Initial support for Comma Chameleon#1416
Conversation
spaghetti-squash
left a comment
spaghetti-squash
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I worry that this will make affected codeblocks harder to maintain. At the very least, we should create libram support for comma chameleon before starting on this.
| const commaJellyfishValue = | ||
| sumNumbers( | ||
| [ | ||
| 1.0, | ||
| 1.0 / 2.0, | ||
| 1.0 / 3.0, | ||
| 1.0 / 4.0, | ||
| 1.0 / 5.0, | ||
| ...Array(100) | ||
| .fill(0) | ||
| .map(() => 1.0 / 20.0), | ||
| ] | ||
| .map((val) => (val * jellyPrice > meatFamiliarValue ? val * jellyPrice : 0)) | ||
| .splice( | ||
| get("_spaceJellyfishDrops"), | ||
| get("_spaceJellyfishDrops") + potentialJellyfishTurns | ||
| ) | ||
| ) - |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
instead of using sumNumbers with map, just use sum; do the splice earlier in the process to make this work
| fullMenu.push( | ||
| menu({ | ||
| canChooseMacro: true, | ||
| location: $location`Barf Mountain`, | ||
| includeExperienceFamiliars: false, | ||
| }) | ||
| .filter((f) => f.familiar === $familiar`Comma Chameleon`) | ||
| .map(calculateOutfitValue)[0] | ||
| ); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I can't tell what it is you're trying to do here, but it doesn't seem like the best way to achieve it.
| ? $familiar`Pocket Professor` | ||
| : $familiar`Comma Chameleon`, | ||
| }; | ||
| if (have(chip) && myFamiliar() === $familiar`Pocket Professor`) { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
chameleon can't equip chip, so that's not going to work
| Math.min(40, pocketProfessorLectures() - get("_pocketProfessorLectures")) | ||
| ); | ||
| } | ||
| visitUrl(`inv_equip.php?which=2&action=equip&whichitem=${toInt(chip)}&pwd`); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
need to make the chameleon your familiar before calling this, or equip straight to the terrarium
|
Amulet coin isn't valued currently, if this pushes up the market price on those, it should be important to check if it's worth using it on them. |
|
i am not going to close this issue but i am going to raise a point here -- the economic ramifications of this PR are... not great. in a 600 turn day, famjacks will be used 13-14 times by a comma owner trying to copy a robort. that's a hell of a lot of jacks per user. we already saw jacks prices go completely wild during cognac-mania; if garbo does this, we wouldn't -just- need an amulet coin check, we'd also need to add ways for garbo to only convert comma-to-robort for embezzler fights and/or additional major jacks handling. this also relies on users to be using keeping-tabs or philter to convert their jacks to robort equipment, AND relies on people not trying to capture that market. overall, my lean is this would cease to be profitable a week or two after implementation and leave the market for famjacks in flames. is this really worth it? |
|
The idea here is that it should equilibriate to a point where jacks are too expensive to be used every turn, but one can still eke value out of the first 5 jelly extracts and whatever other limited daily fam drops. E.g. with a single jack one should expect to be able to grab the first 5 stench jelly drops, putting the value of that jack at >=150k (far above the value of a robort jack) |
4 participants
No description provided.