upgrade conductor core to v0.5.0 - #29
Merged
Merged
Conversation
laceyp99
marked this pull request as ready for review
September 3, 2026 21:59
laceyp99
commented
Sep 4, 2026
laceyp99
left a comment
Owner
Author
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Looks good to merge! Pretty easy migration. Also manually tested the new models within the arpeggiator test eval script and all of the models are +95% accuracy.
I need to update the test eval to refocus to chord progressions in efforts of making the eval harder. Also, in step, I'd want to update the analysis to better reflect insights for chord progressions. I'll create an enhancement issue to the repo next.
This was referenced Sep 4, 2026
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
conductor-coredependency from v0.4.0 to v0.5.0LoopGenerationEngineintegration after auditing v0.5.0 removals and stricter request contractszip()truncation behavior explicit in analysis chart data to satisfy Ruff'sB905rule without changing outputTesting
uv sync --locked --all-extras- passeduv run --locked --all-extras ruff format --check .- passeduv run --locked --all-extras ruff check .- passeduv run --locked --all-extras pytest -q- passed (130 tests)uv build- passedNotes
_Gmodels, string-timing helpers,times_as_string, Ollamaforce_refresh, or the private routing return switch.