Inc., 788 F. Supp. 3d 1026 (N.D. Cal. 2025)
+
+## Bibliographic Metadata
+
+- Author or issuing body: United States District Court for the Northern District of California (Judge Vince Chhabria)
+- Publication date: 2025-06-25
+- Source type: District court order (PDF)
+- URL: https://cases.justia.com/federal/district-courts/california/candce/3:2023cv03417/415175/598/0.pdf
+- Archive URL: None recorded
+- Access date: 2026-08-22
+
+## Reliability Notes
+
+Justia reproduction of Dkt. 598 in No. 3:23-cv-03417-VC. Primary district-court authority. The opinion is fact-specific to these plaintiffs’ market-harm showing and leaves torrenting/distribution claims for later proceedings. Not an appellate holding.
+
+## Used For
+
+- `CASE-KADREY-V-META`
+- `TOPIC-AI-COPYRIGHT`
+- `TOPIC-AI-LITIGATION`
@@ -0,0 +1,36 @@
+---
+id: SRC-NYT-V-OPENAI-12C-2026
+title: The New York Times Company v. Microsoft Corp., Order on Rule 12(c) Contributory Claims (S.D.N.Y. Aug. 6, 2026)
+type: source
+status: draft
+summary: Southern District of New York order dismissing with prejudice news plaintiffs’ material-contribution contributory copyright claims against OpenAI and Microsoft after Cox.
+tags:
+  - source
+  - case
+  - copyright
+  - artificial-intelligence
+sources: []
+relationships: []
+last_verified: "2026-08-22"
+---
+
+# The New York Times Company v. Microsoft Corp., Order on Rule 12(c) Contributory Claims (S.D.N.Y. Aug. 6, 2026)
+
+## Bibliographic Metadata
+
+- Author or issuing body: United States District Court for the Southern District of New York
+- Publication date: 2026-08-06
+- Source type: District court order (PDF)
+- URL: https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.nysd.640396/gov.uscourts.nysd.640396.1662.0.pdf
+- Archive URL: None recorded
+- Access date: 2026-08-22
+
+## Reliability Notes
+
+RECAP copy of an August 6, 2026 order in the consolidated publisher litigation. Primary source for dismissal with prejudice of material-contribution contributory claims premised on alleged end-user infringement, and for denial of leave to amend specified Microsoft theories. Direct-infringement and other remaining claims are not resolved by this order.
+
+## Used For
+
+- `CASE-NYT-V-OPENAI`
+- `TOPIC-AI-COPYRIGHT`
+- `TOPIC-AI-LITIGATION`