The authors should consider citing the related sources

[WenchaoDing]

The visitors may spend some time comparing the following references with this repo:

1. Many modules of this module are copied from Apollo. For example, the spline module in this repo is almost identical to that in Apollo(Smooth Spline), but the authors just deleted the copyright notice of apollo and copied the codes from apollo.

2. EPSILON Open Source Code vs The code in this repo
   (also EUDM Paper and SSC(2019) Youtube vs the visualization and video of this repo)

============================ VS =====================================================
============================ VS =====================================================
============================ VS =====================================================

It is ok to refer to other sources when doing research. But it may be inappropriate for the authors of this repo to delete the copyright notice of the related sources and not acknowledge the most related ones, e.g., Apollo and EPSILON.

[jchengai]

Thank you for pointing this out. I did refer to the part of the source you mentioned (although they're not very related to the proposed method in our paper, and they were cited). It's indeed inappropriate and I apologize.

I'll add the corresponding acknowledgement promptly. You may leave this issue open as a reminder to other visitors.