Skip to content

Conversation

@dependabot
Copy link

@dependabot dependabot bot commented on behalf of github Aug 17, 2025

Bumps actions/download-artifact from 4 to 5.

Release notes

Sourced from actions/download-artifact's releases.

v5.0.0

What's Changed

v5.0.0

🚨 Breaking Change

This release fixes an inconsistency in path behavior for single artifact downloads by ID. If you're downloading single artifacts by ID, the output path may change.

What Changed

Previously, single artifact downloads behaved differently depending on how you specified the artifact:

  • By name: name: my-artifact → extracted to path/ (direct)
  • By ID: artifact-ids: 12345 → extracted to path/my-artifact/ (nested)

Now both methods are consistent:

  • By name: name: my-artifact → extracted to path/ (unchanged)
  • By ID: artifact-ids: 12345 → extracted to path/ (fixed - now direct)

Migration Guide

✅ No Action Needed If:
  • You download artifacts by name
  • You download multiple artifacts by ID
  • You already use merge-multiple: true as a workaround
⚠️ Action Required If:

You download single artifacts by ID and your workflows expect the nested directory structure.

Before v5 (nested structure):

- uses: actions/download-artifact@v4
  with:
    artifact-ids: 12345
    path: dist
# Files were in: dist/my-artifact/

Where my-artifact is the name of the artifact you previously uploaded

To maintain old behavior (if needed):

</tr></table> 

... (truncated)

Commits
  • 634f93c Merge pull request #416 from actions/single-artifact-id-download-path
  • b19ff43 refactor: resolve download path correctly in artifact download tests (mainly ...
  • e262cbe bundle dist
  • bff23f9 update docs
  • fff8c14 fix download path logic when downloading a single artifact by id
  • 448e3f8 Merge pull request #407 from actions/nebuk89-patch-1
  • 47225c4 Update README.md
  • See full diff in compare view

Dependabot compatibility score

Dependabot will resolve any conflicts with this PR as long as you don't alter it yourself. You can also trigger a rebase manually by commenting @dependabot rebase.


Dependabot commands and options

You can trigger Dependabot actions by commenting on this PR:

  • @dependabot rebase will rebase this PR
  • @dependabot recreate will recreate this PR, overwriting any edits that have been made to it
  • @dependabot merge will merge this PR after your CI passes on it
  • @dependabot squash and merge will squash and merge this PR after your CI passes on it
  • @dependabot cancel merge will cancel a previously requested merge and block automerging
  • @dependabot reopen will reopen this PR if it is closed
  • @dependabot close will close this PR and stop Dependabot recreating it. You can achieve the same result by closing it manually
  • @dependabot show <dependency name> ignore conditions will show all of the ignore conditions of the specified dependency
  • @dependabot ignore this major version will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this major version (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)
  • @dependabot ignore this minor version will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this minor version (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)
  • @dependabot ignore this dependency will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this dependency (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)

Bumps [actions/download-artifact](https://github.com/actions/download-artifact) from 4 to 5.
- [Release notes](https://github.com/actions/download-artifact/releases)
- [Commits](actions/download-artifact@v4...v5)

---
updated-dependencies:
- dependency-name: actions/download-artifact
  dependency-version: '5'
  dependency-type: direct:production
  update-type: version-update:semver-major
...

Signed-off-by: dependabot[bot] <support@github.com>
@dependabot dependabot bot added dependencies Pull requests that update a dependency file github_actions Pull requests that update GitHub Actions code labels Aug 17, 2025
@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Aug 17, 2025

Test Results

    36 files  ±0      36 suites  ±0   2m 43s ⏱️ +25s
 6 172 tests ±0   6 172 ✅ ±0  0 💤 ±0  0 ❌ ±0 
38 383 runs  ±0  38 383 ✅ ±0  0 💤 ±0  0 ❌ ±0 

Results for commit 358788d. ± Comparison against base commit 3c1a442.

This pull request removes 10 and adds 8 tests. Note that renamed tests count towards both.
FluentAssertions.Specs.Streams.StreamAssertionSpecs+HaveLength ‑ When_a_throwing_stream_should_have_a_length_it_should_fail(exception: System.ObjectDisposedException: Cannot access a disposed object.
FluentAssertions.Specs.Streams.StreamAssertionSpecs+HaveLength ‑ When_a_throwing_stream_should_have_a_length_it_should_fail(exception: System.ObjectDisposedException: Cannot access a disposed object.
FluentAssertions.Specs.Streams.StreamAssertionSpecs+HavePosition ‑ When_a_throwing_stream_should_have_a_position_it_should_fail(exception: System.ObjectDisposedException: Cannot access a disposed object.
FluentAssertions.Specs.Streams.StreamAssertionSpecs+HavePosition ‑ When_a_throwing_stream_should_have_a_position_it_should_fail(exception: System.ObjectDisposedException: Cannot access a disposed object.
FluentAssertions.Specs.Streams.StreamAssertionSpecs+NotHaveLength ‑ When_a_throwing_stream_should_not_have_a_length_it_should_fail(exception: System.ObjectDisposedException: Cannot access a disposed object.
FluentAssertions.Specs.Streams.StreamAssertionSpecs+NotHaveLength ‑ When_a_throwing_stream_should_not_have_a_length_it_should_fail(exception: System.ObjectDisposedException: Cannot access a disposed object.
FluentAssertions.Specs.Streams.StreamAssertionSpecs+NotHavePosition ‑ When_a_throwing_stream_should_not_have_a_position_it_should_fail(exception: System.ObjectDisposedException: Cannot access a disposed object.
FluentAssertions.Specs.Streams.StreamAssertionSpecs+NotHavePosition ‑ When_a_throwing_stream_should_not_have_a_position_it_should_fail(exception: System.ObjectDisposedException: Cannot access a disposed object.
Object name: 'GetLengthExceptionMessage'.)
Object name: 'GetPositionExceptionMessage'.)
FluentAssertions.Specs.Streams.StreamAssertionSpecs+HaveLength ‑ When_a_throwing_stream_should_have_a_length_it_should_fail(exception: System.ObjectDisposedException: Cannot access a disposed object.
Object name: 'GetLengthExceptionMessage'.)
FluentAssertions.Specs.Streams.StreamAssertionSpecs+HaveLength ‑ When_a_throwing_stream_should_have_a_length_it_should_fail(exception: System.ObjectDisposedException: Cannot access a disposed object.
Object name: 'GetLengthExceptionMessage'.)
FluentAssertions.Specs.Streams.StreamAssertionSpecs+HavePosition ‑ When_a_throwing_stream_should_have_a_position_it_should_fail(exception: System.ObjectDisposedException: Cannot access a disposed object.
Object name: 'GetPositionExceptionMessage'.)
FluentAssertions.Specs.Streams.StreamAssertionSpecs+HavePosition ‑ When_a_throwing_stream_should_have_a_position_it_should_fail(exception: System.ObjectDisposedException: Cannot access a disposed object.
Object name: 'GetPositionExceptionMessage'.)
FluentAssertions.Specs.Streams.StreamAssertionSpecs+NotHaveLength ‑ When_a_throwing_stream_should_not_have_a_length_it_should_fail(exception: System.ObjectDisposedException: Cannot access a disposed object.
Object name: 'GetLengthExceptionMessage'.)
FluentAssertions.Specs.Streams.StreamAssertionSpecs+NotHaveLength ‑ When_a_throwing_stream_should_not_have_a_length_it_should_fail(exception: System.ObjectDisposedException: Cannot access a disposed object.
Object name: 'GetLengthExceptionMessage'.)
FluentAssertions.Specs.Streams.StreamAssertionSpecs+NotHavePosition ‑ When_a_throwing_stream_should_not_have_a_position_it_should_fail(exception: System.ObjectDisposedException: Cannot access a disposed object.
Object name: 'GetPositionExceptionMessage'.)
FluentAssertions.Specs.Streams.StreamAssertionSpecs+NotHavePosition ‑ When_a_throwing_stream_should_not_have_a_position_it_should_fail(exception: System.ObjectDisposedException: Cannot access a disposed object.
Object name: 'GetPositionExceptionMessage'.)

♻️ This comment has been updated with latest results.

@coveralls
Copy link

Pull Request Test Coverage Report for Build 17024401588

Details

  • 0 of 0 changed or added relevant lines in 0 files are covered.
  • No unchanged relevant lines lost coverage.
  • Overall coverage remained the same at 97.292%

Totals Coverage Status
Change from base Build 16913211152: 0.0%
Covered Lines: 12572
Relevant Lines: 12774

💛 - Coveralls

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

dependencies Pull requests that update a dependency file github_actions Pull requests that update GitHub Actions code

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants