Skip to content

Builder methods should be generated via factories - #115

Merged
AndreasIgel merged 63 commits into
mainfrom
feature/99-builder-methods-via-factories
Feb 28, 2026
Merged

AndreasIgel merged 63 commits into
mainfrom
feature/99-builder-methods-via-factories

Conversation

@AndreasIgel

@AndreasIgel AndreasIgel commented Jan 2, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

The generation of methods is refactored in a way, that extending functionality (like #86) would just a further type which could be a result of a factory. So BuilderDefinitionCreator does not need to be extended for each new functionality again. Furthermore the code is much more readable by that, because we do not have a big method-producing class anymore. Furthermore this opens possibilities to give extension-points for custom builder-functionality.

Closes #99

@github-actions

github-actions Bot commented Jan 2, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Dependency Review

✅ No vulnerabilities or license issues or OpenSSF Scorecard issues found.

Snapshot Warnings

⚠️: No snapshots were found for the head SHA d43fa07.
Ensure that dependencies are being submitted on PR branches and consider enabling retry-on-snapshot-warnings. See the documentation for more information and troubleshooting advice.

Scanned Files

None

Comment thread docs/CUSTOMIZING.md
Comment thread docs/CUSTOMIZING.md
@sonarqubecloud

Copy link
Copy Markdown

@AndreasIgel
AndreasIgel merged commit 084501e into main Feb 28, 2026
8 checks passed
@AndreasIgel
AndreasIgel deleted the feature/99-builder-methods-via-factories branch February 28, 2026 21:57
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Refactoring to create Builder Methods via Factories

1 participant