Skip to content

Document optional TweetClaw X/Twitter source workflow#1

Merged
jjjojoj merged 1 commit into
jjjojoj:mainfrom
kriptoburak:codex/tweetclaw-x-source-workflow
Jun 11, 2026
Merged

Document optional TweetClaw X/Twitter source workflow#1
jjjojoj merged 1 commit into
jjjojoj:mainfrom
kriptoburak:codex/tweetclaw-x-source-workflow

Conversation

@kriptoburak

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Summary

  • Add an optional TweetClaw workflow for finding public X/Twitter sources before creating Obsidian cards.
  • Document safe boundaries for API keys, raw exports, monitor output, and reviewed tweet links.
  • Mirror the guidance in the Chinese README and OpenClaw skill instructions.

Validation

  • git diff --check
  • /Users/burak/.local/bin/python3.11 -m py_compile scripts/process_share_links.py scripts/run_regression.py
  • /Users/burak/.local/bin/python3.11 -m unittest discover -s tests -v
  • /Users/burak/.local/bin/python3.11 scripts/run_regression.py --preset github
  • curl -fsSIL https://github.com/Xquik-dev/tweetclaw
  • npm view @xquik/tweetclaw version --json

Note: the local macOS python3 is 3.9.6 and fails on this repo's dataclass(slots=True) usage. I reran the documented checks with Python 3.11, while the repo CI uses Python 3.13.

@jjjojoj jjjojoj merged commit ea35a56 into jjjojoj:main Jun 11, 2026
1 check passed
@jjjojoj

jjjojoj commented Jun 11, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Thanks for the PR, @kriptoburak. This was a useful addition. I tightened the safety boundary a bit before merging so TweetClaw stays framed as read-only public source discovery by default, with account-backed or write-like actions requiring explicit user intent and human confirmation.\n\nMerged now. I really appreciate the help, and thanks for bringing your enthusiasm for building and programming into the project.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants