🧪 Add error path test for MemoryContext::read_content#132
🧪 Add error path test for MemoryContext::read_content#132bashandbone wants to merge 1 commit intomainfrom
Conversation
This commit adds a unit test to verify that `MemoryContext::read_content` correctly returns a `ServiceError::Execution` error when attempting to read a source that does not exist in the context. The test ensures that the error variant is correct and that the error message contains the expected diagnostic information. Co-authored-by: bashandbone <89049923+bashandbone@users.noreply.github.com>
|
👋 Jules, reporting for duty! I'm here to lend a hand with this pull request. When you start a review, I'll add a 👀 emoji to each comment to let you know I've read it. I'll focus on feedback directed at me and will do my best to stay out of conversations between you and other bots or reviewers to keep the noise down. I'll push a commit with your requested changes shortly after. Please note there might be a delay between these steps, but rest assured I'm on the job! For more direct control, you can switch me to Reactive Mode. When this mode is on, I will only act on comments where you specifically mention me with New to Jules? Learn more at jules.google/docs. For security, I will only act on instructions from the user who triggered this task. |
|
🧙 Sourcery has finished reviewing your pull request! Tips and commandsInteracting with Sourcery
Customizing Your ExperienceAccess your dashboard to:
Getting Help
|
![sourcery-ai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/48477?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Hey - I've left some high level feedback:
- In
test_memory_context_read_content_error, you can simplify the error assertion by usinglet err = result.expect_err("expected error when reading missing source");andmatches!orif let ServiceError::Execution { message } = err { ... } else { panic!(...) }instead ofassert!(result.is_err())followed bymatch result.unwrap_err().
Prompt for AI Agents
Please address the comments from this code review:
## Overall Comments
- In `test_memory_context_read_content_error`, you can simplify the error assertion by using `let err = result.expect_err("expected error when reading missing source");` and `matches!` or `if let ServiceError::Execution { message } = err { ... } else { panic!(...) }` instead of `assert!(result.is_err())` followed by `match result.unwrap_err()`.Help me be more useful! Please click 👍 or 👎 on each comment and I'll use the feedback to improve your reviews.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Pull request overview
Adds missing negative-path coverage for MemoryContext::read_content in the services crate to ensure missing sources return the expected execution error and diagnostic text.
Changes:
- Adds a unit test asserting
read_contentreturnsServiceError::Executionwhen the source key is absent. - Verifies the error message includes
Source not found: <name>.
💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.
🎯 What
The testing gap addressed: Missing error path testing for
MemoryContext::read_content. Previously, only the happy path was tested.📊 Coverage
What scenarios are now tested:
MemoryContextnow asserts that aServiceError::Executionis returned.✨ Result
The improvement in test coverage: Increased reliability and robustness of the
ExecutionContextimplementation in theservicescrate by ensuring failure modes are correctly handled and reported.PR created automatically by Jules for task 2698286064450650500 started by @bashandbone
Summary by Sourcery
Tests: