Skip to content

build: upgrade Effect to rc.112 - #18

Open
meeladdawood wants to merge 1 commit into
kitlangton:mainfrom
meeladdawood:codex/upgrade-effect-rc-112
Open

meeladdawood wants to merge 1 commit into
kitlangton:mainfrom
meeladdawood:codex/upgrade-effect-rc-112

Conversation

@meeladdawood

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Summary

  • upgrade root and web Effect packages from 4.0.0-beta.90 to 4.0.0-rc.112
  • migrate schema-backed RPC errors to Schema.TaggedError
  • declare all supported MCP protocol adapters required by the RC API
  • preserve structured-clone worker RPC values such as Date and undefined with Schema.Any

Verification

  • bun run typecheck
  • bun run web:typecheck
  • bun run test (204 passing)
  • bun run web:build
  • Effect language-service diagnostics (0 errors)
  • managed daemon startup reports Motel 0.2.7
  • OTLP/HTTP smoke trace and correlated log successfully ingested and queried through /api/spans/search and /api/logs/search

Adapt schema errors, MCP protocol selection, and worker RPC schemas to the latest Effect v4 release candidate.
@chatgpt-codex-connector

chatgpt-codex-connector Bot commented Aug 30, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codex Review Summary

This comment shows the latest Codex review activity on this pull request.

Review Status Commit Review trigger
📝 Code Review ✅ Completed 2026-08-30T00:49:45.388527Z e3b6995 PR opened
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review" or "@codex security review".

Codex reacts with 👀 while any review is running, comments if it has suggestions, and reacts with 👍 once all reviews finish with no findings.

@chatgpt-codex-connector chatgpt-codex-connector Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: e3b6995bcc

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

Comment thread bun.lock
"@effect/platform-bun": ["@effect/platform-bun@4.0.0-rc.112", "", { "dependencies": { "@effect/platform-node-shared": "^4.0.0-rc.112" }, "peerDependencies": { "effect": "^4.0.0-rc.112" } }, "sha512-Y5n2HhV/vsbrJls9ukX42RL7zqXQxISHegWFsP9njsCyDmGTnq7QYSO82rglwrLPwtTrv5dkSRTuGw4+oXxgMg=="],

"@effect/platform-node-shared": ["@effect/platform-node-shared@4.0.0-beta.90", "", { "dependencies": { "@types/ws": "^8.18.1", "ws": "^8.20.0" }, "peerDependencies": { "effect": "^4.0.0-beta.90" } }, "sha512-0UlZgqJdAjcEr6RtLSqeOtTBeuLO03cTX4FKpzW1nTCScz3wGpELgcaU/T+fURf4LBiD0QQS3tcOYTN/T+qFsw=="],
"@effect/platform-node-shared": ["@effect/platform-node-shared@4.0.0-rc.112", "", { "dependencies": { "@types/ws": "^8.18.1", "ws": "^8.21.3" }, "peerDependencies": { "effect": "^4.0.0-rc.112" } }, "sha512-ttjz0xKamFN7vL8pNDYVwddJLjZvqKePc05djlz2VcdaKbLsnYbtMnL1rbOfHgEnIUSHGh7FkjaN4DM1Ov81sQ=="],

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

P2 Badge Update the ws override to meet the upgraded dependency floor

When @effect/platform-bun exercises the WebSocket implementation from @effect/platform-node-shared, rc.112 requires ws ^8.21.3, but the root override still forces 8.21.0 and the lockfile confirms that unsupported version is selected. The previous beta accepted ^8.20.0, so this incompatibility is introduced by the upgrade; update the override and lockfile to a compatible ws release.

Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant