Skip to content

fix: set output token ids with async scheduling according to sampling params - #2

Closed
llsj14 wants to merge 1 commit into
feat/thinking-budgetfrom
fix/require-output-tok-ids
Closed

llsj14 wants to merge 1 commit into
feat/thinking-budgetfrom
fix/require-output-tok-ids

Conversation

@llsj14

@llsj14 llsj14 commented Jan 9, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner
  • some sampling params need output token ids even under async scheduling

@github-actions

github-actions Bot commented Jan 9, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

👋 Hi! Thank you for contributing to the vLLM project.

💬 Join our developer Slack at https://slack.vllm.ai to discuss your PR in #pr-reviews, coordinate on features in #feat- channels, or join special interest groups in #sig- channels.

Just a reminder: PRs would not trigger full CI run by default. Instead, it would only run fastcheck CI which starts running only a small and essential subset of CI tests to quickly catch errors.

You ask your reviewers to trigger select CI tests on top of fastcheck CI.

Once the PR is approved and ready to go, your PR reviewer(s) can run CI to test the changes comprehensively before merging.

To run CI, PR reviewers can either: Add ready label to the PR or enable auto-merge.

If you have any questions, please reach out to us on Slack at https://slack.vllm.ai.

🚀

llsj14 pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 5, 2026
…3058)

Signed-off-by: ramos <49182011+nemoramo@users.noreply.github.com>
Signed-off-by: mayufeng <mayufeng@example.com>
Co-authored-by: mayufeng <mayufeng@example.com>
@llsj14
llsj14 force-pushed the feat/thinking-budget branch 2 times, most recently from a64076c to 7bd0db0 Compare March 1, 2026 09:52
@llsj14 llsj14 closed this Mar 31, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant