Skip to content

BUG fixing checkout command to support lfs#45

Closed
varnem2 wants to merge 1 commit into
logseq:mainfrom
varnem2:fix/44
Closed

BUG fixing checkout command to support lfs#45
varnem2 wants to merge 1 commit into
logseq:mainfrom
varnem2:fix/44

Conversation

@varnem2

@varnem2 varnem2 commented Aug 22, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Implements proposal from #44

@logseq-cldwalker

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Hi. Thanks for diagnosing and fixing your problem. I'd prefer to not have this be default behavior unless you can point to documentation that lfs checkouts don't slow down or degrade checkouts for anyone else. If you could add add an optional input named checkout-lfs that users can opt-in to, happy to review

@logseq-cldwalker logseq-cldwalker added the awaiting-response Issue will be closed if a reply is not received label Aug 25, 2025
@logseq-cldwalker

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Closing as feedback wasn't addressed

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

awaiting-response Issue will be closed if a reply is not received

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants