Skip to content

Conversation

@google-labs-jules
Copy link
Contributor

This change introduces async/await support to the i2c library by adding new methods with an "Async" suffix that return Promises. The original callback-based methods are preserved for backward compatibility. An example demonstrating the new async/await usage has also been added.


PR created automatically by Jules for task 3795937251641674980 started by @kelly

Adds Promise-based methods to the i2c class to allow for the use of async/await.

The new methods are suffixed with "Async" (e.g., `scanAsync`) and wrap the existing callback-based methods. This change is non-breaking.

Also adds a new example file, `examples/async-await.js`, to demonstrate how to use the new async/await functionality.
@google-labs-jules
Copy link
Contributor Author

👋 Jules, reporting for duty! I'm here to lend a hand with this pull request.

When you start a review, I'll add a 👀 emoji to each comment to let you know I've read it. I'll focus on feedback directed at me and will do my best to stay out of conversations between you and other bots or reviewers to keep the noise down.

I'll push a commit with your requested changes shortly after. Please note there might be a delay between these steps, but rest assured I'm on the job!

For more direct control, you can switch me to Reactive Mode. When this mode is on, I will only act on comments where you specifically mention me with @jules. You can find this option in the Pull Request section of your global Jules UI settings. You can always switch back!

New to Jules? Learn more at jules.google/docs.


For security, I will only act on instructions from the user who triggered this task.

Adds Promise-based methods to the i2c class to allow for the use of async/await.

The new methods are suffixed with "Async" (e.g., `scanAsync`) and wrap the existing callback-based methods. This change is non-breaking.

Also adds a new example file, `examples/async-await.js`, to demonstrate how to use the new async/await functionality.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant